Search

The increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across cancer programs has created the need for standardized monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Delayed recognition without appropriate treatment can have serious and life-threatening consequences. The management of irAEs presents a unique set of challenges that must be addressed at a multidisciplinary level. Although various national and international guidelines and working groups provide high-level recommendations for the management of irAEs, practical guidance is lacking. Furthermore, timely collaboration between specialists requires institutional protocols that enable the early recognition, assessment, and treatment of irAEs. Such protocols should be developed by institution specialists and include algorithms for all healthcare providers involved in the care of patients treated with ICIs. At William Osler Health System in Brampton, Ontario, practical step-by-step multidisciplinary treatment approaches with recommendations for the management of irAEs were developed in collaboration with experts across Canada. Here, we provide an in-depth description of the approaches, outlining baseline investigations prior to the initiation of ICIs, as well as the monitoring and management of irAEs based on symptoms, severity, and involved organ systems. We encourage other centres to adapt and modify our approaches according to their specific needs and requirements.

Introduction: Caudal block is a popular technique in practice for post-operative pain management in children undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries. However, the duration of analgesia achieved by caudal block is limited by the duration of action of the local anaesthetic. The present study was aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of Dexamethasone as an adjuvant to caudal Bupivacaine in children undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries. Methodology: The present study was conducted on children aged between 2-6 years who were scheduled for elective infra-umbilical surgery. All children received general anaesthesia. Children in group A received caudal block with 1 ml/kg of 0.125% Bupivacaine and 1 ml normal saline and children in group B received caudal block with 1 ml/kg of 0.125% Bupivacaine and 0.1 mg/kg Dexamethasone. Collected data were analyzed using Medcalc software. Quantitative data was analyzed using student's t test and categorical data analyzed using the chi square test. Results: The mean duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group B as compared to group A (657±95.6 minute and 221.2±51.2 minute respectively) (p< 0.0001). Post-operative pain score was significantly less in group B at 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 20, and 24 hours, respectively (p

Introduction and Objective: Amyloidoses are a heterogeneous group of disorders resulting from deposition of amyloid fibrils into extracellular tissues. While the kidneys are one of the most frequent sites of amyloid deposition, amyloid deposits can also affect a wide range of organ systems, including the heart, liver, gastrointestinal tract, and peripheral nerves. The prognosis of amyloidosis, especially with cardiac involvement, remains poor; however, a collaborative approach applying new tools for diagnosis and management may improve outcomes. In September 2021, the Canadian Onco-Nephrology Interest Group hosted a symposium to discuss diagnostic challenges and recent advances in the management of amyloidosis from the perspectives of the nephrologist, cardiologist, and onco-hematologist. Methods and Sources of Information: Through structured presentations, the group discussed a series of cases highlighting the varied clinical presentations of amyloidoses affecting the kidney and heart. Expert opinions, clinical trial findings, and publication summaries were used to illustrate patient-related and treatment-related considerations in the diagnosis and management of amyloidoses. Key findings: (1) Overview of the clinical presentation of amyloidoses and the role of specialists in performing timely and accurate diagnostic workup; (2) review of best practices for multidisciplinary management of amyloidosis, including prognostic variables and determinants of treatment response; and (3) update on new and emerging treatments in the management of light chain and amyloid transthyretin amyloidoses. Limitations: This conference featured multidisciplinary discussion of cases, and learning points reflect the assessments by the involved experts/authors. Implications: Identification and management of amyloidoses can be facilitated with a multidisciplinary approach and higher index of suspicion from cardiologists, nephrologists, and hemato-oncologists. Increased awareness of clinical presentations and diagnostic algorithms for amyloidosis subtyping will lead to more timely interventions and improved clinical outcomes.

Despite recent advances in the management of urothelial cancer (UC), cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy regimens remain critical. However, their use can be complicated in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is not uncommon in UC patients. Based on the Galsky criteria for cisplatin ineligibility, most patients with CKD will be excluded from receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy altogether. For patients with borderline kidney function, several strategies – such as the use of split-dose cisplatin, dose reductions, or extra hydration – may facilitate the use of cisplatin, but these need to be prospectively validated. This review highlights the critical need for a multidisciplinary team, including onco-nephrologists, to help manage renal complications and optimize delivery of cancer care in complex UC patients with CKD. Plain Language Summary In patients with urothelial cancer, the presence of chronic kidney disease can significantly impact treatment options, eligibility for clinical trials, and overall patient outcomes. This review discusses key strategies and newer treatment options that can be used to optimize outcomes in patients who often can't receive standard treatments. Importantly, this article also highlights the critical importance and need for a multidisciplinary team of specialists, including kidney specialists with a focus on cancer patients, to help manage kidney function and deliver high-quality care to patients with urothelial cancer and chronic kidney disease. Tweetable Abstract How can we more effectively treat metastatic urothelial cancer patients who have chronic kidney disease? We discuss the evolving treatment landscape, highlight current challenges, and future directions, including the key role for onco-nephrologists as part of the multidisciplinary care team. #urothelialcancer #bladdercancer #CKD #onconephrology. Article highlights Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with cancer. It is thought to affect 34.1–54.7% of urothelial cancer patients and can result in inferior outcomes. Onco-nephrology clinics can help in the management of these patients. Hydration and magnesium supplementation are important to reduce cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. In patients with poor kidney function, alternative regimens such as split-dose cisplatin and carboplatin can also be used where appropriate. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiological Collaboration equation is recommended for routine monitoring of kidney function in urothelial cancer patients. Onco-nephrologists can help when there is difficulty in accurately assessing kidney function. Hydronephrosis is a common finding in patients with urothelial cancer. Percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteric stenting can be considered for these patients to help optimize their kidney function. Discussion with onco-nephrology, urology, and interventional radiology can help to clarify the optimal approach. For patients undergoing dialysis, platinum-based chemotherapy can be considered on a case-by-case basis in conjunction with onco-nephrology input to decide on optimal dosing and timing of treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors can also be considered with evidence showing comparable side effects to non-dialysis patients. There are few data to guide the use of platinum chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid organ transplant patients. Multidisciplinary input including the transplant physician and onco-nephrology is paramount in monitoring graft function and the dosing of antirejection medications. Special consideration should be given to the implications and risk of rejection. Chronic kidney disease patients are under-represented in clinical trials, which limits the generalizability of these data to these patients. The inclusion criteria for clinical trials should be broadened to include chronic kidney disease patients and the criteria for assessing kidney function should be harmonized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last 13 years, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has grown remarkably, owing to their unprecedented anti-tumor efficacy in certain tumor groups. With increased use of ICIs, we are seeing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) more frequently. Renal irAEs, such as ICI-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI), are reported in 2%–5% of patients treated with ICIs, with acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) as the most common histopathologic lesion, though various forms of glomerulonephritis have also been reported. Modifiable risk factors for ICI-AKI include concurrent use of ATIN-associated drugs, like proton pump inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics, and dual ICI therapy with both Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Associated Protein 4 (CTLA-4) and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 and its ligand (PD1/PDL-1) blockade. Kidney biopsies remain the diagnostic modality of choice, though several promising non-invasive biomarkers, which have not yet been broadly clinically validated have emerged. The treatment of ICI-AKI involves holding ICIs, discontinuation of ATIN-associated drugs and initiation of immunosuppression with corticosteroids as first-line therapy. With prompt treatment initiation, most patients achieve full or partial renal recovery, allowing for re-challenge with ICI. However, a subset of patients will require additional steroid-sparing therapies for corticosteroid-dependent or refractory ICI-AKI. Here we review developments in our understanding of the pathophysiology of ICI-AKI, the approach to diagnosis (with a focus on the emergence of novel diagnostic tools), prognostic factors and the current evidence for establishing treatment standards for ICI-AKI. As the evidence base remains largely retrospective, we identify questions that would benefit from future prospective studies in the diagnosis, management and prognostication of ICI-AKI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across cancer programs has created the need for standardized monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Delayed recognition without appropriate treatment can have serious and life-threatening consequences. The management of irAEs presents a unique set of challenges that must be addressed at a multidisciplinary level. Although various national and international guidelines and working groups provide high-level recommendations for the management of irAEs, practical guidance is lacking. Furthermore, timely collaboration between specialists requires institutional protocols that enable the early recognition, assessment, and treatment of irAEs. Such protocols should be developed by institution specialists and include algorithms for all healthcare providers involved in the care of patients treated with ICIs. At William Osler Health System in Brampton, Ontario, practical step-by-step multidisciplinary treatment approaches with recommendations for the management of irAEs were developed in collaboration with experts across Canada. Here, we provide an in-depth description of the approaches, outlining baseline investigations prior to the initiation of ICIs, as well as the monitoring and management of irAEs based on symptoms, severity, and involved organ systems. We encourage other centres to adapt and modify our approaches according to their specific needs and requirements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approximately 30% of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) will develop chronic kidney disease (CKD) or hypertension 15 to 20 years after treatment ends. The incidence of CKD and hypertension in the 5-year window after cancer therapy is unknown. Moreover, extent of monitoring of CCS with CKD and associated complications in current practice is underexplored. To inform the development of new and existing care guidelines for CCS, the epidemiology and monitoring of CKD and hypertension in the early period following cancer therapy warrants further investigation. Objective: To describe the design and methods of the KIdney aNd blooD prESsure ouTcomes in Childhood Cancer Survivors study, which aims to evaluate the burden of late kidney and blood pressure outcomes in the first ~10 years after cancer therapy, the extent of appropriate screening and complications monitoring for CKD and hypertension, and whether patient, disease/treatment, or system factors are associated with these outcomes. Design: Two distinct, but related studies; a prospective cohort study and a retrospective cohort study. Setting: Five Ontario pediatric oncology centers. Patients: The prospective study will involve 500 CCS at high risk for these late effects due to cancer therapy, and the retrospective study involves 5,000 CCS ≤ 18 years old treated for cancer between January 2008 and December 2020. Measurements: Chronic kidney disease is defined as Estimated glomerular filtration rate

As life expectancy among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) improves, the risk of comorbid conditions such as malignancy post-transplantation has also increased. SOTRs are at elevated risks of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs), and skin and solid cancers. PTLDs typically occur early following transplantation, while skin and solid cancers frequently arise in young adulthood (25-40 years). By 30 years following transplantation, 26-41% of pediatric SOTRs have developed cancer. Different risk factors exist for PTLD, and skin and solid cancers, which are modified by cumulative immunosuppression, infections, transplanted organ, and the underlying disease process associated with initial organ failure (e.g., kidney failure). Optimal cancer treatment strategies depend on the specific cancer type, stage, and patient comorbidities. Immunosuppression reduction may be beneficial for certain cancers but must be considered against the risks of acute and chronic rejection and allograft loss. Lifestyle counseling regarding smoking avoidance and sun protection, as well as human papillomavirus vaccination, is an important aspect of cancer prevention. Currently, no cancer screening guidelines exist specifically for pediatric SOTRs. Adult population screening guidelines have not been validated in transplant populations. Therefore, an individualized approach should be taken to cancer screening for pediatric SOTRs, accounting for other cancer risk factors., Author(s): Cal Robinson [sup.1] [sup.2] , Rahul Chanchlani [sup.3] [sup.4] [sup.5] , Abhijat Kitchlu [sup.6] Author Affiliations: (1) grid.42327.30, 0000 0004 0473 9646, Division of Paediatric Nephrology, Department of Paediatrics, [...]

Background Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury (ICPi-AKI), but the optimal duration of therapy has not been established. Prolonged use of corticosteroids can cause numerous adverse effects and may decrease progression-free survival among patients treated with ICPis. We sought to determine whether a shorter duration of corticosteroids was equally efficacious and safe as compared with a longer duration.Methods We used data from an international multicenter cohort study of patients diagnosed with ICPi-AKI from 29 centers across nine countries. We examined whether a shorter duration of corticosteroids (28 days or less) was associated with a higher rate of recurrent ICPi-AKI or death within 30 days following completion of corticosteroid treatment as compared with a longer duration (29–84 days).Results Of 165 patients treated with corticosteroids, 56 (34%) received a shorter duration of treatment and 109 (66%) received a longer duration. Patients in the shorter versus longer duration groups were similar with respect to baseline and ICPi-AKI characteristics. Five of 56 patients (8.9%) in the shorter duration group and 12 of 109 (11%) in the longer duration group developed recurrent ICPi-AKI or died (p=0.90). Nadir serum creatinine in the first 14, 28, and 90 days following completion of corticosteroid treatment was similar between groups (p=0.40, p=0.56, and p=0.89, respectively).Conclusion A shorter duration of corticosteroids (28 days or less) may be safe for patients with ICPi-AKI. However, the findings may be susceptible to unmeasured confounding and further research from randomized clinical trials is needed.

Solid organ transplant recipients on long-term immunosuppressive medication are at increased risk of developing malignancy, and treatment of advanced cancers with angiogenesis inhibitors in this context has not been widely studied. We present a case of recurrent high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma treated with paclitaxel and bevacizumab in the context of prior renal transplantation where the patient responded well to treatment with controlled toxicities, discussing the potential for increased rates of adverse events and drug interactions in this select population.

A 64-year-old man with Kaposi sarcoma in clinical remission after treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and a history of deceased-donor kidney transplantation 4 years prior presented with a slowly progressive increase in his serum creatinine level, well-controlled hypertension, stable subnephrotic-range proteinuria, and bland urinary sediment. An allograft kidney biopsy demonstrated thrombotic microangiopathy, without clinical or laboratory features of systemic involvement. Based on the timing of drug initiation preceding thrombotic microangiopathy, complete recovery after drug withdrawal, and the absence of other etiologies, it was concluded that pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was the likely cause of kidney-limited thrombotic microangiopathy. When pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was resumed, the patient developed hypertension and kidney allograft dysfunction. A new kidney biopsy was not performed because of the overall risk benefit. The case highlights the importance of recognizing novel etiologies of thrombotic microangiopathy in kidney transplant patients with malignancy. Although Kaposi sarcoma has not been linked to thrombotic microangiopathy, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has been increasingly associated with drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy. To our knowledge, this is the first case report that etiologically links pegylated liposomal doxorubicin to kidney-limited thrombotic microangiopathy in a kidney transplant patient.

Background: Nephrectomy is the mainstay of treatment for many kidney cancers, but has been correlated with increased incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibition has been shown to decrease the incidence of end-stage kidney disease and death in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, at present, there has been no description of the use of SGLT2 inhibition in patients with T2D and solitary kidney despite the high risk of CKD progression. Objective: To characterize the use of SGLT2 inhibition and kidney function in a series of patients with T2D with prior nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: University hospital outpatient onco-nephrology clinic. Patients: Patients post-nephrectomy for RCC with T2D who were prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor. Measurements: Serum creatinine, albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR), HgA1c, and blood pressure measurements. Methods: Patients post-nephrectomy with incident use of SGLT2 inhibitor were identified from an existing registry of patients followed in the Onco-Nephrology Clinic at our institution from May 2019 to March 2021. Demographics, medication use, time since nephrectomy, cancer diagnosis, serum creatinine, ACR measurements, and blood pressure measurements were extracted from electronic medical records. Results: Five patients were identified who had initiated SGLT2 inhibition post-nephrectomy. All patients were male, had T2D, and a prior history of hypertension. Renal cell carcinoma was the clinical indication for nephrectomy in all patients. None of patients were prescribed diuretics, and all were receiving renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition therapies. The time from nephrectomy to SGLT2 inhibitor initiation ranged from 5 to 74 months. Baseline mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were 49 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.5-66.5), and mean ACRs were 8.7 mg/mmol (95% CI: 0.6-16.9). After 6 months of SGLT2 inhibition, the mean eGFR and ACR values were 58 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI: 29.7-86.2) and 23.8 mg/mmol (95% CI: 0-60), respectively. After 16 to 18 months of follow-up (4 patients), the mean eGFR was 56 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI: 37.3-74.7), and mean ACR was 10.5 (95% CI: 0-30.5), similar to baseline values before SGTL2i therapy initiation. At baseline, mean systolic blood pressure was 128 mm Hg (95% CI: 118.3-140.9) and remained similar after 12 months of treatment (mean 131 mm Hg [95% CI: 112.3-149.7]). There were no adverse events related to AKI, electrolyte disturbances, ketoacidosis, or genitourinary infections during the 18-month follow-up period. Limitations: Small sample size, lack of a comparison group, and the variable timing of clinical data collection, including eGFR levels following initiation of SGLT2 inhibition. Conclusions: SGLT2 inhibition is becoming a standard component of nephrology care to reduce kidney function decline, cardiovascular risk, and mortality. To our knowledge, our report is the first to provide longitudinal data on SGLT2 inhibitor usage in patients with T2D and solitary kidneys post-nephrectomy. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibition strategies for kidney protection in patients post-nephrectomy.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury (ICPi-AKI) has emerged as an important toxicity among patients with cancer.Methods We collected data on 429 patients with ICPi-AKI and 429 control patients who received ICPis contemporaneously but who did not develop ICPi-AKI from 30 sites in 10 countries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of ICPi-AKI and its recovery. A multivariable Cox model was used to estimate the effect of ICPi rechallenge versus no rechallenge on survival following ICPi-AKI.Results ICPi-AKI occurred at a median of 16 weeks (IQR 8–32) following ICPi initiation. Lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and extrarenal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were each associated with a higher risk of ICPi-AKI. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis was the most common lesion on kidney biopsy (125/151 biopsied patients [82.7%]). Renal recovery occurred in 276 patients (64.3%) at a median of 7 weeks (IQR 3–10) following ICPi-AKI. Treatment with corticosteroids within 14 days following ICPi-AKI diagnosis was associated with higher odds of renal recovery (adjusted OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.58 to 4.41). Among patients treated with corticosteroids, early initiation of corticosteroids (within 3 days of ICPi-AKI) was associated with a higher odds of renal recovery compared with later initiation (more than 3 days following ICPi-AKI) (adjusted OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.16 to 3.79). Of 121 patients rechallenged, 20 (16.5%) developed recurrent ICPi-AKI. There was no difference in survival among patients rechallenged versus those not rechallenged following ICPi-AKI.Conclusions Patients who developed ICPi-AKI were more likely to have impaired renal function at baseline, use a PPI, and have extrarenal irAEs. Two-thirds of patients had renal recovery following ICPi-AKI. Treatment with corticosteroids was associated with improved renal recovery.

Introduction and objective: Onconephrology is a new and evolving field that deals with kidney complications in patients with cancer as well as the management of cancer in patients with preexisting kidney disease. With increasing numbers of patients with cancer with kidney-related complications, the field has garnered increased attention. Thus, an annual Greater Toronto Area Onconephrology Interest Group symposium was held in May 2019. The objective of the meeting was to demonstrate the junctures between oncology and nephrology by highlighting recent data regarding (1) kidney impairment in solid organ malignancies, (2) management and treatment of kidney cancer, (3) kidney impairment in hematologic malignancies, (4) malignancy and kidney transplantation, and (5) hyponatremia in patients with cancer. Methods and sources of information: Through a structured presentation, the group explored key topics discussed at a Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference on Onconephrology. Expert opinions, clinical trial findings, and publication summaries were used to illustrate patient and treatment-related considerations in onconephrology. Key findings: Kidney complications in patients with cancer are a central theme in onconephrology. An estimated 12% to 25% of patients with solid organ malignancies have chronic kidney disease (CKD), although in certain cancers, the prevalence of CKD is higher. Kidney impairment is also a common complication of some hematologic malignancies. The incidence of renal failure in patients with multiple myeloma is estimated at 18% to 56% and light chain cast nephropathy is seen in approximately 30% of these patients. In addition, there appears to be a bidirectional relationship between kidney cancer and CKD, with some data sets suggesting the risk increases as kidney function declines. Cancer is also of concern in patients with preexisting kidney disease. Kidney transplant recipients have a greater risk of cancer and a higher risk of cancer-related mortality. Kidney complications have also been associated with novel cancer therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. An estimated 2% to 4% of patients initiating an immune checkpoint inhibitor may develop nephrotoxicity, whereas up to 40% of patients on CAR T-cell therapy experience cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Tumor lysis syndrome and electrolyte abnormalities, such as hyponatremia, have also been reported with CAR T-cell therapy. While the incidence and prevalence of hyponatremia vary depending on the cancer type and serum sodium cutoff point, hyponatremia may be seen in up to 46% of patients hospitalized in cancer centers. Conclusions: Onconephrology is a developing field and the themes arising from this meeting indicate a need for greater collaboration between oncologists and nephrologists. Educational symposia and onconephrology fellowship programs may allow for improved cancer care for patients with kidney disease.

N/A

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) are a novel and promising anti-cancer therapy. There are limited data on the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients receiving ICPi.Methods We conducted a cohort study of patients receiving ICPi at our center between 2010 and 2017 via electronic health record. The primary outcome was AKI (increase of >50% from baseline serum creatinine (sCr)). Risk factors for AKI were assessed using logistic regression. Survival among those with and without AKI was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results Among 309 patients on ICPi, 51 (16.5%) developed AKI (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stages 1: 53%, 2: 22%, 3: 25%). AKI was associated with other immune-related adverse events (IRAE) (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6 to 6; p

Introduction: Collaborative management of kidney disease relies on coordinated and effective partnerships between multiple providers. Siloed traditional health systems often result in delays, barriers to treatment access, and inefficient monitoring. Methods: We conducted a 1-year observational mixed-methods study. We included all consecutive referrals except for patients without telephone access. We assessed 4 domains of outcomes: (1) patient and caregiver experience, (2) provider experience (e.g., physicians and pharmacists), (3) clinical outcomes specific to medication-related outcomes (e.g., adherence, adverse drug events [ADEs]), and (4) value and efficiency (i.e., medication access, defined as time to treatment and resolution of medication reimbursement issues). Results: Sixty-five patients were referred to the integrated virtual pharmacy (iVRx) model. Most (72%) patients were male. Patients had a median (min, max) age of 60 (27, 85) years and were taking 8 (4, 13) medications. Compared with traditional care delivery models, medication access improved for 56% of participants. Direct home delivery of medication resulted in 91% of patients receiving prescriptions within 2 days of a nephrologist visit. During more than 2,000 pharmacist-patient encounters, 208 ADEs were identified that required clinician intervention to prevent patient harm. When these ADEs were classified by severity, 53% were mild, 45% were moderate (e.g., delaying dose titration in patients initiated on glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists due to intolerable gastrointestinal side effects), and the remaining 2% of ADEs were severe, meaning clinical intervention was required to prevent a serious outcome (e.g., uncontrolled blood pressure, prevention of acute kidney injury). Nephrologists reported high satisfaction with iVRx, citing efficiency, timely response, and collaboration with pharmacists as key facilitators. Of the 65 patient participants, 98% reported being extremely satisfied. Conclusions: The iVRx is an acceptable and feasible clinical strategy. Our pilot program was associated with improved kidney care by increasing medication access for patients and avoiding potential harms associated with ADEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based, guideline-recommended practices improve multiple outcomes in patients admitted with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), but are incompletely implemented in actual practice. Admission order sets with evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic guidance have enabled quality improvement and guideline implementation in other conditions.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now widely used in the treatment of many cancers, and currently represent the standard of care for multiple malignancies. These agents enhance the T cell immune response to target cancer tissues, and have demonstrated considerable benefits for cancer outcomes. However, despite these improved outcomes, there are important kidney immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) associated with ICI. Acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis remains the most frequent kidney iRAE, however glomerular lesions and electrolytes disturbances are increasingly being recognized and reported. In this review, we summarize clinical features and identify risk factors for kidney iRAEs, and discuss the current understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms. We highlight the evidence basis for guideline-recommended management of ICI-related kidney injury as well as gaps in current knowledge. We advocate for judicious use of kidney biopsy to identify ICI-associated kidney injury, and early use of corticosteroid treatment where appropriate. Selected patients may also be candidates for re-challenge with ICI therapy after a kidney iRAE, in view of current data on recurrent rates of kidney injury. Risk of benefits of re-challenge must be considered on an individual considering patient preferences and prognosis. Lastly, we review current knowledge of ICI use in the setting of patients with end-stage kidney disease, including kidney transplant recipients and those receiving dialysis, which suggest that these patients should not be summarily excluded from the potential benefits of these cancer therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and Objective: Amyloidoses are a heterogeneous group of disorders resulting from deposition of amyloid fibrils into extracellular tissues. While the kidneys are one of the most frequent sites of amyloid deposition, amyloid deposits can also affect a wide range of organ systems, including the heart, liver, gastrointestinal tract, and peripheral nerves. The prognosis of amyloidosis, especially with cardiac involvement, remains poor; however, a collaborative approach applying new tools for diagnosis and management may improve outcomes. In September 2021, the Canadian Onco-Nephrology Interest Group hosted a symposium to discuss diagnostic challenges and recent advances in the management of amyloidosis from the perspectives of the nephrologist, cardiologist, and onco-hematologist. Methods and Sources of Information: Through structured presentations, the group discussed a series of cases highlighting the varied clinical presentations of amyloidoses affecting the kidney and heart. Expert opinions, clinical trial findings, and publication summaries were used to illustrate patient-related and treatment-related considerations in the diagnosis and management of amyloidoses. Key findings: (1) Overview of the clinical presentation of amyloidoses and the role of specialists in performing timely and accurate diagnostic workup; (2) review of best practices for multidisciplinary management of amyloidosis, including prognostic variables and determinants of treatment response; and (3) update on new and emerging treatments in the management of light chain and amyloid transthyretin amyloidoses. Limitations: This conference featured multidisciplinary discussion of cases, and learning points reflect the assessments by the involved experts/authors. Implications: Identification and management of amyloidoses can be facilitated with a multidisciplinary approach and higher index of suspicion from cardiologists, nephrologists, and hemato-oncologists. Increased awareness of clinical presentations and diagnostic algorithms for amyloidosis subtyping will lead to more timely interventions and improved clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) have increased patient survival, although substantial treatment-related toxicity remains, including chronic kidney disease (CKD). We assessed the association between CKD and survival and transplant-specific outcomes in HSCT recipients. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of all 408 adult patients with allogenic HSCT at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, Canada, 2015–18). We used logistic regression to identify risk factors for CKD at 1 year post-transplant. Associations between CKD at 1 year and overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD)-free/relapse-free survival, relapse and transplant-related mortality were examined using extended time-varying Cox models. In a sensitivity analysis, we restricted the cohort to survivors at 1 year, using standard Cox proportional hazard models to examine associations between CKD and overall survival, relapse-free survival and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival, and Fine and Gray's competing risk models to determine associations between CKD and relapse/transplant-related mortality. Results The prevalence of CKD at 1 year was 19% (46 patients) with median follow-up of 23 months. Multivariable regression identified age at transplant [adjusted OR (aOR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.05–1.14; P < 0.0001), female gender (aOR 2.83, 95% CI = 1.34–5.97; P = 0.006) and acute kidney injury during the first 100 days (aOR 3.86, 95% CI = 1.70–8.73; P = 0.001) as risk factors for CKD at 1 year. Patients with CKD at 1 year had significantly poorer overall survival than those without CKD, when adjusted for relevant covariates [adjusted HR (aHR) 1.93, 95% CI = 1.02–3.66; P = 0.04 in the time-varying Cox model, and aHR 2.06, 95% CI = 1.04–4.07; P = 0.04 using the standard Cox model]. CKD at 1 year was also associated with worse GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (aHR 1.65, 95% CI = 1.04–2.61; P = 0.03). Conclusions CKD adversely affects the long-term prognosis for allogeneic HSCT recipients, with increased mortality risk and worse GVHD-free/relapse-free survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]