Search

Lung cancer is the principal cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide; however, there has been controversy as to whether there is a difference in survival rate according to gender in Brazil. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to compare the epidemiologic and clinical profile and the overall survival of patients with lung cancer according to gender.A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 1283 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2006 and 2014 at a single cancer center. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier statistics. A log-rank test was used to assess differences between survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to quantitate the relationship between gender and overall survival.Compared with men, women were more frequently younger (P .001), nonsmokers (P = .007), diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (P .001), had early stage disease (P .001), received surgery or surgery in combination with chemotherapy (P .001), and had a better survival rate (P .001). The median overall survival rate was higher in women (14.2 vs. 10.5 months in men; P .001). Cox regression-adjusted analysis shows that women were 16% less likely to die than men (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.98; P = .03).A higher overall survival rate was found in women with lung cancer as compared with men with lung cancer in Brazil.

Objectives Regarding the fatality rates stemming from various existing forms of cancers worldwide, lung cancer (LC) is ranked as the main cause of death amongst those who suffer from cancer. Although the epidemiological, clinical, and histological profile of patients with this type of cancer is largely unknown, Brazil has made tremendous efforts to generate data for supporting healthcare policies concerning lung cancer. Taking these factors into account, this study aims to analyse the epidemiological, clinical, and histological profiles of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Brazil. Material and methods For this study, a cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted to nationally analyse patient’s data within the cancer hospital registries found in the National Cancer Institute (INCA) and the Sao Paulo Cancer Foundation (FOSP) between 2000 and 2011. Results A total of 35,018 patients diagnosed with NSCLC in Brazil between 2000 and 2011 were analysed. The analysis demonstrated the occurrence of an epidemiological shift, related to the most prevalent histological type of NSCLC in the study population from 2003. The shift resulted in a higher percentage of adenocarcinoma (43.3%) over squamous cell carcinoma (36.5%). Additionally, there was a significant increase in both the number of cases of LC in women and in the rates of patients diagnosed with metastatic disease. Conclusion The use of filtered cigarettes since the 60’s and the increase in the number of LC cases in women, were one of the causes for the switch in the histological profile of NSCLC in Brazil. Consequently, adenocarcinoma is now the predominant type of cancer detected. Late diagnosis is a hallmark sign.

Summary Background The combination therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with platinum-based treatment is well known, but its utility in elderly has not been explored systematically. Aim To examine whether aging compromises survival or exacerbates toxicity in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving platinumbased treatment. Methods We performed a nested case-control study in a cohort of chemotherapy naive patients enrolled January 1998–December 2003. Cases were consecutive patients over 70 at diagnosis with stage III or IV NSCLC. Controls were a subset of patients under 70 years matched by stage and year in which they had been treated. All patients received Cisplatin (80 mg/m2) or Carboplatin (4–6 AUC), every 4 weeks, followed by Vinorelbine (30 mg/m2) for a maximum of six courses. The medical history, physical examination and tumor imaging evaluation were performed at baseline and then monthly. Survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test was used for survival comparisons. Chi-squared test was used to compare side effects in the two groups. Results A total of 419 patients were identified for the case-control study (205 elderly/214 young) with 3.6 cycles per patient, on average. The 2- and 3-year survival rates were 20.5% and 6.8% for elderly patients and 9.8% and 2.3% for younger patients (p = 0.017 and 0.014, respectively for 2 and 3 years). The proportion of patients with adverse effects, either grade 3 or 4, was the same in both groups at 2 years (43.9% versus 43.9%; p = 0.99). Conclusions Although elderly patients may self-select or be selected to be healthier, our findings suggest that elderly patients currently undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancer do as well or better than younger patients. Elderly age alone should not preclude patients from receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, since it seems well tolerated and effective in non-small-cell lung cancer among elderly patients.