Search

Objective: To evaluate test characteristics of various diagnostic modalities in the workup of foreign body (FB) sensation in the aerodigestive tract. Methods: Database containing all inpatient otolaryngology consultations between 2008 and 2020 was used. Cases of FB sensation were identified by documented encounter diagnosis or hospital problem of FB or globus sensation. Variables including basic patient demographics, clinical presentations, diagnostic imaging modalities, procedures, and outpatient follow‐up were collected. Results: One hundred and six patients were included in the study. A FB was visualized in 55 patients (52%) and removed in 52 patients (49%); 3 patients had a FB that was visualized initially but not found in the operating room. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were found to be 41%, 50%, 58%, and 33%, respectively, for X‐ray (XR); 91%, 61%, 70%, and 87%, respectively, for computed tomography (CT). Sensitivity and NPV were 25% and 57%, respectively, for flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FFL). Seventy‐one of 106 patients (67%) underwent invasive interventions during their workup for FBs. Ten out of 11 (91%) chicken bones were found in the digestive tract compared to 7 out of 19 (37%) fishbones (p = 0.0046). Conclusion: In patients with history of FB ingestion, CT may be more beneficial than XR as a screening tool for locating foreign bodies and guiding further management. FFL alone is inadequate for ruling out a FB in the aerodigestive tract given FB's high likelihood of being in the esophagus or buried in soft tissue or mucosa. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:1361–1366, 2023 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the improvement in epiphora and need for surgical revision in patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction following balloon-assisted, middle meatal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with chitosan-based dressing versus bioresorbable polyurethane packing versus no packing. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study of consecutive adult patients seen from 2015 to 2018 with follow-up evaluation of epiphora at least 3 months after balloon-assisted, middle meatal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Patients with a history of prior punctoplasty, septoplasty, sinus surgery, or dacryocystorhinostomy of any kind were excluded. Those meeting criteria were stratified by postoperative hemostatic intervention: no packing, bioresorbable packing, and chitosan-based dressing (groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Procedural outcomes were graded as successes or failures based on subjective report and anatomical findings at most recent visit within an 18-month postoperative window. Instances of recommendation for revision surgery were also recorded. Results: Forty-three cases (36 patients) met the abovementioned criteria. Groups 1, 2, and 3 comprised 12, 17, and 14 cases each, respectively. Average patient age was 55.3 years old, and average duration of follow-up was 6.7 months. Significant variation in outcomes was detected across the 3 groups (P =.0495), particularly between groups 1 and 3 (P =.033). Use of chitosan-based dressing trended toward reduced rates of recommendation for surgical revision (P =.203, P =.113). Conclusions: Use of chitosan-based dressing after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy was associated with improved subjective and anatomical outcomes. It may also contribute to less frequent need for revision surgery. Further study in a larger prospective trial is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The COVID-19 health crisis abruptly disrupted the practice of otolaryngology. This article aims to define the changes needed to operate an academic otolaryngology practice safely and efficiently from within the epicenter of the pandemic. We define the areas of normal patient workflow that have been affected by COVID-19, and we offer mitigation strategies with attention paid to the specific needs of subspecialties. Data Sources: The article includes data specific to the office practice metrics of the Weill Cornell Medicine Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, as well as publically available data from New York Presbyterian Hospital system and the New York Times. Review Methods: Expert opinion. Conclusions: Through careful planning and execution, it is possible to reestablish safe otolaryngologic patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. It will require a significant change from prior practice models for successful implementation. Additionally, telemedicine can be positively integrated into the treatment of otolaryngology diseases for new and established patients. Implications for Practice: The information conveyed in this review can be used as a guide by large and small otolaryngology groups to identify aspects of the patient visit that are "at risk" due to COVID-19, and it suggests sensible responses that can be made without a significant disruption to normal practice. The methods used to identify vulnerabilities with the patient visit process can be applied to future unforeseen crises, such as a resurgence of COVID-19 or a novel pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although pediatric rhinosinusitis is a commonly encountered clinical entity, the diagnostic approach and treatment algorithm are constantly evolving. In addition to anatomic and allergic etiologies, immunologic deficiencies have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rhinosinusitis; however, the prevalence of immunologic disease in pediatric rhinosinusitis is poorly defined. Objective: To inform the approach to the evaluation of pediatric patients with rhinosinusitis, this retrospective pilot study examined the prevalence of abnormal results detected on immunologic testing in pediatric patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS). Methods: Patients between 2008 and 2018 were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9/10 codes. Imaging, endoscopy findings, and clinical criteria were used to diagnose CRS and RARS (n = 27). We reviewed available results, including quantitative immunoglobulins (Igs), thyroid evaluation, complete blood count, and titers to Streptococcus, Haemophilus influenzae type B (HiB), Diphtheria, and Tetanus. Statistical analyses were performed with the Mann–Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. Results: Our initial search yielded 140 patients, of which 27 met diagnostic criteria for CRS (17) or RARS (10). Eight patients (29.6%) underwent adenoidectomy and 5 (18.5%) underwent endoscopic sinus surgery. The most common Ig deficiencies were IgM, 13.0%, and IgA, 11.1%. Four (23.5%) of the 17 patients had significantly elevated IgE levels, indicating a possible allergic etiology. Within this cohort, there was an increased incidence of insufficient protective titers to polysaccharide vaccines. HiB titers were not protective in 35% of our cohort. Insufficient pneumococcal protection was more common in patients >10 years, while deficient IgM was more common in those <10 years. Conclusion: High-yield testing in pediatric rhinosinusitis should include titers to polysaccharide antigens, specifically Streptococcus pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Low-yield tests that may be deferred during initial testing include thyroid studies and Tetanus and Diphtheria antibodies. Prospective, high-volume studies are required to further elucidate the role of immunologic testing in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the improvement in epiphora and need for surgical revision in patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction following balloon-assisted, middle meatal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with chitosan-based dressing versus bioresorbable polyurethane packing versus no packing., Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study of consecutive adult patients seen from 2015 to 2018 with follow-up evaluation of epiphora at least 3 months after balloon-assisted, middle meatal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Patients with a history of prior punctoplasty, septoplasty, sinus surgery, or dacryocystorhinostomy of any kind were excluded. Those meeting criteria were stratified by postoperative hemostatic intervention: no packing, bioresorbable packing, and chitosan-based dressing (groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Procedural outcomes were graded as successes or failures based on subjective report and anatomical findings at most recent visit within an 18-month postoperative window. Instances of recommendation for revision surgery were also recorded., Results: Forty-three cases (36 patients) met the abovementioned criteria. Groups 1, 2, and 3 comprised 12, 17, and 14 cases each, respectively. Average patient age was 55.3 years old, and average duration of follow-up was 6.7 months. Significant variation in outcomes was detected across the 3 groups ( P = .0495), particularly between groups 1 and 3 ( P = .033). Use of chitosan-based dressing trended toward reduced rates of recommendation for surgical revision ( P = .203, P = .113)., Conclusions: Use of chitosan-based dressing after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy was associated with improved subjective and anatomical outcomes. It may also contribute to less frequent need for revision surgery. Further study in a larger prospective trial is recommended.