Search

When this author first began to take classes in theater and comedy improvisation, his motives were largely creative and social, though there was some supposition that his mathematics teaching (at a community college) could benefit as well. Students are known to tout their favorite teachers as "funny." Taking improv classes would presumably loosen him up a little and make him more confident about his stage presence, thereby helping to facilitate the occasional joke or witty aside that could make for moments of shared humor between the teacher and the class. Now, some years and many improv classes later, he has come to recognize that the art of improvising and the art of teaching share fundamental themes. In fact, he believes that they can be seen as crafts that share some fundamental rules. The "rules" involved in improv are somewhat less rigidly defined than those in mathematics, but they are rules, nevertheless, and one stands out above the others: the rule of affirmation. If an instructor wishes to develop an interactive rapport with the students, eliciting their participation and facilitating discussion, one should exhibit sensitivity to students' feelings and egos. By affirming some aspect of any student's input, one also pushes the mathematical "scene" forward, into possibly unexpected and rhetorically rich directions.

BackgroundClinical decision support systems (CDSS) are important tools to improve health care outcomes and reduce preventable medical adverse events. However, the effectiveness and success of CDSS depend on their implementation context and usability in complex health care settings. As a result, usability design and validation, especially in real world clinical settings, are crucial aspects of successful CDSS implementations. ObjectiveOur objective was to develop a novel CDSS to help frontline nurses better manage critical symptom changes in hospitalized patients, hence reducing preventable failure to rescue cases. A robust user interface and implementation strategy that fit into existing workflows was key for the success of the CDSS. MethodsGuided by a formal usability evaluation framework, UFuRT (user, function, representation, and task analysis), we developed a high-level specification of the product that captures key usability requirements and is flexible to implement. We interviewed users of the proposed CDSS to identify requirements, listed functions, and operations the system must perform. We then designed visual and workflow representations of the product to perform the operations. The user interface and workflow design were evaluated via heuristic and end user performance evaluation. The heuristic evaluation was done after the first prototype, and its results were incorporated into the product before the end user evaluation was conducted. First, we recruited 4 evaluators with strong domain expertise to study the initial prototype. Heuristic violations were coded and rated for severity. Second, after development of the system, we assembled a panel of nurses, consisting of 3 licensed vocational nurses and 7 registered nurses, to evaluate the user interface and workflow via simulated use cases. We recorded whether each session was successfully completed and its completion time. Each nurse was asked to use the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Task Load Index to self-evaluate the amount of cognitive and physical burden associated with using the device. ResultsA total of 83 heuristic violations were identified in the studies. The distribution of the heuristic violations and their average severity are reported. The nurse evaluators successfully completed all 30 sessions of the performance evaluations. All nurses were able to use the device after a single training session. On average, the nurses took 111 seconds (SD 30 seconds) to complete the simulated task. The NASA Task Load Index results indicated that the work overhead on the nurses was low. In fact, most of the burden measures were consistent with zero. The only potentially significant burden was temporal demand, which was consistent with the primary use case of the tool. ConclusionsThe evaluation has shown that our design was functional and met the requirements demanded by the nurses’ tight schedules and heavy workloads. The user interface embedded in the tool provided compelling utility to the nurse with minimal distraction.

The effects of water stress on fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) production in the field are confounded by the influences of variable inter- and intra-season rainfall. In this study, a rain shelter experiment investigated the effect of water and nitrogen (N) stress on dry matter (DM) production, DM allocation and N partitioning in fodder beet ('Rivage'). Two water-management treatments, irrigated (replacement of the profile water lost weekly) and unirrigated (limited water applied only during fertigation), and three fertiliser N treatments (0, 50 and 300 kg N ha−1 (hereafter, 0N, 50N, 300N)) were evaluated during the 2016–2017 season. Under irrigation, the yield was greater (P =.02) for the 50N than 0N treatments (29.4 and 24.9 t DM ha−1, respectively). Yield did not differ (P =.42) between irrigated 50N and 300N (30.6 t DM ha−1) treatments, indicating surplus N application to the latter. Water and N stress restricted leaf growth, lowered N uptake and reduced yield by 48%–51%. Surplus N in irrigated 300N treatments resulted in increased N uptake and leaf proportion but reduced the storage root proportion. These results demonstrate the plasticity of fodder beet biomass and N allocation in adapting to the availability of water and N. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars ('Rivage' and SF Brigadier™) were evaluated in a field experiment to quantify the effect of cultivar and sowing date on growth physiology. The crops were sown on 19 September, 17 October, 17 November and 15 December in 2014. Crops were sequentially harvested and separated into storage root, leaf blade and petiole for analysis. Fodder beet growth was sigmoidal; the growth of leaf blades and petioles dominated the lag phase while storage root growth dominated the exponential phase. The appearance of the 25th leaf marked the beginning of the exponential phase. The maximum growth rate was not affected by the cultivar or sowing date. Total dry matter (DM) yield was the same for September- and October-sown crops (2444 ± 164 g DM m−2); showing little advantage of early sowing because cold temperatures slowed canopy development. The November- and December-sown crops produced 18% and 30% lower yield than the October-sown crops. 'Rivage' partitioned 5% greater DM to the storage root, an indication of greater sink strength, than SF Brigadier. Information on the pattern of growth can aid management decisions for optimising yield, and is valuable for the improvement of fodder beet models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Briefs for planning studies, whether by consultants or within an organisation, often suffer from a lack of clarity. In turn the inception, management, timing and results of studies may be diverted. This paper offers a pragmatic appraisal of the study process. While it may appear to say the obvious, there is enough wasted time and money to suggest that what appears obvious, often is not. The key lies in a clear definition of the product of the study. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

(1) Background: Winter grazing of livestock poses significant environmental risks of nitrogen (N) leaching and sediment runoff. (2) Methods: A field study tested the effects of sowing catch crops of oats (Avena sativa L.), ryecorn (Secale cereale L.) or triticale (Triticosecale) in June and August (winter) in Southland, New Zealand (NZ), on the risk of N leaching losses from simulated N loads left after winter forage grazing. (3) Results: Catch crops took up 141–191 kg N ha−1 by green-chop silage maturity (approximately Zadoks growth stage 52; November/December). Importantly, early-sown catch crops were able to capture more N during the key leaching period from winter to mid-spring (77–106 kg N ha−1 cf. 27–31 kg N ha−1 for June and August treatments, respectively). At this time, ryecorn and triticale crops sown in June captured 20–29 kg ha−1 more N than June-sown oats (77 kg N ha−1). In October, early-sown catch crops reduced mineral N in the soil profile (0–45 cm depth) by 69–141 kg N ha−1 through the process of plant uptake. At green-chop silage maturity, catch crop yields ranged from 6.6 to 14.6 t DM ha−1. Highest yields and crop quality profiles (e.g., metabolizable energy, crude protein, soluble sugars and starch) were achieved by the oats, irrespective of the sowing date, indicating that trade-offs likely exist between environmental and productive performances of the catch crop species tested. (4) Conclusion: The catch crop of choice by farmers will depend on the desired end use for the crop, its place in the crop rotation and its potential for an environmental benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article looks into tripartite arrangements between business, the State and the trade unions. The development of tripartite arrangements is considered a well-documented feature of modern industrial relations and economic planning. In this article, the case of the Lucas Aerospace Combine Shop Stewards Committee in Great Britain is illustrated. The Combine Committee had been seeking a planning agreement procedure over the Corporate Plan proposals for some time and they felt that the hand-out should be accompanied by some form of agreement which would relate to the employment creation proposals put forward by the Combine Committee. Thus, the experience of workers in Lucas Aerospace and other industries pursuing so-called corporate plan initiatives contains lessons which need to be learnt by those who would argue for an extension of industrial democracy.