Search

Objective: To investigate the developmental defects caused by knockdown of best1 gene in zebrafish as a model for a subtype of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) malformation. Methods: Two antisense morpholinos (MOs) were designed targeting zebrafish best1 to block translation (ATG-MO) or to disrupt splicing (I3E4-MO). MOs were microinjected into fertilized one-cell embryos. Efficacy of splicing MO was confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Phenotypes were analyzed and quantified by microscopy at multiple developmental stages. Neuronal outgrowth was assessed in transgenic zebrafish expressing green fluorescent protein in neurons. Skeletal ossification was visualized by Calcein staining. Results: Knockdown of best1 resulted in zebrafish embryos with shorter body length, curved axis, low survival rate, microcephaly, reduced eye size, smaller head and brain, impaired neuronal outgrowth, and reduced ossification of craniofacial and vertebral bone. Conclusion: Best1 gene plays critical roles in ophthalmologic, neurological and skeletal development in zebrafish. A patient with a premature stop codon in BEST1 gene exhibited similar phenotypes, implying a subtype of CVJ malformation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), caused by pathogenic variants of the BEST1 gene, has not been reported in association with cataracts and ocular malformations. We reported a case with a complex ocular phenotype comprising microphthalmia, microcornea, cataract, and vitelliform macular dystrophy. Case presentation A six-year-old girl manifested photophobia and a poor visual behavior. A thorough ophthalmic examination revealed the patient to have bilateral microphthalmia, microcornea, congenital cataract, and Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Whole exome sequencing (WES) identified one variant in the BEST1 and one variant in CRYBB2 genes: c.218 T > G p.(Ile73Arg) and c.479G > C p.(Arg160Pro). The first variant was inherited from the proband’s father, who was diagnosed with subclinical BVMD, while the second was a de novo variant. A minigene assay showed that c.218 T > G in BEST1 did not affect pre-mRNA splicing. Conclusions This case suggests that the complex ocular phenotype comprising BVMD and congenital cataract with microphthalmia cannot be explained by variation in one gene but is caused by variants in BEST1 and CRYBB2. This case highlights the importance of general clinical evaluation and comprehensive genetic testing for diagnosing complex eye diseases.

Background: Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), caused by pathogenic variants of the BEST1 gene, has not been reported in association with cataracts and ocular malformations. We reported a case with a complex ocular phenotype comprising microphthalmia, microcornea, cataract, and vitelliform macular dystrophy. Case presentation: A six-year-old girl manifested photophobia and a poor visual behavior. A thorough ophthalmic examination revealed the patient to have bilateral microphthalmia, microcornea, congenital cataract, and Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Whole exome sequencing (WES) identified one variant in the BEST1 and one variant in CRYBB2 genes: c.218 T > G p.(Ile73Arg) and c.479G > C p.(Arg160Pro). The first variant was inherited from the proband's father, who was diagnosed with subclinical BVMD, while the second was a de novo variant. A minigene assay showed that c.218 T > G in BEST1 did not affect pre-mRNA splicing. Conclusions: This case suggests that the complex ocular phenotype comprising BVMD and congenital cataract with microphthalmia cannot be explained by variation in one gene but is caused by variants in BEST1 and CRYBB2. This case highlights the importance of general clinical evaluation and comprehensive genetic testing for diagnosing complex eye diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report novel BEST1 variants in six Chinese families with bestrophinopathies of two different inheritance modes and analyze the intrafamilial phenotypic diversity. Method: A total of 25 participants including 13 patients and 12 healthy family members from 6 Chinese families with bestrophinopathies were available for genetic and clinical analysis. All of the patients were subjected to comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations and exome sequencing was performed on the probands to detect the causative variants. The pathogenicity of gene variants was predicted using silico analysis and evaluated according to ACMG guidelines. All (likely) pathogenic variants were determined by Sanger sequencing and co‐segregation analyses were performed on available family members. The relevant original literature previously reported was retrieved to explore the relationship between BEST1‐related gene variants and clinical features. Results: In the 6 families, 3 families (10 patients) were assigned as autosomal dominant bestrophinopathies (VMD) and 3 families (3 patients) were assigned as Autosomal recessive Bestrophinopathies (ARB). A total of 9 variants on the BEST1 gene were identified, containing 7 missense variants, 1 nonsense variant, and 1 frameshift variant, respectively, of which 3 variants c.88A > G (p.Lys30Glu), c.764G > A (p.Arg255Gln) and c.233dupT (p.Ser79Phefs*153) were novel variants. Three families with ARB were detected with heterozygous variants on the BEST1 gene.2 families (8 patients) with BVMD showed markedly irregular dominant inheritance, and the severity of macular lesions varies greatly among individuals of the same family. Among them, the probands showed typical vitelliform lesions in the macula, while the other six patients had no visible signs of the disease by fundus photography (ophthalmoscopy) and minor lesions could be detected on OCT in two patients, the continuity of the ellipsoidal band was interrupted with the chimeric band. The phenotypes of the patients in the three ARB families ranged from typical/atypical vitelliform lesions to extensive extramacular deposits (peripheral spots). Conclusion: This study provided evidence that the phenotype of BVMD manifested irregular dominant inheritance, with patients carrying a pathogenic heterozygous variant of BEST1 to develop obvious intrafamilial phenotypic diversity, and the patients who harbor two pathogenic alleles showed recessive inheritance bestrophinopathies with distinct phenotypic diversity. Our study also emphasized the importance of comprehensive genetic analysis in patients with bestrophinopathies, and in such challenging families with distinct intrafamilial phenotypic diversity, it shall provide novel insights into phenotypic assessments of bestrophinopathies, and contribute to better diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: To describe the clinical heterogeneity of patients with novel mutations in BEST1. METHODS: All the members in the two Chinese families underwent detailed clinical evaluations including best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, applanation tonometry, and dilated fundus examination. Fundus autofluorescence, fundus fluorescein angiography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, electrooculography, and electroretinogram were also performed. Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood for all the participants. The targeted next-generation sequencing of inherited retinal disease-associated genes was conducted to identify the causative mutation. RESULTS: A novel BEST1 missense mutation c.41T>C (p.Leu14Ser) was identified in Family 1. It was co-segregated with the phenotype of best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and bioinformatics analysis confirmed it was harmful. Another novel BEST1 frameshift mutation c.345_346insGGCAAGGACG (p.Glu119Glyfs*116) and a novel USH2A missense mutation c.12560G>A, p.Arg4187His were identified in family 2 with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), which might interact and lead to the phenotype of RP. CONCLUSION: Two novel mutations in the BEST1 gene in two unrelated families with distinct phenotypes and BEST1 mutation accompanied with USH2A mutation would result in RP, which could be enormously helpful in understanding the pathogenesis of the inherited retinal disease caused by a BEST1 mutation.

Abstract Purpose To report novel BEST1 variants in six Chinese families with bestrophinopathies of two different inheritance modes and analyze the intrafamilial phenotypic diversity. Method A total of 25 participants including 13 patients and 12 healthy family members from 6 Chinese families with bestrophinopathies were available for genetic and clinical analysis. All of the patients were subjected to comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations and exome sequencing was performed on the probands to detect the causative variants. The pathogenicity of gene variants was predicted using silico analysis and evaluated according to ACMG guidelines. All (likely) pathogenic variants were determined by Sanger sequencing and co‐segregation analyses were performed on available family members. The relevant original literature previously reported was retrieved to explore the relationship between BEST1‐related gene variants and clinical features. Results In the 6 families, 3 families (10 patients) were assigned as autosomal dominant bestrophinopathies (VMD) and 3 families (3 patients) were assigned as Autosomal recessive Bestrophinopathies (ARB). A total of 9 variants on the BEST1 gene were identified, containing 7 missense variants, 1 nonsense variant, and 1 frameshift variant, respectively, of which 3 variants c.88A > G (p.Lys30Glu), c.764G > A (p.Arg255Gln) and c.233dupT (p.Ser79Phefs*153) were novel variants. Three families with ARB were detected with heterozygous variants on the BEST1 gene.2 families (8 patients) with BVMD showed markedly irregular dominant inheritance, and the severity of macular lesions varies greatly among individuals of the same family. Among them, the probands showed typical vitelliform lesions in the macula, while the other six patients had no visible signs of the disease by fundus photography (ophthalmoscopy) and minor lesions could be detected on OCT in two patients, the continuity of the ellipsoidal band was interrupted with the chimeric band. The phenotypes of the patients in the three ARB families ranged from typical/atypical vitelliform lesions to extensive extramacular deposits (peripheral spots). Conclusion This study provided evidence that the phenotype of BVMD manifested irregular dominant inheritance, with patients carrying a pathogenic heterozygous variant of BEST1 to develop obvious intrafamilial phenotypic diversity, and the patients who harbor two pathogenic alleles showed recessive inheritance bestrophinopathies with distinct phenotypic diversity. Our study also emphasized the importance of comprehensive genetic analysis in patients with bestrophinopathies, and in such challenging families with distinct intrafamilial phenotypic diversity, it shall provide novel insights into phenotypic assessments of bestrophinopathies, and contribute to better diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment for these patients.

Purpose: To describe the phenotype and genotype of a patient with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) over a 13-year follow-up period. Methods: The phenotype of the subject was described after a complete ophthalmological examination, which included fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), electroretinogram (EOG), electroretinography (ERG), and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Genetic analyses were carried out by screening the variations via whole-exome sequencing. Results: This patient presented with retinoschisis and cystic changes when he was 7 years old and was diagnosed with X-linked retinoschisis. In the 13th year after the first presentation, enlarged macular cysts with retinoschisis, macular neovascularization (MNV), and subretinal fluid were displayed on OCT. Autofluorescence showed hyperfluorescence corresponding to the area of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) change. EOG showed no light peak, and the Arden ratio was less than 2.0. Whole-exome sequencing revealed compound heterozygous sequence variations (p. [Arg47Leu; Trp287*]) in the coding sequence of the BEST1 allele inherited from his parents. Thus, a diagnosis of ARB combined with secondary MNV was made. Conclusion: Patients with compound heterozygous BEST1 mutations developed ARB, which could show significant retinoschisis at a young age. Genetic analyses, autofluorescence, and EOG are essential to diagnose ARB correctly in consequence of considerable phenotypic variations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a rare subtype of bestrophinopathy caused by biallelic mutations of the BEST1 gene. ARB is characterized by multifocal subretinal deposits accompanied by macular edema or subretinal fluid, hyperopia, co-existing narrow angle, and a marked decrease in electrooculogram. However, little is known about the genetic variants and specific clinical features of ARB. This is an observational case series of patients with a clinical and genetic diagnosis of ARB who underwent multimodal imaging. We describe ten patients from nine unrelated families with six known variants and three novel missense variants: c.236C→T, p.(Ser79Phe); C.452C→T, p.(Leu151Pro); and c.650C→T, p.(Trp217Met). The most common variant was c.584C→T, p.(Ala195Val), observed in six patients, without correlation to the severity of the phenotype. All patients manifested bilateral multifocal subretinal deposits and subretinal fluid throughout the follow-up period, while intraretinal fluid was found in approximately half of the eyes. The extent or chronicity of the fluid collection did not correlate with visual acuity. Angle-closure glaucoma was present in five eyes. Three patients had a genetically confirmed family history of ARB, and one patient had a clinically suspected family history. This study reveals novel mutations in the BEST1 gene and adds to the spectrum of clinical presentations of ARB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Current Retina Journal / Güncel Retina Dergisi is the property of Anadolu Kitabevi Basim Yayim Medikal Turizm Kirtasiye Tic. Ltd. Sti. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) is a slowly progressive macular disease caused by a pathogenic variant of the Bestrophin (BEST1) gene. Examination coupled with multimodal imaging and genetic testing are used to guide diagnosis and treatment. A 12-year-old girl was examined for decreased vision in the left eye and showed bilateral "egg-yolk"–like macular lesions with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the left eye. Six months later, she experienced decreased vision with appearance of CNV on optical coherence tomography angiography in the right eye. Injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor helped restore vision from 20/125 to 20/20 in the right eye with stabilization of her left eye (vision 20/40). Genetic testing revealed c.851A > G (p.Tyr284Cys), a heterozygous variant of the BEST1 gene. The same variant was found in her father, who was initially misdiagnosed with toxoplasmosis due to a peripheral retinal lesion in the left eye. This is the first report of bilateral consecutive CNV secondary to BVMD. Additionally, it highlights the likely pathogenic role of a novel variant of the BEST1 gene. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To report an adult with autosomal recessive Best vitelliform macular dystrophy with a new homozygous BEST1 mutation, the management of a cystoid macular edema with intravitreal aflibercept in the proband, and the findings in the parents, carriers of heterozygous BEST1 mutations. A 28-year-old female presented with blurry andreduced vision in her both eyes with bilateral vitelliform macular lesions. The patient's parents were also examined. Examinations included electrooculogram (EOGs), imaging studies, and BEST1 gene testing. Interventions included treatment with intravitreal aflibercept for both eyes. The patient presented with visual acuity of 20/20 OD 20/30 OS, RPE changes, multifocal subretinal yellowish deposits resembling vitelliform deposits and subretinal fluids. Cystoid macular edema developed after one month, causing vision reduction (20/28 OD 20/30 OS). Visual acuity recovered to 20/20 OU after serial intravitreal aflibercept injections. The proband showed subnormal EOG Arden ratios. Molecular testing showed the homozygous missense variant c.695T>G p. (IIe232Ser) In exon 6 of the BEST1 mutations and to the best of our knowledge, this variant, which was confirmed by conventional Sanger sequencing, has neither been annotated in databases nor been described in the literature so for (Human Genome Molecular Database 2018.1). In the heterozygous parents, EOGs were subnormal, and minimal autofluorescence changes were seen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Best disease (BD), also known as vitelliform macular dystrophy, is an inherited disease of the central retina caused by more than 300 pathogenic variants in the BEST1 gene. The phenotype of BD is variable, and there are just a few reports on the histopathology of eyes from donors with BD. Here, we describe the histopathological comparison of donor’s eyes from two patients with BD. Eyes obtained from 85-year-old (donor 1) and 65-year-old (donor 2) donors were fixed within 25 h postmortem. Perifoveal and peripheral retinal regions were processed for histology and immunocytochemistry using retinal-specific and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-specific antibodies. Three age-matched normal eyes were used as controls. DNA was obtained from donor blood samples. Sequence analysis of the entire BEST1 coding region was performed and identified a c.886A > C (p.Asn296His) variant in donor 1 and a c.602T > C (p.Ile201Thr) variant in donor 2; both mutations were heterozygous. Fundus examination showed that donor 1 displayed a macular lesion with considerable scarring while donor 2 displayed close to normal macular morphology. Our studies of histology and molecular pathology in the perifovea and periphery of these two BD donor eyes revealed panretinal abnormalities in both photoreceptors and RPE cellular levels in the periphery; donor 1 also displayed macular lesion. Our findings confirm the phenotypic variability of BD associated with BEST1 variants.

Purpose: We describe the long-term follow-up of a patient with multifocal Best disease with chronic bilateral serous macular detachment and unusual peripheral findings associated with a novel mutation in the BEST1 gene. Methods: Case report. Results: A 59-year-old white woman was referred for an evaluation of her macular findings in 1992. There was a family history of Best disease in the patient’s mother and a male sibling. Her medical history was unremarkable. Best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in her right eye and 20/25 in her left eye. The anterior segment examination was normal in both eyes. Funduscopic examination showed multifocal hyperautofluorescent vitelliform deposits with areas of subretinal fibrosis in both eyes. An electrooculogram showed Arden ratios of 1.32 in the right eye and 1.97 in the left eye. Ultra-widefield color and fundus autofluorescence imaging showed degenerative retinal changes in areas throughout the entire fundus in both eyes. Optical coherence tomography, including annual eye-tracked scans from 2005 to 2016, showed persistent bilateral serous macular detachments. Despite chronic foveal detachment, visual acuity was 20/25 in her right eye and 20/40 in her left eye, 24 years after initial presentation. Genetic testing showed a novel c.238T.A (p.Phe80Ile) missense mutation in the BEST1 gene. Conclusion: Some patients with Best disease associated with chronic serous macular detachment can maintain good visual acuity over an extended follow-up. To our knowledge, this is the first report of Best disease associated with this mutation in the BEST1 gene. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe the genetic and clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). Methods: This study presents a retrospective observational case series. Twenty‐one ARB patients and 25 clinically healthy family members were recruited. The coding regions and adjacent intronic regions of BEST1 were analysed via Sanger sequencing. Clinical examinations, including ultrasound biomicroscopy, A‐scan, optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and visual electrophysiology, were reviewed. Results: Six novel mutations (c.380C>T, p.T127M; c.397A>G, p.N133D; c.500A>G, p.E167G; c.817G>A, p.V273M; c.174_176del, p.Q58del; and c.950_955del, p.S318_L319) and 8 previously reported mutations were identified. The p.R255W mutation had the highest frequency in our cohort. Twenty patients had serous retinal detachment with multifocal subretinal vitelliform deposits in the posterior poles. One patient exhibited chorioretinal atrophy. FFA revealed peripheral vascular leakage in 10 patients, and ICGA revealed hyperfluorescent spots in 8 patients. Visual electrophysiology was abnormal in all patients. Fifteen patients with angle closure (AC) or angle‐closure glaucoma (ACG) had shallower anterior chambers and shorter axial lengths than the patients with open angle, contributing to their risk of developing AC/ACG. One patient developed AC during the 7‐year follow‐up period. The misdiagnosis and missed rates were 35.3% and 58.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The six novel mutations and high frequency of p.R255W suggest ethnical differences in the BEST1 mutation spectrum among Chinese patients. BEST1 gene screening and detailed clinical examinations help establishing a diagnosis of ARB. Clinical evaluations of the risk of developing AC/ACG are recommended for ARB patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe the multimodal imaging findings observed unilaterally in a patient with Best disease due to a p.G15D mutation in the BEST1 gene. Methods: The clinical history of a 62-year-old female patient with unilateral Best disease was reviewed. Retinal findings were documented by clinical examination and multimodal imaging. Results: Posterior segment examination of the patient's right eye demonstrated retinal pigment epithelium hypopigmentation and clumping in the central macula beneath a chronic shallow serous retinal detachment (SRD), confirmed by optical coherence tomography. Fluorescein angiography showed central staining with no evidence of focal leakage or choroidal neovascularization, and correlated with the hypoautofluorescence seen on fundus autofluorescence. There was no evidence of choroidal hyperpermeability on indocyanine green angiography, nor was there any neovascularization detected on optical coherence tomography-angiography. The left eye appeared normal with all imaging modalities. Conclusion: Best disease is an autosomal dominant disease that is generally bilateral. We present a case of a unilateral Best disease with serous retinal detachment in a patient with a p.G15D mutation in BEST1. Best disease should be considered in the differential diagnosis of serous retinal detachment and may masquerade as central serous chorioretinopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To determine the spectrum of BEST1 mutations and to study the phenotype in Slovenian families with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy ( BVMD) to identify genotype-phenotype correlations. Methods Twenty patients from five families underwent the ophthalmological examination including electrooculogram ( EOG; N = 17), fundus autofluorescence imaging ( N = 16) and optical coherence tomography ( N = 14). Mutational screening was performed by direct DNA sequencing of the BEST1 gene. Results Mutation c.43G>C (p.Gly15Arg) was detected in three patients from family M presenting with different clinical stages of Best disease. Mutation c.313G>C (p.Arg105Gly) was found in families K, ST, S, B and was associated with incomplete clinical penetrance and variable retinal changes, including extramacular and multifocal lesions. In three patients from family K, an atypical form of BVMD was observed; there were additional peripheral lesions outside of the vascular arcades in addition to the typical macular lesions. Multiple alterations between the vitelliruptive and pseudohypopyon stages over a period of 11 years were seen in one patient. Conclusion Two previously unreported disease-associated variants in the BEST1 gene (p.Gly15Arg and p.Arg105Gly) were found in Slovenian patients with Best disease. Our data expand the mutation spectrum of the BEST1 gene and further support the broad phenotypic variability observed clinically and with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and AF imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Abnormalities in the BEST1 gene have recently been recognised as causing autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). ARB has been noted to have a variable phenotypic presentation, distinct from that of autosomal dominant Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Both conditions are associated with deposits in the retina, a reduced or absent electro-oculography (EOG) light rise, and the risk of developing angle-closure glaucoma. Herein, we describe the clinical and genetic characteristics of a young male diagnosed with ARB associated with angle-closure glaucoma resulting from a novel homozygous mutation in BEST1. Methods: All research involved in this case adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The proband underwent slitlamp examination, retinal autofluorescence imaging and optical coherence tomography after presenting with deteriorating vision. The findings prompted genetic testing with bi-directional DNA sequencing of coding and flanking intronic regions of BEST1. The proband's family members were subsequently screened. Results: A provisional diagnosis of ARB was made based on the findings of subretinal and schitic lesions on fundoscopy and retinal imaging, together with abnormal EOG and electroretinography. Genetic testing identified a novel homozygous mutation in BEST1, c.636+1 G>A. Family members were found to carry one copy of the mutation and had no clinical or electrophysiological evidence of disease. The proband was additionally diagnosed with angle-closure glaucoma requiring topical therapy, peripheral iridotomies and phacoemulsification. Conclusions: Phenotypic overlap, reduced penetrance, variable expressivity and the ongoing discovery of new forms of bestrophinopathies add to the difficulty in distinguishing these retinal diseases. All patients diagnosed with ARB or BVMD should be examined for narrow angles and glaucoma, given their frequent association with these conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe the phenotype and genotype of patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. Methodology: The phenotype of the subjects was described after a complete ophthalmological examination, and in various cases, ancillary testing of the visual field, optical coherent tomography, full field electroretinography and electrophysiology. Genetic analysis was carried out by screening the Bestrophin-1 ( BEST1) gene for mutations by dideoxy sequencing and segregation analysis. Results: We identified three previously described mutations (Ala195Val, Leu191Pro and Arg141His) and two potentially pathogenic changes (Trp93Pro and Trp287Ter) in the Best-1 gene. Two patients carried compound heterozygous mutations, Trp93Pro/Ala195Val, and Leu191Pro/Trp287Ter. Two sisters were homozygous for an Arg141His mutation. All individuals with Best1 gene mutations had signs of maculopathy. Conclusions: Our observations expand the limited number of phenotypes associated with mutations in the Best1 gene. Patients with compound heteroyzygous Best1 mutations developed atypical forms of Best disease. Two siblings with homozygous Arg141His mutation developed symptoms of typical Best vitelliform dystrophy while their parents had clinical features of mild maculopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: It was the aim of this study to report on a patient in whom a novel mutation in the BEST1 gene was responsible for unilateral vitelliform phenotype in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). Methods: An 8-year-old young girl (proband) with unilateral vitelliform phenotype underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination at baseline (time of diagnosis) and 2 years later. Genomic DNA was extracted to look for BEST1 gene mutations in the patient and her parents. Results: Fundus autofluorescence imaging and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography showed unchanged findings in the right eye over the 2-year follow-up period. Conversely, both fundus autofluorescence imaging and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography showed a partial reabsorption of the hyper-autofluorescent/hyper-reflective subretinal material in the left macula over the 2-year follow-up period. On BEST1 gene analysis, the patient presented a novel mutation c.535_537delAAC (p.Asn179del) in homozygous condition; interestingly, despite the absence of parents' consanguinity, both the father and mother showed the same novel mutation in heterozygous condition. Conclusion: This case of unilateral vitelliform phenotype further supports the notion that ARB represents a disease spectrum in terms of severity, age at onset and heritability. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To present the clinical and electrophysiological findings in four members of a family with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and angle-closure glaucoma (ACG). Methods: Four members of a family with BVMD were examined clinically, including visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, biomicroscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry and gonioscopy. Measurements of the anterior chamber depth and axial length, visual field, optical coherence tomography, full-field electroretinography, multifocal electroretinography and electrooculography were performed. In addition molecular genetic analysis of the bestrophin-1 gene ( BEST1), the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor gene ( MITF) and the cone-rod homeobox gene ( CRX) were performed. Results: Four family members with the c.253T>C p.Y85H mutation in the BEST1 gene and BVMD in different stages also exhibited anterior segment abnormalities such as shallow anterior chambers (two cases), and reduced axial lengths in all cases. Microphthalmos (axial length ≤ 20mm) was found in the index patient and in her son. Hyperopia was found in all four examined patients. Closed angles/narrow angles were observed in patients with microphthalmos. The index patient developed ACG at the age of 12 years. Her son inherited microphthalmos, severe hyperopia, and narrow angles. He is at risk of developing ACG. No pathogenic mutation of the MITF or the CRX genes was detected in the index patient. Conclusions: BVMD could be associated with anterior segment abnormalities such as shallow anterior chambers, closed/narrow anterior chamber angles and ACG. Ophthalmologists should be aware of the association between ACG and BVMD. Examination of the anterior segment, gonioscopy and intraocular pressure control are recommended in patients with BVMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe the genotype and phenotype in a 9-year-old boy with bilateral retinopathy. Methods: The patient, his healthy (by history) nonconsanguineous parents and his sister were examined by best-corrected visual acuity, matrix frequency doubling technology, monocular static field analysis, fundus autofluorescence imaging, optical coherence tomography, Ganzfeld electroretinography (ERG), pattern ERG, multifocal ERG, electro-oculography and genotyping of the BEST1 gene. Results: The patient presented with an Arden ratio of 1.25, an unremarkable ERG and fluorescent yellow deposits distributed throughout the fundus suggestive of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). Genotyping revealed a homozygous nonsense mutation in BEST1 (p.R200X). The parents and the sister, who were heterozygous mutation carriers, presented with normal ophthalmological function. Conclusions: ARB is a rare retinal disorder. We contribute a novel patient report indicative of ARB, assessed by clinical examination and confirmed by genotyping of BEST1, to the short list of ARB cases in the literature. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]