Search

Abstract Aims There are no previous studies focusing on collaborative follow‐ups between hospitals and clinics for patients discharged after acute heart failure (AHF) in Japan. The purpose of this study was to determine the status of collaboration between hospitals and clinics for patients with AHF in Japan and to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes using a large Japanese observational database. Methods and results Of 4056 consecutive patients hospitalized for AHF in the Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure registry, we analysed 2862 patients discharged to go home, who were divided into 1674 patients (58.5%) followed up at hospitals with index hospitalization (hospital follow‐up group) and 1188 (41.5%) followed up in a collaborative fashion with clinics or other general hospitals (collaborative follow‐up group). The primary outcome was a composite of all‐cause death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization within 1 year after discharge. Previous hospitalization for HF and length of hospital stay longer than 15 days were associated with hospital follow‐up. Conversely, ≥80 years of age, hypertension, and cognitive dysfunction were associated with collaborative follow‐up. The cumulative 1‐year incidence of the primary outcome, all cause death, and cardiovascular death were similar between the hospital and collaborative follow‐up groups (31.6% vs. 29.6%, P = 0.51, 13.1% vs, 13.9%, P = 0.35, 8.4% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.96). Even after adjusting for confounders, the difference in risk for patients in the hospital follow‐up group relative to those in the collaborative follow‐up group remained insignificant for the primary outcome, all‐cause death, and cardiovascular death (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.97–1.27, P = 0.14, HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.91–1.33, P = 0.33, HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87–1.05, P = 0.33). The cumulative 1‐year incidence of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow‐up group than in the collaborative follow‐up group (25.5% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.02). The risk of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow‐up group than in the collaborative follow‐up group (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01–1.39, P = 0.04). Conclusions In patients hospitalized for AHF, 41.5% received collaborative follow‐up after discharge. The risk of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow‐up group than in the collaborative follow‐up, although risk of the primary outcome, all‐cause death, and cardiovascular death were similar between groups.

Background No clinical studies have focused on the factors associated with discharge destination in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Methods and Results Of 4056 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure in the KCHF (Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure) registry, we analyzed 3460 patients hospitalized from their homes and discharged alive. There were 3009 and 451 patients who were discharged to home and nonhome, respectively. We investigated the factors associated with nonhome discharge and compared the outcomes between home discharge and nonhome discharge. Factors independently and positively associated with nonhome discharge were age ≥80 years (odds ratio [OR],1.76; 95% CI,1.28–2.42), body mass index ≤22 kg/m2 (OR,1.49; 95% CI,1.12–1.97), poor medication adherence (OR, 2.08; 95% CI,1.49–2.88), worsening heart failure (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.46–2.82), stroke during hospitalization (OR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.75–8.00), functional decline (OR, 12.24; 95% CI, 8.74–17.14), and length of hospital stay >16 days (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 3.01–5.69), while those negatively associated were diabetes mellitus (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51–0.94), cohabitants (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46–0.85), and ambulatory state before admission (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.18–0.36). The cumulative 1‐year incidence of all‐cause death was significantly higher in the nonhome discharge group than in the home discharge group. The nonhome discharge group compared with the nonhome discharge group was associated with a higher adjusted risk for all‐cause death (hazard ratio, 1.66; P