4 results on '"Pietsch, Helga"'
Search Results
2. Wie viele Spitzenzeitschriften hat das Land? Österreichische Zeitschriften in den Journal Citation Reports - eine Bestandsaufnahme
- Author
-
Fritz, Alexander, Ginther, Clara, Gmoser, Stefan, Gorraiz, Juan, Hasiba, Regina, Hötzl, Elena, Lackner, Judith, Lackner, Markus, Landl, Karin, Nicolae, Christina, Pessl, Eva, Pietsch, Helga, Schlögl, Christian, Schuh, Stefan, Stiegler, Simone, Therisch-Höller, Angelika, Wusser, Wilhelm, Zechner, Evelyn, and Zechner, Sonja
- Subjects
BB. Bibliometric methods ,HA. Periodicals, Newspapers. - Abstract
Austrian journals in the Journal Citation Reports - a bibliometric analysis (translation of the title). The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to examine how many journals from the social sciences and the sciences published in Austria can be found in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). The respective journals were further evaluated as to which academic discipline they pertain, the respective publisher(s), whether they are freely accessible (open access) and in which quartile they can be found in the impact factor ranking. The analysis made it apparent that there are fewer Austrian journals included in the JCR than in comparable countries. While 551 journals of the Science Edition of the JCR were from Switzerland in 2011, the corresponding number for Austria is only 34. Even Slowenia published more journals (10) in the Social Science Edition in 2011 than Austria (7). Furthermore, most Austrian journals are ranked in the lower quartile of the impact factor ranking. Austrian journals only perform well in the plant sciences. Still, if the impact factor ranking is to be taken as a measure of quality of a journal, Austrian journals overall perform rather poorly. In the sciences half of the journals are published by Springer, while there is no such dominance of any particular publisher in the social sciences. Only few of the journals are open access, one in the social sciences and two in the sciences. This article has been written and the underlying analysis have been performed during a course on bibliometrics, which is part of the post-graduate programme on Library and Information Studies. Therefore, this contribution also aims at demonstrating that such bibliometric analyses are even possible in library education. This should encourage librarians to engage more strongly with similar studies in the discourse not only with colleagues but maybe even in the relevant scientific community.
- Published
- 2013
3. Pyranometer offsets triggered by ambient meteorology: insights from laboratory and field experiments.
- Author
-
Oswald, Sandro M., Pietsch, Helga, Baumgartner, Dietmar J., Weihs, Philipp, and Rieder, Harald E.
- Subjects
- *
PYRANOMETER , *METEOROLOGICAL observations , *RADIATION measurements - Abstract
This study investigates effects of ambient meteorology on the accuracy of radiation measurements performed with pyranometers contained in various heating/ventilation systems (HV-systems). It focuses particularly on instrument offsets observed following precipitation events. To quantify pyranometer responses to precipitation, a series of controlled laboratory experiments as well as two targeted field campaigns were performed in 2016. The results indicate that precipitation (as simulated by spray-tests or observed under ambient conditions) significantly affects the thermal environment of the instruments and thus their stability. Statistical analysis of laboratory experiments showed that precipitation triggers zero offsets of -4 W m-2 or more, independent of the HV-system. Similar offsets have been observed in field experiments under ambient environmental conditions, indicating a clear exceedance of BSRN targets following precipitation events. All pyranometers required substantial time to return to their initial signal states after the simulated precipitation events. Therefore for BSRN standard measurements the recommendation would be to flag the radiation measurements during a natural precipitation event and 90 min after it in nighttime conditions. Further daytime experiments show pyranometer offsets of 50 W m-2 or more in comparison to the reference system. As they show a substantially faster recovery, the recommendation would be to flag the radiation measurements within a natural precipitation event and 10 min after it in daytime conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The Austrian radiation monitoring network ARAD - best practice and added value.
- Author
-
Olefs, Marc, Baumgartner, Dietmar J., Obleitner, Friedrich, Bichler, Christoph, Foelsche, Ulrich, Pietsch, Helga, Rieder, Harald E., Weihs, Philipp, Geyer, Florian, Haiden, Thomas, and Schöner, Wolfgang
- Subjects
RADIATION monitoring devices ,CLIMATOLOGY ,MEASUREMENT of solar radiation ,INFRARED radiation ,EQUIPMENT & supplies - Abstract
The Austrian RADiation monitoring network (ARAD) has been established to advance the national climate monitoring and to support satellite retrieval, atmospheric modeling and the development of solar energy techniques. Measurements cover the downward solar and thermal infrared radiation using instruments according to Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) standards. A unique feature of ARAD is its vertical dimension of five stations, covering an altitude range between about 200ma.s.l (Vienna) and 3100ma.s.l. (BSRN site Sonnblick). The paper outlines the aims and scopes of ARAD, its measurement and calibration standards, methods, strategies and station locations. ARAD network operation uses innovative data processing for quality assurance and quality control, utilizing manual and automated control algorithms. A combined uncertainty estimate for the broadband shortwave radiation fluxes at all five ARAD stations, using the methodology specified by the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement indicates that relative accuracies range from 1.5 to 2.9% for large signals (global, direct: 1000Wm
-2 , diffuse: 500Wm-2 ) and from 1.7 to 23% (or 0.9 to 11.5Wm-²) for small signals (50Wm-2 ) (expanded uncertainties corresponding to the 95% confidence level). If the directional response error of the pyranometers and the temperature response of the instruments and the data acquisition system (DAQ) are corrected, this expanded uncertainty reduces to 1.4 to 2.8% for large signals and to 1.7 to 5.2% (or 0.9-2.6Wm-2 ) for small signals. Thus, for large signals of global and diffuse radiation, BSRN target accuracies are met or nearly met (missed by less than 0.2 percentage points, pps) for 70%of the ARAD measurements after this correction. For small signals of direct radiation, BSRN targets are achieved at two sites and nearly met (also missed by less than 0.2 pps) at the other sites. For small signals of global and diffuse radiation, targets are achieved at all stations. Additional accuracy gains can be achieved in the future through additional measurements, corrections and a further upgrade of the DAQ. However, to improve the accuracy of measurements of direct solar radiation, improved instrument accuracy is needed. ARAD could serve as a useful example for establishing state-of-the-art radiation monitoring at the national level with a multiple-purpose approach. Instrumentation, guidelines and tools (such as the data quality control) developed within ARAD are intended to increase monitoring capabilities of global radiation and thus designed to allow straightforward adoption in other regions, without high development costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.