Search

The aim of this paper was to estimate soil moisture in agricultural crop fields from fully polarimetric L-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data through the polarimetric decomposition of the SAR coherency matrix. A nonnegative-eigenvalue-decomposition scheme, together with an adaptive volume scattering model, is extended to an adaptive model-based decomposition (MBD) (Adaptive MBD) model for soil moisture retrieval. The Adaptive MBD can ensure nonnegative decomposed scattering components and allows two parameters (i.e., the mean orientation angle and a degree of randomness) to be determined to characterize the volume scattering. Its performance was tested using airborne SAR data and coincident ground measurements collected over agricultural fields in southeastern Australia and compared with previous MBD methods (i.e., the Freeman three-component decomposition using the extended Bragg model, the Yamaguchi three-component decomposition, and an iterative generalized hybrid decomposition). The results obtained with the newly proposed decomposition scheme agreed well with expectations based on observed plant structure and biomass levels. The new method was superior in tracking soil moisture dynamics with respect to previous decomposition methods in our study area, with root-mean-square error of soil moisture estimations being 0.10 and 0.14 m3/m3, respectively, for surface and double-bounce components. However, large variability in the achieved soil moisture accuracy was observed, depending on the presence of row structures in the underlying soil surface. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The backscatter predicted by three common surface scattering models (the Integral Equation Model (IEM), the Dubois, and the Oh models) was evaluated against fully polarized L-band airborne observations. Before any site-specific calibration, the Oh model was found to be the most accurate among the three, with mean errors between the simulated and the observed backscatter of 1.2 dB ( ±2.6 dB standard deviation of the error) and -0.4 dB ( ±2.4 dB) for HH and VV polarizations, respectively, while the IEM and Dubois presented larger errors, with a maximum of 4.5 dB ( ±2 dB) for the IEM in VV polarization. The backscatter errors were observed to be related to surface roughness, another major factor determining the electromagnetic scattering at the soil surface. An existing semiempirical calibration of the surface roughness correlation length was therefore applied to improve the mismatch between modeled and observed backscatters. The application of the semiempirical calibration led to a significant improvement of the backscatter prediction for the IEM. After calibration, the IEM outperformed the Oh model, resulting in a mean backscatter error of -0.3 dB ( ±1.1 dB) and -0.2 ( ±1.2 dB) for HH and VV polarizations, respectively. To test the robustness of the semiempirical calibration, calibration functions derived from an independent data set were applied and shown to also improve the (uncalibrated) IEM performance, suggesting that the calibration procedure is relatively robust for global application. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Using the airborne Polarimetric L-band Imaging Synthetic aperture radar (PLIS) the impact of high revisit cycle and full polarimetric acquisitions on biomass retrieval was investigated by means of backscatter-based multi-temporal methods. Parametric and non-parametric models were used to relate reference biomass levels obtained from field plot measurements and high point density lidar data to backscatter intensities or polarimetric target decomposition components. Single-date retrieval using multiple independent variables provided lower estimation errors when compared to models using one independent variable with errors decreasing by 2% to 15%. The multi-temporal aggregation of daily biomass estimates did not improve the overall retrieval accuracy but provided more reliable estimates with respect to single-date methods. Backscatter intensities improved estimation accuracies up to 10% compared to polarimetric target decomposition components. Using all four polarizations increased the estimation accuracy marginally (2%) when compared to a dual-polarized system. The biomass estimation error was considerably reduced (up to 30%) only by decreasing the spatial resolution and was related to decreasing forest variability with increasing pixel size. These results indicate that, at least in semi-arid areas, future L-band missions would not significantly improve biomass estimation accuracy using backscatter-based modeling approaches despite their better spatial resolution, higher revisit cycles and the availability of fully polarimetric information. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

NASA's SoilMoisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission will carry the first combined spaceborne L-band radiometer and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) system with the objective of mapping near-surface soil moisture and freeze/thaw state globally every 2-3 days. SMAP will provide three soil moisture products: i) high-resolution from radar (~3 km), ii) low-resolution from radiometer (~36 km), and iii) intermediate-resolution from the fusion of radar and radiometer (~9 km). The Soil Moisture Active Passive Experiments (SMAPEx) are a series of three airborne field experiments designed to provide prototype SMAP data for the development and validation of soil moisture retrieval algorithms applicable to the SMAP mission. This paper describes the SMAPEx sampling strategy and presents an overview of the data collected during the three experiments: SMAPEx-1 (July 5-10, 2010), SMAPEx-2 (December 4-8, 2010) and SMAPEx-3 (September 5-23, 2011). The SMAPEx experiments were conducted in a semi-arid agricultural and grazing area located in southeastern Australia, timed so as to acquire data over a seasonal cycle at various stages of the crop growth. Airborne L-band brightness temperature (~1 km) and radar backscatter (~10 m) observations were collected over an area the size of a single SMAP footprint (38 km × 36 km at 35° latitude) with a 2-3 days revisit time, providing SMAP-like data for testing of radiometer-only, radar-only and combined radiometer-radar soil moisture retrieval and downscaling algorithms. Airborne observations were supported by continuous monitoring of near-surface (0-5 cm) soil moisture along with intensive ground monitoring of soil moisture, soil temperature, vegetation biomass and structure, and surface roughness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission, launched in January 2015, was designed to provide a global soil moisture product at medium resolution (~9 km), by combining observations from its radar and radiometer. Several downscaling methods have been proposed by the SMAP team for this purpose. This paper evaluates another candidate downscaling method, namely, the Bayesian merging approach. While this has been tested using a synthetic data set across the USA, it is imperative that it can also be tested using the experimental data for a comprehensive range of land surface conditions (i.e., in different hydro-climatic regions) prior to a global application. Consequently, this paper applies this method using the data collected from SMAP experiments field campaigns in south-eastern Australia that closely simulated the SMAP data stream for a single SMAP radiometer pixel over a three-week interval. The method studied here differs from the linear downscaling methods of the SMAP mission, in that it uses a nonlinear method based on Bayes’ theorem. The medium-resolution soil moisture product is obtained using background soil moisture estimates that are updated according to the difference between the observed and predicted brightness temperatures and backscatter coefficients, relating the high- and low-resolution data. Results were assessed against a reference soil moisture map derived from high-resolution airborne radiometer observations. The root-mean-square-error and R^2 for the Bayesian merging method were found to be 0.02 cm3/cm3 and 0.55, respectively, at 9-km resolution, being similar to the SMAP’s “optional” downscaling method. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The baseline radiometer brightness temperature ( Tb ) downscaling algorithm for NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission, scheduled for launch in January 2015, is tested using an airborne simulation of the SMAP data stream. The algorithm synergistically uses 3 km Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) backscatter ( σ ) to downscale a 36 km radiometer Tb to 9 km. While the algorithm has already been tested using experimental datasets from field campaigns in the USA, it is imperative that it is tested for a comprehensive range of land surface conditions (i.e. in different hydro-climatic regions) before global application. Consequently, this study evaluates the algorithm using data collected from the Soil Moisture Active Passive Experiments (SMAPEx) in south-eastern Australia, that closely simulate the SMAP data stream for a single SMAP radiometer pixel over a 3-week interval, with repeat coverage every 2–3 days. The results suggest that the average root-mean-square error (RMSE) in downscaled Tb is 3.1 K and 2.6 K for h - and v -polarizations respectively, when downscaled to 9 km resolution. This increases to 8.2 K and 6.6 K when applied at 1 km resolution. Downscaling over the relatively homogeneous grassland areas resulted in 2 K lower RMSE than for the heterogeneous cropping area. Overall, the downscaling error was around 2.4 K when applied at 9 km resolution for five of the nine days, which meets the 2.4 K error target of the SMAP mission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]