Search

Objective: To ascertain the changes of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) values in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with ocrelizumab and their association with treatment response. Methods: Multicenter prospective study including 115 RRMS patients initiating ocrelizumab treatment between February 2020 and March 2022 followed during a year. Serum samples were collected at baseline and every 3 months to measure sNfL and sGFAP levels using single-molecule array (SIMOA) technology. Based on age and body mass index, sNfL values were standardized using z-score. NEDA (non-evidence of disease activity)-3 status was defined for patients free of disease activity after a year of follow-up. Inflammation (INFL) was considered when new relapses occurred during follow-up or new MRI lesions were found at 1-year exploration. PIRA (progression independent of relapse activity) was defined as disability progression occurring in the absence of relapses or new MRI activity. Results: After a year on ocrelizumab, 85 patients (73.9%) achieved NEDA-3. Thirty patients did not achieve NEDA: 20 (17.4%) because of INFL and 10 (8.7%) because of PIRA. Of INFL patients, 6 (30.0%) had relapses, and 17 (85.0%) had at least one new MRI lesion at the 12-month examination. At baseline, INFL patients had higher sNfL (p = 0.0003) and sGFAP (p = 0.03) than the NEDA-3 group. PIRA patients mostly exhibited low sNfL and heterogeneous sGFAP levels. After a year, NEDA-3 and INFL patients showed similar decreases in sNfL (p < 0.0001) and sGFAP (p < 0.0001 for NEDA-3 and p = 0.001 for INFL ones). However, the decrease occurred earlier in NEDA-3 patients. Accordingly, sNfL > 1.5 z-score 3 months after ocrelizumab initiation indicated a higher risk of inflammation (OR = 13.6; p < 0.0001). Decrease in sGFAP values occurred later in both groups, with significant reductions observed at 12 months for INFL and 6 and 12 months for NEDA-3. No significant changes in sNfL or sGFAP were observed in PIRA patients. Conclusion: Ocrelizumab induced normalization of sNfL and sGFAP in the majority of NEDA-3 and inflammatory patients but did not cause changes in the PIRA group. Our data suggest that normalization of sNfL and sGFAP is associated with the lack of inflammatory-associated disease progression but it may not affect non-inflammatory PIRA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mycoplasma pneumoniae, a frequent respiratory pathogen, can cause neurological disease manifestations. We here present a case of M. pneumoniae as cause of meningitis and occurrence of an intracranial abscess as a complication of mastoiditis with septic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in a patient with multiple sclerosis on anti-CD20 therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe SARS-CoV-2 infections may still be observed in people bearing risk factors, such as the use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which are adopted in several autoimmune disorders including multiple sclerosis (MS). COVID-19 diagnosis is routinely based on nasopharyngeal swab testing, but suboptimal sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection compared to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) may lead to misdiagnosis in some cases. Such diagnostic issues were described in a few MS patients receiving anti-CD20 mAbs, including middle-aged people and lacking information on subsequent MS therapeutic management, a debated topic as no evidence-based guidance on de-risking strategies is currently available. Here, we report the case of a young MS patient who developed severe COVID-19 pneumonia under treatment with the anti-CD20 mAb ocrelizumab, and who was finally diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 by BAL despite repeatedly negative nasopharyngeal swabs. Ocrelizumab was then discontinued, and treatment with a sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor modulator was started, followed by maintenance of clinical and radiological MS stability. Challenges in diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia in people without risk factors other than immunomodulatory treatment are hence discussed, as well as potential strategies for de-risking MS therapies. The latter topic is increasingly debated based on raising concerns for potential long-term safety issues of high-efficacy treatments, including anti-CD20 mAbs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of review: B-cell depletion therapy, including anti-CD20 and anti-CD19 therapies, is increasingly used for a variety of autoimmune and conditions, including those affecting the central nervous system. However, B-cell depletion therapy use can be complicated by adverse effects associated with administration and immunosuppression. This review aims to summarize the application of anti-CD20 and anti-CD19 therapies for the pediatric neurologist and neuroimmunologist. Recent findings: Most existing literature come from clinical trials with adult patients, although more recent studies are now capturing the effects of these therapies in children. The most common side effects include infusion related reactions and increased infection risk from immunosuppression. Several strategies can mitigate infusion related reactions. Increased infections due to persistent hypogammaglobulinemia can benefit from replacement immunoglobulin. Summary: B-cell depletion therapies can be safe and effective in pediatric patients. Anticipation and mitigation of common adverse effects through primary prevention strategies, close monitoring, and appropriate symptomatic management can improve safety and tolerability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article examines the stability of ocrelizumab, a medication used to treat multiple sclerosis, when blood samples are delayed in centrifugation. The study finds that delaying centrifugation for up to 24 hours at room temperature does not significantly impact the concentration of ocrelizumab in the serum. This research is important for evaluating the feasibility of in-home blood collection for patients with mobility disabilities, as it can improve convenience and adherence to treatment. While the findings suggest that in-home collection may be applicable to other similar medications, further studies are needed for confirmation. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Clinical trials comparing the efficacy of ocrelizumab (OCR) with other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) other than interferon (IFN) β-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) are lacking. Objectives: To compare the treatment effect of OCR vs six DMTs' (IFN β-1a, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, natalizumab) treatment pathways used in clinical practice by combining clinical trial and real-world data. Methods: Patient-level data from OPERA trials and open-label extension phase, and from the German NeuroTransData (NTD) MS registry, were used to build 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts controlling for seven baseline covariates, including brain imaging activity. Efficacy outcomes were time to first relapse and time to 24-week confirmed disability progression over 5.5 years of follow-up. Intention-to-treat analysis using all outcome data irrespective of treatment switch was applied. Results: The analyses included 611 OPERA patients and 7141 NTD patients. We built 12 paired-matched cohorts (six for each outcome, two for each DMT) to compare efficacy of OCR in OPERA with each DMT treatment pathway in NTD. Post-matching, baseline covariates and PS were well balanced (standardized mean difference <.2 for all cohorts). Over 5.5 years, patients treated with OCR showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of relapse (hazard ratios [HRs].30 to.54) and disability progression (HRs.51 to.67) compared with all index therapies and their treatment switching pathways in NTD. Treatment switch and/or discontinuation occurred frequently in NTD cohorts. Conclusion: OCR demonstrates superiority in controlling relapses and disability progression in RMS compared with real-world treatment pathways over a 5.5-year period. These analyses suggest that high-efficacy DMTs and high treatment persistence are critical to achieve greatest clinical benefit in RMS. Registration: OPERA I (NCT01247324), OPERA II (NCT01412333) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract In clinical trials, the percentage of patients discontinuing treatment with ocrelizumab due to adverse events was low. However, real-world populations are often more diverse than randomized controlled trials (RCTs), therefore it is important to assess discontinuation rates in real-world studies. This systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify real-world discontinuation and persistence data for ocrelizumab in studies of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). Searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase to identify relevant real-world studies that met pre-determined Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study (PICOS) criteria. Only articles published in English were included, but the study country was not restricted. A total of 30 studies were included, with the majority reporting real-world persistence data that appear to be similar to or better than in the pivotal clinical trials, with only 1 study reporting higher discontinuation rates due to adverse events compared with the clinical trials. Other studies identified reported that the risk of discontinuation was higher for other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) compared with ocrelizumab, and adherence was also higher for ocrelizumab versus other DMTs. These findings have clinical relevance, as other studies have reported improved clinical outcomes and lower care costs for patients that are persistent or adherent to other DMTs.

In clinical trials, the percentage of patients discontinuing treatment with ocrelizumab due to adverse events was low. However, real-world populations are often more diverse than randomized controlled trials (RCTs), therefore it is important to assess discontinuation rates in real-world studies. This systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify real-world discontinuation and persistence data for ocrelizumab in studies of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). Searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase to identify relevant real-world studies that met pre-determined Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study (PICOS) criteria. Only articles published in English were included, but the study country was not restricted. A total of 30 studies were included, with the majority reporting real-world persistence data that appear to be similar to or better than in the pivotal clinical trials, with only 1 study reporting higher discontinuation rates due to adverse events compared with the clinical trials. Other studies identified reported that the risk of discontinuation was higher for other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) compared with ocrelizumab, and adherence was also higher for ocrelizumab versus other DMTs. These findings have clinical relevance, as other studies have reported improved clinical outcomes and lower care costs for patients that are persistent or adherent to other DMTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a debilitating neurological disease characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration in the central nervous system. Despite extensive research, the pathology of MS remains incompletely understood. Ocrelizumab (OCRE), a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20-positive B cells, has shown efficacy in relapsing (RR) and primary progressive (PP) MS. Neurofilaments (Nf) are emerging biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury, reflecting disease activity and treatment response in MS. This study aimed to assess the impact of OCRE on serum Nf levels (NfLs) in RRMS and PPMS patients and explore factors influencing treatment response.

Balo's concentric sclerosis (BCS) is a rare subtype of multiple sclerosis. Advanced MRI metrics, such as magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and the ratio of total N-acetylaspartate concentration/total creatine concentration (tNAA/tCr) using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS), are commonly used in research studies to investigate the effect of a disease modifying therapy (DMT). We report a patient diagnosed with BCS, receiving ocrelizumab, and provide a comparison of the lesion volume, T1-gadolinium lesion volume, MTR, FA, MD, and MRS metrics at baseline, 6- and 12-month follow-up. There was a reduction in Balo's lesion volume on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging observed in our patient from baseline (23.925 mL) to 12-month follow-up (2.391 mL), with the largest decrease from baseline to 6-month follow-up (3.650 mL). There was no T1-gadolinium enhancement seen at month 6 and 12. The MTR of the lesion did not change significantly (baseline = 50.9%, 6-month = 49.9%, 12-month =50.1%) but the FA increased from 0.188 (at baseline) to 0.304 (at 6 months), while the 12-month follow-up FA was 0.297. We also noted a reduction in MD from baseline (1.333 × 10−3 mm2/s) to 6-month follow-up (1.037 × 10−3 mm2/s), while the 12-month follow-up MD was 1.086 × 10−3 mm2/s. There was a 10.3% increase in tNAA/tCr from 1.583 (at month 0) to 1.747 (at month 12). Our results demonstrate for the first time a direct effect of ocrelizumab on BCS lesions. To validate our findings, more observations are needed in a larger group of BCS patients.

Ocrelizumab (OCR) is a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved for both Relapsing and Primary Progressive forms of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) treatment. OCR is postulated to act via rapid B cell depletion; however, by analogy with other anti-CD20 agents, additional effects can be envisaged, such as on Protein Kinase C (PKC). Hence, this work aims to explore novel potential mechanisms of action of OCR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from MS patients before and after 12 months of OCR treatment. We first assessed, up-stream, PKCβII and subsequently explored two down-stream pathways: hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α)/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and human antigen R (HuR)/manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) and heat shock proteins 70 (HSP70). At baseline, higher levels of PKCβII, HIF-1α, and VEGF were found in MS patients compared to healthy controls (HC); interestingly, the overexpression of this inflammatory cascade was counteracted by OCR treatment. Conversely, at baseline, the content of HuR, MnSOD, and HSP70 was significantly lower in MS patients compared to HC, while OCR administration induced the up-regulation of these neuroprotective pathways. These results enable us to disclose the dual positive action of OCR: anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective. Therefore, in addition to B cell depletion, the effect of OCR on these molecular cascades can contribute to counteracting disease progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The reason why some multiple sclerosis (MS) patients show disease activity after alemtuzumab (ALM) is still unclear, but ocrelizumab (OCR) could represent an interesting sequential therapeutic approach. Objectives: To investigate safety and efficacy of OCR in MS patients with disease activity after two ALM courses. Methods: Observational retrospective multi-centers Italian cohort study. Results: Seventy-two subjects were included. Mean follow-up (FU) was 2.4 (±1) years. Forty-five patients (62.5%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with infections accounting for 96.7% of cases. A reduction in total lymphocytes was observed between OCR start and 6 months FU, driven by BCD19+ lymphocytes depletion (p < 0.001). Immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels decreased between OCR start and 6 months FU (p < 0.001). At 2-year FU, relapse, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and disability worsening-free survival were 92.1%, 90.8%, and 89.2%. The evidence of inflammatory activity between the two ALM courses was associated with higher risk of relapse, MRI activity, and NEDA-3 status loss in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS; p = 0.02, p = 0.05, p = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: OCR after two ALM courses seemed to be safe and effective. Early IgM hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in a high proportion of patients. The evidence of inflammatory activity between ALM courses seemed to increase the risk of MS re-activation on OCR treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: CD20-depleting therapies are a real milestone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study examined the ocrelizumab (OCR) use in patients with primary progressive (PP) and relapsing remitting (RR) MS, also evaluating the predictors of treatment response. Methods: Patients with MS treated with OCR between 2017 and 2022 were included, and OCR use trends examined. The patients' characteristics were assessed at baseline and after 24 months of OCR to assess the NEDA-3 status. Results: This study included 421 patients: 33 (7.9%) with PP and 388 (92.1%) with RR MS. Among these, 67 (17.3%) were naïve, while switchers from first- and second-line disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) were 199 (51.3%) and 122 (31.4%), respectively. An increasing trend in OCR use was reported. For six patients treated with rituximab, OCR was chosen to improve tolerability; for 390 switcher patients, the choice was due to ineffectiveness; and for 25, as an exit strategy from natalizumab due to JC virus positivity. NEDA-3 status was calculated for subjects exposed to 24 months of OCR and was achieved by 163/192 (84.9%) RR patients and 9/16 (56%) PP patients, with younger age (p = 0.048) and annualized relapse rate in the year previous to OCR (p = 0.005) emerging as determinants. For the 25 patients who switched to OCR after natalizumab, no clinical or MRI activity after 12 months was reported. Conclusion: OCR has been confirmed to be a highly efficacious option for patients with PP and RR MS, even proving to be a valid exit strategy for natalizumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The wearing-off phenomenon is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with ocrelizumab. We aim to evaluate the presence and severity of wearing-off to ocrelizumab in relation to demographic and MS clinical variables, immune profiling, and a marker of neuroaxonal damage (plasma neurofilament light chain (pNfl)). Methods: This cross-sectional study included MS patients treated with ocrelizumab from at least 1 year. Wearing-off questionnaire and blood samples were collected between 21 and 23 weeks after the previous ocrelizumab infusion. Lymphocyte subpopulations were evaluated on peripheral blood using flow cytometry. PNfl was evaluated using fully automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay. Results: We included 106 people with MS (age 49.5 ± 11.6 years; females 42.3%; wearing-off 57.6%). On regression models, wearing-off was associated with higher pNfl, CD8, CD3, and CD3CD27 lymphocytes. Most frequent wearing-off symptoms were cognitive, sensory, and balance problems; wearing-off started < 1 week (9.4%), 1–4 weeks (10.7%) or > 4 weeks (10.7%) before infusion; 44.8% of the complaints were moderate to severe. Severity of wearing-off was associated with higher pNfl and CD8 lymphocytes. Conclusions: Wearing-off is common in people with MS treated with ocrelizumab, and is associated with reduced immunomodulation (higher T lymphocytes) and increased neuroaxonal damage, suggesting reduced treatment response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Up to 10 years ago the most common approach to the treatment of pediatric MS (ped-MS) was to start with IFNB or GA (so-called first-line therapies or moderate-efficacy disease-modifying therapies [ME-DMTs]) and to switch to more aggressive treatments (or high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies [HE-DMTs]) in non-responder patients. The use of HE-DMTs as first choice was recommended in selected cases with an active, aggressive form of MS. Indications for the treatment of ped-MS were essentially derived from data of observational studies. Recently, results of three randomized clinical trials have been published as well as data from many observational studies evaluating the effect of new and more active DMTs, with clear evidence that HE-DMTs are more effective than ME-DMTs. Therefore, the paradigm of treatment for patients with MS onset before 18 years of age should be changed, offering treatment with HE-DMTs as first option, because of their superior effectiveness to prevent relapses and disease progression. HE-DMTs present an overall reassuring safety profile and obtain better adherence to treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, demyelinating, and neurodegenerative connective tissue disease affecting the central nervous system (CNS). Recently, there has been a dramatic improvement in several vital concepts of immune pathophysiology underlying MS. Notably, one of the prerequisites to MS development is Epstein--Barr virus (EBV) infection. Greater attention has been drawn towards promising, innovative immunotherapies in the management and treatment of MS. Whilst there are numerous immunotherapies currently proposed for MS, the B cell depleting therapy that predominantly uses the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as rituximab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab have demonstrated promising clinical benefits by targeting the memory B cells, which are the primary reservoir of EBV latency. Although mAbs have proved beneficial in the treatment of MS, they pose the risk of potential adverse effects. The current systematic review was undertaken to explore the therapeutic role of anti-CD20 therapy and its downsides in the treatment of MS and EBV infection. Clinical trials and prospective and retrospective studies reporting anti-CD20 therapy were carefully reviewed. The initial sections discuss the clinical features of MS, the probable link between EBV and MS, and the role of B cells in MS pathogenesis. Here, we show the potential role of anti-CD20 therapy more of a boon than a bane as the therapy yields more promising results for MS treatment. Nevertheless, the adverse effects could be minimized following a planned therapeutic regimen for treating MS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Switching disease-modifying therapy (DMT) may be considered for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) if a patient's current therapy is no longer optimal. This was particularly important during the recent COVID-19 pandemic because of considerations around immune deficiency and impaired vaccine response associated with B cell-depleting DMTs. This real-world, single-center study aimed to evaluate change or decline in functional ability and overall disease stability in people with RRMS who were switched from B cell-depleting ocrelizumab (OCRE) to diroximel fumarate (DRF) because of safety concern related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Adults with RRMS were included if they had been clinically stable for ≥ 1 year on OCRE. Data collected at baseline and 1 year post switch included relapse rate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), blood work for assessment of peripheral immune parameters, the Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results: Participants (N = 25) had a mean (SD) age of 52 (9) years, and a mean (SD) duration of 26 (8) months' treatment with OCRE before the switch to DRF. Median washout duration since the last OCRE infusion was 7 months (range 4–18 months). No participants relapsed on DRF during follow-up, and all remained persistent on DRF after 1 year. There were no significant changes in peripheral immune parameters, other than an increase in the percentage of CD19+ cells 1 year after switching (p < 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant changes in CAB, OCT, and PROs. Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that transition to DRF from OCRE may be an effective treatment option for people with RRMS who are clinically stable but may need to switch for reasons unrelated to effectiveness. Longer follow-up times on larger samples are needed to confirm these observations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In 2021 ofatumumab, a recombinant human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) already authorized for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, received the marketing approval for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Differently from ocrelizumab, that is administered intravenously, ofatumumab if the first anti-CD20 mAb to be administered subcutaneously without a premedication. Methods and objectives: In this study we aimed to describe and compare the main characteristics of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) describing the occurrence of Injective Related Reactions (IRRs) following the treatment with ocrelizumab and ofatumumab reported in the Eudravigilance (EV) database during years 2021–2023. Results: A total of 860 ICSRs with either ofatumumab and ocrelizumab as suspected drug were retrieved from Eudravigilance, of which 51% associated with ofatumumab and 49% with ocrelizumab. The majority of patients who experienced IRRs following ocrelizumab belonged to the age group of 18– 64  years (73%), while the age-group was mostly not specified (55%) in ICSRs reporting ofatumumab as suspected. The distribution of gender was almost similar in the two groups, with the majority of ICSRs related to female patients. “Pyrexia” was the Preferred Term (PT) most reported for ofatumumab, while “Infusion related reaction” were more frequently reported with ocrelizumab. Premedication drugs were reported in 148 ICSRs. Out of 89 ICSRs for which the Time to Event (TTE) was calculated, 74 reported IRRs that occurred the same day of the drug administration. Discussion: Based on the results of this study, although a risk of of atumumab-induced IRRs cannot be excluded, it should be considered as manageable considering that the drug seems to be mostly associated with the occurrence of fever. Thus, it is important to continue to closely monitor the use of these in clinical practice to improve the knowledge on their long-term safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ocrelizumab is a CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody used for treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light (NFL) chain levels are reduced in MS patients under ocrelizumab treatment indicating a preventive action against neuro-axonal degeneration. Our aim, in this preliminary study, was to explore the impact of ocrelizumab treatment on synaptic integrity through assessment of neurogranin levels. Methods: Thirteen relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients resistant to first-line immunomodulating agents were enrolled and followed up for 24 months under ocrelizumab treatment. Disease activity was monitored by periodic EDSS, MSSS, and cranial-spinal MRI assessments. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-3 was determined, and CSF levels of NFL (marker of neuro-axonal integrity) and neurogranin (marker of synaptic integrity) were measured by ELISA at baseline and 12-month ocrelizumab treatment. Results: Seven RRMS patients, who preserved NEDA-3 status during 24-month follow-up, showed ≥30% NFL level decrease, whereas 6 patients with stable/increased NFL levels displayed relapse, MRI lesion, or disability progression. Although most RRMS patients exhibited increased CSF levels of neurogranin under ocrelizumab treatment, patients with and without neurogranin level increase did not differ in terms of clinical features and NEDA-3 status. Baseline neurogranin levels negatively correlated with baseline EDSS scores. Conclusion: Our results confirm that NFL effectively monitors treatment response of RRMS patients under ocrelizumab treatment. Neurogranin does not appear to exhibit a similar benefit in screening of RRMS disease activity. Nevertheless, lower neurogranin levels are associated with increased disability in RRMS indicating a potential disease activity biomarker function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels have been proposed as a biomarker of the clinical activity, disability progression, and response to treatment of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS); however, questions remain about its implementation in clinical practice. Ocrelizumab (OCR) has proven effective in improving clinical and radiological outcomes and reducing sNfL levels. This real-life study followed the sNfL levels of 30 PwMS treated for 12 months with OCR and evaluated the usefulness of this biomarker for their short-term prognosis, considering expanded disability status scale (EDSS), annualized relapse rate (ARR), radiological activity, and NEDA-3 values. OCR reduced ARR in 83% of PwMS and radiological activity in 80%. EDSS was maintained, while NEDA-3 was achieved in 70% at 12 months. OCR produced an early reduction in sNfL levels (at 3 months). At baseline, greater MRI-evaluated radiological activity was associated with higher sNfL levels. sNfL levels over the first 12 months of treatment did not predict a suboptimal response or sustained control of the disease. Longer-term studies are needed to explore the predictive usefulness of sNfL levels in PwMS treated with high-efficacy drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The management of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has undergone transformative evolution with the introduction of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), specifically anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, such as ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA). Materials and methods: This is an independent retrospective cohort study in Relapsing MS (RMS) patients followed at eight Italian MS centers who initiated treatment with OCR or OFA in the participating centers and with at least 12 months on therapy. A generalized linear regression model inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) PS-adjusted was performed to evaluate the relationship between annualized relapse rate (ARR) and treatment groups. No evidence of disease activity-NEDA-3 at 12-month score was also collected. Safety profile of the investigated DMTs was recorded. Results: A total cohort of 396 RMS patients fulfilled the required criteria and were enrolled in the study. Out of them, 216 had a prescription of OCR and 180 of OFA. The mean follow-up was 13.2 ± 1.9 months. The estimated means for ARR did not show differences between the two groups, 0.059 for patients on OCR and 0.038 for patients on OFA (p = 0.185). The generalized regression model IPTW PS-adjusted did not reveal differences between patients on OCR and OFA (ExpBOFA 0.974, 95%CI 934–1.015, p = 0.207). NEDA-3 at 12 months was experienced by 199(92.1%) patients on OCR and 170(94.4%) patients on OFA (p = 0.368). Generally, both therapies exhibit good tolerability. Conclusions: The treatment with OCR and OFA resulted in comparable control of disease activity with good safety profile. Our results need further validation in larger multicentre studies with long-term follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation remains unclear in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving ocrelizumab. We aimed to assess HBV seroprevalence and reactivation risk in MS patients on ocrelizumab and to evaluate the effectiveness of antiviral prophylaxis against HBV reactivation. Methods: In this single-center, cross-sectional study, 400 people with MS receiving ocrelizumab were screened for HBV at baseline and antiviral prophylaxis was implemented based on serological results. Patients were monitored for HBV reactivation, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Among 56 (14%) patients who had serology compatible with occult or resolved HBV infection, 49 (85.7%) received antiviral prophylaxis regularly and had no HBV reactivation during the follow-up. Reactivation of HBV occurred in 2 out of 7 (28.6%) patients who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis and in one patient who did not adhere to the prophylaxis regimen. All patients with reactivation had anti-HBs levels below 100 mIU/mL and the median titer was significantly lower than the patients with no HBV reactivation (p = 0.034). Conclusion: This study highlights a 14% anti-HBc positivity, indicating a potential risk for HBV reactivation in people with MS receiving ocrelizumab. This suggests the importance of vigilant monitoring and the implementation of prophylactic measures. Our recommendation emphasizes antiviral prophylaxis, particularly for patients with low anti-HBs, and a pre-emptive strategy for others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ocrelizumab is an approved intravenously administered anti-CD20 antibody for multiple sclerosis (MS). The safety profile and patient preference for conventional versus shorter ocrelizumab infusions were investigated in the ENSEMBLE PLUS study. Methods: ENSEMBLE PLUS was a randomized, double-blind substudy to the single-arm ENSEMBLE study (NCT03085810), comparing outcomes in patients with early-stage relapsing–remitting MS receiving ocrelizumab 600 mg over the approved 3.5-h (conventional) versus 2-h (shorter) infusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) following the first randomized dose (RD); the secondary endpoint included IRR frequency at subsequent RDs. Results: At first RD, the number of patients with an IRR in the conventional (101/373; 27.1%) versus shorter (107/372; 28.8%) infusion group was similar (difference, stratified estimates [95% CI]: 1.9% [− 4.4, 8.2]). Most IRRs (conventional: 99.4%; shorter: 97.7%) were mild/moderate. IRR frequency decreased over the course of RDs; three patients discontinued from the shorter infusion arm but continued with conventional infusion. Overall, > 98% of IRRs resolved without sequelae in both groups. Pre-randomization throat irritation was predictive of future throat irritation as an IRR symptom. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were consistent with the known ocrelizumab safety profile. On completion of ENSEMBLE PLUS, most patients chose to remain on (95%) or switch to (80%) shorter infusion. Conclusion: ENSEMBLE PLUS demonstrates the safety and tolerability of shorter ocrelizumab infusions. Most patients remained on/switched to shorter infusion after unblinding; IRRs did not strongly influence patient decisions. Clinical Trials Registration: Substudy of ENSEMBLE (NCT03085810). Registration: March 21, 2017. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study investigates clinical and biomarker differences between standard interval dosing (SID) and extended interval dosing (EID) of ocrelizumab therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: This is a prospective, double-arm, open-label, multi-center study in Denmark. Participants diagnosed with MS on ocrelizumab therapy >12 months were included (n = 184). Clinical, radiological, and blood-based biomarker outcomes were evaluated. MRI disease activity, relapses, worsening of neurostatus, and No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 (NEDA-3) were used as a combined endpoint. Results: Out of 184 participants, 107 participants received EID (58.2%), whereas 77 participants received SID (41.8%). The average extension was 9 weeks with a maximum of 78 weeks. When comparing EID to SID, we found higher levels of B-cells, lower serum concentrations of ocrelizumab, and similar levels of age-adjusted NFL and GFAP in the two groups. No difference in NEDA-3 between EID and SID was demonstrated (hazard ratio: 1.174, p = 0.69). Higher levels of NFL were identified in participants with disease activity. Body mass index correlated with levels of ocrelizumab and B-cells. Conclusion: Extending one treatment interval of ocrelizumab on average 9 weeks and up to 78 weeks did not result in clinical, radiological, or biomarker evidence of worsening compared with SID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ocrelizumab (OCR) is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting and primary-progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an individualized OCR extended interval dosing (EID), after switching from standard interval dosing (SID). Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, single-centre study including MS patients regularly followed at the Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland. After a cumulative OCR dose ⩾1200 mg, stable patients were switched to EID (OCR infusions following CD19+ 27+ memory B cell repopulation). Results: A total of 128 patients were included in the study, and 113 (88.3%) were switched to EID with a median interval of 9.9 (8.8–11.8) months between infusions. No clinical relapses occurred; 2 (1.8%) patients experienced disability worsening. Three (2.7%) and 2 (1.8%) patients experienced new T2 brain and spinal lesions, respectively. There was a mild decrease in IgG and IgM concentrations during both SID and EID OCR regimens (β = −0.23, p = 0.001 and β = −0.07, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Switch to personalized dosing of OCR based on CD19+ 27+ memory B cell repopulation led to a great extension of the interval between infusions, with maintained clinical and radiological efficacy. Given the potential advantages in terms of safety and health costs, EID OCR regimens should be further investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present a case of a 30-year-old man with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who developed psoriasiform dermatitis following his second course of ocrelizumab. This resolved with topical therapies and discontinuation of treatment. Cases of psoriasiform rashes have been increasingly reported in the use of ocrelizumab and are possibly due to B-cell (CD20) depletion and T-cell overregulation. Nevertheless, skin-related adverse reactions are not yet considered in the risk management plans of anti-CD20 treatments in multiple sclerosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Over the past few years, anti-CD20 therapies like rituximab, ocrelizumab or ofatumumab have seen an increase in interest in the treatment of neurological autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), or resistant forms of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). They are generally well-tolerated, but recent reports have highlighted severe dental disorders in patients undergoing anti-CD20 therapies. The aim was to describe a series of cases and to compare with the available scientific literature. Methods: We reviewed 6 patient cases with dental disorders during anti-CD20 therapy that were reported to the pharmacovigilance center. A disproportionality analysis was also conducted on Vigibase® for each anti-CD20 and each adverse effect described in the cases. Results: Six cases of dental and gingival conditions in relatively young patients were reported (median age: 40.5 years old [min: 34; max: 79]). Oral conditions were developed in four patients with MS treated with ocrelizumab and in two patients receiving rituximab (one patient with MG and one with NMOSD). The onset of oral conditions ranged from 10 days to 2 years after treatment initiation. Notably, all patients treated with ocrelizumab experienced gingival recession. Various dental pathologies were observed, including tooth loss, dental pain, caries, brittle teeth, dental fractures, dental abscesses, and periodontitis. Analysis of Vigibase® revealed 284 worldwide cases of dental and gingival conditions under ocrelizumab, 386 cases under rituximab, and 80 under ofatumumab. Significant associations were found between these therapies and dental pathologies, particularly tooth abscesses and infections. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting dental conditions developed in patients long-term treated with anti-CD20 treatments. This issue, literature data, and Vigilyze® analysis might be considered a safety signal that necessitates being confirmed with more robust data, such as a retrospective study with a control group. Meanwhile, proactive measures are essential like frequent dental checkups and dental hygienic measures to prevent oral health problems associated with anti-CD20 therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) impact the cellular immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). In this study, we aim to elucidate the characteristics of the involved antigen-specific T cells via the measurement of broad cytokine profiles in pwMS on various DMTs. We examined SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses in whole blood cultures characterized by the release of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17A, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), as well as antibodies (AB) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in pwMS following either two or three doses of mRNA or viral vector vaccines (VVV). For mRNA vaccination non-responders, the NVX-CoV2373 protein-based vaccine was administered, and immune responses were evaluated. Our findings indicate that immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwMS are skewed towards a Th1 phenotype, characterized by IL-2 and IFN-γ. Additionally, a Th2 response characterized by IL-5, and to a lesser extent IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13, is observed. Therefore, the measurement of IL-2 and IL-5 levels could complement traditional IFN-γ assays to more comprehensively characterize the cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Our results provide a comprehensive cytokine profile for pwMS receiving different DMTs and offer valuable insights for designing vaccination strategies in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveTo ascertain the changes of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) values in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with ocrelizumab and their association with treatment response.MethodsMulticenter prospective study including 115 RRMS patients initiating ocrelizumab treatment between February 2020 and March 2022 followed during a year. Serum samples were collected at baseline and every 3 months to measure sNfL and sGFAP levels using single-molecule array (SIMOA) technology. Based on age and body mass index, sNfL values were standardized using z-score. NEDA (non-evidence of disease activity)-3 status was defined for patients free of disease activity after a year of follow-up. Inflammation (INFL) was considered when new relapses occurred during follow-up or new MRI lesions were found at 1-year exploration. PIRA (progression independent of relapse activity) was defined as disability progression occurring in the absence of relapses or new MRI activity.ResultsAfter a year on ocrelizumab, 85 patients (73.9%) achieved NEDA-3. Thirty patients did not achieve NEDA: 20 (17.4%) because of INFL and 10 (8.7%) because of PIRA. Of INFL patients, 6 (30.0%) had relapses, and 17 (85.0%) had at least one new MRI lesion at the 12-month examination. At baseline, INFL patients had higher sNfL (p = 0.0003) and sGFAP (p = 0.03) than the NEDA-3 group. PIRA patients mostly exhibited low sNfL and heterogeneous sGFAP levels. After a year, NEDA-3 and INFL patients showed similar decreases in sNfL (p < 0.0001) and sGFAP (p < 0.0001 for NEDA-3 and p = 0.001 for INFL ones). However, the decrease occurred earlier in NEDA-3 patients. Accordingly, sNfL > 1.5 z-score 3 months after ocrelizumab initiation indicated a higher risk of inflammation (OR = 13.6; p < 0.0001). Decrease in sGFAP values occurred later in both groups, with significant reductions observed at 12 months for INFL and 6 and 12 months for NEDA-3. No significant changes in sNfL or sGFAP were observed in PIRA patients.ConclusionOcrelizumab induced normalization of sNfL and sGFAP in the majority of NEDA-3 and inflammatory patients but did not cause changes in the PIRA group. Our data suggest that normalization of sNfL and sGFAP is associated with the lack of inflammatory-associated disease progression but it may not affect non-inflammatory PIRA.

Abstract Introduction Over the past few years, anti-CD20 therapies like rituximab, ocrelizumab or ofatumumab have seen an increase in interest in the treatment of neurological autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), or resistant forms of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). They are generally well-tolerated, but recent reports have highlighted severe dental disorders in patients undergoing anti-CD20 therapies. The aim was to describe a series of cases and to compare with the available scientific literature. Methods We reviewed 6 patient cases with dental disorders during anti-CD20 therapy that were reported to the pharmacovigilance center. A disproportionality analysis was also conducted on Vigibase® for each anti-CD20 and each adverse effect described in the cases. Results Six cases of dental and gingival conditions in relatively young patients were reported (median age: 40.5 years old [min: 34; max: 79]). Oral conditions were developed in four patients with MS treated with ocrelizumab and in two patients receiving rituximab (one patient with MG and one with NMOSD). The onset of oral conditions ranged from 10 days to 2 years after treatment initiation. Notably, all patients treated with ocrelizumab experienced gingival recession. Various dental pathologies were observed, including tooth loss, dental pain, caries, brittle teeth, dental fractures, dental abscesses, and periodontitis. Analysis of Vigibase® revealed 284 worldwide cases of dental and gingival conditions under ocrelizumab, 386 cases under rituximab, and 80 under ofatumumab. Significant associations were found between these therapies and dental pathologies, particularly tooth abscesses and infections. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting dental conditions developed in patients long-term treated with anti-CD20 treatments. This issue, literature data, and Vigilyze® analysis might be considered a safety signal that necessitates being confirmed with more robust data, such as a retrospective study with a control group. Meanwhile, proactive measures are essential like frequent dental checkups and dental hygienic measures to prevent oral health problems associated with anti-CD20 therapies.

Background: We aim to provide up-to-date real-world evidence on the persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization, and costs of multiple sclerosis (MS) by comparing ocrelizumab to other disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) and within different DMT sequences. Methods: We included 3371 people with MS who first received or switched DMT prescriptions from January 2018 to December 2022; they were identified through hospital discharge records, drug prescriptions, and exemption codes from the Campania Region (South Italy). We calculated persistence (time from the first prescription to discontinuation or switching to another DMT), adherence (proportion of days covered (PDC)), DMT costs, and MS hospital admissions and related costs. Results: The most frequently prescribed DMT was dimethyl fumarate (n = 815; age 38.90 ± 11.91 years; 69.5% females), followed by ocrelizumab (n = 682; age 46.46 ± 11.29 years; 56.3%); 28.8% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab were naïve to DMTs. Using ocrelizumab as a statistical reference, the risk of discontinuation was higher for other highly active (HR = 6.32; 95%CI = 3.16, 12.63; p < 0.01) and low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (HR = 10.10; 95%CI = 5.10, 19.77; p < 0.01); adherence was lower for other highly active DMTs (Coeff = −0.07; 95%CI = −0.10, −0.04; p < 0.01) and low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (Coeff = −0.16; 95%CI = −0.19, −0.14; p < 0.01). monthly DMT costs were higher for other highly active DMTs (Coeff = 77.45; 95%CI = 29.36, 125.53; p < 0.01) but lower for low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (Coeff = −772.31; 95%CI = −816.95, −727.66; p < 0.01). The hospital admissions and related costs of MS were similar between ocrelizumab, other highly active DMTs, and other low-/medium-efficacy DMTs, and with ocrelizumab as the first-line DMT after other highly active DMTs and after low-/medium-efficacy DMTs, which was possibly due to the low number of observations. Conclusions: From 2018 to 2022, ocrelizumab was among the most frequently prescribed DMTs, with 28.8% prescriptions to incident MS patients, confirming its relevance in clinical practice. Ocrelizumab was associated with the highest persistence and adherence, pointing towards its favorable benefit–risk profile. The costs of ocrelizumab were lower than those of other highly active DMTs.

Ocrelizumab (OCR), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is approved for treating relapsing remitting (RR) and primary progressive (PP) multiple sclerosis (MS). The standard interval dosing (SID) regimen requires intravenous infusions every six months. Experience of extended dosing due to COVID-19 pandemic-related issues suggests that this strategy may provide comparable efficacy while reducing treatment burden and healthcare costs. This study aimed to evaluate clinical effectiveness, changes in B- and T-cell count, and immunoglobulin dynamics associated with extended interval dosing (EID) of ocrelizumab in a real-world setting. We retrospectively included RRMS or PPMS patients treated with OCR that had already received two OCR cycles and with at least 6 months of follow up after the last infusion. EID was defined as a ≥4 weeks delay compared to SID. Clinical outcomes were occurrence of relapses, MRI activity, 6-months confirmed disability progression (CDP) and their combination (No Evidence of Disease Activity, NEDA-3). We also evaluated changes in CD19+ B cell count, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell count, immunoglobulin titers, and occurrence of hypogammaglobulinemia (hypo-Ig). Frequency tests, multivariate regression models, and survival analysis were applied as appropriate. We analyzed data on 93 subjects (75.3% RRMS) for a total of 389 infusions (272 SID, 117 EID). Clinical and MRI activity, CDP, and NEDA 3 did not significantly differ between EID and SID. EID was associated with lower rates of B-cell depletion. T-cell dynamics and incidence of hypo-Ig were comparable following EID and SID. Hypo-IgG at index infusion was associated with further occurrence of hypo-IgG; male sex and hypo-IgM at index infusion were independently associated with hypo-IgM. In conclusion, OCR EID does not impact MS clinical and radiological outcomes, although it interferes with B-cell dynamics. These findings provide support for a tailored schedule of OCR in MS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ocrelizumab (OCR) and Fingolimod (FGL) are two high-efficacy treatments in multiple sclerosis which, besides their strong anti-inflammatory activity, may limit neurodegeneration. Aim: To compare the effect of OCR and FGL on clinical and MRI endpoints. Methods: 95 relapsing–remitting patients (57 OCR, 38 FGL) clinically followed for 36 months underwent a 3-Tesla MRI at baseline and after 24 months. The annualized relapse rate, EDSS, new cortical/white matter lesions and regional cortical and deep grey matter volume loss were evaluated. Results: OCR reduced the relapse rate from 0.48 to 0.04, FGL from 0.32 to 0.05 (both p < 0.001). Compared to FGL, OCR-group experienced fewer new white matter lesions (12% vs 32%, p = 0.005), no differences in new cortical lesions, lower deep grey matter volume loss (− 0.12% vs − 0.66%; p = 0.002, Cohen's d = 0.54), lower global cortical thickness change (− 0.45% vs − 0.70%; p = 0.036; d = 0.42) and reduced cortical thinning/volume loss in several regions of interests, including those of parietal gyrus (d-range = 0.65–0.71), frontal gyrus (d-range = 0.47–0.60), cingulate (d-range = 0.41–0.72), insula (d = 0.36), cerebellum (cortex d = 0.72, white matter d = 0.44), putamen (d = 0.35) and thalamus (d = 0.31). The effect on some regional thickness changes was confirmed in patients without focal lesions. Conclusions: When compared with FGL, patients receiving OCR showed greater suppression of focal MRI lesions accumulation and lower cortical and deep grey matter volume loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Ocrelizumab is a humanized anti‐CD20‐monoclonal antibody that has recently been approved for the treatment of certain types of multiple sclerosis. Isolated case reports of ocrelizumab‐associated colitis have been reported in the literature. We present a case series of ocrelizumab‐associated intestinal injury with a focus on histopathologic features and report a case of ocrelizumab‐associated hepatitis. Methods and results: A retrospective computerized search was conducted from 03/2017 to 08/2022, which identified six patients with suspected or clinically confirmed ocrelizumab‐associated intestinal injury and one patient with hepatic injury. Pertinent clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic findings were reviewed and recorded. Seven patients (six female, one male) were identified with ages ranging from 24 to 68 years. The presenting symptoms included diarrhoea (n = 5), abdominal pain (n = 3), hematochezia (n = 2), and vomiting (n = 1), nausea (n = 1) fever (n = 1), and weight loss (n = 1). Endoscopic findings ranged from normal (n = 1) to patchy colonic inflammation with or without ulceration (n = 4) and decreased mucosal vascular pattern in the rectum (n = 1). Crohn's disease was clinically suspected in two patients and ulcerative colitis in one patient. None of the patients had a prior confirmed diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Histologic patterns of initial colonic injury included acute colitis/proctitis (n = 5), and chronic active colitis (n = 1). Follow‐up ranged from 1 to 3 years and 10 months. All patients were alive at follow‐up. Follow‐up biopsies were available for four patients and findings included focal acute colitis (n = 1), apoptotic colopathy (n = 1) lymphocytic colitis (n = 1), and normal mucosa (n = 1). Four patients were treated with steroids and ocrelizumab was discontinued in three patients. Two patients were symptomatically managed with subsequent resolution of symptoms. The liver biopsy from the patient with a marked hepatic pattern of liver enzyme elevation showed an acute hepatitis pattern of injury with prominent centrilobular necrosis, which resolved upon discontinuation of the drug and treatment with steroids and azathioprine. Conclusions: The histologic manifestations of ocrelizumab‐associated intestinal injury are variable and can mimic inflammatory bowel disease. Hepatic injury can rarely manifest as an acute hepatitis pattern of injury with necrosis. Identifying ocrelizumab‐associated injury is paramount in determining management, which often includes discontinuation of ocrelizumab therapy, and/or administration of immunosuppressive therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We aim to provide up-to-date real-world evidence on the persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization, and costs of multiple sclerosis (MS) by comparing ocrelizumab to other disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) and within different DMT sequences. Methods: We included 3371 people with MS who first received or switched DMT prescriptions from January 2018 to December 2022; they were identified through hospital discharge records, drug prescriptions, and exemption codes from the Campania Region (South Italy). We calculated persistence (time from the first prescription to discontinuation or switching to another DMT), adherence (proportion of days covered (PDC)), DMT costs, and MS hospital admissions and related costs. Results: The most frequently prescribed DMT was dimethyl fumarate (n = 815; age 38.90 ± 11.91 years; 69.5% females), followed by ocrelizumab (n = 682; age 46.46 ± 11.29 years; 56.3%); 28.8% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab were naïve to DMTs. Using ocrelizumab as a statistical reference, the risk of discontinuation was higher for other highly active (HR = 6.32; 95%CI = 3.16, 12.63; p < 0.01) and low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (HR = 10.10; 95%CI = 5.10, 19.77; p < 0.01); adherence was lower for other highly active DMTs (Coeff = −0.07; 95%CI = −0.10, −0.04; p < 0.01) and low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (Coeff = −0.16; 95%CI = −0.19, −0.14; p < 0.01). monthly DMT costs were higher for other highly active DMTs (Coeff = 77.45; 95%CI = 29.36, 125.53; p < 0.01) but lower for low-/medium-efficacy DMTs (Coeff = −772.31; 95%CI = −816.95, −727.66; p < 0.01). The hospital admissions and related costs of MS were similar between ocrelizumab, other highly active DMTs, and other low-/medium-efficacy DMTs, and with ocrelizumab as the first-line DMT after other highly active DMTs and after low-/medium-efficacy DMTs, which was possibly due to the low number of observations. Conclusions: From 2018 to 2022, ocrelizumab was among the most frequently prescribed DMTs, with 28.8% prescriptions to incident MS patients, confirming its relevance in clinical practice. Ocrelizumab was associated with the highest persistence and adherence, pointing towards its favorable benefit–risk profile. The costs of ocrelizumab were lower than those of other highly active DMTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recent success of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapies in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has highlighted the role of B cells in the pathogenesis of MS. In people with MS, the inflammatory characteristics of B-cell activity are elevated, leading to increased pro-inflammatory cytokine release, diminished anti-inflammatory cytokine production and an accumulation of pathogenic B cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. Rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ublituximab and BCD-132 are anti-CD20 therapies that are either undergoing clinical development, or have been approved, for the treatment of MS. Despite CD20 being a common target for these therapies, differences have been reported in their mechanistic, pharmacological and clinical characteristics, which may have substantial clinical implications. This narrative review explores key characteristics of these therapies. By using clinical trial data and real-world evidence, we discuss their mechanisms of action, routes of administration, efficacy (in relation to B-cell kinetics), safety, tolerability and convenience of use. Clinicians, alongside patients and their families, should consider the aspects discussed in this review as part of shared decision-making discussions to improve outcomes and health-related quality of life for people living with MS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Neurologie Pro Praxi is the property of SOLEN sro and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Ocrelizumab is an effective medication for multiple sclerosis. However, infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are a concern for patients and may lead to discontinuation of ocrelizumab. To minimize IRRs, pre-medications are administered. However, from our experience, these medications, especially diphenhydramine, can cause marked drowsiness. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether cetirizine is non-inferior to diphenhydramine in limiting the proportion and severity of reactions from ocrelizumab infusions. Methods: Twenty participants were serially randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 10 mg of cetirizine or 25 mg of diphenhydramine orally prior to their first three ocrelizumab infusions. Results: The rate of IRRs in this study was similar across both treatment groups with no increase in the risk of severity, and no grade 3 IRRs. Further, patients receiving cetirizine experienced a reduction in fatigue. While there was not a significant difference in global satisfaction, this score increased over time in the cetirizine arm while it remained unchanged in the diphenhydramine arm. Conclusions: Overall, our results suggest that cetirizine does not increase the risk of infusion-related reactions compared to diphenhydramine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Currently, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) are widely used in clinical practice. At the same time, there are a variety of drug options for DMTs, but the effect of the drugs that can better relieve symptoms and improve the prognosis are still inconclusive. Objectives: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DMTs for PMS and to identify the best among these drugs. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before 30 January, 2023. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the confidence in the network meta-analysis (CINeMA) framework. We estimated the summary risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Results: We included 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 9,234 patients in the study. DMT can effectively control the disease progression of MS. Among them, mitoxantrone, siponimod, and ocrelizumab are superior to other drug options in delaying disease progression (high certainty). Mitoxantrone was the best (with high certainty) for mitigating deterioration (progression of disability). Ocrelizumab performed best on the pre- and post-treatment Timed 25-Foot Walk test (T25FW; low certainty), as did all other agents (RR range: 1.12–1.05). In the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), natalizumab performed the best (high certainty), as did all other agents (RR range: 1.59–1.09). In terms of imaging, IFN-beta-1b performed better on the new T2 hypointense lesion on contrast, before and after treatment (high certainty), while siponimod performed best on the change from baseline in the total volume of lesions on T2-weighted image contrast before and after treatment (high certainty), and sWASO had the highest area under the curve (SUCRA) value (100%). In terms of adverse events (AEs), rituximab (RR 1.01), and laquinimod (RR 1.02) were more effective than the placebo (high certainty). In terms of serious adverse events (SAEs), natalizumab (RR 1.09), and ocrelizumab (RR 1.07) were safer than placebo (high certainty). Conclusion: DMTs can effectively control disease progression and reduce disease deterioration during the treatment of PMS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a potential adverse event of diseasemodifying therapies (DMTs) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), as well as of methylprednisolone pulsed therapy used in case of MS relapse. DILI may be induced by different mechanisms, including idiosyncratic reaction, autoimmune hepatitis or viral reactivation. In patients receiving the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) ocrelizumab, DILI has been rarely reported and was mostly associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. Here we present the case of a woman with highly active relapsing–remitting MS who had experienced two episodes of DILI while receiving different DMTs, and was successfully switched to ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 mAb, after a further event associated with ocrelizumab treatment and unrelated to HBV reactivation. Despite sharing the mechanism of action, differences in structure, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, and use of ancillary drugs (only needed for ocrelizumab) may have accounted for the successful switch. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a successful switch from ocrelizumab to ofatumumab due to DILI. Ofatumumab may therefore represent a valid therapeutic option for patients experiencing DMTs- and ocrelizumab-induced liver injury, providing that HBV reactivation has been ruled out. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Neurologie Pro Praxi is the property of SOLEN sro and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

IntroductionIn 2021 ofatumumab, a recombinant human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) already authorized for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, received the marketing approval for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Differently from ocrelizumab, that is administered intravenously, ofatumumab if the first anti-CD20 mAb to be administered subcutaneously without a premedication.Methods and objectivesIn this study we aimed to describe and compare the main characteristics of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) describing the occurrence of Injective Related Reactions (IRRs) following the treatment with ocrelizumab and ofatumumab reported in the Eudravigilance (EV) database during years 2021–2023.ResultsA total of 860 ICSRs with either ofatumumab and ocrelizumab as suspected drug were retrieved from Eudravigilance, of which 51% associated with ofatumumab and 49% with ocrelizumab. The majority of patients who experienced IRRs following ocrelizumab belonged to the age group of 18–64 years (73%), while the age-group was mostly not specified (55%) in ICSRs reporting ofatumumab as suspected. The distribution of gender was almost similar in the two groups, with the majority of ICSRs related to female patients. “Pyrexia” was the Preferred Term (PT) most reported for ofatumumab, while “Infusion related reaction” were more frequently reported with ocrelizumab. Premedication drugs were reported in 148 ICSRs. Out of 89 ICSRs for which the Time to Event (TTE) was calculated, 74 reported IRRs that occurred the same day of the drug administration.DiscussionBased on the results of this study, although a risk of ofatumumab-induced IRRs cannot be excluded, it should be considered as manageable considering that the drug seems to be mostly associated with the occurrence of fever. Thus, it is important to continue to closely monitor the use of these in clinical practice to improve the knowledge on their long-term safety.

Objective: To describe a case of neoehrlichiosis, an emerging opportunistic tick-borne infection, in a patient with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with ocrelizumab. Methods: This is a case study. Results: Our patient developed clinical infection over several months while on ocrelizumab and was ultimately diagnosed with neoehrlichiosis, caused by the bacteria Neoehrlichia mikurensis. Resolution of symptoms began within a few days after the initiation of antibiotic treatment. Conclusion: We describe the first probable case of ocrelizumab-associated neoehrlichiosis in a patient with MS. Clinicians should be aware of this potentially debilitating and life-threatening infection in patients receiving CD20-depleting therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Ocrelizumab (OCR) is a humanized anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody approved for treating multiple sclerosis. We present three patients who developed psoriasiform dermatitis (PsD) during OCR treatment and a review of the cases published to date. We hereby report the first exclusive fingernail involvement. Most of the cases had a mild skin involvement and only one case required OCR discontinuation. No association with arthritis, personal or family history of psoriasis was found. Data compiled suggests that PsD tends to appear within the first year of treatment. There are few studies focusing on B‐lymphocytes in psoriasis and several hypotheses attempt to explain their role. The most widely accepted is the depletion of regulatory B‐lymphocytes with immunomodulatory function through interleukin‐10. However, the exact mechanism by which this occurs with OCR remains unclear and the presented case of anti‐CD20‐induced PsD highlights the importance of continuous monitoring of new treatments in terms of dermatological side effects and the induction of skin diseases, in particular psoriasis. There is also a need to inform the professional community about the possibility of psoriasis in patients with multiple sclerosis and the consequences of this condition.

Recent studies in adults suggested that extended-interval dosing of rituximab/ocrelizumab (RTX/OCR) larger than 12 months was safe and could improve safety. This was an observational cohort study of very active pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (PoMS) (median (range) age, 16 (12–17) years) treated with RTX/OCR with 6 month standard-interval dosing (n = 9) or early extended-interval dosing (n = 12, median (range) interval 18 months (12–25)). Within a median (range) follow-up of 31 (12–63) months after RTX/OCR onset, one patient (standard-interval) experienced relapse and no patient showed disability worsening or new T2-weighted lesions. This study suggests that the effectiveness of RTX/OCR is maintained with a median extended-interval dosing of 18 months in patients with very active PoMS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Risk concerns related to ocrelizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) during the COVID-19 pandemic caused infusion delays with extended interval dosing (EID). We reviewed medical records of patients on ocrelizumab to determine whether EID maintains its effectiveness compared to standard interval dosing (SID). Among 361 patients, 231 (64%) and 123 (34%) had at least one infusion with infusion intervals of ⩾8 months and ⩾12 months, respectively. There were no differences in demographics or clinical profiles between the SID and EID groups. No significant differences between rates of breakthrough activity among relapsing-remitting patients were observed between SID (three patients) and EID (seven patients). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recently, research on the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) has focused on the role of B lymphocytes and the possibility of using specific drugs, such as Ocrelizumab and Rituximab, directed toward these cells to reduce inflammation and to slow disease progression. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of Ocrelizumab/Rituximab on laboratory immune parameters and identify the predictors of treatment responses. Methods: A retrospective single-center study was conducted among patients who received infusion therapy with an anti-CD20 drug to treat MS. Results: A total of 64 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 277 total cycles of therapy studied. Compared with the baseline values, anti-CD20 infusions resulted in absolute-value and percentage decreases in B lymphocyte levels and increased the absolute and percentage levels of NK cells 3 and 5 months after therapy (p < 0.001). After multivariate logistic regression analysis, a reduced percentage level of NK cells 3 months after infusion could predict disease activity 6 months after Ocrelizumab/Rituximab administration (p = 0.041). Conclusions: Lower percentage levels of NK cells 3 months after anti-CD20 infusion correlate with the presence of disease activity 6 months after therapy, confirming a possible protective role of NK cells in MS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, ocrelizumab (OCR) infusions for MS patients were often re-scheduled because of MS center's disruption and concerns regarding immunosuppression. The aim of the present study was to assess changes in OCR schedule during the first wave of pandemic in Italy and to evaluate the effect of delayed infusion on clinical/radiological endpoints. Methods: Data were extracted from the Italian MS Register database. Standard interval dosing was defined as an infusion interval ≤ 30 weeks, while extended interval dosing was defined as an infusion interval > 30 weeks at the time of the observation period. Clinico-demographics variables were tested as potential predictors for treatment delay. Time to first relapse and time to first MRI event were evaluated. Cumulative hazard curves were reported along their 95% confidence intervals. A final sample of one-thousand two patients with MS from 65 centers was included in the analysis: 599 pwMS were selected to evaluate the modification of OCR infusion intervals, while 717 pwRMS were selected to analyze the effect of infusion delay on clinical/MRI activity. Results: Mean interval between two OCR infusions was 28.1 weeks before pandemic compared to 30.8 weeks during the observation period, with a mean delay of 2.74 weeks (p < 0.001). No clinico-demographic factors emerged as predictors of infusion postponement, except for location of MS centers in the North of Italy. Clinical relapses (4 in SID, 0 in EID) and 17 MRI activity reports (4 in SID, 13 in EID) were recorded during follow-up period. Discussion: Despite the significant extension of OCR infusion interval during the first wave of pandemic in Italy, a very small incidence of clinical/radiological events was observed, thus suggesting durable efficacy of OCR, as well as the absence of rebound after its short-term suspension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open-label extension (OLE) studies help inform long-term safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS). We report exploratory analyses from a phase 2 trial on the longest follow-up to date of ocrelizumab-treated patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS). The primary treatment period (PTP) comprised four 24-week treatment cycles; participants were randomized to double-blind ocrelizumab (2000 mg or 600 mg), placebo, or interferon β-1a (open label) for one cycle, then dose-blinded ocrelizumab 1000 mg or 600 mg for the remaining cycles. The PTP was followed by consecutive assessed and unassessed treatment-free periods (TFPs) and then the OLE (ocrelizumab 600 mg every 24 weeks). Safety and efficacy were prospectively assessed. Of 220 participants randomized, 183 (84%) completed the PTP. After the TFP, 103 entered OLE (median OLE ocrelizumab exposure 6.5 years). Most common adverse events across all periods were infusion-related reactions. MRI activity, annualized relapse rate, and confirmed disability progression (CDP) rates remained low throughout. During the assessed TFP, there was a trend toward less and later B-cell repletion, and later CDP, for patients randomized to ocrelizumab; MRI activity was observed in 16.3% of patients, the earliest 24 weeks after the last ocrelizumab dose. This is the longest follow-up of ocrelizumab-treated patients with RRMS, with no new safety signals emerging during an observation period from 2008 to 2020. Results reinforce the sustained efficacy of long-term ocrelizumab. Reduced disease activity was maintained following interruption of 6-month dosing cycles, with no evidence of rebound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]