Search

Background. Over 30% of the world’s population is anaemic, with a significant proportion of these being iron deficient. As iron deficiency (ID) anaemia in men and post-menopausal women is mostly caused by gastrointestinal blood loss or malabsorption, the initial evaluation of a patient with ID anaemia involves referral to a gastroenterologist. The current drive towards patient blood management in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)prescribes that we regulate not only the use of blood transfusion but also the management of patients in whom the cause of iron loss or inadequate iron absorption is sought. Recommendations have been developed to: (i) aid clinicians in the evaluation of suspected gastrointestinal iron loss and iron malabsorption, and often a combination of these; (ii) improve clinical outcomes for patients with gastrointestinal causes of ID; (iii) provide current, evidence-based, context-specific recommendations for use in the management of ID; and (iv) conserve resources by ensuring rational utilisation of blood and blood products. Method. Development of the guidance document was facilitated by the Gastroenterology Foundation of Sub-Saharan Africa and the South African Gastroenterology Society. The consensus recommendations are based on a rigorous process involving 21 experts in gastroenterology and haematology in SSA. Following discussion of the scope and purpose of the guidance document among the experts, an initial review of the literature and existing guidelines was undertaken. Thereafter, draft recommendation statements were produced to fulfil the outlined purpose of the guidance document. These were reviewed in a round-table discussion and were subjected to two rounds of anonymised consensus voting by the full committee in an electronic Delphi exercise during 2022 using the online platform, Research Electronic Data Capture. Recommendations were modified by considering feedback from the previous round, and those reaching a consensus of over 80% were incorporated into the final document. Finally, 44 statements in the document were read and approved by all members of the working group. Conclusion. The recommendations incorporate six areas, namely: general recommendations and practice, Helicobacter pylori, coeliac disease, suspected small bowel bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, and preoperative care. Implementation of the recommendations is aimed at various levels from individual practitioners to healthcare institutions, departments and regional, district, provincial and national platforms. It is intended that the recommendations spur the development of centre-specific guidelines and that they are integrated with the relevant patient blood management protocols. Integration of the recommendations is intended to promote optimal evaluation and management of patients with ID, regardless of the presence of anaemia.

Background. Overlapping clinical, endoscopic, radiographic and histological features, coupled with poor microbiological yield, make differentiating Crohn’s disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) challenging. Granulomas are present in both diseases; in CD they predict the need for immunosuppressive therapy that requires ITB to be excluded before initiation.Objectives. To compare granuloma-positive CD and ITB, to identify factors that may aid in diagnosis.Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating granuloma-positive CD and ITB identified from a pathology database.Results. Sixty-eight ITB and 48 CD cases were identified. Patients with ITB were more likely to be male, and to have HIV infection, isolated colitis, night sweats and tachycardia. ITB was also associated with lower serum albumin and haemoglobin and higher C-reactive protein levels, a chest radiograph showing active tuberculosis, and lymph nodes >1 cm on imaging. Extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) were predictive of CD. There were no significant differences in smoking status, symptom duration or perianal disease. On multivariate analysis, HIV positivity (odds ratio (OR) 29.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.15 - 410.96; p=0.01), isolated colitis (OR 6.17, 95% CI 1.17 - 32.52; p=0.03) and the absence of EIMs (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 - 0.65; p=0.02) remained significant risk factors for ITB.Conclusion. This is the first study to identify clinical and biochemical factors to aid in differentiating granuloma-positive ITB from CD. EIMs support a diagnosis of CD, while isolated colitis and HIV are predictors of ITB.Â

Several new classes of drugs have recently been developed for the management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). In response, updated international guidelines have been published providing recommendations on how to incorporate these agents into existing treatment algorithms. Recent approval of these new therapies in South Africa has however raised many questions on how they should best be used in a local setting. Since no formal guidance is available, the South African Gastroenterology Society (SAGES) has put forward, in the present position paper, guidance on the best use of both existing and novel drug therapies in the management of IBD in the South African setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]