Search

Background: Globalization has resulted in a growing bilingual population worldwide; thus, bilingual speakers with aphasia are also increasing. The ability to juggle languages has been reported to enhance attentional control abilities in healthy populations. However, few studies have looked at the impact of bilingualism on attentional control abilities in individuals with aphasia. Different subcomponents of attention are seldom studied in bilingual aphasia. Aims: The goal of the study is to explore the influence of bilingualism on three subcomponents of attention in individuals with aphasia, namely alerting, orienting and executive control. The study aimed to examine whether (1) individuals with aphasia show evidence of an attentional deficit in comparison to language-matched healthy peers, (2) there is evidence of a bilingual advantage in attentional mechanisms, and (3) there is a relationship between bilingualism and subcomponents of attention. Methods and Procedures: All the participants (10 French-English bilingual and 7 French monolingual adults with aphasia and 32 monolingual and bilingual healthy controls) performed a behavioural version of the Attention Network Test. The efficiency of the three attentional networks was assessed by measuring how response times varied with different warning cues and flanker type, resulting in alerting, orienting and executive control effects. Objective and subjective measures of bilingualism were also included. Results: Results confirmed a bilingual advantage in attentional mechanisms with and without aphasia. More specifically, group difference for healthy controls was evident in the accuracy rate only. For individuals with aphasia, between-group comparisons revealed differences in alerting ability: the bilingual group presented a significantly greater difference score than the monolingual group in the mu (μ) component of the response time distribution, whereas the monolingual group was able to take advantage of the alerting cue in the tau (τ) component. Furthermore, the monolingual and bilingual speakers with aphasia exhibited reduced alerting and more interference effect when compared to their respective healthy controls. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that bilingualism impacts attentional mechanisms in individuals with aphasia as well as healthy controls. Specifically, bilingual individuals with aphasia showed more efficient alerting skills than monolinguals with aphasia. Ex-Gaussian data analysis revealed effects that might otherwise be thought to be non-existent. Considering the growing bilingual population, an understanding of the behavioural signs and symptoms of attentional abilities in individuals with aphasia is necessary for both theoretical and clinical purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: People with dementia experience autonomy loss, and require caregiver support on a daily basis. Dementia is also characterized by progressive communication disorders, leading to isolation in both persons with dementia and caregivers. Caregivers also experience stress and increasing burden which makes them particularly susceptible to burnout. As a whole, these factors hamper quality of life in both members of the dyad. The present study examines the efficacy of COMPAs, an App designed on principles of person‐centered and emotional communication, with the purpose of improving well‐being in persons with dementia and their caregivers, including the extreme isolation conditions imposed by COVID‐19. Method: In this implementation study on COMPAs, caregivers in two long‐term care facilities were trained to use COMPAs and taught strategies to improve communication with persons with dementia. Measures were taken before and after 8 weeks of interventions with COMPAs. Qualitative analyses on semi‐structured interviews and quantitative analysis on questionnaires were completed. Results: Interventions with COMPAs improved the quality of communication and quality of life within the dyad. They also reduced caregiver burden and increased their feeling of personal accomplishment. Conclusion: COMPAs contributes to the well‐being of persons with dementia and their caregivers, thanks to its focus on emotional communication. It represents a valid tool to improve person‐centered communication in long‐term care facilities, including extreme isolation contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]