Search

Copyright of Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia is the property of DADPPRI UI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Whilst Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis (CBTp) has been found to reduce psychotic symptoms, most evidence supporting its implementation originates from studies in Western and high-income countries. Furthermore, questions remain regarding the efficacy of CBTp conducted via teleconsultation. Herein we report an ongoing case in Indonesia involving an individual with schizoaffective disorder, who received 60 sessions of CBTp over seven months. Sessions were delivered via a combination of voice and video calls. The patient, a 40-year-old male, was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder at the age of 26. He exhibited symptoms of paranoid and religious delusions, hallucinations (auditory, visual, and somatic) and disorganised speech during our intake interview. Negative symptoms were not apparent. In the 14 years prior to our initial consultation, the patient was prescribed antipsychotics and demonstrated good adherence. He had no history of psychotherapy independent of our clinic. Treatment involved CBTp techniques, including psychoeducation, a symptom diary, relaxation, and behavioural experiments. Study outcome was assessed with Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales. Both hallucination and delusion subscale scores improved 53% from 53 at intake to 25 during an assessment administered 6 months later. Results from this study demonstrate that the CBTp is both feasible, and beneficial, when conducted via teleconsultation in Indonesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) for identifying common mental disorders in an outpatient clinical psychologist office setting in Indonesia. A total of 661 outpatients from a clinical psychology office in Jakarta, Indonesia, participated in the study. The complete PHQ was administered, and its results were compared with diagnoses made by clinical psychologists based on ICD-11 criteria, including somatoform disorder (n = 6), depression (n = 117), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD, n = 50), panic disorder (n = 42), bulimia nervosa (n = 2), binge eating disorder (n = 2), and other diagnoses such as OCD and BPD (n = 442). Receiver operating characteristics were computed to examine cut-off points, and optimal cut-off points based on the Youden Index were identified for somatoform disorder (PHQ-15 ≥ 13), depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 13), GAD (GAD- 7 ≥ 10), and panic disorder (PHQ-PD ≥ 7). Cut-off points for the alcohol abuse and eating disorder modules of the PHQ could not be determined due to a lack of sample, and AUC was suboptimal for PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PHQ-ED. The Indonesian PHQ demonstrated good sensitivity but low specificity in identifying somatoform disorder, depression, GAD, and panic disorders based on ICD-11 criteria among Indonesian clinical psychologist office outpatients. In the Indonesian outpatient psychiatric context, the utility of the Indonesian PHQ appeared to be most effective in ruling out diagnoses. • Optimal cut-offs in Indonesian outpatients: somatoform (PHQ-15 ≥ 13), depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 13), GAD (GAD-7 ≥ 10), panic (PHQ-PD ≥ 7). • The Indonesian PHQ shows good sensitivity for ruling out diagnoses, but limited specificity requires caution for confirming diagnoses. • The Indonesian PHQ's limited specificity may result from the psychiatric outpatient sample, with similar studies in specialist contexts showing lower accuracy than in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-20) and its short version (ULS-8) are widely used to measure loneliness. However, the question remains whether or not previous studies using the scale to measure loneliness are measuring the construct equally across countries. The present study examined the measurement invariance (MI) of both scales in Germany, Indonesia, and the United States (N = 2350). The one-, two-, and three-factor structure of the ULS-20 did not meet the model fit cut-off criteria in the total sample. The ULS-8 met the model fit cut-off criteria and has configural, but not metric invariance because two items unrelated to social isolation were not MI. The final six items (ULS-6) exclusively related to social isolation had complete MI. Participants from the United States scored highest in the ULS-6, followed by participants from Germany and then Indonesia. We conclude that the ULS-6 is an appropriate measure for cross-cultural studies on loneliness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The prevalence of psychotic experiences (PEs) is higher in low-and-middle-income-countries (LAMIC) than in high-income countries (HIC). Here, we examine whether this effect is explicable by measurement bias. Methods: A community sample from 13 countries (N = 7141) was used to examine the measurement invariance (MI) of a frequently used self-report measure of PEs, the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE), in LAMIC (n = 2472) and HIC (n = 4669). The CAPE measures positive (e.g. hallucinations), negative (e.g. avolition) and depressive symptoms. MI analyses were conducted with multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses. Results: MI analyses showed similarities in the structure and understanding of the CAPE factors between LAMIC and HIC. Partial scalar invariance was found, allowing for latent score comparisons. Residual invariance was not found, indicating that sum score comparisons are biased. A comparison of latent scores before and after MI adjustment showed both overestimation (e.g. avolition, d = 0.03 into d = −0.42) and underestimation (e.g. magical thinking, d = −0.03 into d = 0.33) of PE in LAMIC relative to HIC. After adjusting the CAPE for MI, participants from LAMIC reported significantly higher levels on most CAPE factors but a significantly lower level of avolition. Conclusion: Previous studies using sum scores to compare differences across countries are likely to be biased. The direction of the bias involves both over- and underestimation of PEs in LAMIC compared to HIC. Nevertheless, the study confirms the basic finding that PEs are more frequent in LAMIC than in HIC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While many known risk factors and mechanisms for psychosis exist, the time it takes for these risk factors and mechanisms to influence psychosis remains unclear. Furthermore, the average duration of a psychotic symptom has not been estimated. The aim of the study is to discover the average duration of an episode of psychotic symptoms and other mental disorders, as well as the average duration by which psychological mechanisms of risk factors and psychotic symptoms or other mental disorders operate. This study is an online longitudinal survey with various time-interval assessments (baseline, 7 daily, 4 weekly, 4 fortnightly, and 6 monthly assessments). A community sample of Indonesians were recruited via internet and a sample of help-seekers were recruited from clinical practices. From November 2018 to March 2019, we recruited 464 participants who completed the baseline survey from the community. Of the 464 participants, 73% of them are female with ages ranging from 18 - 57 years and 33.2% reported having been diagnosed with at least one mental disorder. The expected results of the surveys provide us with estimates regarding appropriate time-intervals of risk factors and mechanisms of psychosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The need for a brief screening tool for psychosis is widely recognized. The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is a popular self‐report measure of psychosis, but a cut‐off score that can detect those most likely to fulfill diagnostic criteria for psychotic disorder is not established. Methods: A case–control sample from the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis Project study (N = 1375, healthy individuals, n = 507, and individuals with a psychotic disorder, n = 868), was used to examine cut‐off scores of the CAPE with receiver operating curve analyses. We examined 27 possible cut‐off scores computed from a combination of scores from the frequency and distress scales of the various factors of the CAPE. Results: The weighted severity positive symptom dimension was most optimal in detecting individuals with a psychotic disorder (>1.75 cut‐off; area under the curve = 0.88; sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 88%), which correctly identified 80% of the sample as cases or controls with a diagnostic odds ratio of 22.69. Conclusions: The CAPE can be used as a first screening tool to detect individuals who are likely to fulfill criteria for a psychotic disorder. The >1.75 cut‐off of the weighted severity positive symptom dimension provides a better prediction than all alternatives tested so far. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psychotic experiences (PEs) are common in the general population but do not necessarily reflect a risk status if they occur in relative isolation or are not distressing. Emerging evidence suggests that PEs might be experienced as more benign for individuals from collectivistic low- and middle-income countries (LAMIC) compared with individualistic high-income countries (HIC). The aim of this study was to determine whether: (1) self-reported PEs are less distressing in community samples from LAMIC than from HIC; (2) the network of PEs is significantly less connected in a sample from LAMIC than from HIC. Adults from 8 HIC (n = 4669) and 5 LAMIC (n = 2472) were compared. The lifetime frequency of PEs and related distress were assessed with the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences. We analyzed the associations of PEs with distress and country type. The interconnection of PEs was visualized by a network analysis and tested for differences in global connection strengths. The average endorsement rates of PEs were significantly higher in LAMIC than in HIC (χ 2 = 1772.87, P <.01, Φ cramer = 0.50). There was a universal positive correlation between higher frequency of PEs and more distress, but the distress levels controlled for frequency were significantly higher in HIC (R 2 = 0.11; b = 0.26; SE = 0.01; T = 17.68; P <.001). Moreover, the network of PEs was significantly less connected in LAMIC (S = 0.40, P <.05). The findings indicate that PEs are of less clinical relevance in LAMIC compared with HIC. The universal use of current high-risk criteria might thus not be adequate without consideration of associated distress and cultural values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]