Search

Purpose: It is well established that hollow viscus perforation leads to sepsis and acute kidney injury (AKI) in non‐trauma patients. However, the relationship between traumatic hollow viscus injury (HVI) and AKI is not well understood. Utilizing data from the National Trauma Data Bank, we investigated whether HVI serves as a risk factor for AKI. Additionally, we examined the characteristics of AKI in stable patients who underwent conservative treatment. Methods: We reviewed blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) cases from 2012 to 2015, comparing patients with and without AKI. Significant factors from univariate analysis were tested in a multivariate logistic regression (MLR) to identify independent AKI determinants. We also analyzed subsets: patients without HVI and stable patients given conservative management. Results: Out of the 563,040 BAT patients analyzed, 9073 (1.6%) developed AKI. While a greater proportion of AKI patients had HVI than those without AKI (13.3% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.001), this difference wasn't statistically significant in the MLR (p = 0.125). Notably, the need for laparotomy (odds = 3.108, p < 0.001) and sepsis (odds = 13.220, p < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for AKI. For BAT patients managed conservatively (systolic blood pressure >90 mmHg, without HVI or laparotomy; N = 497,066), the presence of sepsis was a significant predictor for the development of AKI (odds = 16.914, p < 0.001). Conclusions: While HVI wasn't a significant risk factor for AKI in BAT patients, the need for laparotomy was. Stable BAT patients managed conservatively are still at risk for AKI due to non‐peritonitis related sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The split-thickness skin graft (STSG) procedure is frequently used in the reconstruction of burn-injured patients. This study assessed the impact of graft timing on associated skin complications in patients with torso burns using a comprehensive national database. Methods: Truncal burn (2nd-degree and 3rd-degree burns covering 20-89% TBSA) patients who underwent STSG in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2011 to 2015 were studied. The outcomes examined were graft-related complications (superficial surgical site infections, deep surgical site infections, and graft failure), overall mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS). Patients were compared based on the presence or absence of grafting complications. A linear regression model was used to assess the relationship between hospital LOS and graft timing, considering other variables. Results: Among the 853 studied patients, the cohort with graft complications exhibited a significantly prolonged time to STSG (413.0 h compared to 264.6 h, P < 0.001) and a higher percentage of patients with pre-existing diabetes (18.5 vs. 8.0%, P = 0.008). The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that both the extended time to STSG (odds = 1.001, P = 0.003) and pre-existing diabetes (odds = 2.790, P = 0.010) significantly elevated the likelihood of complications associated with STSG. Notably, this delay did not elevate mortality risks. A positive relationship was found between grafting delay and LOS. Conclusion: The findings underscore that a prolonged duration to skin grafting contributes to extended hospital stays and increased graft-related complications. However, the role of grafting delay in influencing the mortality of truncal burn patients appeared inconsequential, indicating that mortality may be influenced by various factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gunshot wound (GSW) injuries are an important public health concern in the United States. The study purpose was to measure the association between GSW location and need for operative treatment. This was a retrospective cohort study. Sample consisted of all patients treated for maxillofacial gunshot wound injuries at Cook County Health from 2008 to 2018. The sample data were collected through a retrospective charts review and review of computed tomography imaging. The predictor variable was the region of the face involved with the GSW and it was divided into 3 levels, upper face (UF), middle face (MF), and lower face (LF). The outcome variable was whether operative intervention was rendered or not (operative vs no intervention). Other variables of interest collected included patient demographics, the type of surgical intervention, disposition (home vs rehab/morgue), rate of intracranial injury, and need for blood transfusion. Data analysis was performed using Chi-square for proportions and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 180 patients were identified to have sustained GSW injuries to the face during abovementioned time frame. Of those, 120 patients had isolated GSW injuries with no other organs involvement. The median age was 25 years. Majority of the patients were males (94%). The involved facial region appeared to influence the need for operative management and this reached statistical significance (Chi-square 22.703, P <.001). GSW injuries to LF were 2.94 times more likely to require operative intervention than injuries to the MF (RR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.625-5.327). Injuries of the UF were 2 times more likely to require operative intervention than injuries of the MF (RR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.023-4.008). Injuries to the UF were more likely to be associated with intracranial injuries (Chi-square = 20.522, P <.001). In patients with facial GSW injuries, there is an association between injury location and the need for operative intervention. Injuries to the LF were most likely to require surgical intervention followed by the UF and MF, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES The role of thoracic endovascular aortic replacement (TEVAR) in patients with concomitant blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) and blunt abdomen trauma (BAT) was evaluated using nationwide real-world data. The risk of post-TEVAR abdominal haemorrhage was studied. METHODS Patients with BTAI and BAT in the National Trauma Data Bank were retrospectively studied. Propensity score matching was used to evaluate the effect of TEVAR in delayed abdominal surgeries for haemostasis and the delayed need for blood transfusion. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for delayed intra-abdominal haemorrhage in these patients. RESULTS A total of 928 concomitant BTAI and BAT patients were studied (TEVAR versus non-TEVAR, 206 vs 722). After a well-balanced propensity score matching analysis, patients who received TEVAR had significantly more delayed abdominal surgeries for haemostasis (7.7% vs 4.5%, standardized mean difference = 0.316) and delayed need for blood transfusion (11.6% vs 7.1%, standardized mean difference = 0.299) than those who did not. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that TEVAR increased the need for delayed abdominal surgeries (odds ratio = 2.026, P  =   0.034). Among the patients who underwent TEVAR, the patients with delayed abdominal surgeries for haemostasis had a significantly higher proportion of severe abdominal injury (abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 4 or 5) than patients without delayed abdominal surgeries for haemostasis (31.6% vs 15.5%, P  =   0.038). CONCLUSIONS Patients with concomitant BTAI and BAT had a higher risk of intra-abdominal haemorrhage after TEVAR, especially patients with severe abdominal trauma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The number and type of patients treated by trauma centers can vary widely because of a number of factors. There might be trauma centers with a high volume of torso GSWs that are not designated as high-level trauma centers. We proposed that, for torso gunshot wounds (GSWs), the treating hospital's trauma volume and not its trauma center level designation drives patient prognosis. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for torso GSWs. The characteristics of torso GSWs in trauma centers with different volumes of torso GSWs were compared. The association between torso GSW volumes of trauma centers and the outcomes of torso GSWs were evaluated with propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis. Results: There were 618 trauma centers that treated 14,804 torso GSW patients in two years (2014-2015). In 191 level I trauma centers, 82 of them (42.9%, 82/191) treated <1 torso GSW per month. After well-balanced PSM, patients who were treated in higher volume trauma centers (≥9 torso GSWs/month) had a significantly lower mortality rate (7.9% vs. 9.7%). Patients treated in trauma centers with ≥9 torso GSWs/month had a 30.9% (odds ratio = 0.764) lower probability of death than if sent to trauma centers with <9 torso GSWs/month. Treatment in level I or II trauma centers did not significantly affect mortality. Conclusion: There is an uneven distribution of torso GSWs among trauma centers. Torso GSWs treated in trauma centers with ≥9 torso GSWs/month have significantly superior outcomes with regard to survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The endpoint of resuscitative interventions after traumatic injury resulting in cardiopulmonary arrest varies across institutions and even among providers. The purpose of this study was to examine survival characteristics in patients suffering torso trauma with no recorded vital signs (VS) in the emergency department (ED).Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank was analyzed from 2007 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were patients with blunt and penetrating torso trauma without VS in the ED. Patients with head injuries, transfers from other hospitals, or those with missing values were excluded. The characteristics of survivors were evaluated, and statistical analyses performed.Results: A total of 24,191 torso trauma patients without VS were evaluated in the ED and 96.6% were declared dead upon arrival. There were 246 survivors (1%), and 73 (0.3%) were eventually discharged home. Of patients who responded to resuscitation (812), the survival rate was 30.3%. Injury severity score (ISS), penetrating mechanism (odds ratio [OR] 1.99), definitive chest (OR 1.59) and abdominal surgery (OR 1.49) were associated with improved survival. Discharge to home (or police custody) was associated with lower ISS (OR 0.975) and shorter ED time (OR 0.99).Conclusion: Over a recent nine-year period in the United States, nearly 25,000 trauma patients were treated at trauma centers despite lack of VS. Of these patients, only 73 were discharged home. A trauma center would have to attempt over one hundred resuscitations of traumatic arrests to save one patient, confirming previous reports that highlight a grave prognosis. This creates a dilemma in treatment for front line workers and physicians with resource utilization and consideration of safety of exposure, particularly in the face of COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stable patients with less severe injuries are not necessarily triaged to high-level trauma centers according to current guidelines. Obese patients are prone to comorbidities and complications. We hypothesized that stable obese patients with low-energy trauma have lower mortality and fewer complications if treated at Level-I/II trauma centers. Methods: Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) patients with systolic blood pressures ≥90mmHg, Glasgow coma scale ≥14, and respiratory rates at 10-29 were derived from the National Trauma Data Bank between 2013-2015. Per current triage guidelines, these patients are not necessarily triaged to high-level trauma centers. The relationship between obesity and mortality of stable BAT patients was analyzed. A subset analysis of patients with injury severity scores (ISS) <16 was performed with propensity score matching (PSM) to evaluate outcomes between Level-I/II and Level-III/IV trauma centers. Outcomes of obese patients were compared between Level-I/II and Level-III/IV trauma centers. Non-obese patients were analyzed as a control group using a similar PSM cohort analysis. Results: 48,043 stable BAT patients in 707 trauma centers were evaluated. Non-survivors had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (28.7 vs. 26.9, p < 0.001) and higher proportion of obesity (35.6% vs. 26.5%, p < 0.001) than survivors. After a PSM (1,502 obese patients: 751 in Level-I/II trauma centers and 751 in Level-III/IV trauma centers), obese patients treated in Level-I/II trauma centers had significantly lower complication rates than obese patients treated in other trauma centers (20.2% vs. 26.6%, standardized difference = 0.151). The complication rate of obese patients treated at Level-I/II trauma centers was 20.6% lower than obese patients treated at other trauma centers. Conclusion: Obesity plays a role in the mortality of stable BAT patients. Obese patients with ISS < 16 have lower complication rates at Level-I/II trauma centers compared to obese patients treated at other trauma centers. Obesity may be a consideration for triaging to Level-I/II trauma centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Uninsured and low socioeconomic status patients who suffer burn injuries have disproportionately worse morbidity and mortality. The Affordable Care Act was signed into law with the goal of increasing access to insurance, with Medicaid expansion in January 2014 having the largest impact. To analyze the population-level impact of the Affordable Care Act on burn outcomes, and investigate its impact on identified at-risk subgroups, a retrospective time series of patients was created using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database between 2011 and 2016. An interrupted time series analysis was conducted to examine mortality, length of stay, and the probabilities of discharge home, home with home health, and to another facility before and after January 2014. There were no changes in burn mortality detected. There was a statistically significant reduction in the probability of being discharged home (-0.000967, P < .01; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.0015379 to -0.0003962) or discharged home with home health (-0.000709, P < .01; 95% CI -0.00110 to 0.000317) after 2014. There was an increase in the probability of being discharged to another facility (0.00108, P = .01; 95% CI 0.000282-0.00188). While the enactment of the major provisions of the Affordable Care Act in 2014 was not associated with a change in mortality for burn patients, it was associated with more patients being discharged to a facility: This may represent a significant improvement in access to care and rehabilitation. Future studies will assess the societal and economic impact of improved access to post-discharge facilities and rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to better characterize the course and outcome of the uncommon subset of trauma patients with combined thermal and intraabdominal organ injuries. The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for burn patients with intraabdominal injury treated in all U.S. trauma centers from July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2015. General demographics, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), shock index (SI), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) for burn, Injury Severity Score (ISS), blood transfusions, and abdominal surgery were evaluated. During the 5-year study period, there were 334 burn patients with intraabdominal injury, 39 (13.2%) of which received abdominal surgery. Burn patients who underwent operations had more severe injuries reflected by higher SI, AIS, ISS, blood transfusion, and worse outcomes including higher mortality, longer hospital and ICU length of stay, and more ventilator days compared to patients who did not undergo an operation. Nonsurvivors also exhibited more severe injuries, and a higher proportion received abdominal operation compared to survivors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that GCS on arrival, SI, AIS, ISS, blood transfusion, and abdominal operation to be independent risk factors for mortality. Propensity score matching to control covariables (mean age, systolic blood pressure on arrival, GCS on arrival, SI, ISS, time to operation, blood transfusion, and comorbidities) showed that of trauma patients who received abdominal operation, those with concomitant burn injury exhibited a higher rate of complications but no significant difference in mortality compared to those without burns, suggesting that patients with concomitant burns are not less salvageable than nonburned trauma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Delayed patient admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) from the ED is common in China. Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock requiring ICU admission are in need of specialised monitoring and tailored treatment. Delayed admission to the ICU might be associated with adverse clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis.Methods: Patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU from the ED from January 2010 to April 2018 were retrospectively identified from a clinical data warehouse. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Length of stay in ED (EDLOS) was compared between survivors and non-survivors. A multivariable regression model was employed to adjust for potential confounding due to patient clinical condition.Results: A total of 1997 patients, including 473 non-survivors and 1524 survivors, were included. The crude mortality rate for patients with EDLOS <6 hours was 21.4%, which was significantly lower than patients with EDLOS of 12-24 hours (31.9%), and those with EDLOS >24 hours (31.8%). After adjusting for PaO2/FiO2, serum creatinine, age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, body mass index, lactate, comorbidities and infection site, EDLOS continued to be independently associated with increased risk of hospital mortality. Compared with the group with EDLOS <6 hours, those with EDLOS between 12and24 hours (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.58) and EDLOS >24 hours (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.52) showed a significantly increased risk of death.Conclusions: Our study shows that prolonged EDLOS is independently associated with increased risk of hospital mortality in patients with sepsis requiring ICU admission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]