Search

Organ transplantation remains the treatment of last resort in case of failure of a vital organ (lung, liver, heart, intestine) or non-vital organ (essentially the kidney and pancreas) for which supplementary treatments exist. It remains the best alternative both in terms of quality-of-life and life expectancy for patients and of public health expenditure. Unfortunately, organ shortage remains a widespread issue, as on average only about 25% of patients waiting for an organ are transplanted each year. This situation has led to the consideration of recent donor populations (deceased by brain death with extended criteria or deceased after circulatory arrest). These organs are sensitive to the conditions of conservation during the ischemia phase, which have an impact on the graft's short- and long-term fate. This evolution necessitates a more adapted management of organ donation and the optimization of preservation conditions. In this general review, the different aspects of preservation will be considered. Initially done by hypothermia with the help of specific solutions, preservation is evolving with oxygenated perfusion, in hypothermia or normothermia, aiming at maintaining tissue metabolism. Preservation time is also becoming a unique evaluation window to predict organ quality, allowing repair and/or optimization of recipient choice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Transition care programmes are designed to improve coordination of care between hospital and home. For heart failure patients, meta‐analyses show a high efficacy but with moderate evidence level. Moreover, difficulties for implementation of such programmes limit their extrapolation. Methods and results: We designed a mixed‐method study to assess the implementation of the PRADO‐IC, a nationwide transition programme that aims to be offered to every patient with heart failure in France. This programme consists essentially in an administrative assistance to schedule follow‐up visits and in a nurse follow‐up during 2 to 6 months and aims to reduce the annual heart failure readmission rate by 30%. This study assessed three quantitative aims: the cost to avoid a readmission for heart failure within 1 year (primary aim, intended sample size 404 patients), clinical care pathways, and system economic outcomes; and two qualitative aims: perceived problems and benefits of the PRADO‐IC. All analyses will be gathered at the end of study for a joint interpretation. Strengths of this study design are the randomized controlled design, the population included in six centres with low motivation bias, the primary efficiency analysis, the secondary efficacy analyses on care pathway and clinical outcomes, and the joint qualitative analysis. Limits are the heterogeneity of centres and of intervention in a control group and parallel development of other new therapeutic interventions in this field. Conclusions: The results of this study may help decision‐makers to support an administratively managed transition programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Inflammation and cardiac remodelling are common and synergistic pathways in heart failure (HF). Emerging biomarkers such as soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15), which are linked to inflammation and fibrosis process, have been proposed as prognosis factors. However, their potential additive values remain poorly investigated. Methods and results: Here, we aimed at evaluating inflammatory and remodelling biomarkers to predict both short‐term and long‐term mortality in a population with chronic HF in comparison with other classical clinical or biological markers (i.e. N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, hs‐cTnT, C‐reactive protein) alone or using meta‐analysis global group in chronic HF risk score in a cohort of 182 patients followed during 80 months (interquartile range: 12.3–90.0). Proportional hazard assumption does not hold for sST2 and C‐reactive protein, and follow‐up was split into short term (less than 1 year), midterm (between 1 and 5 years), and long term (after 5 years). In univariate analysis, C‐reactive protein and sST2 were predictive of short‐term mortality but not of middle term and long term whereas GDF‐15 was predictive of short and mid‐term but not of long‐term mortality. In a multivariate model after adjustment for meta‐analysis global group in chronic HF score including the three markers, only sST2 was predictive of short‐term mortality (P = 0.0225), and only GDF‐15 was predictive of middle term mortality (P = 0.0375). None of the markers was predictive of long‐term mortality. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that both sST2 and GDF‐15 significantly improve the prognosis evaluation of HF patients and suggest that the value of GDF‐15 is more sustained overtime and could predict middle term events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Biomarkers are not recommended until now to guide the management of patients with heart failure (HF). Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) appears as a promising biomarker. The current study considered pre‐discharged sST2 values as a guide for medical management in patients admitted for acute HF decompensation, in an attempt to reduce hospital readmission. Methods and results: STADE‐HF was a blinded prospective randomized controlled trial and included 123 patients admitted for acute HF. They were randomized into the usual treatment group (unknown sST2 level) or the interventional treatment group, for whom sST2 level was known and used on Day 4 of hospitalization to guide the treatment. The primary endpoint was the readmission rate for any cause at 1 month. It occurred in 10 patients (19%) in the usual group and 18 (32%) in the sST2 group without statistical difference (P = 0.11). Post hoc analysis in the whole group shows that the mean duration of hospitalization was lower in patients with low sST2 (<37 ng/mL) at admission vs. high sST2 (8.5 ± 9.5 vs. 14.8 ± 14.9 days, respectively, P = 0.003). In addition, a decrease in sST2 greater than 18% is significantly associated with a lower readmission rate. Conclusions: Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2‐guided therapy over a short period of time does not reduce readmissions. However, sST2 was clearly associated with duration of hospitalization, and the decrease in sST2 was associated with decreased rehospitalizations. Long‐term outcome using sST2‐guided therapy deserves further investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) has become a global pandemic. Despite recent developments in both medical and device treatments, HF incidences continues to increase. The current definition of HF restricts itself to stages at which clinical symptoms are apparent. In advanced heart failure (AdHF), it is universally accepted that all patients are refractory to traditional therapies. As the number of HF patients increase, so does the need for additional treatments, with an increased proportion of patients requiring advanced therapies. Areas covered: This review discusses extensive evidence for the effect of medical treatment on HF, although the data on the effect on AdHF is scare. Authors review the relevant literature for treating AdHF patients. Furthermore, mechanical circulatory devices (MCD) have emerged as an alternative to heart transplantation and have been shown to enhance quality of life and reduce mortality therefore authors also review the current literature on the different MCD and technologies. Expert commentary: More patients will need advanced therapies, as the access to heart transplantation is limited by the number of available donors. AdHF patients should be identified timely since the window of opportunities for advanced therapy is narrow as their morbidity is progressive and survival is often short. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are used to bridge the patient with end-stage heart failure to cardiac transplantation (BTT) or to destination therapy (DT). Since 2003 in the Montpellier’s hospital, 29 VADs have been implanted (8 to DT). In the majority of cases, the VAD was used in acute end-stage of heart failure; one-year mortality was 45%. Unlike inotropic agents, levosimendan, a new calcium senziter, enhances myocardial contractility without increasing myocardial oxygen consumption. 15 out of 29 patients were on the Intermacs classification level 1, on a scale of 1 to 7, 9 received levosimendan and 6 did not. 9 of 29 patients were undergoing to levosimendan infusion to prevent right ventricular failure; 5 were under mechanical ventilation and 5 under Extra-corporal membran oxygenation (ECMO) or trans-aortic left ventricular discharge by Impella 5.0 (Abiomed) before LVAD. 7 out of 29 patients (77.8%) were alive one year later, among who one died from cancer. 2 patients were under ECMO after LVAD. In contrast, only 6 patients out of 29 patients (20,7%) without levosimendan are alive after one year. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant independant effect of levosimendan infusion on one year mortality in this retrospective study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]