Search

Background Whether sex can influence the clinical response to biological treatment in patients with severe asthma has not been fully addressed. Aims and methods The aim of this study was to investigate in patients with severe asthma undergoing biological treatment the individual evolution of lung function measurements and patient-reported asthma control scores over a 12-month follow-up period, in relation to patients’ sex, in different age ranges. Second, the change in the administered dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) before and after 12 months of treatment was investigated. Results 64 patients (58% female and 42% male) with a median age of 52 years were enrolled in the study. There were no relevant differences between sexes in terms of lung function, patient-reported asthma control, exacerbation rate and daily OCS dose within the study timeframe. A separate sub-analysis by biological treatment confirmed the same finding. Stratifying individuals by age, we showed that older men had lower lung function parameter values (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % predicted and FEV1/forced vital capacity index) than older women, whereas an opposite trend was observed in terms of Asthma Control Test score. No other relevant differences were detected after age stratification. Conclusion According to our findings, sex does not act as a determinant of treatment response to biologicals in people with severe asthma. Although to be confirmed in larger studies, our data suggest that neither sex nor age should limit biological treatment prescription, once the eligibility criteria for that therapy are satisfied.

We used random sampling to estimate the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in Verona, Italy. Of 1,515 participants, 2.6% tested positive by serologic assay and 0.7% by reverse transcription PCR. We used latent class analysis to estimate a 3.0% probability of infection and 2.0% death rate.

Abstract Background Data on electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use among health professional students, who can play a central role in promoting healthy habits and smoking cessation, are sparse. Moreover, the association between e-cigarettes and smoking habits is still debated. The present study aimed to investigate the diffusion of e-cigarette use among nursing students in north-eastern Italy and explore its association with tobacco smoking. Methods In 2015, a questionnaire focused on e-cigarette use and tobacco smoking habits was anonymously administered to 2020 students attending nursing courses held by Verona University in 5 different centres. Of these students, 1463 (72.4%) answered the questionnaire. The influence of e-cigarette ever use on both tobacco smoking initiation in all subjects and smoking cessation among ever smokers was investigated by multivariable logistic models. Results Most responders were female (77.1%), and the mean (SD) age was 23.2 (4.2) years. Nearly all students (94.7%) had heard about e-cigarettes. Approximately one-third (30.3, 95% CI 27.9–32.7%) had ever used e-cigarettes, but only 2.1% (1.5–3.0%) had used e-cigarettes in the last month. Very few (2.1%) of those responders who had never used e-cigarettes were willing to try them. Prevalence values were much higher for tobacco smoking: 40.9% of responders reported being current tobacco smokers, and 10.1% reported being past smokers. Ever use and current use of e-cigarettes were reported by 57.2 and 4.4% of current tobacco smokers and by 12.0 and 0.6% of never or past smokers, respectively (p

Introduction As of 30 April 2020, the novel betacoronavirus SARS-CoV-2 had infected more than 3 172 000 individuals, killing over 224 000 people and spreading to more than 200 countries. Italy was the most affected country in Europe and the third most affected in the world in terms of the number of cases. Therefore, the aims of this study are: (1) to estimate the prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals among the general population of Verona; (2) to assess the accuracy (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) of an ELISA serological test for the screening of SARS-CoV-2.Methods and analysis The study will be carried out on a random sample of subjects aged at least 10 years from the general population of Verona. Participants will undergo the measurement of vital parameters (oxygen saturation measured by oximeter, respiratory rate and body temperature detected by laser thermometer), the administration of a COVID-19-related symptoms questionnaire, the collection of a blood sample and a nasopharyngeal swab. Our evaluation will include the statistical technique of Latent Class Analysis, which will be the basis for the estimation of prevalence.Ethics and dissemination The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Verona and Rovigo provinces on 15 April 2020 (internal protocol number 2641CESC). The study results will be submitted for publication in international, peer-reviewed journals and the complete dataset will be deposited in a public repository. Most relevant data will be made available to policy-makers as well as disseminated to stakeholders and to the community.

Background. Stenosis is the main cause of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure. It is unclear, however, if surveillance for stenosis enhances AVF function and longevity and if there is an ideal time for intervention.Methods. In a 5-year randomized, controlled, open trial we compared blood flow surveillance and pre-emptive repair of subclinical stenoses (one or both of angioplasty and open surgery) with standard monitoring and intervention based upon clinical criteria alone to determine if the former prolonged the longevity of mature forearm AVFs. Surveillance with blood pump flow (Qb) monitoring during dialysis sessions and quarterly shunt blood flow (Qa) or recirculation measurements identified 79 AVFs with angiographically proven, significant (>50%) stenosis. The AVFs were randomized to either a control group (intervention done in response to a decline in the delivered dialysis dose or thrombosis; n = 36) or to a pre-emptive treatment group (n = 43). To evaluate a possible relationship between outcome and haemodynamic status of the access, AVFs were divided into functional and failing subgroups, according to Qa values higher or lower than 350 ml/min or the absence or presence of recirculation.Results. A Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that pre-emptive treatment reduced failure rate (P = 0.003) and the Cox hazards model identified treatment (P = 0.009) and higher baseline Qa (P = 0.001) as the only variables associated with favourable outcome. Primary patency rates were higher in treatment than in control AVFs in both functional (P = 0.021) and failing subgroups (P = 0.005). They were also higher in functional than in failing AVFs in both control (P<0.001) and treatment groups (P = 0.023). Access survival was significantly higher in pre-emptively treated than in control AVFs (P = 0.050), a higher post-intervention Qa being the only variable associated with improved access longevity (P = 0.044). Secondary patency rates were similar in pre-emptively treated and control AVFs in both functional (P = 0.059) and failing subgroups (P = 0.394). They were also similar in functional and failing AVFs in controls (P = 0.082), but were higher in pre-emptively treated functional AVFs than in pre-emptively treated failing AVFs (P = 0.033) or in the entire control group (P = 0.019).Conclusions. We provide evidence that active blood flow surveillance and pre-emptive repair of subclinical stenosis reduce the thrombosis rate and prolong the functional life of mature forearm AVFs. We also show that Qa is a crucial indicator of access patency and a Qa >350 ml/min portends a superior outcome with pre-emptive action in AVFs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Surgery is an established treatment for stenosed and thrombosed forearm arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs), but the literature on its outcome is limited. We report our experience of the surgical repair of stenosis in patent and thrombosed forearm AVFs and evaluate the outcome of two procedures, proximal neo-anastomosis (NEO) vs replacement of the stenosed segment with a polytetrafluoroethylene graft interposition (GI). Methods. Sixty-four stenosed forearm AVFs underwent surgery, 32 pre-emptively and 32 post-thrombosis. End points of the study were initial success, restenosis and access loss rates. After treatment, AVFs were surveilled for restenosis by measuring access flow quarterly and performing at least one follow-up angiogram. Results. Initial procedural success was 92%; 100% for patent and 84% for thrombosed AVFs. The restenosis rate was 0.189 events/AVF-year for both patent and thrombosed AVFs, while the access loss rate was 0.016 events/AVF-year in patent and 0.148 in thrombosed AVFs. Stenosis was corrected by NEO in 27 AVFs and by GI in 30. The restenosis and access loss rates were 0.151 vs 0.214 and 0.033 vs 0.019 events/AVF-year for NEO vs GI, respectively. At Coxs hazard analysis, no variable was significantly associated with restenosis, while the timing of intervention was the only significant determinant of access loss, repaired clotted accesses carrying an 8.0-fold relative risk of access loss compared with patent AVFs (P = 0.048). Conclusion. Our study shows that surgery remains a valid option for the pre-emptive repair of stenosis and to salvage clotted forearm AVFs, offering an excellent initial success rate and low restenosis rate. It confirms that it is better to treat stenosis pre-emptively than post-thrombosis (though the restenosis rate appears to be uninfluenced by the timing of intervention) and suggests that GI compares favourably with conventional NEO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]