Search

IntroductionWe previously reported a specific defect of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) monocyte polarization to anti-inflammatory M2-like macrophages related to increased miR-155 expression in all RA patients except those receiving adalimumab (ADA). In this longitudinal study, we examined whether different tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were able to restore monocyte polarization to M2-like macrophages and their effect on the transcriptomic signature.MethodsM2-like polarization induced by human serum AB was studied in 7 healthy donors and 20 RA patients included in the ABIRA cohort before and 3 months after starting ADA or etanercept (ETA). The differential gene expression of M2- and M1-related transcripts was studied in macrophage-derived monocytes after differentiation.ResultsAt baseline, RA monocytes showed a defect of polarization to M2-like macrophages as compared with healthy donor monocytes, which was negatively correlated with disease activity. M2-like polarization from circulating monocytes was restored only with ADA and not ETA treatment. The transcriptomic signature demonstrated downregulation of M2-related transcripts and upregulation of M1-related transcripts in active RA. In patients receiving ADA, the transcriptomic signature of M2-related transcripts was restored.ConclusionThis longitudinal study demonstrates that ADA but not ETA is able to restore the M2-like polarization of monocytes that is defective in RA.

Background: Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a severe, life-threatening syndrome characterised by hyperinflammation and macrophage activation. Viral infections such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are a well-recognised trigger of HLH but the treatment of such cases is not well-defined. We present a case of primary EBV driven HLH that was successfully treated with the interleukin-1 inhibitor anakinra in addition to rituximab and high-dose steroids. Case: A 22-year-old female with no past medical history developed a mononucleosis-like illness lasting five days characterised by fevers, sore throat and neck swelling. Two weeks following this she presented with fevers, night sweats, fatigue and right upper quadrant pain. She was diagnosed with HLH based on high fevers with hyperferritaemia, hypertriglyceridaemia, pancytopaenia, abnormal liver function tests and hepatosplenomegaly. Extensive investigation revealed an EBV viral load of 23,000,000 copies/ml with nil other obvious triggers. A diagnosis of primary-driven EBV HLH was made. She was treated with the interleukin-1 inhibitor anakinra, methylprednisolone and IVIG and a single dose of rituximab.Following the commencement of treatment, the patient made a dramatic improvement. Her EBV viral load reduced to 660 within nine days and her blood counts and liver function returned to normal. She was discharged from hospital on day sixteen. She continued the anakinra for 5 weeks at a weaning dose and completed a 12-week weaning dose of steroids. She has returned to her studies and has no lasting complications from her illness. Discussion: This case highlights the potential of primary EBV infection to cause fulminant HLH. The prompt diagnosis and treatment of HLH using anakinra and rituximab in addition to conventional HLH treatment was safe, and associated with a dramatic clinical improvement. The use of anakinra has been documented in other cases of HLH but none, to our knowledge, of primary EBV-driven HLH with no underlying haematological or rheumatological condition.

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFis) have revolutionized the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however despite considerable progress, only a small proportion of patients maintain long-term clinical response. Selection of, and switching between, biologics is mainly empirical, experiential, and not evidence-based. Most biopharmaceutical proteins (BP) can induce an immune response against the foreign protein component. Immunogenicity and the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is considered one of the main reasons for loss of therapeutic efficacy (secondary failure). ADAs may neutralize and/or promote clearance of circulating BP with resultant low serum drug levels, loss of clinical response, poor drug survival and adverse events, such as infusion reactions. ADA identification is technically difficult and not standardized, making interpretation of immunogenicity data from published clinical studies challenging. Trough TNFi drug levels correlate with clinical outcomes, exhibiting a “concentration-response” relationship. Measurement of ADA and drug levels may improve patient care and improve cost-effectiveness of BP use. However, in the absence of clinically-validated, reliable assays and consensus guidelines, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and immunogenicity testing have not been widely adopted in routine clinical practice in Rheumatology. Here we discuss the utility and relevance of TDM and immunogenicity testing of TNFis in RA (focusing on the most widely used TNFis globally, with the most available data, i.e., infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept), the limitations of currently available assays and potential future immunopharmacological strategies to personalize disease management.

An important goal for personalized treatment is predicting response to a particular therapeutic. A drawback of biological treatment is immunogenicity and the development of antibodies directed against the drug [anti-drug antibodies (ADA)], which are associated with a poorer clinical outcome. Here we set out to identify a predictive biomarker that discriminates rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are more likely to develop ADA in response to adalimumab, a human monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α. By taking advantage of an immune-phenotyping platform, LEGENDScreen™, we measured the expression of 332 cell surface markers on B and T cells in a cross-sectional adalimumab-treated RA patient cohort with a defined ADA response. The analysis revealed seven differentially expressed markers (DEMs) between the ADA+ and ADA− patients. Validation of the DEMs in an independent prospective European cohort of adalimumab treated RA patients, revealed a significant and consistent reduced frequency of signal regulatory protein (SIRP)α/β-expressing memory B cells in ADA+ vs. ADA− RA patients. We also assessed the predictive value of SIRPα/β expression in a longitudinal RA cohort prior to the initiation of adalimumab treatment. We show that a frequency of < 9.4% of SIRPα/β-expressing memory B cells predicts patients that will develop ADA, and consequentially fail to respond to treatment, with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.92. Thus, measuring the frequency of SIRPα/β-expressing memory B cells in patients prior to adalimumab treatment may be clinically useful to identify a subgroup of active RA subjects who are going to develop an ADA response and not gain substantial clinical benefit from this treatment.