Search

Refereed/Peer-reviewed Background: There is a recognized need for evidence to inform breast cancer screening guidelines and services for transgender people, who face barriers to accessing appropriate and inclusive health care. Aims: This review summarized evidence for breast cancer risk and screening guidelines in transgender individuals, including the potential impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT); factors that may influence screening decision-making and behaviors; and considerations for providing culturally safe, high-quality screening services. Methods: A protocol was developed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Searches were performed in Medline, Emcare, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for articles reporting information on the provision of culturally safe, high-quality breast cancer screening services for transgender people. Results: We identified 57 sources for inclusion: 13 cross-sectional studies, 6 case reports, 2 case series, 28 review or opinion articles, 6 systematic reviews, 1 qualitative study, and 1 book chapter. Evidence on rates of breast cancer screening among transgender people and the association between GAHT and breast cancer risk was inconclusive. Factors negatively associated with cancer screening behaviors included socioeconomic barriers, stigma, and lack of health provider awareness of transgender health issues. Breast cancer screening recommendations varied and were generally based on expert opinion due to the lack of clear evidence. Considerations for providing culturally safe care to transgender people were identified and mapped to the areas of workplace policies and procedures, patient information, clinic environment, professional conduct, communication, and knowledge and competency. Discussion: Screening recommendations for transgender individuals are complicated by the lack of robust epidemiological data and clear understanding of the role GAHT may play in breast cancer pathogenesis. Guidelines have been developed based on expert opinion and are subsequently not uniform or evidence based. Further work is required to clarify and consolidate recommendations.

Aim: To determine feasibility and acceptability of completing PROs questionnaires at completion and 1 year after curative cancer treatment. Methods: Patients assessed in a nurse-led end of treatment survivorship clinic, at a tertiary referral centre, recruited between October 2015 and July 2016 were mailed a survey at baseline and at 12-month follow-up. The survey included validated PRO questionnaires. A target response rate for feasibility, defined as the proportion of the eligible population approached that completed the survey, was set at 70%. Qualitative feedback regarding the survey was collected from participants. Results: Of the 47 eligible patients approached, 34 (72.4%) agreed to participate with 29 (61.9%) completing the survey at baseline, and 21 (44.7%) at follow-up. Respondents lost to follow-up at 12 months had clinically meaningful lower scores on all QLQ-C30 functioning scales and 8 out of 9 symptom scales/items. Qualitative feedback from survey respondents indicated the content was relevant and acceptable. Participants expressed willingness to complete a similar survey approximately once per year and a higher preference for completing the survey in hard copy compared with online. Conclusions: Cancer survivors are willing to provide information on a range of PROs, but those with higher needs were the ones less likely to complete surveys. There is scope to improve the response rate and representativeness of the patient cohort captured. Future research should identify strategies to optimise recruitment when collecting PROs data from cancer survivors. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

This study investigated the individual variability in oral tactile sensitivity considering touch, by means of Von Frey Hair monofilaments (VFH) and spatial resolution, using the grating orientation test (GOT). The relationships of the two measures with 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) responsiveness and fungiform papillae density and size were investigated. One hundred and forty-four subjects (48.6% women, aged 18-30) participated in the study. VFH and GOT thresholds were assessed by three-down/one-up staircase method. Responsiveness to 3.2 mM PROP was assessed on the general Labeled Magnitude Scale. Fungiform papillae density (FPD) and size were determined from automated counting. VFH thresholds appeared unsuitable to reveal individual variation in responsiveness to point-pressure on the tongue. The frequency of GOT thresholds approximated a normal distribution and covered the whole range of variation, thus indicating an ability to measure individual variation in oral tactile sensitivity. No significant linear correlations were found between any of the oral tactile sensitivity measures and PROP responsiveness, FPD total and size class. VFH and GOT thresholds were not significantly associated. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering was used to classify participants for their PROP responsiveness, total FPD and GOT threshold. Three clusters were identified, C1 (n = 67), Cl2 (n = 42), and Cl3 (n = 35), differing for PROP responsiveness and FPD only. Results encourage future studies to explore association between GOT and both perception and preference for different food texture. Furthermore, deeper investigation of individual variability in sensitivity to different types of oral tactile stimuli would be helpful to capture differences in tactile sensitivity among the most sensitive individuals.

There is a recognised need for reported national data that inform health policy, health professions, and consumers about the wellbeing of Australians with cancer and other chronic conditions. International initiatives have demonstrated the viability and benefits of utilising population-based cancer registries to monitor the prevalence and trajectory of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes among people with cancer. Establishing a similar level of monitoring in Australia would require timely access to health data collected by publicly funded, population-based cancer registries, and the capacity to link this information across jurisdictions. Combining information from different sources via data linkage is an efficient and cost-effective way to maximise how data are used to inform population health and policy development. However, linking health datasets has historically been highly restricted, resource-intensive, and costly in Australia due to complex and outdated legislative requirements, duplicative approval processes, and differing policy frameworks in each state and territory. This has resulted in significant research waste due to underutilisation of existing data, duplication of research efforts and resources, and data not being translated into decision-making. Recognising these challenges, from 2015 to 2017 the Productivity Commission investigated options for improving data availability and use in Australia, considering factors such as privacy, security, and intellectual property. The inquiry report recommended significant reforms for Australian legislation, including the creation of a data sharing and release structure to improve access to data for research and policy development purposes. This paper discusses (1) opportunities in HRQOL research enabled by data linkage, (2) barriers to data access and use in Australia and the implications for waste in HRQOL research, and (3) proposed legislative reforms for improving data availability and use in Australia.

Exposure to smoke emitted from wildfire and planned burns (i.e., smoke events) has been associated with numerous negative health outcomes, including respiratory symptoms and conditions. This rapid review investigates recent evidence (post-2009) regarding the effectiveness of public health messaging during smoke events. The objectives were to determine the effectiveness of various communication channels used and public health messages disseminated during smoke events, for general and at-risk populations. A search of 12 databases and grey literature yielded 1775 unique articles, of which 10 were included in this review. Principal results were: 1) Smoke-related public health messages are communicated via a variety of channels, but limited evidence is available regarding their effectiveness for the general public or at-risk groups. 2) Messages that use simple language are more commonly recalled, understood, and complied with. Compliance differs according to socio-demographic characteristics. 3) At-risk groups may be advised to stay indoors before the general population, in order to protect the most vulnerable people in a community. The research included in this review was observational and predominantly descriptive, and is therefore unable to sufficiently answer questions regarding effectiveness. Experimental research, as well as evaluations, are required to examine the effectiveness of modern communication channels, channels to reach at-risk groups, and the ‘stay indoors’ message. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

The Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Aboriginal) population has a higher age-standardised cancer mortality rate and a significantly lower 5-year survival rate for all cancers than the non-Aboriginal population. Aboriginal people from regional and remote South Australia and the Northern Territory, are often required to travel to Adelaide to access specialist cancer care services. The burden and expenses associated with transport and accommodation and cultural and linguistic factors have been identified as barriers to accessing medical treatment and health services. In collaboration with community and stakeholders, Cancer Council South Australia led the development of the Cancer Healing Messages flipchart and patient flyer to assist health professionals in explaining cancer and the cancer journey to Aboriginal cancer patients and their families. This study examined the usage, acceptability and perceived usefulness of the resources, barriers to uptake, and strategies to improve their utilisation and sustainability.An evaluation survey was conducted among Aboriginal Health Workers (AHWs) and other health professionals working with Aboriginal clients in South Australia (n=18). Participants indicated whether they agreed that the resources are valuable, culturally appropriate, helpful for explaining aspects of cancer to Aboriginal cancer patients, and useful with regard patient outcomes, how frequently they used or would use the resources for information, and how they use the flipchart in practice. Participants were also asked to report any usage barriers.The resources were considered useful, valuable and culturally appropriate by almost all participants; however, there was a discrepancy between intentions to use the resources and actual uptake, which was low. The most commonly reported barriers related to appropriateness for certain patients and lack of availability of resources in some contexts.The Cancer Healing Messages flipchart and patient flyer are perceived as appropriate, valuable, and useful tools for AHWs. A long-term strategy and clear implementation plan involving education, training and promotion of the materials, is required to achieve broad reach and sustainable utilisation of the Cancer Healing Messages flipchart and patient flyer.