Search

ABSTRACT: Objective: Medullary thyroid carcinoma, a rare form of thyroid cancer, is typically managed with surgical excision. However, in patients with locally-invasive tumors, an aggressive surgical attempt may result in unnecessary morbidity. Neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibition has been utilized to downstage tumors prior to surgical excision but its role in thyroid cancer treatment is not well-established. We describe the potential role that lenvatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, may have as a neoadjuvant agent in advanced locoregional medullary thyroid carcinoma. Methods: Our patient presented with a large left thyroid mass and bulky left lateral neck lymphadenopathy. Imaging studies revealed a hypervascular and locally-invasive tumor with metastatic central and left lateral lymphadenopathy. A lymph node biopsy cytologic evaluation and plasma calcitonin concentration of 32,926 pg/mL were consistent with medullary thyroid carcinoma. Rearranged during transfection germline mutation testing was negative. A multidisciplinary team of physicians deemed the patient a poor surgical candidate and recommended 4 months of neoadjuvant lenvatinib therapy to reduce tumor burden with a subsequent reassessment of resectability. Given the tumor's hypervascularity, lenvatinib was chosen due its potent vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibition, as well as its availability at our institution. Results: Lenvatinib therapy resulted in rapid regression of tumor volume (approximately 70% reduction) as documented by computed tomography and ultrasound. Surgery after 4 months of treatment resulted in a 99% reduction in serum calcitonin and imaging studies 6 months later showed no residual disease. Conclusion: Lenvatinib has potential as a neoadjuvant agent in advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma, and permitted tumor resection in this previously inoperable patient.

Background:Thyroid nodules are relatively common and are routinely evaluated by fine-needle aspiration cytology, usually performed by clinicians. We noticed qualitative and/or quantitative variability in samples submitted to the cytopathology laboratory from clinicians, for example, the number of glass slides submitted (2–25) and air-dried smears versus alcohol-fixed slides, with variability in specimen adequacy and interpretability. The objective of this study was to standardize the preanalytic variables to determine if there is an improvement in the specimen quality.Methods:We standardized the method of collection (ultrasound-guided, 25-gauge needle, four passes) and preparation of samples (four total smears: two air-dried, two fixed, with liquid-based preparation and/or cell block) and personnel involved.Results:Standardization of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration and sample preparation by clinical staff resulted in an overall improvement in the quality of sample (odds ratio = 3.82, 95% confidence interval 2.02–7.24, p< 0.0001) with an increased proportion of satisfactory samples from 67% prestandardization to 89% poststandardization.Conclusions:Standardization resulted in a significant improvement in specimen interpretability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]