Search

AbstractNeuropathic pain is the crucial dose-limiting side effect of paclitaxel in chemotherapy patients that negatively impacts the quality of life and survival. Currently, no effective treatment option is available. Aprepitant, a well-established chemotherapy antiemetic performing neurokinin-1 receptor antagonism, shows analgesic effects in some pain models. We studied aprepitant analgesic effects on the paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain model in rats besides inflammatory markers assessment. Rats intraperitoneally received paclitaxel, reaching the cumulative paclitaxel dose of 8 mg/kg. Aprepitant was orally administered every alternate day between days 2 and 14, with a prescribed dosage of 10 or 20 mg/kg. The evaluation of mechanical allodynia and cold hyperalgesia involved the measurement of paw withdrawal threshold and acetone test score on days 0, 7, and 14. On day 14, paw licking latency was measured using a hot plate test before scarification and tissue collection for interleukin 1β, tumor necrosis factor α, and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) evaluation. Paclitaxel induced neuropathy as indicated by a lowered hind paw withdrawal threshold in the Von Frey test, a higher score in the acetone test, and shortened hot plate latency. Aprepitant effectively alleviated cold and thermal hyperalgesia as well as mechanical allodynia. Moreover, aprepitant administration significantly reversed paclitaxel-mediated elevation of proinflammatory cytokines levels in dorsal root ganglia. In addition, aprepitant application suppressed the protein expression of NF-kB in the dorsal root ganglia of paclitaxel-treated rats, as revealed by western blot analysis. Aprepitant treatment ameliorates neuropathy induced by paclitaxel, which is associated with decreasing proinflammatory cytokines and NF-kB expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication after surgery. Preventing PONV in high-risk patients often requires a multimodal approach combining antiemetic drugs with diverse mechanisms. While aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, is recognised as highly effective for PONV prevention, uncertainties remain regarding its effectiveness. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The analysis assessed the effectiveness of aprepitant (A), aprepitant plus ondansetron (AO) and aprepitant plus dexamethasone and ondansetron (ADO) in preventing PONV compared to ondansetron alone (O) or in combination with dexamethasone (DO). Results: In the analysis of 12 studies involving 2729 patients, aprepitant demonstrated significant efficacy in preventing PONV compared to ondansetron alone (A versus [vs.] O: PONV incidence 12.5% vs. 28.5%, relative risk [RR] = 0.45, P < 0.001; complete response rate 55.97% vs. 50.35%, RR = 1.13, P = 0.010). The combination of aprepitant with ondansetron (AO) also showed a significantly lower incidence of PONV compared to ondansetron alone (11.3% vs. 26.8%, RR = 0.43, P < 0.001) and a higher complete response rate (38.1% vs. 26.84%, RR = 1.41, P = 0.020). In addition, ADO significantly reduced PONV incidence compared to DO (ADO vs. DO: 13.63% vs. 35.38%, RR = 0.38, P = 0.006). Conclusion: Aprepitant, whether used alone or in combination with ondansetron or both ondansetron and dexamethasone, consistently outperforms ondansetron in achieving a complete response as it lowers vomiting rates and reduces the need for rescue therapy during the crucial 24–48-h postoperative period.

Abstract Recent advancements in cancer therapy have led to the development of novel nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems aimed at enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. This study focuses on evaluating aprepitant-loaded PLGA and Eudragit RS 100 nanoparticles for their potential antiangiogenic effects. Characterization studies revealed that aprepitant-loaded nanoparticles exhibited particle sizes ranging from 208.50 to 238.67 nm, with monodisperse distributions (PDI

Abstract Background HCC (Hepatocellular carcinoma) is the most common primary malignant cancer in the liver. Treatment options to incurable HCC such as sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, had numerous side effects and questionable effectiveness. Neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) have a major role in inflammation and tumour environment including the resistance to cell death, the induction of angiogenesis and the promotion of cell migration and proliferation. Additionally, NK-1R is over-expressed in human tumour cells including HCC. Moreover, Aprepitant, one of the NK-1R antagonists exerts multiple antitumor activities (antiproliferative, apoptotic, antimigration, and antiangiogenesis) in vivo and in vitro. Study aim To analyze the effectiveness of combining sorafenib with aprepitant in the management of HCC (experimental). Patients and methods In this retrospective experimental study, the human HCC cell line, HepG2, cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of sorafenib alone, aprepitant alone and combination of both sorafenib and aprepitant evaluation of cytotoxicity, apoptosis, MMP-9, VEGF, NF-kB p-65, p-AKT and p-ERK were done. Moreover, The extent of the NK-1 receptor expression was assessed by immunocytochemistry on 50 HCC paraffin blocks of Egyptian HCC patients and another 50 paraffin blocks of liver cirrhosis only as a control. Results Decreased levels of MMP-9, VEGF, NF-kB p-65, p-AKT and p-ERK was more substantial in the combination therapy compared to sorafenib alone and aprepitant alone. Moreover, the rate of apoptosis and cytotoxicity were significantly higher in the combination treatment group than the monotherapy groups with more anti inflammatory, anti angiogentic and anti metastatic effects. Also, among the 50 HCC paraffin blocks, the majority (60%) showed a strong NK-1 expression; which significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with the progression free survival (PFS) but not the overall survival (OS) of the patients when applying multivariate analysis. Conclusion HCC had strong expression and immunostaining for NK1R.Therefore, combined aprepitant and sorafenib may be a promising approach in HCC treatment compared to each one alone.

Recent advancements in cancer therapy have led to the development of novel nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems aimed at enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. This study focuses on evaluating aprepitant-loaded PLGA and Eudragit RS 100 nanoparticles for their potential antiangiogenic effects. Characterization studies revealed that aprepitant-loaded nanoparticles exhibited particle sizes ranging from 208.50 to 238.67 nm, with monodisperse distributions (PDI < 0.7) and stable zeta potentials (between − 5.0 and − 15.0 mV). Encapsulation efficiencies exceeding 99% were achieved, highlighting the efficacy of PLGA and Eudragit RS 100 as carriers for aprepitant. Cellular uptake studies demonstrated enhanced internalization of aprepitant-loaded nanoparticles by HUVEC cells compared to free aprepitant, as confirmed by fluorescence microscopy. Furthermore, cytotoxicity assays revealed significant dose-dependent effects of aprepitant-loaded nanoparticles on HUVEC cell viability, with IC50 values at 24 h of 11.9 µg/mL for Eudragit RS 100 and 94.3 µg/mL for PLGA formulations. Importantly, these nanoparticles effectively inhibited HUVEC cell migration and invasion induced by M2c supernatant, as evidenced by real-time cell analysis and gene expression studies. Moreover, aprepitant-loaded nanoparticles downregulated VEGFA and VEGFB gene expressions and reduced VEGFR-2 protein levels in HUVEC cells, highlighting their potential as antiangiogenic agents. Overall, this research underscores the promise of nanoparticle-based aprepitant formulations in targeted cancer therapy, offering enhanced therapeutic outcomes through improved drug delivery and efficacy against angiogenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Substance P (SP), an important neuropeptide, has a crucial role in the progression of several cancers, including prostate cancer, through interacting with the neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R). Oxidative stress is also involved in the onset and progression of prostate cancer. However, no studies have been performed on the cross-talk between the SP/NK1R system and cellular redox balance in prostate cancer, and how it is involved in tumorogenesis. We aimed to investigate the effect of the SP/NK1R system and the blockage of NK1R with its specific antagonist (aprepitant) on the cellular redox status of the prostate cancer cell line (PC3 and LNCaP). We performed the resazurin assay to evaluate the toxicity of the aprepitant on the PC3 and LNCaP cell lines. The intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level was measured after SP and aprepitant treatment. The alterations of expression and activity of two crucial cellular oxidoreductases, glutaredoxin, and thioredoxin were evaluated by qRT-PCR and commercial kits (ZellBio GmbH), respectively. Our results revealed that SP increased ROS production and decreased the expression and activity of glutaredoxin and thioredoxin. On the other hand, treatment of cells with aprepitant showed reverse results. In conclusion, we found that the SP/NK1R system could promote prostate cancer progression by inducing oxidative stress. In addition, the inhibition of NK1R by aprepitant modulated the effect of the SP/NK1R system on the cellular redox system. Aprepitant might therefore be introduced as a candidate for the treatment of prostate cancer; however, more studies are required to confirm the validation of this hypothesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We recently developed a series of nalfurafine analogs (TK10, TK33, and TK35) that may serve as non-addictive candidate analgesics. These compounds are mixed-action agonists at the kappa and delta opioid receptors (KOR and DOR, respectively) and produce antinociception in a mouse warm-water tail-immersion test while failing to produce typical mu opioid receptor (MOR)-mediated side effects. The warm-water tail-immersion test is an assay of pain-stimulated behavior vulnerable to false-positive analgesic-like effects by drugs that produce motor impairment. Accordingly, this study evaluated TK10, TK33, and TK35 in a recently validated assay of pain-related behavioral depression in mice that are less vulnerable to false-positive effects. For comparison, we also evaluated the effects of the MOR agonist/analgesic hydrocodone (positive control), the neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist aprepitant (negative control), nalfurafine as a selective KOR agonist, SNC80 as a selective DOR agonist, and a nalfurafine/SNC80 mixture. Intraperitoneal injection of dilute lactic acid (IP lactic acid) served as a noxious stimulus to depress vertical and horizontal locomotor activity in male and female ICR mice. IP lactic acid-induced locomotor depression was alleviated by hydrocodone but not by aprepitant, nalfurafine, SNC80, the nalfurafine/SNC80 mixture, or the KOR/DOR agonists. These results suggest that caution is warranted in advancing mixed-action KOR/DOR agonists as candidate analgesics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: HCC (Hepatocellular carcinoma) is the most common primary malignant cancer in the liver. Treatment options to incurable HCC such as sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, had numerous side effects and questionable effectiveness. Neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) have a major role in inflammation and tumour environment including the resistance to cell death, the induction of angiogenesis and the promotion of cell migration and proliferation. Additionally, NK-1R is over-expressed in human tumour cells including HCC. Moreover, Aprepitant, one of the NK-1R antagonists exerts multiple antitumor activities (antiproliferative, apoptotic, antimigration, and antiangiogenesis) in vivo and in vitro. Study aim: To analyze the effectiveness of combining sorafenib with aprepitant in the management of HCC (experimental). Patients and methods: In this retrospective experimental study, the human HCC cell line, HepG2, cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of sorafenib alone, aprepitant alone and combination of both sorafenib and aprepitant evaluation of cytotoxicity, apoptosis, MMP-9, VEGF, NF-kB p-65, p-AKT and p-ERK were done. Moreover, The extent of the NK-1 receptor expression was assessed by immunocytochemistry on 50 HCC paraffin blocks of Egyptian HCC patients and another 50 paraffin blocks of liver cirrhosis only as a control. Results: Decreased levels of MMP-9, VEGF, NF-kB p-65, p-AKT and p-ERK was more substantial in the combination therapy compared to sorafenib alone and aprepitant alone. Moreover, the rate of apoptosis and cytotoxicity were significantly higher in the combination treatment group than the monotherapy groups with more anti inflammatory, anti angiogentic and anti metastatic effects. Also, among the 50 HCC paraffin blocks, the majority (60%) showed a strong NK-1 expression; which significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with the progression free survival (PFS) but not the overall survival (OS) of the patients when applying multivariate analysis. Conclusion: HCC had strong expression and immunostaining for NK1R.Therefore, combined aprepitant and sorafenib may be a promising approach in HCC treatment compared to each one alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) has a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Aprepitant, a selective NK-1R antagonist, can inhibit the growth of various tumours in vitro and in vivo. However, it remains unclear whether aprepitant has cytotoxic effects on iCCA. Methods: We measured the expression of SP/NK-1R in clinical samples of iCCA by immunohistochemistry. Then, we detected the cytotoxic effects of aprepitant on iCCA cells via MTT, EdU and colony formation assay. We constructed a subcutaneous xenograft model of BALB/c nude mice by using HCCC-9810 and RBE cell lines to explore the effects of aprepitant in vivo. To elucidate the potential mechanisms, we explored the pro-apoptotic effect of aprepitant by flow cytometric, western blotting, ROS detection and JC-1 staining. Furthermore, we detected the autophagic level of HCCC-9810 and RBE by western blotting, mRFP-eGFP-LC3 adenovirus transfection and electron microscope. Results: SP/NK-1R is significantly expressed in iCCA. Aprepitant inhibited human iCCA xenograft growth and dose-dependently decreased the viability of RBE and HCCC-9810 cells. Aprepitant-induced mitochondria-dependent apoptosis through ROS/JNK pathway. Additionally, pretreatment with z-VAD-fmk partly reversed the effect of aprepitant on cell viability, while NAC completely attenuated the cytotoxic effects of aprepitant in vitro. Furthermore, we observed the dynamic changes of au-tophagosome in RBE and HCCC-9810 cells treated with aprepitant. Conclusion: SP/NK-1R signalling is significantly activated in iCCA and promotes the proliferation of iCCA cells. By contrast, aprepitant can induce autophagy and apoptosis in iCCA cells via ROS accumulation and subsequent activation of JNK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of aprepitant in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). Methods: Clinical trials meeting the inclusion criteria were identified through searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, as well as clinical trials registered at clinicaltrials. gov. These trials compared aprepitant with the control or placebo groups among patients who underwent MBS. Meta-analysis was performed using StataSE 17.0 software to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the effectiveness of aprepitant in preventing PONV following MBS. Results: A total of five articles comprising six studies including 929 patients undergoing MBS were included. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in the incidence of PONV among patients receiving aprepitant (pooled RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.38–0.68, P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis indicated that aprepitant effectively reduced PONV incidence at 0, 6, and 12 h postoperatively in patients with MBS, but did not decrease PONV occurrence at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. Conclusion: Aprepitant demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in preventing PONV following MBS, effectively reducing patient discomfort, and improving postoperative recovery. Therefore, aprepitant should be considered a preventive measure in patients undergoing MBS to enhance patient satisfaction and recovery rates. Additionally, to maintain an effective drug concentration, aprepitant should be administered within the first 24 h postoperatively. PROSPERO Registration: CRD 42024528154. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Elevated substance P can be utilized to predict early mortality during the first week of cerebral infarction. Whether aprepitant, a substance P receptor blocker could be utilized to alleviate poststroke pneumonia which is investigated in this study. Intraluminal monofilament model of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) was constructed in C57BL/6J male mice, and the relative expression of substance P was detected in collected bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung tissue homogenate at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours poststroke. On the other hand, different concentrations of aprepitant (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg) were atomized and inhaled into MCAO mice. Inflammation cytokines and bacterial load were detected in collected BALF and lung tissue homogenate at 72-hour poststroke, and lung injury was revealed by histological examination. Aprepitant administration decreased total proteins, total cells, neutrophils, and macrophages in BALF. The concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon γ, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and IL-10 in lung tissue homogenates were also diminished by the administration of aprepitant. In conclusion, aprepitant could attenuate poststroke pneumonia in mice suggesting its potential therapeutic use in the clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Substance P (SP) is a peptide neurotransmitter that plays a role in pain transmission, stress, inflammation, and emesis through neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R). Previous studies of NK-1R antagonists suggest that SP can have either convulsant or anticonvulsant effects. Aprepitant, an NK-1R antagonist, is clinically used to prevent nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy and post-operative patients. However, the effects of aprepitant on epilepsy have not been studied yet. Therefore, the objective of this study was to explore the influence of aprepitant on epileptiform activity in a rat model of epilepsy induced by penicillin. Male Wistar rats, aged 2.5 to 3 months, were divided into 5 groups (n=6): Control, Vehicle, Aprepitant, Substance P, and Aprepitant+Substance P. Aprepitant was administered intragastrically (30 mg/kg) 24 hours and 3 hours before surgery. Substance P (10 pmol) was administered intraventricularly during the surgical procedure. Induction of epileptiform activity was achieved by the injection of penicillin G (500 IU) into the cortex. Electrocorticography (ECoG) recording was conducted online using the PowerLab data acquisition system for over 3 hours. The disparity in spike frequency and amplitude among groups for each 10-minute interval was assessed through One-Way ANOVA and subsequent Tukey post-hoc tests, utilizing the SPSS 15.0 software package. Epileptiform activity was observed in all rats within 3 minutes after the injection of penicillin into the cortex. No significant difference was found between groups in terms of spike frequency and amplitude. When the percentage changes in mean spike frequency and amplitude values were calculated, no significant difference was shown between the groups. Using a penicillin-induced epilepsy model, the present study showed that aprepitant does not affect epileptiform activity in the presence or absence of exogenous SP. Further studies are needed to understand possible anticonvulsant or proconvulsant properties of aprepitant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Losartan is an anti-hypertensive drug that belongs to the class of angiotensin-II receptor blockers that act by inhibiting the binding of angiotensin II to its receptor. Aprepitant belongs to the class of neurokinin receptor-1 receptor blockers used to treat nausea and vomiting. In the case of severe hypertension, there are the majority of predominant symptoms occurring but one such symptom is nausea and vomiting. This condition may potentially be treated by a combination of losartan and aprepitant, but there is no information about the pharmacokinetic interactions for this combination. When losartan and aprepitant are taken concomitantly there may be a chance that these two drugs may alter the pharmacokinetics of each other. Thus, the effects of both the drugs were assessed on each other. To assess the preclinical pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction a rapid, simple, and sensitive approach for the simultaneous estimation of losartan and aprepitant in rat plasma by LC–QqQ-MS/MS has been developed and validated. The separation was done on Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 (4.6 mm × 100 mm, 3.5 µm) by gradient elution using 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water and acetonitrile. Multiple reaction monitoring was performed using a positive ionization mode. The precursor and product ions for losartan, aprepitant, and telmisartan (internal standard) were m/z 423.2 → 207.0, m/z 535.2 → 277.0, and, m/z 515.3 → 276.1, respectively. The proposed method was validated in accordance with USFDA bioanalytical guidelines. The method was found linear, accurate and sensitive to estimate the losartan and aprepitant in rat plasma with the lowest limit of quantification of 1 ng/mL. The pharmacokinetic parameters like half-life, Tmax and the area under the curve for aprepitant have been significantly affected when administered with losartan and vice versa. These results provide insights for futuristic investigation at the pharmacodynamic level of drug–drug interactions for this combination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancers hijack the nervous system for growth and spread. Thus, disrupting neuron-cancer crosstalk holds promise for blocking metastasis. Recently, Padmanaban et al. reported new therapeutic targets and showed that breast cancer cells activate sensory neurons to secrete the neuropeptide substance P (SP), leading to single-strand (ss)RNA release and noncanonical Toll-like receptor (TLR)7 signaling that drives metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: At a single‐center pediatric hospital, the neurokinin‐1 receptor antagonist aprepitant was used to treat refractory pruritus in epidermolysis bullosa (EB) and atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods: Thirty‐seven patients were included (24 EB patients, 13 AD patients), ages 10 months to 37 years. Results: 58% (14/24) of patients with EB and 85% (11/13) of patients with AD reported aprepitant was effective in decreasing their pruritus, with age‐related differences in efficacy observed in EB patients, and access to the medication by insurance denial or availability of the drug as a barrier to use. Conclusions: Aprepitant shows promise in controlling refractory pruritus in pediatric EB and AD patients and deserves further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The supercritical antisolvent (SAS) process was a green alternative to improve the low bioavailability of insoluble drugs. However, it is difficult for SAS process to industrialize with limited production capacity. A coaxial annular nozzle was used to prepare the microcapsules of aprepitant (APR) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) by SAS with N, N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) as solvent. Meanwhile, the effects of polymer/drug ratio, operating pressure, operating temperature and overall concentration on particles morphology, mean particle diameter and size distribution were analyzed. Microcapsules with mean diameters ranging from 2.04 μm and 9.84 μm were successfully produced. The morphology, particle size, thermal behavior, crystallinity, drug content, drug dissolution and residual amount of DMF of samples were analyzed. The results revealed that the APR drug dissolution of the microcapsules by SAS process was faster than the unprocessed APR. Furthermore, the drug powder collected every hour is in the kilogram level, verifying the possibility to scale up the production of pharmaceuticals employing the SAS process from an industrial point of view.

Winnie Yeo,1 Nicole TY Ngai,1 Christopher CH Yip,1 Frankie KF Mo,1 Victoria A Yeo,1 Jonathan WH Ko,1 Leung V Li,1 Thomas KH Lau,1 Kwai Tung Lai,1 Elizabeth Pang,1 Claudia HW Yip,1 Horatio L Yeo,1 Carol Chi Hei Kwok,2 Stephanie WY Ko,1 Alex Molassiotis3 1Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Clinical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong KongCorrespondence: Winnie Yeo, Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China, Email winnieyeo@cuhk.edu.hkPurpose: Although risk factors related to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) have been identified in previous studies, only a few studies have evaluated the risk factors associated with contemporary antiemetic prophylaxis, including olanzapine/aprepitant- or NEPA-containing regimens. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with CINV development in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.Methods: Data from 304 patients enrolled in 3 previously reported prospective antiemetic studies were included. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict risk factors associated with CINV occurrence. Additionally, the likelihood of treatment failure in relation to the number of risk factors in individual patients was evaluated.Results: Multivariate analysis of the entire study group revealed that obesity status (defined as body mass index/= 25.0 kg/m2) and the use of olanzapine/aprepitant- or NEPA-containing anti-emetic regimens were associated with a high likelihood, while a history of motion sickness was associated with a lower likelihood, complete response (CR), and “no nausea” in the overall phase. A history of vomiting during pregnancy was also associated with a lower likelihood of an overall CR. Patients with an increasing number of risk factors had a higher likelihood of treatment failure and shorter time to first vomiting. Those who did not achieve CR and “no nausea” in the first cycle were less likely to achieve these parameters in the subsequent cycle of chemotherapy.Conclusion: The present study confirmed previously reported risk factors for CINV in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Further optimization of CINV control is required for patients with identifiable risk factors; olanzapine/aprepitant- or NEPA- containing prophylaxis are the preferred contemporary anti-emetics regimens for Chinese breast cancer patients undergoing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.Keywords: cytotoxic, nausea and vomiting, olanzapine, aprepitant, NEPA

The management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in children remains challenging due to differences in the chemotherapy regimens, their relative emetogenicity compared to that in adults and differences in drug metabolism and the available formulations. The common four classes of anti-emetics used for the treatment and prophylaxis of CINV in children include dexamethasone, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (5HT3RAs), and olanzapine. The appropriate dose of dexamethasone for CINV prophylaxis in children is unknown, with a significant variability in dosage ranging between 6 and 32 mg/m2/day. The dose of dexamethasone is decreased by 30% when this drug is combined with (fos)aprepitant in children, in contrast to a decrease of 50% required in adults. The use of aprepitant in younger children (<12 years) is often hampered by the non-availability of oral suspension formulations in many countries; alternatively, 80 mg capsules are administered for 1–3 days in certain institutes to children weighing between 15 and 40 kg. Among the different 5HT3RAs, palonosetron is comparatively metabolized faster in children than in adults, requiring a higher dosage for similar efficacy to that achieved in adults. Olanzapine is a newer agent, used in doses between 0.1 and 0.14 mg/kg/day in children, with good anti-emetic efficacy, but has sedation and hyperglycemia as concerning adverse effects. Drug interactions between anti-emetics and between anti-emetics and chemotherapy/supportive agents (azole antifungals, cyclosporine, arsenic trioxide), especially QTc prolongation, should be considered during prescription. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the widely used approaches for improving the dissolution of poorly water-soluble drugs is particle size reduction. Ball milling is a mechanical, top-down technique used to reduce particle size. The effect of ball number, ball size, and milling speed on the properties of milled Aprepitant is evaluated. A full factorial design was employed to investigate the influence of affecting factors on particle size reduction. The initial suspension was made by suspending the drug in distilled water using excipients followed by milling in a planetary ball mill. Ball size, ball number, and milling speed modulated particle size distribution of Aprepitant. Increasing the number of balls from minimum to maximum for each ball size led to approximately a 28% reduction in mean particle size, a 37% decrease in D90%, and a 25% decrease in the ratio of volume mean particle diameter to numeric mean particle diameter. On average, using 10 mm balls instead of 30 mm balls reduced mean particle size by 1.689 µm. As a result, ball size, ball number, and milling speed are three effective factors in the process of ball milling. By increasing the ball number and decreasing the ball size, efficient micronization of drug particles takes place and the particle size is more uniform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We aimed to compare the effects of aprepitant on the incidence of PONV after LSG. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, the case group received the standard care regimen for PONV (dexamethasone 10 mg, ondansetron 4 mg, and metoclopramide 10 mg) plus prophylactic oral aprepitant 80 mg 1 h preoperatively. The control group received standard care plus a placebo. Comparative analyses using the Rhodes index were performed at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Results: A total of 400 patients (201 in the aprepitant group and 199 in the placebo group) underwent LSG. The groups were homogeneous. The aprepitant group experienced less PONV: early, 69 (34.3%) vs. 103 (51.7%), p ≤ 0.001; 6 h, 67 (33.3%) vs. 131 (65.8%), p ≤ 0.001; 12 h, 41 (20.4%) vs. 115 (57.8%), p ≤ 0.001; and 24 h, 22 (10.9%) vs. 67 (33.7%), p ≤ 0.001. Fewer patients in the aprepitant group vomited: early, 3 (1.5%) vs. 5 (2.5%), p = 0.020; 6 h, 6 (3%) vs. 18 (9%), p = 0.020; 12 h, 2 (1%) vs. 17 (8.5%), p = 0.006; and 24 h, 1 (0.5%) vs. 6 (3%), p = 0.040. Patients in the aprepitant group required less additional PONV medication: early, 61 (30.3%) vs. 86 (43.2), p = 0.008; 6 h, 7 (3.5%) vs. 34 (17%), p = 0.001; 12 h, 6 (3%) vs. 31 (15.6%), p ≤ 0.001; and 24 h, 5 (2.5%) vs. 11 (5.5%), p ≤ 0.001. Conclusions: Prophylactic aprepitant improved PONV between 0 h (early) and 24 h postoperatively in patients undergoing LSG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Definition: Peptidergic systems show promise as targets for fighting tumors. While some peptides encourage the growth and spread of tumor cells and angiogenic mechanisms, others display antitumor properties. As such, peptide ligands and receptor antagonists could be used as antitumor agents alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Peptide receptor antagonists can counteract the oncogenic effects of specific peptides by inducing apoptosis in various types of tumor cells, hindering cancer cell migration and inhibiting angiogenesis. Peptides and peptide receptor antagonists are not currently used in clinical practice as antitumor agents. Still, aprepitant, a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist, is a promising candidate due to its ability to promote apoptosis in many cancer cells. However, to utilize aprepitant as an anticancer agent, the dosage must be increased and administered for a more extended period. Moving beyond current protocols for aprepitant's use as an antiemetic is essential. Additionally, a common anticancer strategy with aprepitant is possible regardless of cancer cell type. Finally, combining aprepitant with chemotherapy or radiotherapy is encouraged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intractable nausea can occur in numerous settings. We report on a 49-year-old woman with a past medical history of cystic fibrosis (CF) with chronic hypoxia, chronic nausea, complex infection history and frequent hospitalizations who was admitted to an academic medical center with a CF exacerbation. Her chronic nausea worsened with the use of antimicrobials, and she was unable to tolerate dopamine or serotonin antagonist antiemetics. Nausea persisted despite the use of benzodiazepines and antihistamines. She was given a one-time dose of fosaprepitant 150 mg intravenously (IV) with marked improvement of her nausea. During subsequent exacerbations, she again developed severe nausea which continued to respond well to a one-time dose of fosaprepitant 150 mg IV. Fosaprepitant is a substance P/neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist that is FDA-approved for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and has been used to prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting. Its use in other contexts has not been well established. This case suggests a role for fosaprepitant in the management of nausea outside the context of chemotherapy or general anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the world's largest health concerns with growing global incidence and mortality. The potential value of the neurokinin-1 receptor as a therapeutic target has been reported in several tumor types, including CRC. Here we examined the potential anti-tumor effects of a clinically approved neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, aprepitant, alone and its combination with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) as a first choice CRC chemotherapeutic drug, in both in vitro and in vivo models of CRC. Methods: MTT assay was employed for assessing cell proliferation. mRNA expression levels were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis was performed using an Annexin-V/propidium iodide assay kit. We finally conducted an in vivo experiment in a mouse model of CRC to confirm the in vitro antiproliferative activity of aprepitant and 5-FU. Results: We found that aprepitant and 5-FU significantly reduced CRC cell viability. The combination of drugs exhibited potent synergistic growth inhibitory effects on CRC cells. Moreover, aprepitant and 5-FU induced apoptosis and altered the levels of apoptotic genes (up-regulation of Bax, and p53 along with downregulation of Bcl-2). Importantly, the aprepitant and 5-FU combination showed a more pronounced impact on apoptosis and associated genes than either of the agents alone. Furthermore, aprepitant reduced tumor growth in vivo and led to significantly longer survival time, and this effect was more prominent when using the aprepitant and 5-FU combination. Conclusions: Collectively, combinatory treatment with aprepitant and 5-FU potentially exerts synergistic growth inhibition and apoptosis induction in CRC, deserving further consideration as a novel strategy for CRC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Voriconazole is an antifungal drug for which therapeutic monitoring is recommended to prevent side effects. Temporary administration of the antiemetic drug fosaprepitant remarkably decreases the plasma concentration of voriconazole from the therapeutic range. The ratio of the major metabolite voriconazole N-oxide to voriconazole exceeded that at any other time for a patient who started chemotherapy during voriconazole therapy. We attributed this unpredictable result to cytochrome P450 3A4 induced by aprepitant that was converted from fosaprepitant in vivo. Methods Concentrations of voriconazole and voriconazole N-oxide were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry in primary human hepatocytes after incubation with aprepitant. Aprepitant suppressed voriconazole N-oxide formation within 24 h, followed by a continuous increase. Levels of drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 mRNA were measured using real-time PCR in primary human hepatocytes incubated with aprepitant. Results Cytochrome P450 3A4 and 2C9 mRNA levels increased ~4- and 2-fold, respectively, over time. Cytochrome P450 3A4 induction was confirmed using reporter assays. We also assessed L-755446, a major metabolite of aprepitant that lacks a triazole ring. Both compounds dose-dependently increased reporter activity; however, induction by L-755446 was stronger than that by aprepitant. Conclusion These results indicate that aprepitant initially inhibited voriconazole metabolism via its triazole ring and increased cytochrome P450 3A4 induction following L-755446 formation. The decrease in plasma voriconazole concentration 7 days after fosaprepitant administration was mainly attributed to cytochrome P450 3A4 induction by L-755446. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common side effect associated with general anesthesia. Both ondansetron and aprepitant been effectively used to prevent PONV. However, there is a disagreement of opinions regarding the superiority of these two drugs. This study aims to compare the efficacy of aprepitant with ondansetron in preventing PONV following orthognathic surgeries. Methods In this double-blinded clinical trial, 80 patients scheduled for orthognathic surgery at Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran, were randomly assigned to two groups. A standardized anesthesia protocol was used for all patients. The first group received a placebo capsule administered one hour before the surgical procedure along with 4 mg (2 ml) of ondansetron intravenously after anesthesia induction. The second group was given 80 mg aprepitant capsules one hour before the surgery, followed by an injection of 2 ml intravenous distilled water after anesthesia induction. The occurrence and severity of PONV, the amount of rescue medication required, and the complete response of patients assessed within 24 h after the surgery. Results There were no significant differences in demographic data between the two groups. Patients in the aprepitant group had a significantly lower incidence and severity of nausea (2.5% versus 27.5%), vomiting (5% versus 25%), and required fewer rescue medications (7.5% versus 62.5%) compared to the ondansetron group. Additionally, the aprepitant group showed a higher complete response rate (90% versus 67.5%) in the 0-2 and 12-24 postoperative hours. Conclusion According to the findings of this study, aprepitant has demonstrated a greater efficacy in preventing PONV following orthognathic surgery, when compared to ondansetron. Trial registration Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT code: IRCT20211205053279N3), date of registration: 16/12/2022.

Summary: Dexamethasone is one of the key antiemetic agents and is widely used even now. However, dexamethasone has been associated with several adverse reactions even after short-term administration. Therefore, developing a steroid-free antiemetic regimen is an important issue to consider. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of palonosetron, aprepitant, and olanzapine in a multi-institutional phase II study. Chemotherapy-naive patients scheduled to receive cisplatin were enrolled and evaluated for the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during 120 h after chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the study was total control (TC) in the overall phase. The key secondary endpoint was complete response (CR), which was assessed in the acute, delayed, and overall phase, respectively. Adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Eighty-five patients were enrolled from 8 centers in Japan, of which 83 were evaluable for analyses. The percentage of patients who achieved TC during the overall phase was 31.3%. CR was achieved in 61.4%, 84.3%, and 65.1% of patients during the overall, acute, and delayed phases, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse event was anorexia. The primary endpoint was below the threshold and we could not find benefit in the dexamethasone-free regimen, but CR during the overall phase was similar to that of the conventional three-drug regimen. This antiemetic regimen without dexamethasone might be an option for patients for whom corticosteroids should not be an active application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: While total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) protocols include Dexamethasone and Ondansetron prophylaxis, bariatric patients continue to be considered at particularly high risk for postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV). A multimodal approach for prophylaxis is recommended by the Bariatric Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society however, there remains a lack of consensus on the optimal strategy to manage PONV in these patients. Haloperidol has been shown at low doses to have a therapeutic effect in treatment of refractory nausea and in PONV prophylaxis in other high risk surgical populations. We sought to investigate its efficacy as a prophylactic medication for PONV in the bariatric population and to identify which perioperative strategies were most effective at reducing episodes of PONV. Methods: An institutional bariatric database was created by retrospectively reviewing patients undergoing elective minimally invasive bariatric procedures from 2018 to 2022. Demographic data reviewed included age, gender, preoperative body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, and primary language. Primary endpoints included patient reported episodes of PONV, total doses of Ondansetron administered, need for a second antiemetic (rescue medication), complication rate (most commonly readmission within 30 days), and length of stay. Fisher's exact test, Mann–Whitney test, and ANOVA were used to evaluate the effect of perioperative management on various endpoints. Results: A total of 475 patients were analyzed with Haloperidol being utilized in 15.8% of all patients. Patients receiving Haloperidol were less likely to require Ondansetron outside of the immediate perioperative period (34.7% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.02), experienced less PONV (41.3% vs. 64.3%, p = 0.01) and also had a decreased median length of stay (27.3 vs. 35.8 h, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Addition of low dose Haloperidol to Bariatric ERAS protocols decreases incidence of PONV and the need for additional antiemetic coverage resulting in a significantly shorter length of stay, increasing the likelihood of safe discharge on postoperative day 1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are distressing complications for patients undergoing surgeries under general anesthesia. This study compares the efficacy of oral Aprepitant and intravenous Ondansetron in preventing PONV. Methods: A randomized control trial was conducted with 80 patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia, divided into two groups receiving either oral Aprepitant or intravenous Ondansetron. The primary outcomes measured were the incidence of nausea, vomiting, need for rescue antiemetics, patient satisfaction, and side effects. Results: The Aprepitant group demonstrated significantly lower incidences of nausea (67.5% vs. 42.5%, P=0.019) and a reduced need for rescue antiemetics (22.5% vs. 52.5%, P=0.011) compared to the Ondansetron group. Patient satisfaction was higher in the Aprepitant group. Additionally, the incidence of headache as a side effect was lower in the Aprepitant group (25.0% vs. 55.0%, P=0.006). Conclusion: Oral Aprepitant is more effective than intravenous Ondansetron in managing PONV post-elective surgeries under general anesthesia. Its use is associated with higher patient satisfaction and fewer side effects, suggesting it should be considered a preferred option for PONV prophylaxis in such clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common side effect associated with general anesthesia. Both ondansetron and aprepitant been effectively used to prevent PONV. However, there is a disagreement of opinions regarding the superiority of these two drugs. This study aims to compare the efficacy of aprepitant with ondansetron in preventing PONV following orthognathic surgeries. Methods: In this double-blinded clinical trial, 80 patients scheduled for orthognathic surgery at Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran, were randomly assigned to two groups. A standardized anesthesia protocol was used for all patients. The first group received a placebo capsule administered one hour before the surgical procedure along with 4 mg (2 ml) of ondansetron intravenously after anesthesia induction. The second group was given 80 mg aprepitant capsules one hour before the surgery, followed by an injection of 2 ml intravenous distilled water after anesthesia induction. The occurrence and severity of PONV, the amount of rescue medication required, and the complete response of patients assessed within 24 h after the surgery. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic data between the two groups. Patients in the aprepitant group had a significantly lower incidence and severity of nausea (2.5% versus 27.5%), vomiting (5% versus 25%), and required fewer rescue medications (7.5% versus 62.5%) compared to the ondansetron group. Additionally, the aprepitant group showed a higher complete response rate (90% versus 67.5%) in the 0-2 and 12-24 postoperative hours. Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, aprepitant has demonstrated a greater efficacy in preventing PONV following orthognathic surgery, when compared to ondansetron. Trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT code: IRCT20211205053279N3), date of registration: 16/12/2022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is an ongoing problem. While effectiveness of triplet antiemetic regimens in the delayed CINV phase (24–120 hours after administration of chemotherapy) has been studied, their effectiveness in the long-delayed phase (120–168 hours post-administration) is unknown. We compared the efficacy of 3- and 5-day courses of a triplet antiemetic prophylaxis containing aprepitant (APR) in controlling long-delayed CINV after cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy. We obtained patient-level data from a nationwide, multicenter, prospective observational study in Japan. The incidence and timing of CINV after 3- and 5-day APR-containing regimens were compared using inverse probability treatment weighting. The analysis included 380 patients. The incidence rates of long-delayed nausea and vomiting were significantly reduced for the 5-day compared with the 3-day regimen (29.1% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.0042; 6.7% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Among those without CINV, vomiting was not reported after day 2 in the 5-day APR group but increased after day 4 in the 3-day APR group. A 5-day regimen triplet antiemetic prophylaxis with APR decreased long-delayed vomiting compared with a 3-day regimen in patients receiving CDDP-based chemotherapy. However, the 5-day regimen showed no advantage over the 3-day regimen against long-delayed nausea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are adverse effects after surgery, which may increase the risk of complications. Aprepitant is a neurokinin‐1 receptor blocker and has been shown to reduce chemotherapy‐related nausea and vomiting and PONV. However, its role in endoscopic skull base surgery remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of aprepitant in reducing PONV in endoscopic transsphenoidal (TSA) pituitary surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review between July 2021 and January 2023 of 127 consecutive patients who underwent TSA was performed at a tertiary academic institution. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative aprepitant use. Two groups were matched based on known risk factors of PONV (age, sex, nonsmoking, and history of PONV). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV. Secondary outcome measures included the number of anti‐emetic use, length of stay, and postoperative cererebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Results: After matching, 48 patients were included in each group. The aprepitant group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of vomiting than the non‐aprepitant group (2.1% vs 22.9%, p = 0.002). The number of nausea episodes and anti‐emetic use decreased with aprepitant use (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of nausea, length of stay, or postoperative CSF leak. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that aprepitant decreased the incidence of postoperative vomiting with odds ratio of 0.107. Conclusion: Aprepitant may serve as a useful preoperative treatment to reduce PONV in patients undergoing TSA. Further studies are needed to evaluate its impact in other arenas of endoscopic skull base surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In present, there was no detailed report on the formulation optimization and quality evaluation of aprepitant (APT) injectable lipid emulsion (APT-IE). The aim of the present investigation was to prepare and evaluate its properties of APT-IE loaded with an APT phospholipid complex (APT-PC) in vitro and in vivo. APT-PC was obtained by solvent evaporation with APT and phospholipids, then analyzed by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Lipid emulsions are a new formulation that can reduce side effects and improve drug loading. APT-IE prepared by High-pressure homogenization and optimized by response surface methodology (RSM). The proportion of sodium oleate, poloxamer 188 and soybean oil were selected as variables for the optimization. The optimal formulation of ATP-IE had the following characteristics: particle size, 82.83 ± 1.89 nm; polydispersity index, 0.243 ± 0.008; zeta potential, −59.0 ± 2.54 mV; encapsulation efficiency, 98.84%±1.43%; drug loading, 7.08 ± 0.16 mg/mL; and osmotic pressure, 301 ± 2.15 mOsmol/kg. Transmission electron microscopy images indicated that the particle diameter of APT-IE was approximately 100 nm, with a morphology of spheroidal or spherical. APT-IE exhibited sufficient stability after storage at 4 ± 2 °C for more than 6 months. The results of the pharmacokinetic study demonstrated that APT-IE had the advantages of better safety, higher bioavailability, and obvious liver targeting than APT solution (APT-SL). The area under the curve (AUC) of APT-IE was 3-fold enhanced compared with APT-SL. The targeted enhancement multiple of APT-IE to liver tissue was greater than that of APT-SL. These results suggested that APT-IE has broad clinical application and industrial production potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article's objective is to present the latest evidence and information on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). PONV continues to affect 30% of the surgical population causing patient dissatisfaction, extending length of stay, and increasing overall costs. This review includes the introduction of 2 new intravenous formulations of antiemetics (amisulpride, aprepitant), updates on nontraditional therapies, suggestions for combination prophylaxis, emerging data on rescue treatment, and considerations for special populations and settings. Both of the new antiemetics provide promising options for pharmacologic interventions for PONV with favorable safety profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Numerous molecules have been introduced to participate in the formation of breast cancer, the most common malignancy in women. Among them, neuropeptide substance P (SP) and its related receptor neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) have attracted unprecedented attention in tumorigenesis processes. In this study, we investigated the effect of the SP/NK1R pathway on the induction of oxidative stress in breast cancer and examine the therapeutic potential of NK1R inhibition in this malignancy. Methods: MCF-7 cells were treated with varying concentrations of SP and aprepitant, an FDA-approved NK1R antagonist, either as a single drug or in a combined modality. Resazurin assay was used to evaluate the anti-cancer ability of aprepitant. The alteration in the intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and gene expression were determined using ROS assay and the qRT-PCR analysis, respectively. Results: The stimulation of the SP/NK1R axis in the MCF-7 cells was coupled with the accumulation of ROS as well as upregulation of NF-κB and its related pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-6. In contrast, the suppression of NK1R by aprepitant halted the viability of MCF-7 cells, at least partly due to p53-mediated upregulation of p21. Moreover, aprepitant attenuated the oncogenic properties of SP by preventing the oxidative property of this neuropeptide. Conclusion: Overall, our results suggest that the SP/NK1R pathway might play a critical role in breast cancer pathogenesis, probably through inducing ROS/NF-κB-mediated inflammatory responses. Moreover, it seems that blockage of the axis has promising therapeutic value against breast cancer cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prostate cancer is the second prevalent cancer in men. While the anti-cancer effect of Hesperidin and (Aprepitant) AP on prostate cancer cells is well documented, their combined effect and their mechanism of action are not fully investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the anti-cancer effects of Hesperidin and AP alone and in combination on prostate cancer cells. PC3 and LNCaP cell lines were treated with Hesperidin and AP alone and in combination. The Resazurin test was used for assessing cell viability. The ROS (reactive oxygen Species) level, P53, P21, Bcl-2, and Survivin gene expression were assessed. Also, a trypan blue assay was done. Hesperidin and AP reduced cell viability and increased apoptosis in PC3 and LNCaP cells. The ROS level reduced after treating the PC3 and LNCaP cells with AP with or without Hesperidin. P53 and P21 gene expression increased after treatment with Hesperidin with or without AP compared to the untreated group in the PC3 cell line. Bcl-2 and Survivin gene expression decreased with AP with or without Hesperidin in the PC3 and LNCaP cells. The current study showed the synergic anti-cancer effect of Hesperidin and AP in both PC3 and LNCaP cell lines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We recently developed a series of nalfurafine analogs (TK10, TK33, and TK35) that may serve as non-addictive candidate analgesics. These compounds are mixed-action agonists at the kappa and delta opioid receptors (KOR and DOR, respectively) and produce antinociception in a mouse warm-water tail-immersion test while failing to produce typical mu opioid receptor (MOR)-mediated side effects. The warm-water tail-immersion test is an assay of pain-stimulated behavior vulnerable to false-positive analgesic-like effects by drugs that produce motor impairment. Accordingly, this study evaluated TK10, TK33, and TK35 in a recently validated assay of pain-related behavioral depression in mice that are less vulnerable to false-positive effects. For comparison, we also evaluated the effects of the MOR agonist/analgesic hydrocodone (positive control), the neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist aprepitant (negative control), nalfurafine as a selective KOR agonist, SNC80 as a selective DOR agonist, and a nalfurafine/SNC80 mixture. Intraperitoneal injection of dilute lactic acid (IP lactic acid) served as a noxious stimulus to depress vertical and horizontal locomotor activity in male and female ICR mice. IP lactic acid-induced locomotor depression was alleviated by hydrocodone but not by aprepitant, nalfurafine, SNC80, the nalfurafine/SNC80 mixture, or the KOR/DOR agonists. These results suggest that caution is warranted in advancing mixed-action KOR/DOR agonists as candidate analgesics.

Abstract Introduction Non‐inferiority of NEPA (fixed combination of NK1 receptor antagonist (RA), netupitant, and 5‐HT3RA, palonosetron) versus an aprepitant regimen was previously shown in a pragmatic study in patients receiving anthracycline cyclophosphamide (AC) and non‐AC moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). In the MEC group a numerically higher complete response (CR: no emesis, no rescue) rate was seen for NEPA during the overall 0–120 h phase (NEPA 76.1% vs. 63.1% aprepitant). As NEPA exhibits long‐lasting efficacy, this study evaluated a prolonged period up to 144 h, beyond the traditional 120 h post‐chemotherapy. In this post‐hoc analysis we explore the comparative efficacy of NEPA versus the aprepitant regimen in the MEC group up to 144 h, while also assessing the impact of risk factors on CINV prevention. Methods This was a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, prospective study. Oral NEPA was administered as a single dose on day 1, while aprepitant was given on days 1–3 + ondansetron on day 1; all patients were to receive dexamethasone on days 1–4. Patients were chemotherapy‐naïve and receiving MEC, with a subset evaluation of those with a risk factor for developing CINV (i.e., female, male

Introduction: This study was performed to evaluate the degree of 3-day chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in children with cancer who received highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) to ascertain the efficacy of aprepitant single-dose on dayL 1 plus granisetron and dexamethasone (DEX). Methods: This clinical trial study was conducted on 120 patients in the age range of 5 to 18 years old who received chemotherapy. Patients were divided into two groups; Group A received aprepitant at 125 mg/kg on day 1 orally, followed by 80 mg/kg daily on days 2 and 3 and Group B received a single dose of aprepitant 125 mg/kg on day 1 orally and placebo on days 2 and 3. All groups received granisetron 3 mg/m2 on day 1 and DEX on days 1 to 3. The primary and secondary endpoints were to evaluate the proportion of patients with acute, delayed and overall CINV within each group. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups for vomiting, nausea or the use of rescue therapy. The number of patients without vomiting on day 1 was similar in both groups (96.5% vs. 98.3%, respectively; p = 0.848). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, a single dose of aprepitant 125 mg/kg was as effective as administering three doses of aprepitant on 3 days. Therefore, the use of a single dose of aprepitant in combination with other standard treatment regimens to prevent CINV in children who received HEC was safe and efficacious and can be beneficial.

AbstractIn present, there was no detailed report on the formulation optimization and quality evaluation of aprepitant (APT) injectable lipid emulsion (APT-IE). The aim of the present investigation was to prepare and evaluate its properties of APT-IE loaded with an APT phospholipid complex (APT-PC) in vitro and in vivo. APT-PC was obtained by solvent evaporation with APT and phospholipids, then analyzed by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Lipid emulsions are a new formulation that can reduce side effects and improve drug loading.APT-IE prepared by High-pressure homogenization and optimized by response surface methodology (RSM). The proportion of sodium oleate, poloxamer 188 and soybean oil were selected as variables for the optimization. The optimal formulation of ATP-IE had the following characteristics: particle size, 82.83 ± 1.89 nm; polydispersity index, 0.243 ± 0.008; zeta potential, −59.0 ± 2.54 mV; encapsulation efficiency, 98.84%±1.43%; drug loading, 7.08 ± 0.16 mg/mL; and osmotic pressure, 301 ± 2.15 mOsmol/kg. Transmission electron microscopy images indicated that the particle diameter of APT-IE was approximately 100 nm, with a morphology of spheroidal or spherical. APT-IE exhibited sufficient stability after storage at 4 ± 2 °C for more than 6 months. The results of the pharmacokinetic study demonstrated that APT-IE had the advantages of better safety, higher bioavailability, and obvious liver targeting than APT solution (APT-SL). The area under the curve (AUC) of APT-IE was 3-fold enhanced compared with APT-SL. The targeted enhancement multiple of APT-IE to liver tissue was greater than that of APT-SL. These results suggested that APT-IE has broad clinical application and industrial production potential.

Background: Nausea and vomiting the most common side effect of chemotherapy is perceived as a major adverse effect of the treatment. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is associated with a significant deterioration in quality of life, causing severe clinical conditions, such as electrolyte imbalances, dehydration, malnutrition and leading to treatment discontinuation. Fortunately, improvements in treatments for nausea and vomiting have been able to mitigate these adverse effects in most patients. This study aims to compare Olanzapine with Aprepitant in the prevention of CINV. Methods and Materials: The study was conducted in breast cancer patients attending the department of oncology at KR hospital. The patients who met inclusion criteria were randomized to one of these two antiemetic regimens. Group A: Aprepitant group. Group B: Olanzapine group Protocol therapy was continued with each chemotherapy cycle until discontinuation of the same regimen of chemotherapy. Patients were permitted to take rescue therapy of the treating investigator's choice for nausea and/or vomiting based on clinical circumstances. Patients were asked to record daily episodes of vomiting (number and time) and the utilization of rescue therapy. Patients were contacted telephonically to remind them to complete the forms. Results: CR for vomiting in the acute period was 91.8% and 90.4% (p=0.730); for the delayed period 67.2% and 83.3% (p=0.040); for the overall period 62.3% and 81.7% (p=0.018) for the Olanzapine and Aprepitant arm respectively. Conclusion: This study shows that Olanzapine is better than Aprepitant in terms of prevention of nausea. While Aprepitant is good in the prevention of vomiting. Hence combination of both Olanzapine and Aprepitant would mitigate both nausea and vomiting in a better way. Combination of these two agents needs to be studied in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The substance P (SP)/neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) system is involved in cancer progression. NK-1R, activated by SP, promotes tumor cell proliferation and migration, angiogenesis, the Warburg effect, and the prevention of apoptosis. Tumor cells overexpress NK-1R, which influences their viability. A typical specific anticancer strategy using NK-1R antagonists, irrespective of the tumor type, is possible because these antagonists block all the effects mentioned above mediated by SP on cancer cells. This review will update the information regarding using NK-1R antagonists, particularly Aprepitant, as an anticancer drug. Aprepitant shows a broad-spectrum anticancer effect against many tumor types. Aprepitant alone or in combination therapy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy could reduce the sequelae and increase the cure rate and quality of life of patients with cancer. Current data open the door to new cancer research aimed at antitumor therapeutic strategies using Aprepitant. To achieve this goal, reprofiling the antiemetic Aprepitant as an anticancer drug is urgently needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Post operative nausea and vomiting is one of the commonest and unpleasant complications encountered and often cause delay in the discharge of patients. It is often associated with complications like dehydration, haematoma formation, wound dehiscence resulting in prolonged hospital stay. This study aimed to compare the effect of aprepitant and ramosetron, for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients after intra-abdominal surgeries. Materials and methods: This randomised double blinded study included patients who underwent intraabdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups, group A and B(22 patients in each group) receiving oral aprepitant(80mg) and single dose of intravenous ramosetron(0.3mg) respectively. Incidence and extent of nausea and vomiting, use of rescue antiemetics and number of post operative nausea and vomiting episodes in both the drug groups were assessed at 12,24 and 48 hours after the operation. Results: In patients receiving aprepitant(Group A) incidence and severity of post operative nausea and vomiting were found to be comparable to the same in the patients receiving ramosetron(Group B) in 12th, 24th and 48th post operative hours. Conclusion: It was found that Aprepitant and Ramosetron had comparable efficacy in preventing PONV upto 48 hrs post operatively in patients having abdominal surgeries under general anaesthesia, as well as in aspects of causing adverse effects. Number of patients who experienced nausea and vomiting postoperatively were less in the Group A population(Aprepitant group) compared to the patients in Group B(Ramosetron group). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer is one of the disorders that causes the most fatalities in modern times and is responsible for a significant number of deaths each year. The accurate administration of this disease has been hampered by a variety of factors including variances in the disease found in various regions of the globe. Several medications, in addition to diagnostic procedures, have evolved as a result of advancements in scientific research in order to treat certain cancers and have contributed to the cure of this disease to some degree. The study of the medical repercussions of cancer remains an intriguing and important subject of interest even after all the efforts that have been accomplished over a long period of scientific research. The purpose of this work was to contribute to the advancement of such fundamental scientific research by describing the attribution of unique modes of vibration of the antiemetic aprepitant as well as the anticancer medication capecitabine. Using standard FT-IR spectrum analysis and molecular docking techniques, the exact atomic-level mechanism of aprepitant and capecitabine is determined, by targeting the human NK1 substance P receptor (Human brain NK1 receptor) and thymidine phosphatase (cancer tissue) proteins. The quantum mechanical wavelength–energy relation was used to anticipate the associated energy intervals in order to assess the bioactivity of the molecules and the transfer of charge between HOMO and LUMO orbitals. Molecular docking investigations of aprepitant and capecitabine with the NK1 receptor and the thymidine phosphorylase proteins have been determined, respectively. The root mean square deviation and binding energy, as well as the types of bonds formed and the exact pathway taken by the anticancer medications in their interaction with the receptor, are established. This knowledge may be used to improve the mechanism of action, efficacy, and effectiveness of NK1 receptor antagonist drugs and anticancer medication, as well as to design innovative anticancer agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Substance P is a peptide from the tachykinin family, which is found in peripheral and central nervous systems, causing vasodilation and increased secretion in the nasal mucosa. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the experimental model of allergic rhinitis will cause allergic changes in the larynx and to compare the effects of aprepitant, a substance P antagonist, on nasal symptoms in allergic rhinitis, and histopathological changes in the nasal and laryngeal mucosa with antihistamine and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA). Study Design: An experimental animal study. Method: The study was carried out on 34 healthy 8–12 weeks old female Sprague Dawley rats in 5 groups. The rats in which an experimental allergic rhinitis model was created with ovalbumin were scored by observing their nasal symptoms, and nasal and laryngeal mucous membranes included in the study were evaluated histopathologically after medications. Results: As a result of the analysis of the data obtained from the study, antihistamine and LTRA significantly reduced the symptoms of nose scratching and sneezing, while aprepitant did not affect nasal symptoms. In the histopathological examination of the larynx, effects that would make a significant difference were found in the allergy group when compared to the control group. On the larynx, aprepitant reduced pseudostratification significantly compared to the allergy group. Conclusion: Aprepitant provides histopathological changes in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, but does not have sufficient effect on nasal symptoms. The effect of aprepitant on the larynx has not been clearly demonstrated. Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 133:2891–2897, 2023 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Aprepitant, as a neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R) antagonist, originally applied for curing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, has been reported to have significant antitumor effect on several malignant tumors. However, the effect of aprepitant on gallbladder cancer (GBC) is not clear yet. This study aimed to investigate the anti-tumor activity of aprepitant on GBC and the potential mechanisms. Methods The NK-1R expression of gallbladder cancer cells were examined by immunofluorescence. MTT assay, wound healing and transwell migration assay were applied to detect the effect of aprepitant on cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Flow cytometry was used to detect the apoptosis rate. The effects of aprepitant on the expressions of cytokine were examined by real-time quantitative PCR and MAPK activation were detected via immunofluorescence and western blotting. Besides, xenograft model was established to investigate the effect of aprepitant in vivo. Results Our results indicated that NK‐1R was markedly expressed in gallbladder cancer cells and aprepitant effectively inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion. Furthermore, the apoptosis, ROS and inflammation response were significantly boosted by aprepitant in GBC. Aprepitant induced NF‐κB p65 nuclear translocationin and increased the expressions of p-P65, p-Akt, p-JNK, p-ERK and p-P38, as well as the mRNA levels of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α. Consistently, aprepitant suppressed the growth of GBC in xenograft mice model. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that aprepitant could inhibit the development of gallbladder cancer via inducing ROS and MAPK activation, which suggested that aprepitant may become a promising therapeutic drug against GBC.

The management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in children remains challenging due to differences in the chemotherapy regimens, their relative emetogenicity compared to that in adults and differences in drug metabolism and the available formulations. The common four classes of anti-emetics used for the treatment and prophylaxis of CINV in children include dexamethasone, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (5HT3RAs), and olanzapine. The appropriate dose of dexamethasone for CINV prophylaxis in children is unknown, with a significant variability in dosage ranging between 6 and 32 mg/m2/day. The dose of dexamethasone is decreased by 30% when this drug is combined with (fos)aprepitant in children, in contrast to a decrease of 50% required in adults. The use of aprepitant in younger children (

IntroductionFor patients undergoing cardiac surgery and catheterization procedures, severe post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) can occur despite standard anti-emetic interventions. Aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor blocker, is safe and effective at preventing PONV resistant to standard therapies.MethodsPatients with a history of severe PONV presenting for cardiac surgery or catheterization procedures from January 1, 2018 to January 6, 2021 were identified. After pharmacist approval, patients received aprepitant pre-operatively (Dose: 80 mg for weight >50 kg, 40 mg for weight 30–50 kg). A retrospective chart review was performed. Primary outcomes of the incidence of PONV and PONV-related complications were evaluated.ResultsSeventeen patients were included with a mean age of 16.0 years at the time of their initial procedure, which acted as the “control” procedure, and 17.5 years when they received aprepitant. After the control procedure 64.7% of patients required rescue anti-emetics. When this group of patients received aprepitant pre-operatively at their subsequent procedure, only 17.6% required rescue medication (p = 0.005). Similarly, 64.7% of patients suffered at least one PONV-related complication after the control procedure. With aprepitant use pre-operatively, 5.9% of the same patients experienced a PONV-complication (p = 0.0003). Specifically, unplanned ICU admission due to severe PONV after catheterization procedures decreased from 55.6% (5/9) in the control group to 0 after these patients were treated pre-emptively with aprepitant (p = 0.01). For surgical patients, there were significant decreases in PONV-related complications including delayed oral intake and delayed ambulation (p = 0.04) in the aprepitant group compared to the control group.DiscussionThis small, retrospective study supports the conclusion that preoperative aprepitant administration in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization or cardiac surgery with a history of congenital heart disease and severe PONV significantly reduces the incidence of PONV and PONV-related complications. Decreasing these complications will likely improve the surgical experience for patients and families while also decreasing hospital costs and improving efficiency.

Purpose: Exosomes are membrane-derived nano-vesicles upregulated in pathological conditions like cancer. Therefore, inhibiting their release is a potential strategy for the development of more efficient combination therapies. Neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2) is a key component in exosome release; however, a clinically safe yet efficient nSMase2 inhibitor remains to be used discovered. Accordingly, we made an effort to identify potential nSMase2 inhibitor(s) among the approved drugs. Methods: Virtual screening was performed and aprepitant was selected for further investigation. To evaluate the reliability of the complex, molecular dynamics were performed. Finally, using the CCK-8 assay in HCT116 cells, the highest non-toxic concentrations of aprepitant were identified and the nSMase2 activity assay was performed to measure the inhibitory activity of aprepitant, in vitro. Results: To validate the screening results, molecular docking was performed, and the retrieved scores were in line with the screening results. The root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) plot of aprepitant–nSMase2 showed proper convergence. Following treatment with different concentrations of aprepitant in both cell-free and cell-dependent assays, nSMase2 activity was remarkably decreased. Conclusion: Aprepitant, at a concentration as low as 15 µM, was able to inhibit nSmase2 activity in HCT116 cells without any significant effects on their viability. Aprepitant is therefore suggested to be a potentially safe exosome release inhibitor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]