Search

Existing test-time adaptation (TTA) approaches often adapt models with the unlabeled testing data stream. A recent attempt relaxed the assumption by introducing limited human annotation, referred to as Human-In-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation (HILTTA) in this study. The focus of existing HILTTA lies on selecting the most informative samples to label, a.k.a. active learning. In this work, we are motivated by a pitfall of TTA, i.e. sensitive to hyper-parameters, and propose to approach HILTTA by synergizing active learning and model selection. Specifically, we first select samples for human annotation (active learning) and then use the labeled data to select optimal hyper-parameters (model selection). A sample selection strategy is tailored for choosing samples by considering the balance between active learning and model selection purposes. We demonstrate on 4 TTA datasets that the proposed HILTTA approach is compatible with off-the-shelf TTA methods which outperform the state-of-the-art HILTTA methods and stream-based active learning methods. Importantly, our proposed method can always prevent choosing the worst hyper-parameters on all off-the-shelf TTA methods. The source code will be released upon publication.

The redundancy of Convolutional neural networks not only depends on weights but also depends on inputs. Shuffling is an efficient operation for mixing channel information but the shuffle order is usually pre-defined. To reduce the data-dependent redundancy, we devise a dynamic shuffle module to generate data-dependent permutation matrices for shuffling. Since the dimension of permutation matrix is proportional to the square of the number of input channels, to make the generation process efficiently, we divide the channels into groups and generate two shared small permutation matrices for each group, and utilize Kronecker product and cross group shuffle to obtain the final permutation matrices. To make the generation process learnable, based on theoretical analysis, softmax, orthogonal regularization, and binarization are employed to asymptotically approximate the permutation matrix. Dynamic shuffle adaptively mixes channel information with negligible extra computation and memory occupancy. Experiment results on image classification benchmark datasets CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Tiny ImageNet and ImageNet have shown that our method significantly increases ShuffleNets' performance. Adding dynamic generated matrix with learnable static matrix, we further propose static-dynamic-shuffle and show that it can serve as a lightweight replacement of ordinary pointwise convolution.

Generalizing deep learning models to unknown target domain distribution with low latency has motivated research into test-time training/adaptation (TTT/TTA). Existing approaches often focus on improving test-time training performance under well-curated target domain data. As figured out in this work, many state-of-the-art methods fail to maintain the performance when the target domain is contaminated with strong out-of-distribution (OOD) data, a.k.a. open-world test-time training (OWTTT). The failure is mainly due to the inability to distinguish strong OOD samples from regular weak OOD samples. To improve the robustness of OWTTT we first develop an adaptive strong OOD pruning which improves the efficacy of the self-training TTT method. We further propose a way to dynamically expand the prototypes to represent strong OOD samples for an improved weak/strong OOD data separation. Finally, we regularize self-training with distribution alignment and the combination yields the state-of-the-art performance on 5 OWTTT benchmarks. The code is available at https://github.com/Yushu-Li/OWTTT., Comment: Accepted at ICCV 2023 (Oral)

The Bayesian Lasso is constructed in the linear regression framework and applies the Gibbs sampling to estimate the regression parameters. This paper develops a new sparse learning model, named the Bayesian Lasso Sparse (BLS) model, that takes the hierarchical model formulation of the Bayesian Lasso. The main difference from the original Bayesian Lasso lies in the estimation procedure; the BLS method uses a learning algorithm based on the type-II maximum likelihood procedure. Opposed to the Bayesian Lasso, the BLS provides sparse estimates of the regression parameters. The BLS method is also derived for nonlinear supervised learning problems by introducing kernel functions. We compare the BLS model to the well known Relevance Vector Machine, the Fast Laplace method, the Byesian Lasso, and the Lasso, on both simulated and real data. The numerical results show that the BLS is sparse and precise, especially when dealing with noisy and irregular dataset., Comment: 21 pages