Search

BACKGROUND Variations in the clinical presentation of the unilateral cleft lip resulted in numerous surgical repair techniques used around the world. No universally accepted method exists to evaluate aesthetic surgical results. The purpose of this study is to use the Hubli lip grading system, developed by Smile Train, to evaluate the aesthetic results of unilateral cleft lip repairs based on the surgical technique used. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of unilateral cleft lip repair operations performed by Smile Train surgeons throughout Africa, Americas, Asia Pacific, and Europe and Middle East between 2014 and 2018. Using the Hubli lip grading criteria, factoring in cleft severity, acceptable outcomes were identified and compared with the surgical technique used. RESULTS Eight thousand forty-one unilateral cleft lip repairs were reviewed. The majority utilized the rotational advancement technique (n = 5541, 68.9%) with a statistically significant percentage of acceptable outcomes (92.1%), followed by an acceptance rate of 91.9% with variations of the z-plasty technique, 90.5% with the straight-line repair and its variations, and 88.4% using "other" techniques (P

Background The Millard rotation-advancement cleft lip repair is the most commonly performed cleft lip repair. An extended perialar incision allows for further advancement of the lateral lip element and improved positioning of the alar base. There is a lack of data evaluating differences in nasal alar growth when the perialar incision is utilized. This study compares the long-term effects of a perialar incision on the alar surface area of unilateral cleft lip patients who underwent a Millard cleft lip repair. Methods Thirty-seven patients with a diagnosis of unilateral cleft lip treated with a Millard primary lip repair were studied. A perialar incision was utilized in 16 patients while 21 patients underwent a standard Millard repair. 3dMD facial images were taken at least 10 years after the initial lip repair. Using the patient's non-cleft side as an internal control, the Alar Ratio (AR) was calculated, defined as the cleft alar surface area divided by the non-cleft alar surface area. Results The AR was significantly greater in the standard Millard repair group compared to the perialar incision group, 0.74 and 0.64 respectively (P = .02). The incomplete cleft population demonstrated a more profound difference between the treatment groups (0.82 and 0.62, respectively). Conclusions This study reveals an association between a perialar incision and decreased alar surface area. Long-term follow up results suggest a perialar scar restricts alar growth leading to significant asymmetry between the cleft and non-cleft sides. Therefore, surgical technique must be carefully considered prior to utilizing a perialar incision during unilateral cleft lip repair.