Search

This article deals with the federative coordination of health policy. The Brazilian federation established by the 1988 Constitution determined greater municipal autonomy, however, in the 1990s, there was a need for the federal government to coordinate certain public policies, with emphasis on health policy. This study proposes to analyze how the municipality of Viçosa, MG, positions itself, with regard to health policy, in the face of federative coordination exercised by the federal government. In order to fulfill the aim, a qualitative case study of the health policy of the municipality of Viçosa, MG, was carried out, with an indepth study being carried out. Three methods were used for data collection: interviews with 22 subjects, observation and document analysis, characterizing the sequenced triangulation of data collection techniques. From the collected data, content analysis was performed based on three categories: “Command”, “Autonomy”, and “Responsibility”. It is concluded that the municipal government reacts to the national guidelines, and that, due to the predominance of the federal government's induction, the reduced normative and financial autonomy and the lack of capacity of the municipal government to propose programs that are peculiar to the municipality of Viçosa, MG, the health demands assimilated by the public governance of the municipality are those determined and established by the federal government, compatible with the municipal needs, being the federal coordination determinant for the effective attendance of the municipal health demands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Economia & Gestão is the property of Revista Economia & Gestao and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: to identify how and when the open government principles, specifically transparency, participation, and collaboration, are being incorporated into the public policy cycle phases in local governments. Theoretical framework: theories related to public policy analysis and open government. Method: a single case study with an incorporated focus on the open government initiative of the São Paulo City Hall, where three distinct public policies were analyzed from a theoretical-analytical framework built by integrating the approach of the public policy cycle with the three open government principles. Results: the study showed that in none of the analyzed policies there was the full incorporation of these principles in the five phases of the policy cycle and that little progress was made regarding the requirements for them to be considered open policies. Conclusions: the study contributes to narrowing the theoreticalmethodological gap concerning the effectiveness of open government initiatives. The method offers conditions to be applied in different realities and can be used in future research to better understand how open government principles are being incorporated into public policies of governments that have signed open government commitments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This essay aims to analyze how the dimensions of consensus and conflict are treated in the literature on collaborative innovation. Approach: Narrative literature review oriented towards a preliminary theoretical investigation. Next, topics related to the dimensions of consensus and conflict and the propositions are explored constructive management of differences, integrative and flexible leadership, and institutional design. Finally, the methodological and empirical perspectives of this field of study are presented, with the suggestion of the environmental theme, specifically the management of water resources, as a beneficial research area for the study of collaborative innovation. Results: After analyzing, it concludes with the concept of approximate consensus based on shared understandings and the substitution of destructive conflict for constructive conflict in fostering collaborative innovation. Contributions: The main contributions are the systematization of consensus and conflict in the theoretical framework of collaborative innovation and the exposition of illustrative cases, advocating the strengthening of this field of research in Brazil due to the vast environmental regime in the country and its regional particularities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal Public Administration & Social Management / Administração Pública e Gestão Social is the property of Administracao Publica e Gestao Social and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Amazônia, Organizações e Sustentabilidade (AOS) is the property of Amazon, Organizations & Sustainability - AOS / Amazônia, Organizações e Sustentabilidade (AOS) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista do Serviço Público (Civil Service Review) is the property of Revista do Servico Publico and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista do Serviço Público (Civil Service Review) is the property of Revista do Servico Publico and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Amazônia, Organizações e Sustentabilidade (AOS) is the property of Amazon, Organizations & Sustainability - AOS / Amazônia, Organizações e Sustentabilidade (AOS) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Gestão & Planejamento is the property of FACS Servicos Educacionais S.A. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Administração de Roraima is the property of Revista de Administracao de Roraima and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Interações is the property of Revista Interacoes and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Gestão & Tecnologia is the property of Revista Gestao & Tecnologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal Public Administration & Social Management / Administração Pública e Gestão Social is the property of Administracao Publica e Gestao Social and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal Public Administration & Social Management / Administração Pública e Gestão Social is the property of Administracao Publica e Gestao Social and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This research is oriented by the following research problem: what ways of thinking and acting impact the development of the Vitoria Metropolitan management? The goal is to understand how social subjectivity, constituted from the intertwining of subjective settings, appears in the processes of construction of Metropolitan management in Vitória, Espírito Santo. The study is justified because of the lack of research on the subject of city management in its cultural and historical dimension. The theoretical framework that underpins this research is the theory of subjectivity, drawn from the principles of qualitative epistemology. The results show that those subjective settings that impact on metropolitan management in Vitória are associated mainly with personalistic political mode of conduct, which obstructs their development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The government of the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais adopted a management model, known as Management Shock, by way of covenants called Agreement on Results, which foresee possible rewards for the achievement of agreed upon targets. Considering such covenants and the assumption that agents can promote adjustments or changes in performance indicators contained therein in order to pursue interests different than those initially agreed upon, this research sought to identify the organizational and environmental factors influencing changes of performance indicators in the government's management structure. This research was conducted in light of the Agency and Contingency Theories. To this end, we conducted a qualitative case study, collecting data through documentary analysis, questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The interviews were subsequently submitted to content analysis. The results show that the tools provided are not sufficient to shield the model's managerial structure from pressures identified using Agency and Contingency Theories. As a consequence the model as originally proposed was undermined, allowing for changes to indicators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]