Search

We report a case of aortic perforation caused by the staple line formed during a wedge resection for lung cancer. Six hours after an uneventful wedge resection, sudden frank drainage of blood from the chest tube occurred. A reoperation was performed, and we found bleeding from the aorta. After suturing the bleeding spot on the aorta, we found that the stapling line of the lung rode on the aorta with longitudinal contact. We speculated that the stapling line scratched the aorta in synchrony with the patient's breathing and injured the aorta.

Clinical evidence demonstrating the impact of statins for preventing late target lesion revascularization (TLR) after newer-generation drug-eluting stent implantation and differences in the effect of statins on late TLR according to pre-interventional vessel remodeling and vessel size is limited. We retrospectively evaluated 1193 de novo lesions in 720 patients who underwent everolimus-eluting stent implantation using intravascular ultrasound from January 2010 to December 2012. The primary endpoint was late TLR. Lesions were divided into the statin group (n = 825) and non-statin group (n = 368). The incidence of late TLR was significantly lower in the statin than non-statin group (1.7% vs. 5.2%, respectively; p = 0.001), and within the statin group, it was significantly lower in the follow-up low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) p = 0.006). Furthermore, in positive remodeling lesions and non-small vessel size lesions, the incidence of late TLR was significantly lower in the statin than non-statin group (1.6% vs. 8.5% and 1.3% vs. 5.3%, respectively; p = 0.001 and p = 0.004). Lowering the LDL-C level using statins was more effective for preventing late TLR after everolimus-eluting stent implantation. Evaluating pre-interventional vessel remodeling patterns and vessel size might be helpful to stratify lesions at high risk of late TLR.

There is still no clear guideline for surgical treatment for patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). When it comes to which surgical treatment to choose, microvascular decompression (MVD) or Gamma Knife surgery (GKS), we should know the long-term outcome of each treatment. We analyzed 179 patients undergoing MVD and 52 patients undergoing GKS followed for 1 year or longer. We evaluated the patient’s neurological status including pain relief, complications and recurrence. Results were assessed with Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity and facial numbness scores. Overall outcomes were compared between the two groups based on pain relief and complications. BNI pain intensity and facial numbness scores at the final visit were significantly lower in the MVD group than in the GKS group (P

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), an asbestos‐related occupational disease, is an aggressive and incurable tumor of the thoracic cavity. Despite recent advances in MPM treatment, overall survival of patients with MPM is very low. Recent studies have implicated that PI3K/Akt signaling is involved in MPM cell survival and development. To investigate the effects of Akt inhibitors on MPM cell survival, we examined the effects of nine selective Akt inhibitors, namely, afuresertib, Akti‐1/2, AZD5363, GSK690693, ipatasertib, MK‐2206, perifosine, PHT‐427, and TIC10, on six MPM cell lines, namely, ACC‐MESO‐4, Y‐MESO‐8A, MSTO‐211H, NCI‐H28, NCI‐H290, and NCI‐H2052, and a normal mesothelial cell line MeT‐5A. Comparison of IC 50 values of the Akt inhibitors showed that afuresertib, an ATP‐competitive specific Akt inhibitor, exerted tumor‐specific effects on MPM cells. Afuresertib significantly increased caspase‐3 and caspase‐7 activities and apoptotic cell number among ACC‐MESO‐4 and MSTO‐211H cells. Moreover, afuresertib strongly arrested the cell cycle in the G1 phase. Western blotting analysis showed that afuresertib increased the expression of p21WAF 1/ CIP 1 and decreased the phosphorylation of Akt substrates, including GSK‐3β and FOXO family proteins. These results suggest that afuresertib‐induced p21 expression promotes G1 phase arrest by inducing FOXO activity. Furthermore, afuresertib significantly enhanced cisplatin‐induced cytotoxicity. Interestingly, results of gene set enrichment analysis showed that afuresertib modulated the expression E2F1 and MYC, which are associated with fibroblast core serum response. Together, these results suggest that afuresertib is a useful anticancer drug for treating patients with MPM.

Aims To compare the effects of lipophilic simvastatin and hydrophilic rosuvastatin on plasma adiponectin and glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in patients with non-ischaemic chronic heart failure (NICHF). Methods and results Seventy-one stable outpatients with NICHF, who were already receiving standard therapy for CHF, were randomized to simvastatin (n = 35) or rosuvastatin (n = 36). Plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), total adiponectin, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, HbA1c, and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), a marker of oxidative stress, were measured before and 4 months after treatment with simvastatin or rosuvastatin. There was no difference in the baseline characteristics including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and biochemical parameters between the two groups. In both groups, plasma BNP levels and LVEF did not change after 4 months. Plasma levels of adiponectin and oxLDL did not change and HbA1c level was slightly increased (6.0 ± 0.9 vs. 6.1 ± 0.9%, P = 0.053) in the simvastatin group. In contrast, plasma adiponectin level was significantly increased (12.3 ± 7.3 vs. 14.0 ± 8.2 µg/mL, P = 0.012) concomitant with a significant reduction in oxLDL and HbA1c (oxLDL: 8.8 ± 4.7 vs. 7.6 ± 4.7 U/mL, P = 0.0059; HbA1c: 6.0 ± 0.7 vs. 5.9 ± 0.7%, P = 0.002) in the rosuvastatin group. Conclusion These findings suggest that hydrophilic rosuvastatin but not lipophilic simvastatin increases adiponectin and decreases HbA1c levels in patients with NICHF.

A certain percentage of aldosterone (ALD) breakthrough generally occurs in patients with hypertension and chronic heart failure and is an important issue during long-term treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). It has been reported that efonidipine decreases the plasma levels of ALD. However, the long-term effects of efonidipine on the plasma levels of ALD and the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) remain unknown in patients with hypertension. Sixty stable outpatients with essential hypertension who had received amlodipine and ACE-I or ARB for more than 1 year were randomized into two groups (amlodipine group (n=30): continuous amlodipine treatment at a stable dose; efonidipine group (n=30): amlodipine (5 mg day(-1)) was changed to efonidipine at a dose of 40 mg day(-1)). There was no difference in their baseline characteristics including the LVMI and plasma levels of ALD. In the amlodipine group, there were no significant changes in blood pressure, LVMI or plasma levels of ALD for 18 months. In the efonidipine group, blood pressure did not change after replacement of amlodipine with efonidipine, although there was a significant decrease in the plasma levels of ALD after 6 months. The decrease in ALD was sustained for 18 months and LVMI was significantly decreased after 18 months (121+/-25 vs. 114+/-21 g m(-2), P0.05). There was a significant correlation between the changes in LVMI and % changes of ALD in the efonidipine group. These findings indicate that the effect of efonidipine on the suppression of plasma ALD was sustained for at least 18 months and that long-term efonidipine therapy decreases LVMI in patients with essential hypertension.