Search

Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES Since 2000, we anastomosed the saphenous vein graft to the right coronary artery system using the stump of the right internal thoracic artery as inflow. The long-term results of patients where the right coronary artery was grafted with the right internal thoracic artery or the ascending aorta as saphenous vein inflow has not been reported. METHODS From 2000 to 2018, 699 consecutive patients had right internal thoracic artery elongated with saphenous vein (I-graft group, n  = 358, 51.2%) or saphenous vein from the aorta (Ao-graft group, n  = 341, 48.8%) on right coronary artery system. Inclusion criteria were age ≤75 years, bilateral internal thoracic arteries as a Y graft on the left system (three-vessel disease, n  = 603, 86.3%) or as a left internal thoracic artery on left anterior descending and right internal thoracic artery elongated with saphenous vein on the right coronary artery system (two-vessel disease, n  = 96, 13.7%), only 1 saphenous vein per patient. Propensity-matching identified 272 patients per group. One-hundred and twenty-two patients underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography to asses grafts patency after a median follow-up of 88 (65–93) months. RESULTS In the paired samples, there was no difference in the early outcome. Ten-year survival and freedom from death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization were higher in I-graft group: 90.6 [standard error (SE): 2.0] vs 78.2 (SE: 5.3), P  = 0.0266, and 85.2 (SE: 2.4) vs 69.9 (SE: 5.3), P  = 0.0179. Saphenous vein graft, at a long-time follow-up, showed a higher patency rate (81.6% (SE: 7.0) vs 50.7% (SE: 7.9), P  < 0.0001) and a smaller internal lumen diameter (2.7, standard deviation: 0.4 vs 3.4, standard deviation: 0.6 mm, P  < 0.0001) when right internal thoracic artery was the inflow. CONCLUSIONS Grafting the right coronary artery with saphenous vein may entail higher patency rate and better outcome when the inflow is the right internal thoracic artery than when is the ascending aorta. Prospective randomized data are needed to test this hypothesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) at ≤20°C for aortic arch surgery has been widely used for decades, with or without cerebral perfusion (CP), antegrade (antegrade cerebral perfusion [ACP]), or retrograde. In recent years nadir temperature progressively increased to 26°C–28°C (moderately hypothermic circulatory arrest [MHCA]), adding ACP. Aim of this multicentric study is to evaluate early results of aortic arch surgery and if DHCA with 10 min of cold reperfusion at the same nadir temperature of the CA before rewarming (delayed rewarming [DR]) can provide a neuroprotection and a lower body protection similar to that provided by MHCA + ACP. Methods: A total of 210 patients were included in the study. DHCA + DR was used in 59 patients and MHCA + ACP in 151. Primary endpoints were death, neurologic event (NE), temporary (TNE), or permanent (permanent neurologic deficit [PND]), and need of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Results: Operative mortality occurred in 14 patients (6.7%), NEs in 17 (8.1%), and PNDs in 10 (4.8%). A total of 23 patients (10.9%) needed RRT. Death + PND occurred in 21 patients (10%) and composite endpoint in 35 (19.2%). Intergroup weighed logistic regression analysis showed similar prevalence of deaths, NDs, and death + PND, but need of RRT (odds ratio [OR]: 7.39, confidence interval [CI]: 1.37–79.1) and composite endpoint (OR: 8.97, CI: 1.95–35.3) were significantly lower in DHCA + DR group compared with MHCA + ACP group. Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrate that DHCA + DR has the same prevalence of operative mortality, NE and association of death+PND than MHCA + ACP. However, the data suggests that DHCA + DR when compared with MHCA + ACP provides better renal protection and reduced prevalence of composite endpoint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Based on Carpentier's classification and principles, the techniques for mitral valve repair continue to evolve. We herein report our experience with the morphofunctional echocardiographic analysis of single mitral leaflets, as different anatomic features, even if conflicting, may coexist not only in the two leaflets but in the same leaflet as well. A classification is proposed, based on the length (normal, short, or long) and mobility (normal, restricted, or excessive) of mitral leaflets. The surgical techniques adopted for mitral valve repair are the direct consequence of this analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In this prospective multicenter analysis, we aimed to investigate the predictive role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Materials and Methods: One hundred and seventy‐nine consecutive patients without previous PPI underwent TAVR from February 2017 to September 2021. Patients were further divided based on presence (n = 48) and absence of conduction abnormalities (CAs) at hospital admission (n = 131). Results: In patients with previous CAs, NLR values did not differ significantly between patients requiring PPI (n = 16, 33%) and those not requiring it. In contrast, in patients with no CAs at hospital admission, NLR values measured at admission and on TAVR day were significantly higher in patients requiring PPI (n = 17, 13%) (4.07 ± 3.22 vs. 3.01 ± 1.47, p =.025, and 10.81 ± 7.81 vs. 5.84 ± 3.78, p =.000, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed that NLR at TAVR day was an independent predictor of PPI in patients without CAs (OR 1.294; 95% CI 1.028–1.630; p =.028), but not in those with previous CAs. ROC curve analysis showed that the cut point was a NLR value of >7.25. Time to PPI was delayed till 21 days in patients without CAs. Conclusions: In this prospective study, higher NLR values on the day of TAVR day were associated with an increased PPI rate in patients undergoing TAVR with no previous CAs. It is advisable, being inflammation part of the process, to prolong the time of observation for all patients without CAs till at least 21 days not to miss any new CA necessitating PPI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular disorder occurring in up to 10% of the general population. Mitral valve reconstructive strategies may address any of the components, annulus, leaflets, and chords, involved in the valvular competence. The classical repair technique involves the resection of the prolapsing tissue. Chordal replacement was introduced already in the '60, but in the mid '80, some surgeons started to use expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) Gore‐Tex sutures. In the last years, artificial chords have been used also using transcatheter approach such as NeoChord DS 1000 (Neochord) and Harpoon TSD‐5. The first step is to achieve a good exposure of the papillary muscles that before approaching the implant of the artificial chords. Then, the chords are attached to the papillary muscle, with or without the use of supportive pledgets. The techniques to correctly implant artificial chords are many and might vary considerably from one center to another, but they can be summarized into three big families of suturing techniques: single, running or loop. Regardless of how to anchor to the mitral leaflet, the real challenge that many surgeons have taken on, giving rise to some very creative solutions, has been to establish an adequate length of the chords. It can be established based on anatomically healthy chords, but it is important to bear in mind that surgeons work on the mitral valve when the heart is arrested in diastole, so this length could fail to replicate the required length in the full, beating heart. Hence, some surgeons suggested techniques to overcome this problem. Herein, we aimed to describe the current use of artificial chords in real‐world surgery, summarizing all the tips and tricks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim of the Study: Mitral valve repair is the procedure of choice to correct mitral regurgitation. However, some dangerous iatrogenic complications can occur at the end of the procedure. Therefore, we sought to review the most frequent and clinically relevant acute iatrogenic complication following mitral valve repair. Methods: A thorough review of the literature has been performed. Criteria for considering studies for this non‐systematic review were as follows: observational and interventional studies investigating the acute iatrogenic complications following mitral valve repair, and essential review studies pertinent to the topic. Results: The most frequent is the systolic anterior motion. Due to a systolic dislocation of the anterior leaflet toward the outflow tract, it causes both obstruction of the outflow tract and mitral regurgitation. Often it is due to excess of catecholamines or to reduced filling of the left ventricle but sometimes needs further surgical maneuvers, focused on moving posteriorly the coaptation line. It can be obtained by shortening the posterior leaflet or increasing the size of the ring or applying an Alfieri stitch to limit the movements of the anterior leaflet. Another complication, often underdiagnosed and potentially lethal, is the injury of the circumflex artery that happens at the level of the anterolateral commissure or P1 zone. Two mechanisms are involved. The first one is the direct injury of the artery by a stitch (roughly 25% of the patients present a distance artery‐annulus <3 mm. The second one is the distortion of the artery, attracted toward the annulus by a misplaced stitch. The attraction causes kinking with stenosis of different degrees till functional occlusion. However, the artery has to be far from the annulus and the atrial tissue has to be stiff and resistant, as after an infective process, to move the circumflex artery toward the annulus without tearing. Positioning the stitches very close to the mitral leaflets in the dangerous area is the only prevention to the complication. The treatment in the operating theater is partial or total removal/reimplantation of the annular sutures or coronary artery bypass grafting to the circumflex area. If the injury is demonstrated only after coronary angiography, percutaneous revascularization can be attempted before further surgical treatment. Conclusions: Acute iatrogenic complication after mitral repair exists and may compromize patient outcome. Raising awareness about these issues, the precautions to prevent them, and the manners of resolution is therefore mandatory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several studies in literature have shown that 90% of emboli related to non-valvular atrial fibrillation originate from left atrial appendage. Percutaneous closure or surgical exclusion of left atrial appendage in patients with high bleeding and high cardioembolic risk is currently a well established procedure in literature, clinical practice and guidelines. Knowledge of different techniques of left atrial appendage closure is necessary to individualize the procedure according to the patient anatomy and pre-procedural imaging evaluations. In this review the authors will evaluate different left atrial appendage closure systems and the different pre and intra procedural imaging methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim of the study: Wrapping of the ascending aorta (AA), isolated or associated with aortoplasty, has never been completely accepted. Some complications, as folding of the aortic wall, compression of the vasa vasorum and changes in the flow pattern, with consequent dilatation of the proximal arch, have been described. We used fresh autologous pericardium (FAP), so far never reported, to wrap the AA, with the aim to stabilize its size when moderately dilated, maintaining the preoperative dimension or limiting the reduction to a few millimeters. Materials and Methods: From 2015 to 2019, 10 patients, who were operated on for valve or coronary surgery or both, underwent wrapping of the AA with FAP. Mean age was 69 ± 7 years and EuroSCORE II 3.5 ± 1.7. Four patients had moderately impaired ejection fraction (35%–49%). Results: There was no early or late mortality. One patient was reoperated on after 48 months for severe mitral regurgitation. At a follow‐up of 53 ± 14 months, a transthoracic echocardiogram showed that the AA size reduced slightly but significantly, from 45.2 ± 2.0 to 42.5 ± 4.1 mm, p =.03. The diameter of the proximal arch remained unchanged, from 37.1 ± 1.6 to 36.3 ± 2.9 mm, p =.20. Conclusions: In the presence of moderately dilated AA, wrapping can be a reasonable option. The use of FAP stabilizes the size of the aorta after a follow‐up of 53 months. Maintaining a size similar to the preoperative one avoids the complications related to the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resection or exclusion of scars following a myocardial infarction on the left anterior descending artery territory started even before the beginning of the modern era of cardiac surgery. Many techniques were developed, but there is still confusion on who did what. The original techniques underwent modifications that brought to a variety of apparently new procedures that, however, were only a "revisitation" of what described before. In some case, old techniques were reproposed and renamed, without giving credit to the surgeon that was the original designer. Herein we try to describe which are the seminal procedures and some of the most important modifications, respecting however the merit of who first communicated the procedure to the scientific world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The long‐term outcome of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) is based on what happens during the more or less 60 min of aortic cross‐clamping necessary to transform a leaking valve into a well‐functioning one. As a consequence, the experience of the surgeon performing the procedure is the only determinant of the success rate that deserves to be taken into account. It is clear from the literature that the number of cases/year is inversely related to the number of early and late deaths, repair failures, and reoperations. However, there is no agreement on the minimum caseload/year that represents the threshold to identify surgeons that can perform or not MVr. This problem then cannot be regulated by specific guidelines of Scientific Societies, but only by the ethical perception, we have of our profession. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]