1. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of fatty liver: prospective study with same-day biopsy used as the reference standard.
- Author
-
Kim DY, Park SH, Lee SS, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Kim MY, Lee Y, Kim TK, Khalili K, Bae MH, Lee JY, Lee SG, Yu ES, Kim, Dae Yoon, Park, Seong Ho, Lee, Seung Soo, Kim, Hye Jin, Kim, So Yeon, Kim, Min-Young, and Lee, Yedaun
- Abstract
Purpose: The study purpose was to prospectively determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT in diagnosing fatty liver using same-day biopsy as the reference standard.Materials and Methods: One hundred seventy-nine potential living liver donors underwent unenhanced and portal-phase contrast-enhanced hepatic CT and subsequent liver biopsy on the same day. Attenuation difference between the liver and the spleen on unenhanced (( pre ) L-S) and contrast-enhanced (( post ) L-S) images and blood-subtracted hepatic attenuation on contrast-enhanced images (( post ) L-B), calculated by [L - 0.3 x (0.75 x P + 0.25 x A)]/0.7 where L, P and A represent the attenuation of the liver, main portal vein and abdominal aorta, respectively, were obtained. The accuracy of these indices in diagnosing fatty liver according to various threshold levels, 5%-30% histological steatosis in increments of 5%, was compared using ROC analysis.Results: The area under the ROC curve for ( pre ) L-S, ( post ) L-S and ( post ) L-B was 0.663-0.918, 0.712-0.847 and 0.821-0.923, respectively, depending on the threshold levels of hepatic steatosis. The accuracy of ( pre ) L-S and ( post ) L-S did not differ (P >or= 0.054), despite a trend towards a lower accuracy with ( post ) L-S. ( post ) L-B yielded higher accuracy than ( pre ) L-S at threshold levels of 5% and 10% (Por= 0.144). Conclusion: Portal-phase contrast-enhanced CT has a similar, or even greater, accuracy than unenhanced CT in diagnosing fatty liver. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF