Sandali, Otman, El Sanharawi, Mohamed, Lecuen, Nicolas, Barale, Pierre-Olivier, Bonnel, Sebastien, Basli, Elena, Borderie, Vincent, Laroche, Laurent, and Monin, Claire
Purpose: To compare the safety and functional outcomes of 25-gauge and 23-gauge (G) micro-incision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) instrumentation with the standard 20-G vitrectomy system in the treatment of epiretinal membranes (ERM). Methods: A retrospective comparative study of 553 consecutive cases with epiretinal membrane who underwent pars plana vitrectomy. Twenty-gauge, 25-gauge and 23-gauge vitrectomy was performed respectively in 347, 91, and 115 eyes. Surgery duration, visual acuity improvement, intraocular pressure variation, intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: The mean surgical time in the 23-G group and in the 25-G group was shorter than in the 20-G group ( P < 0.001). Visual improvement was higher 8 days postoperatively in the 25-G group than in the 20-G and 23-G groups ( P = 0.035), but not at 6 weeks postoperatively ( P = 0.186). In the 20-G group, the IOP increased significantly on the first day postoperatively ( P < 0.001), while in the 23-G group, the IOP decreased on the first day postoperatively ( P = 0.073). In the 25-G group, the IOP did not change significantly ( P = 0.807). The incidence of complications was not statistically significant between the three groups. Retinal breaks were significantly related to the induction of posterior vitreous detachment, independent of the system gauge. Conclusion: In ERM surgery, 23-G and 25-G (MIVS) systems are as safe and effective as the 20-G system, and significantly reduce surgical time. Although the 25-G system provides an earlier visual improvement, the 23- and 25- gauge systems are comparable, and the selection will depend on the surgeon's preference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]