Search

Diagnosing urothelial cancer (UCa) via invasive cystoscopy is painful, specifically in men, and can cause infection and bleeding. Because the UCa risk is higher for male patients, urinary non-invasive UCa biomarkers are highly desired to stratify men for invasive cystoscopy. We previously identified multiple DNA methylation sites in urine samples that detect UCa with a high sensitivity and specificity in men. Here, we identified the most relevant markers by employing multiple statistical approaches and machine learning (random forest, boosted trees, LASSO) using a dataset of 251 male UCa patients and 111 controls. Three CpG sites located in ALOX5, TRPS1 and an intergenic region on chromosome 16 have been concordantly selected by all approaches, and their combination in a single decision matrix for clinical use was tested based on their respective thresholds of the individual CpGs. The combination of ALOX5 and TRPS1 yielded the best overall sensitivity (61%) at a pre-set specificity of 95%. This combination exceeded both the diagnostic performance of the most sensitive bioinformatic approach and that of the best single CpG. In summary, we showed that overlap analysis of multiple statistical approaches identifies the most reliable biomarkers for UCa in a male collective. The results may assist in stratifying men for cystoscopy.

We identified DNA methylation targets specific for urothelial cancer (UC) by genome-wide methylation difference analysis of human urothelial (RT4, J82, 5637), prostate (LNCAP, DU-145, PC3) and renal (RCC-KP, CAKI-2, CAL-54) cancer cell lines with their respective primary epithelial cells. A large overlap of differentially methylated targets between all organs was observed and 40 Cytosine-phosphate-Guanine motifs (CpGs) were only specific for UC cells. Of those sites, two also showed high methylation differences (≥47%) in vivo when we further compared our data to those previously obtained in our array-based analyses of urine samples in 12 UC patients and 12 controls. Using mass spectrometry, we finally assessed seven CpG sites in this “bladder-specific” region of interest in urine samples of patients with urothelial (n = 293), prostate (n = 75) and renal (n = 23) cancer, and 143 controls. DNA methylation was significantly increased in UC compared to non-UC individuals. The differences were more pronounced for males rather than females. Male UC cases could be distinguished from non-UC individuals with >30% sensitivity at 95% specificity (Area under the curve (AUC) 0.85). In summary, methylation sites highly specific in UC cell lines were also specific in urine samples of UC patients showing that in-vitro data can be successfully used to identify biomarker candidates of in-vivo relevance.