Search

Objectives: We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of tezosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (HF).Background: Tezosentan has been previously shown to improve hemodynamics in patients with stable chronic HF.Methods: In a double-blind fashion, 292 patients (cardiac index < or =2.5 l/min per m(2) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) > or =15 mm Hg) who were admitted to the hospital and in need of intravenous treatment for acute HF and central hemodynamic monitoring were randomized to 24-h intravenous treatment with tezosentan (50 or 100 mg/h) or placebo. Central hemodynamic variables, the dyspnea score, and safety variables were measured.Results: After 6 h of treatment, significantly greater increases in the cardiac index and decreases in PCWP were observed with both tezosentan dosages than with placebo (mean treatment effects at 0.38 and 0.37 l/min per m(2) with 50 and 100 mg/h and -3.9 mm Hg for each dose, respectively; p < 0.0001). This effect was maintained during the remaining infusion and for > or =6 h after treatment cessation. A tendency for an improved dyspnea score and a decreased risk of clinical worsening was observed after 24 h of treatment with each tezosentan dose. Adverse events, more frequent with tezosentan than with placebo (headache, asymptomatic hypotension, early worsening of renal function, nausea, vomiting), were dose-related.Conclusions: Intravenous tezosentan rapidly and effectively improved hemodynamics in these patients. The similar beneficial effects of the two dosages and the increased dose-related adverse events with the higher dosage suggest that the optimal dosing regimen is <50 mg/h. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study evaluated whether a xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitor, oxypurinol, produces clinical benefits in patients with New York Heart Association functional class III to IV heart failure due to systolic dysfunction receiving optimal medical therapy.Background: Increased XO activity may contribute to heart failure pathophysiology.Methods: Patients (n = 405) were randomized to oxypurinol (600 mg/day) or placebo. Efficacy at 24 weeks was assessed using a composite end point comprising heart failure morbidity, mortality, and quality of life.Results: The percentage of patients characterized as improved, unchanged, or worsened did not differ between those receiving oxypurinol or placebo. Oxypurinol reduced serum uric acid (SUA) by approximately 2 mg/dl (p < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, patients with elevated SUA (>9.5 mg/dl, n = 108) responded favorably to oxypurinol (p = 0.02 for interaction term), whereas oxypurinol patients with SUA <9.5 mg/dl exhibited a trend towards worsening. In addition, SUA reduction to oxypurinol correlated with favorable clinical response. Within the entire oxypurinol patient cohort, those characterized as either improved or unchanged had significantly greater reductions in SUA compared with patients who worsened (-2.3 +/- 2.1 mg/dl vs. -1.0 +/- 1.9 mg/dl, p = 0.0006). In placebo patients, lower baseline SUA, but not change in SUA, correlated with improved clinical outcome.Conclusions: Oxypurinol did not produce clinical improvements in unselected patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure. However, post-hoc analysis suggests that benefits occur in patients with elevated SUA in a manner correlating with the degree of SUA reduction. Serum uric acid may serve as a valuable biomarker to target XO inhibition in heart failure. (Oxypurinol Compared With Placebo for Class III-IV NYHA Congestive Heart Failure; NCT00063687). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]