Search

In this paper an algebraic method is presented to derive a 4 × 4 Hermitian Schrödinger equation from E = V + c m 2 c 2 + ( p − e c A ) 2 with E → i ℏ ∂ ∂ t and p → − i ℏ ∇ . The latter operator replacement is a common procedure in a quantum description of the total energy. In the derivation we don’t make use of Dirac’s method of four vectors. Moreover, the root operator isn’t squared either. Instead, use is made of the algebra of operators to derive a Hermitian matrix Schrödinger equation. We believe that new physics can be obtained from an alternative quantization of the relativistic total energy. Note e.g. the pion physics behind the Klein–Gordon equation and the antimatter behind the Dirac quantization of the total relativistic energy. In this paper, for the sake of clarity, a time-only dependence of the electromagnetic potential vector is assumed. It is also demonstrated that a “latent” Lorentz invariance exists related to a derived expression for amplitude and phase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is demonstrated that a probability loophole exists for Einstein local hidden variables to violate the Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt contrast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper a type D breakdown of the Navier Stokes (NS) in with , is demonstrated. The element of the breakdown also occurs in the Euler equation. We consider the fact that in , Ladyzhenskaya found an exact type B solution. The discussion revolves around the notion, also found in quantum spin theory, that in the behavior of a system can be quite different from the behavior in . Concerning applications, our resolution of the problem implies that e.g. hydrology problems formulated as a NS equation can only be solved in computational approximation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the present paper a robustness stress-test of the CHSH experiments for Einstein locality and causality is designed and employed. Random A and B from dice and coins, but based on a local model, run ”parallel” to a real experiment. We found a local causal model with a nonzero probability to violate the CHSH inequality for some relevant quartets Q of settings in the series of trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]