Search

Background: In 2008, a new forensic hospital was opened as a totally smoke-free facility. This study describes the attitudes and experience of mental health professionals working in the high secure mental health facility three years after it was opened. It is part of a larger evaluation describing the experience of current and discharged hospital patients. Methods: Quantitative data was collected using a survey of hospital staff (N = 111) with a 50% response rate. The survey collected demographic and smoking data to describe staff responses to statements relating to hospital smoking policy, patient care and staff support. Results: Among staff surveyed, 13% were current smokers and 41% were ex-smokers (10% quit after commencing employment in the smoke-free hospital). Most (88%) preferred to work in a smoke-free environment, although this was significantly lower in smokers compared to non-smokers (39% vs. 95%). While most staff felt that the smokefree environment had a positive impact on the health of patients (86%) and on themselves (79%), smokers were significantly less likely to agree. Just over half (57%) of staff surveyed agreed that patient care was easier in a totally smoke-free environment, although less smokers agreed compared to non-smokers. Staff who smoked were also significantly less likely to indicate they had sufficient support working in a smoke-free environment, compared to non-smokers (15% vs. 38%). Conclusions: The staff surveyed supported the smoke-free workplace policy; most agreed that patient care was easier and that the policy did not lead to an increase in patient aggression. Implementation of a total smoking ban can result in positive health outcomes for patients and staff, and may influence some staff to quit. Staff who smoke have a less positive experience of the policy and require additional support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and Aims. In 2008, a new high secure forensic mental health inpatient hospital was opened in New South Wales as a smoke-free facility. This study describes the experience of patients and the impact of the smoke-free policy on smoking intentions and practice. Design and Methods. The study methods included: (1) four semi-structured focus groups with 21 current patients; (2) patient surveys collected from 45 current patients; and (3) follow-up survey from 15 discharged patients. All methods included questions related to smoking history, experience of moving to and living in the smoke-free environment and smoking intentions or status post discharge. Results. Many focus group participants indicated that they were now off cigarettes for life while some were angry about the policy. Nearly all (80%) patients surveyed smoked prior to admission. Over one-third (39%) of patients were angry at being forced to stop smoking, while 42% wanted to give up when they were admitted. Most (62%) felt they had gained weight since they stopped smoking; however, 75% indicated that living in a smoke-free environment had a positive effect on their health. Over a third (36%) of patients indicated that they intended to smoke when discharged. Post discharge, of the 12 who smoked prior to admission, seven (58%) remained non-smokers at follow up. Discussion and Conclusions. This study describes promising findings about the experience of patients moving to a smoke-free mental health inpatient facility, including improved health and potential for sustained smoking cessation post discharge.[Hehir AM, Indig D, Prosser S, Archer VA. Evaluation of a smoke-free forensic hospital: Patients' perspectives on issues and benefits. Drug Alcohol Rev 2012;31:672-677] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]