Search

Drosophila experimental evolution, with its well-defined selection protocols, has long supplied useful genetic material for the analysis of functional physiology. While there is a long tradition of interpreting the effects of large-effect mutants physiologically, identifying and interpreting gene-to-phenotype relationships has been challenging in the genomic era, with many labs not resolving how physiological traits are affected by multiple genes throughout the genome. Drosophila experimental evolution has demonstrated that multiple phenotypes change because of the evolution of many loci across the genome, creating the scientific challenge of sifting out differentiated but noncausal loci for individual characters. The fused lasso additive model method allows us to infer some of the differentiated loci that have relatively greater causal effects on the differentiation of specific phenotypes. The experimental material that we use in the present study comes from 50 populations that have been selected for different life histories and levels of stress resistance. Differentiation of cardiac robustness, starvation resistance, desiccation resistance, lipid content, glycogen content, water content, and body masses was assayed among 40–50 of these experimentally evolved populations. Through the fused lasso additive model, we combined physiological analyses from eight parameters with whole-body pooled-seq genomic data to identify potentially causally linked genomic regions. We have identified approximately 2,176 significantly differentiated 50-kb genomic windows among our 50 populations, with 142 of those identified genomic regions that are highly likely to have a causal effect connecting specific genome sites to specific physiological characters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Model organisms subjected to sustained experimental evolution often show levels of phenotypic differentiation that dramatically exceed the phenotypic differences observed in natural populations. Genome-wide sequencing of pooled populations then offers the opportunity to make inferences about the genes that are the cause of these phenotypic differences. We tested, through computer simulations, the efficacy of a statistical learning technique called the “fused lasso additive model” (FLAM). We focused on the ability of FLAM to distinguish between genes which are differentiated and directly affect a phenotype from differentiated genes which have no effect on the phenotype. FLAM can separate these two classes of genes even with relatively small samples (10 populations, in total). The efficacy of FLAM is improved with increased number of populations, reduced environmental phenotypic variation, and increased within-treatment among-replicate variation. FLAM was applied to SNP variation measured in both twenty-population and thirtypopulation studies of Drosophila subjected to selection for age-at-reproduction, to illustrate the application of the method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Experimental evolutionary genomics now allows biologists to test fundamental theories concerning the genetic basis of adaptation. We have conducted one of the longest laboratory evolution experiments with any sexually-reproducing metazoan, Drosophila melanogaster. We used next-generation resequencing data from this experiment to examine genome-wide patterns of genetic variation over an evolutionary time-scale that approaches 1,000 generations. We also compared measures of variation within and differentiation between our populations to simulations based on a variety of evolutionary scenarios. Our analysis yielded no clear evidence of hard selective sweeps, whereby natural selection acts to increase the frequency of a newly-arising mutation in a population until it becomes fixed. We do find evidence for selection acting on standing genetic variation, as independent replicate populations exhibit similar population-genetic dynamics, without obvious fixation of candidate alleles under selection. A hidden-Markov model test for selection also found widespread evidence for selection. We found more genetic variation genome-wide, and less differentiation between replicate populations genome-wide, than arose in any of our simulated evolutionary scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]