Search

Abstract Background Genomic profiling of advanced solid cancer in patients with no further evidence based standard treatment options is a novel approach to identify potential experimental treatment options based on specific genomic alterations. Due to the expected short survival of these patients timely assessment of potential druggable targets is critical to minimize the risk of deterioration during the analysis. The primary objective of this prospective study is to evaluate the turnaround time for genomic profiling and the clinical investigational procedures. The secondary objectives are to investigate how often genomic alterations in tumor tissue gives rise to a matched treatment offer and evaluate the clinical outcome. Methods The PRECODE study is a prospective, non-randomized, single-center cohort study conducted at Departments of Oncology and Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Enrollment between March 1, 2019 and December 31, 2024. Eligibility criteria are age ≥ 18 years, written informed consent, advanced solid tumors, exhausted treatment options, ECOG performance status 0–2, adequate organ function and life expectancy ≥ 3 months. A core needle biopsy is analyzed by next generation sequencing using a pan-cancer comprehensive panel. Results are discussed weekly at institutional/local and national multidisciplinary tumor boards. Discussion Strategies and methods for genomic profiling of advanced solid cancers differ. Rapid analysis and interpretation of sequencing data are key to avoiding delays in initiation potential experimental treatments, as these late-stage patients may quickly deteriorate. Although a highly optimized setup with fast-track clinical evaluation and genomic profiling has been established a subset will not be offered a targeted treatment due to deterioration. Local and national multidisciplinary teams have been established to optimize individualized treatment decisions. After genomic profiling a subset of patients will take part in clinical trials, which will constrain the reporting of overall survival or progression free survival. Trial registration Danish Ethics Committee, Projekt-ID: S-2018014, date of approval: 27- FEB- 2019) Danish Data Protection Agency (Journal no: 18/58329, date of approval: 23-NOV-2018). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05385081 (retrospectively registered).

Abstract Background An increasing number of trials indicate that treatment outcomes in cancer patients with metastatic disease are improved when targeted treatments are matched with druggable genomic alterations in individual patients (pts). An estimated 30–80% of advanced solid tumors harbor actionable genomic alterations. However, the efficacy of personalized cancer treatment is still scarcely investigated in larger, controlled trials due to the low frequency and heterogenous distribution of druggable alterations among different histologic tumor types. Therefore, the overall effect of targeted cancer treatment on clinical outcomes still needs investigation. Study design/methods ProTarget is a national, non-randomized, multi-drug, open-label, pan-cancer phase 2 trial aiming to investigate the anti-tumor activity and toxicity of currently 13 commercially available, EMA-approved targeted therapies outside the labeled indication for treatment of advanced malignant diseases, harboring specific actionable genomic alterations. The trial involves the Danish National Molecular Tumor Board for confirmation of drug-variant matches. Key inclusion criteria include a) measurable disease (RECIST v.1.1), b) ECOG performance status 0–2, and c) an actionable genomic alteration matching one of the study drugs. Key exclusion criteria include a) cancer type within the EMA-approved label of the selected drug, and b) genomic alterations known to confer drug resistance. Initial drug dose, schedule and dose modifications are according to the EMA-approved label. The primary endpoint is objective response or stable disease at 16 weeks. Pts are assigned to cohorts defined by the selected drug, genomic alteration, and tumor histology type. Cohorts are monitored according to a Simon’s two-stage-based design. Response is assessed every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks. The trial is designed similar to the Dutch DRUP and the ASCO TAPUR trials and is a partner in the Nordic Precision Cancer Medicine Trial Network. In ProTarget, serial fresh tumor and liquid biopsies are mandatory and collected for extensive translational research including whole genome sequencing, array analysis, and RNA sequencing. Discussion The ProTarget trial will identify new predictive biomarkers for targeted treatments and provide new data and essential insights in molecular pathways involved in e.g., resistance mechanisms and thereby potentially evolve and expand the personalized cancer treatment strategy. Protocol version: 16, 09-MAY-2022. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04341181. Secondary Identifying No: ML41742. EudraCT No: 2019–004771-40.

Introduction: We report brigatinib long-term efficacy and safety from phase 1/2 and phase 2 (ALTA) trials in ALK–rearrangement positive (ALK+) NSCLC. Methods: The phase 1/2 study evaluated brigatinib 30 to 300 mg/d in patients with advanced malignancies. ALTA randomized patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC to brigatinib 90 mg once daily (arm A) or 180 mg once daily (7-d lead-in at 90 mg; arm B). Results: In the phase 1/2 study, 79 of 137 brigatinib-treated patients had ALK+ NSCLC; 71 were crizotinib pretreated. ALTA randomized 222 patients (n = 112 in arm A; n = 110 in arm B). Median follow-up at phase 1/2 study end (≈5.6 y after last patient enrolled) was 27.7 months; at ALTA study end (≈4.4 y after last patient enrolled), 19.6 months (A) and 28.3 months (B). Among patients with ALK+ NSCLC in the phase 1/2 study, median investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8–21.2); median overall survival was 47.6 months (28.6–not reached). In ALTA, median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.2 months (7.4–11.1) in arm A and 15.6 months (11.1–18.5) in arm B; median independent review committee (IRC)-assessed PFS was 9.9 (7.4–12.8) and 16.7 (11.6–21.4) months, respectively; median overall survival was 25.9 (18.2–45.8) and 40.6 (32.5–not reached) months, respectively. Median intracranial PFS for patients with any brain metastases was 12.8 (9.2–18.4) months in arm A and 18.4 (12.6–23.9) months in arm B. No new safety signals were identified versus previous analyses. Conclusions: Brigatinib exhibited sustained long-term activity and PFS with manageable safety in patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC.

Background: Besides the cancer itself, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy (CT). Data on VTE development and impact on treatment course and outcome in real-life NSCLC patients receiving immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) is currently sparse. More knowledge within this area is warranted due to the emerging use of ICI in clinical practice. Objectives: To quantify risk of VTE and recurrent VTE in NSCLC patients receiving ICI. Explore the clinical impact of VTE on ICI course and survival and explore potential risk factors for VTE. Patients/methods: Patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) at the University Hospital of Odense, Denmark during 2015–2018 were identified and data gathered retrospectively from electronic medical records (n = 118). All patients had finished ICI at the time of data-cut off. Baseline Khorana Score (KRS) was calculated within one week prior to ICI initiation. Based on follow-up data cumulative incidence of VTE and its impact on outcome and survival was performed using Kaplan Meier and cox-regression hazard estimation. Results: Risk of VTE was 8% during ICI and 15% at any time point after ICI initiation. Cumulative incidence rates of VTE at 1, 3, 6 and 18 months after first ICI was 1.7%, 5.2%, 6.9% and 13.8% respectively. Median time to VTE during ICI was 2.3 months [IQR 0.6–5.4]. Having VTE during ICI lead to discontinuation of ICI in 78% of cases, most due to fatal PE. History of VTE before onset of ICI was a significant risk factor for recurrent VTE during ICI (24% within this subgroup) despite use of anticoagulant therapy. Conclusions: The incidence and impact of VTE during ICI for real-life NSCLC patients is not negligible with almost 10% developing VTE leading to termination of further ICI in the majority of cases - many due to fatal PE. The risk of recurrent anticoagulant resistant VTE in patients with known VTE during ICI is also considerable, which calls for better management and prevention of VTE including development of treatment specific VTE risk assessment models.