Search

Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors are replacing vitamin K-dependent antagonists as anticoagulation treatment in many clinical scenarios. Trauma centers are noting an increase in patients presenting on these medications. The 2018 Food and Drug Administration approval of andexanet alfa provides an alternative anticoagulation reversal. Barriers may limit utilization of new medications including a lack of grade 1A evidence supporting the use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) versus andexanet alfa and cost. To evaluate barriers of andexanet alfa utilization by trauma surgeons, a 15-question survey was conducted. There was a 9% completion rate (n = 89). The results revealed 23.5% would choose andexanet alfa as first-line treatment in children, and 25.8% as first-line treatment in adults. The majority of respondents, 64.7% and 67.4%, would use PCC preferentially in children and adults, respectively. Respondents indicated that cost burden was an overriding factor (76.3%); 42.4% cited lack of high-level efficacy data of andexanet alfa for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors. Additional double-blinded multi-institutional randomized controlled trials comparing 4F-PCC and andexanet alfa for factor Xa inhibitor reversal are needed to support efficacy especially with the increased cost associated.

Background:. Keloids are disfiguring, scar-like lesions that are challenging to treat, with low response rates to current interventions and frequent recurrence. It has been widely reported that keloids are characterized by myofibroblasts, specialized contractile fibroblasts that express alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). However, evidence supporting a role for myofibroblasts in keloid pathology is inconclusive, with conflicting reports in the literature. This complicates development of more effective therapies, as the benefit of interventions targeting myofibroblasts is unclear. This study was undertaken to determine whether myofibroblasts can be considered characteristic of keloids. Methods:. Myofibroblasts in tissue sections from keloids, hypertrophic scars (HTSs), and normal skin were localized by α-SMA immunostaining. Expression of α-SMA mRNA (ACTA2 gene) in normal skin and keloid tissue, and in fibroblasts from normal skin, keloid, and HTSs, was measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results:. Normal skin did not exhibit α-SMA-expressing myofibroblasts, but myofibroblasts were identified in 50% of keloids and 60% of HTSs. No significant differences in ACTA2 expression between keloid and normal skin tissue were observed. Mean ACTA2 expression was higher in HTS (2.54-fold, P = 0.005) and keloid fibroblasts (1.75-fold, P = 0.046) versus normal fibroblasts in vitro. However, α-SMA expression in keloids in vivo was not associated with elevated ACTA2 in keloid fibroblasts in vitro. Conclusions:. Despite elevated ACTA2 in cultured keloid fibroblasts, myofibroblast presence is not a consistent feature of keloids. Therefore, therapies that target myofibroblasts may not be effective for all keloids. Further research is required to define the mechanisms driving keloid formation for development of more effective therapies.