Search

Abstract Background Prognostic factors of poor outcome in patients with hematological malignancies and COVID-19 are poorly defined. Patients and methods This was a Spanish transplant group and cell therapy (GETH) multicenter retrospective observational study, which included a large cohort of blood cancer patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection through PCR assays from March 1st 2020 to May 15th 2020. Results We included 367 pediatric and adult patients with hematological malignancies, including recipients of autologous (ASCT) (n = 58) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) (n = 65) from 41 hospitals in Spain. Median age of patients was 64 years (range 1–93.8). Recipients of ASCT and allo-SCT showed lower mortality rates (17% and 18%, respectively) compared to non-SCT patients (31%) (p = 0.02). Prognostic factors identified for day 45 overall mortality (OM) by logistic regression multivariate analysis included age > 70 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–3.8, p = 0.011]; uncontrolled hematological malignancy (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6–5.2, p 20 mg/dL (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7–6.4, p

Abstract Introduction Biosimilars of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) have shown similar efficacy to originator filgrastim (Neupogen® [NEU]; Amgen Inc.) as prophylaxis in neutropenia and in the mobilization of stem cells in patients receiving combination chemotherapy with G-CSF. Methods This was a retrospective study in which the characteristics of stem cell mobilization treated with a G-CSF alone were compared in 216 patients and 56 donors. The two G-CSF compared were NEU and the biosimilar filgrastim Zarzio® (Sandoz GmbH) (referred to hereafter as BIO). Primary objectives were mobilization rate (minimum of 10 × 103/ml CD34+ on day 4 of treatment [day +4]) and use of the immunostimulant plerixafor (PLEX) in each group. Results The general characteristics of the patients receiving NEU (n = 138) and those receiving BIO (n = 78) did not differ significantly. PLEX was used in 24% of BIO patients and in 25.7% of NEU patients. The median CD34+ cell count on day +4 was significantly lower in BIO patients who needed PLEX than in those who did not (2.4 vs. 4.8 × 103/ml; p = 0.002), as was the final CD34+ cell count (2.5 vs. 3.3 × 106/kg; p 0.03). Mobilization failure rate was higher in the BIO group than in the NEU group (20 vs. 0%; p = 0.01). With respect to donors, more than one apheresis was needed in three BIO donors, one of them with PLEX. The use of BIO was the only risk factor for mobilization failure in patients who needed PLEX (hazard ratio 10.3; 95% confidence interval 1.3–77.8). Conclusion The study revealed that BIO had a lower efficacy for stem cell mobilization when the only treatment was G-CSF, especially in poor mobilizers needing PLEX.

Background and Objectives Dendritic cells (DC) play a critical role in the regulation of alloimmune responses and might influence the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We studied the clinical relevance of early reconstitution of DC after reduced-intensity conditioning allo-SCT (allo-RIC).Design and Methods This study included 79 adult patients undergoing allo-RIC from HLA-identical siblings. Peripheral blood samples were drawn from patients at 1 month (+1m) and 3 months (+3m) after the transplant. DC were identified as positive for HLA-DR and negative for CD3, CD19, CD14 and CD56. The expression of CD33, CD123 and CD16 was used to identify myeloid DC, plasmacytoid DC and CD16+ DC subpopulations, respectively.Results Patients whose DC count at +1m was lower than the median had a higher probability of treatment-related mortality (TRM) (60% vs 12%; p=0.02), poorer overall survival (OS) (15% vs 45%; p=0.002) and worse event-free survival (EFS) (20% vs 38%; p=0.03). A multivariate analysis confirmed that low DC counts had a detrimental effect on OS (RR 3.2; p=0.007), relapse (RR 4.1; p=0.01), and EFS (RR 6; p=0.001). Low CD16+ DC counts were observed to have a detrimental effect on EFS, which was due to both a higher incidence of deaths caused by infections (50% vs 0%, p=0.05) and a higher incidence of relapse (57% vs 50%; p=0.03). Indeed, the number of CD16+ DC at +3 m was the most important prognostic factor for EFS (RR 6; p=0.001).Interpretations and Conclusions This study shows the clinical importance of DC recovery, especially of the CD16+ DC subset, in the outcome of patients treated with allo-RIC.