Search

Objective: Many young adults report frequent cannabis use and are at risk for cannabis harms. Knowledge of the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) concentrations of cannabis products may promote harm reduction, but few studies have characterized cannabinoid concentration knowledge in this population. This study used day-level data to examine predictors of cannabinoid concentration knowledge and associations of cannabinoid concentration knowledge with substance-related consequences among young adults. Method: Participants (n = 131; mean age = 22.11 years; 64.12% female) from a larger study of cannabis and alcohol co-use completed daily surveys over 21 days assessing knowledge of the cannabinoid concentrations of cannabis used, forms of cannabis used, motives for cannabis use (medicinal, nonmedicinal, both), and substance-related consequences. Results: On average, participants reported at least some knowledge of the THC and CBD concentrations of their cannabis on 48% and 32% of their cannabis use days, respectively. Generalized linear mixed models revealed that participants with a greater propensity to use nonflower (relative to flower) cannabis products and to report medicinal (relative to exclusively nonmedicinal) motives for cannabis use reported greater cannabinoid concentration knowledge overall across days, controlling for sociodemographic factors and level of cannabis involvement. Participants with greater overall cannabinoid concentration knowledge reported positive substance-related consequences more often. In addition, participants were more likely to report negative substance-related consequences on days during which cannabinoid concentrations were known versus unknown. Conclusions: Findings suggest that cannabinoid concentration knowledge may be higher among young adults who report primarily nonflower and medicinally motivated cannabis use, although cannabinoid concentration knowledge, alone, may not protect against negative substance-related consequences at the day level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use is common, but observational studies examining negative consequences of simultaneous use have rarely considered dose‐related interactions between alcohol and cannabis. This study examined interactions between quantities of cannabis and alcohol consumed in predicting negative consequences on simultaneous use days. Methods: Young adults (N = 151; 64% female; 62% White) reporting recent simultaneous use and at least weekly alcohol and cannabis use completed 21 daily, smartphone‐based surveys assessing previous day quantities of cannabis and alcohol used, types of cannabis used (flower, concentrates, edibles), and negative substance‐related consequences. Multilevel models examined: (1) whether negative consequences differed within‐person across simultaneous use days and single‐substance use days; and (2) whether quantities of alcohol and cannabis consumed on simultaneous use days interacted, within‐person, to predict negative consequences. We focused on quantities of cannabis flower (grams) in primary analyses and explored quantities of other forms of cannabis (concentrates, edibles) in supplementary analyses. Results: Participants reported fewer negative consequences on alcohol‐only (243 observations) and cannabis‐only (713 observations) days than they did on simultaneous use days (429 observations). On simultaneous use days involving cannabis flower use (313 observations across 81 participants), the within‐person association between number of standard drinks and negative consequences was weaker on days during which larger (vs. smaller) amounts of cannabis flower were consumed. Inspection of simple slopes revealed that decreased alcohol use was associated with less of a decline in negative consequences when combined with relatively greater amounts of cannabis flower. Conclusions: Although simultaneous use was associated with more negative consequences than alcohol‐only and cannabis‐only use, negative consequences on simultaneous use days varied as a function of the interaction between alcohol and cannabis quantities. As findings suggest that using larger amounts of cannabis may attenuate declines in negative consequences associated with lighter drinking, interventions for higher‐risk simultaneous use patterns may benefit from a focus on quantities of both alcohol and cannabis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In-play betting is a novel form of sports betting that allows players to make continuous bets during a game. The present study examined the dispositional and contextual correlates of in-play sports betting and related harms. Method: Participants were 84 individuals (73.81% men, Mage = 41.02) who engaged in in-play betting. Participants first completed an online questionnaire including measures of problem gambling severity, childhood trauma, impulsivity, and emotion dysregulation. Participants then completed a 14-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study involving completing brief surveys twice per day. EMA surveys assessed in-play betting behaviors, motives, contexts, and harms. Results: A total of 1,365EMA surveys were completed, of which 32.89% involved placing at least one in-play bet. A total of 77 (91.67%) participants placed at least one in-play bet during the study period. Participants reported greater in-play betting involvement (the number of bets placed, money spent) and an increased likelihood of experiencing in-play betting-related financial and relationship harms when using substances while betting and when motivated to place in-play bets by an interest in sports or to "be in the game." Participants, who used substances during a greater proportion of in-play betting occasions, who more frequently endorsed coping motives for in-play betting, and who exhibited elevated problem gambling severity, reported greater in-play betting involvement and the likelihood of experiencing in-play betting-related harms overall. Conclusions: Responsible gambling initiatives targeting contextual risk factors, such as using alcohol and cannabis while in-play betting, may help to reduce the intensity of in-play betting and its associated harms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: People who use cannabis for medicinal (vs. nonmedicinal) reasons report greater cannabis use and lower alcohol use, which may reflect a cannabis-alcohol substitution effect in this population. However, it is unclear whether cannabis is used as a substitute or complement to alcohol at the day level among people who use cannabis for both medicinal and nonmedicinal reasons. This study used ecological momentary assessment to examine this question. Method: Participants (N = 66; 53.1% men; mean age 33 years) completed daily surveys assessing previous-day reasons for cannabis use (medicinal vs. nonmedicinal), cannabis consumption (both number of different types of cannabis used and grams of cannabis flower used), and number of standard drinks consumed. Results: Multilevel models revealed that, in general, greater cannabis consumption on a given day was associated with greater same-day alcohol use. Further, days during which cannabis was used for medicinal (vs. exclusively nonmedicinal) reasons were associated with reduced consumption of both cannabis and alcohol. The day-level association between medicinal reasons for cannabis use and lower alcohol consumption was mediated by using fewer grams of cannabis on medicinal cannabis use days. Conclusions: Day-level cannabis-alcohol associations may be complementary rather than substitutive among people who use cannabis for both medicinal and nonmedicinal reasons, and lower (rather than greater) cannabis consumption on medicinal use days may explain the link between medicinal reasons for cannabis use and reduced alcohol use. Still, these individuals may use greater amounts of both cannabis and alcohol when using cannabis for exclusively nonmedicinal reasons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A robust literature has found that loot box purchasing is associated with gambling and problem gambling. However, it remains unclear whether this association is merely an artifact of known psychological risk factors for gambling. The present study thus examined associations of loot box purchasing with gambling and problem gambling while controlling for potential psychological confounders. Current gamers, recruited from five Canadian universities (N = 1189) and Academic Prolific and Reddit (N = 499), reported on loot box engagement, gambling engagement, and psychological characteristics. In each sample, binomial logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between past-year loot box purchasing and likelihood of past-year gambling. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were used to examine the associations of each of past-year loot box purchasing and risky loot box engagement with problem gambling severity. In both samples, having purchased loot boxes in the past year was significantly associated with increased likelihood of having gambled in the past year and greater problem gambling severity. In the student sample, greater risky loot box engagement was significantly associated with increased problem gambling severity. Consistent with previous research, there exist associations between loot box purchasing and gambling. Results suggest that these associations are robust to known psychological risk factors for gambling, reducing plausibility of the notion that the association between loot box purchasing and gambling exists only due to shared psychological vulnerabilities. Loot box purchasing represents an important marker of risk for gambling and problem gambling among people who play video games. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aims: Sports betting has increased markedly in recent years, in part due to legislative changes and the introduction of novel forms of sports betting (e.g., in-play betting). Some evidence suggests that in-play betting is more harmful than other types of sports betting (i.e., traditional and single-event). However, existing research on in-play sports betting has been limited in scope. To address this gap, the present study examined the extent to which demographic, psychological, and gambling-related constructs (e.g., harms) are endorsed by in-play sports bettors relative to single-event and traditional sports bettors. Methods: Sports bettors (N = 920) aged 18+ from Ontario, Canada completed an online survey containing self-report measures of demographic, psychological, and gambling-related variables. Participants were classified as either in-play (n = 223), single-event (n = 533), or traditional bettors (n = 164) based on their sports betting engagement. Results: In-play sports bettors reported higher problem gambling severity, endorsed greater gambling-related harms across several domains, and reported greater mental health and substance use difficulties compared to single-event and traditional sports bettors. There were generally no differences between single-event and traditional sports bettors. Discussion: Results provide empirical support for the potential harms associated with in-play sports betting and inform our understanding of who may be at risk for increased harms associated with in-play betting. Conclusions: Findings may be important for the development of public health and responsible gambling initiatives to reduce the potential harms of in-play betting, particularly as many jurisdictions globally move towards legalization of sports betting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous research has identified attentional biases towards addiction-related stimuli, including gambling-related stimuli. Eye-tracking is considered the gold standard methodology for measuring attentional biases, yet no review to date has examined its use in measuring gambling-related attentional biases. This systematic review synthesized the literature using eye-tracking to examine attentional biases among people who gamble. We reviewed articles from Web of Science and PubMed that were published from 1990 to 2021. A total of 11 articles were included, with sample sizes ranging from 38 to 173 participants. Of these studies, seven examined attentional biases for gambling-related visual stimuli. These seven studies provided support that gambling can result in the development of an attentional bias for gambling-related stimuli. With respect to correlates of gambling-related attentional biases, there were mixed results. Some studies identified significant positive associations between gambling-related attentional biases and psychosocial variables, such as problem gambling severity, gambling expectancies, gambling cravings, gambling motives, depressive symptom severity, alcohol use severity, daily stress, affective impulsivity, and immersion. Four studies examined attentional biases for responsible gambling messaging and advertisements, finding that both people who do and do not gamble attend less to responsible gambling messaging compared to other types of information such as the betting odds. Research using eye-tracking to examine attentional biases among people who gamble is in its infancy. Yet, the preliminary results support the identification of attentional biases using the gold-standard methodology. Further studies are needed to examine the correlates and potential clinical utility of assessing gambling-related attentional biases using eye-tracking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectifs La présente étude s'est penchée sur le point de vue des enfants relativement au retour en classe après le confinement imposé par la pandémie, sur le port du masque en classe et sur la santé mentale des enfants et des parents pendant la pandémie. Méthodologie La présente étude transversale a fait partie d'un exercice de simulation scolaire de deux jours au cours duquel les élèves ont été répartis au hasard entre diverses recommandations sur le port du masque. Au moyen d'analyses régression multiple, les chercheurs ont analysé le compte rendu des parents sur la santé mentale et, après la simulation, celui des élèves sur l'anxiété liée à la COVID-19 et le port du masque. Les élèves plus âgés ont participé à des groupes de travail semi-structurés pour compléter les données du questionnaire. Résultats Sur les 190 élèves de la présente étude, 31 % ne dépassaient pas la quatrième année et 95 % avaient hâte de rentrer en classe. La plus grande anxiété des parents ou des proches (β= 0,67; p <0,001) et leur niveau de scolarité plus bas (β=1,86; p <0,002) étaient prédicteurs d'une plus grande anxiété des enfants à l'égard de la COVID-19. Les élèves plus âgés étaient plus susceptibles de trouver le port du masque nuisible aux interactions avec leurs camarades que les plus jeunes (χ2[1]=31,16; p <0,001) et pour leur capacité à comprendre l'enseignant (χ2[1]=13,97; p <0,001). Les élèves du groupe sans masque étaient plus susceptibles de craindre de contracter la COVID-19 à l'école (χ2[1]=10,07; p <0,05) que ceux du groupe qui le portaient, et d'anticiper éprouver de la difficulté à le porter (χ2[1]=18,95; p <0,001). Conclusions Chez les enfants anxieux à cause de la COVID-19, l'anxiété des parents et l'information sur la COVID-19 pourraient être des cibles d'intervention. De futures recherches devraient porter sur les effets de la mise en œuvre prolongée de mesures sanitaires d'atténuation des risques sur la réussite scolaire et la santé mentale des enfants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives This study examined children's perspectives about returning to in-person school following lockdown due to the pandemic and about mask-wearing in class, as well as the mental health of children and parents during the pandemic. Methods This cross-sectional study was part of a 2-day school simulation exercise that randomized students to different masking recommendations. Parent-report of mental health and post-simulation child-report of COVID-19-related anxiety and mask-wearing were analyzed using descriptive and multiple regression analyses. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with older students to supplement questionnaire data. Results Of 190 students in this study, 31% were in grade 4 or lower 95% looked forward to returning to in-person school. Greater child anxiety about COVID-19 was predicted by increased parent/caregiver anxiety (β=0.67; P<0.001), and lower parental educational attainment (β=1.86; P<0.002). Older students were more likely than younger students to report that mask-wearing interfered with their abilities to interact with peers (χ2(1)=31.16; P<0.001) and understand the teacher (χ2(1)=13.97; P<0.001). Students in the group that did not require masks were more likely than students in the masking group to report worries about contracting COVID-19 at school (χ2(1)=10.07; P<0.05), and anticipated difficulty wearing a mask (χ2(1)=18.95; P<0.001). Conclusions For children anxious about COVID-19, parental anxiety and education about COVID-19 may be targets for intervention. Future research should examine the impact of prolonged implementation of public health mitigation strategies in school on academic achievement and children's mental health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Monetary limit setting protected against select in-play betting harms at the within- and between-person levels. • Time limit setting increased risk for select in-play betting harms at the between-person level. • Select responsible gambling strategies may be applicable to in-play betting. Self-regulation strategies, such as limit setting, can be effective in reducing harms associated with gambling. However, limited research has examined their applicability to in-play sports betting. The current study therefore examined the utility of self-regulation strategies in reducing in-play betting intensity and associated harms. Adults engaging in-play betting (N = 77; M age = 41.23 years, 71.43 % men) completed 14 days of ecological momentary assessment surveys in which they reported their in-play betting behaviours (number of bets placed, money spent), use of self-regulation strategies for in-play betting (setting monetary limits, setting time limits, stopping betting when no longer fun, taking frequent breaks), and in-play-betting-related harms. Multilevel models revealed that participants with a greater propensity to set monetary limits were overall less likely to experience financial, interpersonal, and health harms. In addition, participants were less likely to experience emotional/psychological harms following in-play betting occasions during which they set monetary limits (versus when they did not). In contrast, participants with a greater propensity to set time limits tended to spend more money on in-play bets, experienced more harms on average, and were overall more likely to experience financial and work/study harms. Results provide preliminary support for the utility of monetary limit setting, but not time limit setting, in reducing in-play-betting-related harms. Findings support the applicability of select self-regulation strategies originally proposed for more traditional forms of gambling to in-play sports betting, and highlight a need for further research investigating whether other responsible gambling strategies may be effective in reducing in-play-betting-related harms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Gaming disorder (GD) is an increasingly common behavioural addiction, with estimated global prevalence rates of 3%. A variety of pharmacological treatments have been used to treat GD, yet no review to date has synthesized clinical trials evaluating their efficacy. This systematic review therefore synthesized the literature reporting on clinical trials of pharmacological treatments for GD. Method: We reviewed articles from MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed Central, CINAHL, and PsycINFO that were published as of March of 2022. A total of 828 articles were retrieved for review and 12 articles were included, reporting on a total of 724 participants. Results: Most participants were male (98.6%), and all were currently living in South Korea. The most common drugs used to treat GD were bupropion, methylphenidate, and a range of selective-serotonin reuptake-inhibitors. The Young Internet Addiction Scale was the most frequently instrument to measure gaming-related outcomes. All studies reported reduced symptoms of GD from pre-to post-treatment. Across all clinical trials, GD symptom reductions following the administration of pharmacological treatments ranged from 15.4% to 51.4%. Conclusion: Preliminary results suggest that a wide array of pharmacological interventions may be efficacious in the treatment of GD. Future studies using double-blind randomized controlled trial designs, recruiting larger and more representative samples, and controlling for psychiatric comorbidities are needed to better inform understanding of pharmacological treatments for GD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]