1. Intrinsic judgment error in men’s championship world surf league: WSL 2021
- Author
-
Tony Meireles Santos, Lucas Eduardo Rodrigues Santos, Ítalo Vinicius, Cayque Brietzke, Lucas Camilo Pereira, Paulo Henrique Melo, Thaiene Camila Beltrão Moura, Taddeo De Negri, Hassan Mohamed Elsangedy, and Flávio Oliveira Pires
- Subjects
Reliability ,Validity ,Surfing ,Judgment ,Fair game ,Sports ,GV557-1198.995 - Abstract
Introduction: Surfers’ performances are subjectively ranked by 5 judges. Low reliability and validity in judgment may lead to preventable errors and unfair scores. Objective: The aims of the present study is to describe the judgment error for each wave surfed in world surf league (WSL) championship tour of 2021, establish between-judge reliability, and establish judgment validity comparing each judge score with the final control score of the wave. Methodology: To describe the judgment error, we analyzed the available WSL data related to the 2021 Men’s Championship Tour (4,095 waves; 20,475 scores). Results: We found an inverted ‘U’-shaped pattern for the judgment error score vs. control score, explained by a quadratic regression model (R = 0.52; SEE = 0.10). The reliability produced an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (CI95% = 0.97, 1.00), with a between judge (typical) error of 0.15. Validity analyses indicated a minimal real difference of 0.49 in the sum of two waves between the surfers for having 95% certainty for the heat winner. Conclusion: We recommend WSL incorporate intrinsic judgment errors to increase fairness and trust in the WSL championship tour.
- Published
- 2025