Search

Stress echocardiography (SE) is a well established and valid technique, widely used for the diagnostic evaluation of patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiac diseases. This statement of the Echocardiography Working Group of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology summarizes the consensus of the writing group regarding the applications of SE, based on the expertise of their members and on a critical review of present medical literature. The main objectives of the consensus document include a comprehensive review of SE methodology and training—which focus on the preparation, the protocols used, the analysis of the SE images, and updated, evidence-based knowledge about SE applications on ischemic and nonischemic heart diseases, such as in cardiomyopathies, heart failure, and valvular heart disease.

Heart failure (HF) is recognized as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common phenotype in patients presenting with HF. Timely diagnosis, appropriate identification of the underlying cause, individualized risk stratification, and prediction of clinical response to treatment have improved the prognosis of DCM over the last few decades. In this article, we reviewed the current evidence on available imaging techniques used for DCM patients. In this direction, we evaluated appropriate scenarios for the implementation of echocardiography, nuclear imaging, and cardiac computed tomography, and we focused on the primordial role that cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) holds in the diagnosis, prognosis, and tailoring of therapeutic options in this population of special clinical interest. We explored the predictive value of CMR toward left ventricular reverse remodeling and prediction of sudden cardiac death, thus guiding the decisions for device therapy. Principles underpinning the use of state-of-the-art CMR techniques such as parametric mapping and feature-tracking strain analysis are also provided, along with expectations for the anticipated future advances in this field. We also attempted to correlate the evidence with clinical practice, with the intent to address questions on selecting the optimal imaging method for different indications and clinical needs. Overall, we recommend a comprehensive assessment of DCM patients at baseline and at follow-up intervals depending on the clinical status, with the addition of CMR as a second-line modality to other imaging techniques. We also provide an algorithm to guide the detailed imaging approach of the patient with DCM. We expect that future guidelines will upgrade their clinical recommendations for the utilization of CMR in DCM, which is expected to further improve the quality of care and the outcomes. This review provides an up-to-date perspective on the imaging of dilated cardiomyopathy patients and will be of clinical value to training doctors and physicians involved in the area of heart failure.

Background: Inflammation is a key process underlying the clinical course of coronary artery disease (CAD). C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) contribute to its pathophysiology and act as biomarkers. We sought to examine whether known single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) impact CAD progression, reflecting increased inflammation. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated coronary angiographies of patients with established CAD who were re-investigated for stable/unstable angina after a time interval of >12 months. We defined progression of CAD as the emergence of a new plaque or a ≥20 % increase of a formerly non-significant lesion. We genotyped patients for the 1846 C>T CRP and -174 G>C IL-6 SNPs. The probability of CAD progression among the Mendelian randomization groups was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Data were analyzed using a Cox model that included relevant clinical factors. Results: A total of 157 patients were included. The serum levels of CRP and IL-6 differed significantly between genotypes. The genotype frequencies of IL-6 were consistent with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, whereas those for CRP were excluded from our conclusions. At 48 months, 83 patients (52.9 %) with the IL-6 C allele versus 74 (47.1 %) with the G allele exhibited CAD progression. Patients with the IL-6 C allele had a 52.8 % probability for progression versus 13.3 % for those with the G allele (p=0.005). The results were confirmed by multivariate analysis; dyslipidemia, family history, and IL-6 SNP emerged as significant factors. Conclusion: Patients with established CAD who carried the -174 C allele of the IL-6 gene demonstrated an increased risk for the progression of coronary plaques over a four-year period. Further studies will be needed to validate these findings. Keywords: Coronary artery disease, inflammation, progression, interleukin-6, gene polymorphisms, SNP