Search

The SET domain containing lysine-specific methyltransferase, Set7/9, covalently attaches methyl moieties to a variety of histone and non-histone substrates. Among the substrates of Set7/9 are: p53, NF-kB, PARP1, E2F1, and other transcription factors that regulate many vital processes in the cell. Through the post-translational regulation of these critical master-regulators Set7/9 is involved in regulation of cell proliferation, cancer progression, and DNA damage response. Noteworthy, the role of Set7/9 in tumorigenesis is contradictory and apparently depends on the cellular context. In this study, we investigated the effect of Set7/9 on tumorigenic characteristics of lung cancer cells. We showed that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-out of Set7/9 in A549 and its shRNA-mediated knock-down in H1299 NSCLC cell lines both augment the proliferation rate of tumor cells compared to the matching wild-type cells. Mechanistically, ablation of Set7/9 increased the expression of cyclin A2 and D1 genes thereby promoting the accumulation of cells in S phase. Furthermore, knockout of Set7/9 decreased the expression of E-cadherin, whose product is critical for cell-cell interactions. Accordingly, this led to the increased migration of lung cancer cells. Finally, both ablation or pharmacological inhibition of Set7/9 enzymatic methyltransferase activity by the selective inhibitor (R)-PFI-2 sensitized NSCLC cells to genotoxic drug, doxorubicin. This effect was also recapitulated on patients-derived NSCLC cell lines. Taken together, our results suggest that Set7/9 plays anti-proliferative and DNA damage-protective roles in NSCLC cells and hence represents an attractive target for anti-cancer chemotherapy.

This study aimed to analyze clinical and regional factors influencing the distribution of actionable genetic alterations in a large consecutive series of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs). KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations, HER2 amplification and overexpression, and microsatellite instability (MSI) were tested in 8355 CRC samples. KRAS mutations were detected in 4137/8355 (49.5%) CRCs, with 3913 belonging to 10 common substitutions affecting codons 12/13/61/146, 174 being represented by 21 rare hot-spot variants, and 35 located outside the “hot” codons. KRAS Q61K substitution, which leads to the aberrant splicing of the gene, was accompanied by the second function-rescuing mutation in all 19 tumors analyzed. NRAS mutations were detected in 389/8355 (4.7%) CRCs (379 hot-spot and 10 non-hot-spot substitutions). BRAF mutations were identified in 556/8355 (6.7%) CRCs (codon 600: 510; codons 594–596: 38; codons 597–602: 8). The frequency of HER2 activation and MSI was 99/8008 (1.2%) and 432/8355 (5.2%), respectively. Some of the above events demonstrated differences in distribution according to patients’ age and gender. In contrast to other genetic alterations, BRAF mutation frequencies were subject to geographic variation, with a relatively low incidence in areas with an apparently warmer climate (83/1726 (4.8%) in Southern Russia and North Caucasus vs. 473/6629 (7.1%) in other regions of Russia, p = 0.0007). The simultaneous presence of two drug targets, BRAF mutation and MSI, was observed in 117/8355 cases (1.4%). Combined alterations of two driver genes were detected in 28/8355 (0.3%) tumors (KRAS/NRAS: 8; KRAS/BRAF: 4; KRAS/HER2: 12; NRAS/HER2: 4). This study demonstrates that a substantial portion of RAS alterations is represented by atypical mutations, KRAS Q61K substitution is always accompanied by the second gene-rescuing mutation, BRAF mutation frequency is a subject to geographical variations, and a small fraction of CRCs has simultaneous alterations in more than one driver gene.

PD-L1 testing is currently performed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We questioned whether the results of PCR-based measurement of PD-L1 RNA expression correlate with IHC scores obtained by different commercial assays.167 consecutive non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) were analyzed for PD-L1 RNA expression and 22C3, SP263, and SP142 IHC scoring using recommended cut-offs. RNA expression was divided into low, moderate, and high categories.RNA and protein expression demonstrated moderate correlation as continuous variables. Using prespecified RNA cut-offs, PCR testing showed a high negative predictive value towards the IHC analysis: the share of PD-L1 protein-negative tumors among cases classified as PD-L1-low by the PCR test reached 92-99% for all three antibodies. Meanwhile, about half of cases with moderate to high PD-L1 RNA expression had IHC staining in less than 1% tumor cells as determined by 22C3 or SP263 antibodies. Among the 51 discordant cases, which had1% tumor staining by both 22C3 and SP263 clones but high RNA level, 29 (57%) showed ≥1% positive immune cells by SP263 and/or 22C3, 14 cases (27%) had detectable IHC expression in 0.1-0.9% tumor or immune cells by SP263 and/or 22C3, and 8 (16%) were entirely negative by IHC.Some NSCLCs demonstrate readily detectable PD-L1 expression on the level of RNA, but fall below commonly accepted cut-offs by IHC. It remains to be studied whether these discrepancies are attributed to technical or biological reasons. Clinical sensitivity of these tumors to immune therapy deserves additional investigations.

Colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) are sensitive to treatment by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies only if they do not carry activating mutations in down-stream EGFR targets (KRAS/NRAS/BRAF). Most clinical trials for chemo-naive CRC patients involved combination of targeted agents and chemotherapy, while single-agent cetuximab or panitumumab studies included either heavily pretreated patients or subjects who were not selected on the basis of molecular tests. We hypothesized that anti-EGFR therapy would have significant efficacy in chemo-naive patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation-negative CRC. Nineteen patients were prospectively included in the study. Two (11%) patients experienced partial response (PR) and 11 (58%) subjects showed stable disease (SD). Median time to progression approached 6.1 months (range 1.6–15.0 months). Cetuximab efficacy did not correlate with RNA expression of EGFR and insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2). Only one tumor carried PIK3CA mutation, and this CRC responded to cetuximab. Exome analysis of patients with progressive disease (PD) revealed 1 CRC with high-level microsatellite instability and 1 instance of HER2 oncogene amplification; 3 of 4 remaining patients with PD had allergic reactions to cetuximab, while none of the subjects with PR or SD had this complication. Comparison with 19 retrospective KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation-negative patients receiving first-line fluoropyrimidines revealed no advantages or disadvantages of cetuximab therapy. Cetuximab demonstrates only modest efficacy when given as a first-line monotherapy to KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation-negative CRC patients. It is of question, why meticulous patient selection, which was undertaken in the current study, did not result in the improvement of outcomes of single-agent cetuximab treatment.

Background: Discontinuation of gefitinib treatment is often accompanied by a disease flare. Some studies have demonstrated a benefit of the use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) beyond progression; however, long-term results of these investigations remain limited. Patients and Methods: We observed 70 patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFR-M+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving single-agent gefitinib in a routine clinical setting; 56 patients were experiencing RECIST progression at the time of the analysis. Results: There was a significant increase (p = 0.00001) in overall survival (OS) in patients continuing on gefitinib beyond progression (n = 21; median duration of continued gefitinib use: 4.2 months; median OS: not reached; expected OS: 29.7 months) as compared to those who stopped gefitinib treatment upon disease progression (n = 35; median OS: 14.0 months). The association between extended gefitinib use and improved OS remained true in multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio = 4.49, 95% confidence interval 1.25-16.09; p = 0.021). Patient selection bias constitutes an essential limitation of this clinical observational study, given that patients with a more favorable disease course and/or high initial tumor sensitivity to TKI treatment were more likely to be considered for prolonged gefitinib use. Conclusion: This study confirms that continued administration of gefitinib beyond progression is a viable treatment option for some patients with EGFR-M+ NSCLC, in particular those who cannot be rescued by novel EGFR mutation-specific inhibitors such as osimertinib.