Search

Peripheral neuropathies commonly affect quality of life of patients due to pain, sleep disturbances, and fatigue, although trials have not adequately explored these domains of care. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nortriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin, and mexiletine on pain, sleep, and fatigue in patients diagnosed with cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy (CSPN).We implemented a Bayesian adaptive design to perform a 12-wk multisite, randomized, prospective, open-label comparative effectiveness study in 402 CSPN patients. Participants received either nortriptyline (n = 134), duloxetine (n = 126), pregabalin (n = 73), or mexiletine (n = 69). At prespecified analysis timepoints, secondary outcomes, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys including Short Form (SF)-12, pain interference, fatigue, and sleep disturbance, were collected.Mexiletine had the highest quit rate (58%) due to gastrointestinal side effects, while nortriptyline (38%) and duloxetine (38%) had the lowest quit rates. If tolerated for the full 12 wk of the study, mexiletine had the highest probability (90%) of positive outcomes for improvements in pain interference and fatigue. There was no significant difference among the medications for sleep disturbance or SF-12 scores. Adverse events and lack of efficacy were the two most common reasons for cessation of therapy.Physicians caring for patients with CSPN should consider mexiletine to address pain and fatigue, although nortriptyline and duloxetine are better medications to trial first since they are better tolerated. Future research should compare other commonly used medications for CSPN to determine evidence-based treatment strategies.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Neuronal hyperexcitability (manifested by cramps) plays a pathological role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and drugs affecting it may help symptomatic management and slow disease progression. We aimed to determine safety and tolerability of two doses of ranolazine in patients with ALS and evaluate for preliminary evidence of drug-target engagement by assessing muscle cramp characteristics. METHODS: We performed an open-label dose-ascending study of ranolazine in 14 individuals with ALS in 2 sequential cohorts: 500 mg (Cohort 1) and 1000 mg (Cohort 2) orally twice daily. Each had a 2-week run-in period, 4-week drug administration, and 6-week safety follow up. Primary outcome was safety and tolerability. Exploratory measures included cramp frequency and severity, fasciculation frequency, cramp potential duration, ALS Functional Rating Scale-revised, and forced vital capacity. RESULTS: Six and eight participants were enrolled in cohorts 1 and 2 respectively. There were no serious adverse events. Two subjects in cohort 2 discontinued the drug due to constipation. The most frequent drug-related adverse event was gastrointestinal (40%). Cramp frequency decreased by 54.8% (95% CI 39 to 70.8%) and severity decreased by 46.3% (95% CI 29.5 to 63.3%), which appeared to be dose-dependent, with decreased awakening due to cramps. Other outcomes showed no change. DISCUSSION: Ranolazine was well tolerated in ALS up to 2000 mg daily with gastrointestinal side effects being the most frequent. Ranolazine reduced cramp frequency and severity, supporting its investigation for muscle cramps in a future placebo-controlled trial.

Limited resources are a challenge when planning comparative effectiveness studies of multiple promising treatments, often prompting study planners to reduce the sample size to meet the financial constraints. The practical solution is often to increase the efficiency of this sample size by selecting a pair of treatments among the pool of promising treatments before the clinical trial begins. The problem with this approach is that the investigator may inadvertently leave out the most beneficial treatment. This paper demonstrates a possible solution to this problem by using Bayesian adaptive designs. We use a planned comparative effectiveness clinical trial of treatments for sialorrhea in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as an example of the approach. Rather than having to guess at the two best treatments to compare based on limited data, we suggest putting more arms in the trial and letting response adaptive randomization (RAR) determine better arms. To ground this study relative to previous literature we first compare RAR, adaptive equal randomization (ER), arm(s) dropping, and a fixed design. Given the goals of this trial we demonstrate that we may avoid 'type III errors' - inadvertently leaving out the best treatment - with little loss in power compared to a two-arm design, even when choosing the correct two arms for the two-armed design. There are appreciable gains in power when the two arms are prescreened at random.

This multicenter/multinational, open-label, ascending-dose study (NCT01898364) evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exploratory efficacy of repeat-dose avalglucosidase alfa (neoGAA), a second-generation, recombinant acid α-glucosidase replacement therapy, in late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). Patients ≥18 years, alglucosidase alfa naïve (Naïve) or previously receiving alglucosidase alfa for ≥9 months (Switch), with baseline FVC ≥50% predicted and independently ambulatory, received every-other-week avalglucosidase alfa 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg over 24 weeks. 9/10 Naïve and 12/14 Switch patients completed the study. Avalglucosidase alfa was well-tolerated; no deaths/life-threatening serious adverse events (SAEs). One Naïve patient withdrew for study drug-related SAEs (respiratory distress/chest discomfort). Infusion-associated reactions (IARs) affected 8 patients. Most treatment-emergent AEs/IARs were non-serious with mild-to-moderate intensity. At screening, 5 Switch patients tested positive for anti-avalglucosidase alfa antibodies; on-treatment, 2 Switch and 9 Naïve patients seroconverted. Post-infusion, avalglucosidase alfa plasma concentrations declined monoexponentially (t1/2z∼1.0 h). AUC was 5-6 × higher in the 20 vs 5 mg/kg group. Pharmacokinetics were similar between Switch and Naïve groups and over time. Baseline quadriceps muscle glycogen was low (∼6%) in most patients, generally remaining unchanged thereafter. Exploratory efficacy parameters (pulmonary function/functional capacity) generally remained stable or improved. Avalglucosidase alfa's well-tolerated safety profile and exploratory efficacy results support further avalglucosidase alfa development. ispartof: NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS vol:29 issue:3 pages:167-186 ispartof: location:England status: published

Purpose This study describes a phonetic complexity-based approach for speech intelligibility and articulatory precision testing using preliminary data from talkers with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Method Eight talkers with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and 8 healthy controls produced a list of 16 low and high complexity words. Sixty-four listeners judged the samples for intelligibility, and 2 trained listeners completed phoneme-level analysis to determine articulatory precision. To estimate percent intelligibility, listeners orthographically transcribed each word, and the transcriptions were scored as being either accurate or inaccurate. Percent articulatory precision was calculated based on the experienced listeners' judgments of phoneme distortions, deletions, additions, and/or substitutions for each word. Articulation errors were weighted based on the perceived impact on intelligibility to determine word-level precision. Results Between-groups differences in word intelligibility and articulatory precision were significant at lower levels of phonetic complexity as dysarthria severity increased. Specifically, more severely impaired talkers showed significant reductions in word intelligibility and precision at both complexity levels, whereas those with milder speech impairments displayed intelligibility reductions only for more complex words. Articulatory precision was less sensitive to mild dysarthria compared to speech intelligibility for the proposed complexity-based approach. Conclusions Considering phonetic complexity for dysarthria tests could result in more sensitive assessments for detecting and monitoring dysarthria progression.

IntroductionThe translation of discoveries to drugs, devices, and behavioral interventions requires well-prepared study teams. Execution of clinical trials remains suboptimal due to varied quality in design, execution, analysis, and reporting. A critical impediment is inconsistent, or even absent, competency-based training for clinical trial personnel.MethodsIn 2014, the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) funded the project, Enhancing Clinical Research Professionals’ Training and Qualifications (ECRPTQ), aimed at addressing this deficit. The goal was to ensure all personnel are competent to execute clinical trials. A phased structure was utilized.ResultsThis paper focuses on training recommendations in Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Leveraging input from all Clinical and Translational Science Award hubs, the following was recommended to NCATS: all investigators and study coordinators executing a clinical trial should understand GCP principles and undergo training every 3 years, with the training method meeting the minimum criteria identified by the International Conference on Harmonisation GCP.ConclusionsWe anticipate that industry sponsors will acknowledge such training, eliminating redundant training requests. We proposed metrics to be tracked that required further study. A separate task force was composed to define recommendations for metrics to be reported to NCATS.

The beneficial effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) was a major discovery that came about through one young physician putting together a string of previous observations. To understand how this discovery came to light, we must first go back to earlier times when men hunted by bow-and-arrow to capture their prey. The substance used to poison the prey was eventually was identified as curare. Centuries later, a connection was made between the physiological effects of curare and a disease entity with no known pathological mechanism or treatment, myasthenia gravis. In 1935, house officer Dr. Mary Walker was the first physician to try physostigmine in the treatment of MG, which had previously been used to treat curare poisoning. What she saw was a dramatic improvement in the symptoms experienced in patients with MG, and thus became the first documented case of use of physostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in the treatment of MG. This article is a summary of the history of the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. This article is part of the special issue entitled 'Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors: From Bench to Bedside to Battlefield'.

Importance One major advantage of developing large, federally funded networks for clinical research in neurology is the ability to have a trial-ready network that can efficiently conduct scientifically rigorous projects to improve the health of people with neurologic disorders. Observations National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Network for Excellence in Neuroscience Clinical Trials (NeuroNEXT) was established in 2011 and renewed in 2018 with the goal of being an efficient network to test between 5 and 7 promising new agents in phase II clinical trials. A clinical coordinating center, data coordinating center, and 25 sites were competitively chosen. Common infrastructure was developed to accelerate timelines for clinical trials, including central institutional review board (a first for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke), master clinical trial agreements, the use of common data elements, and experienced research sites and coordination centers. During the first 7 years, the network exceeded the goal of conducting 5 to 7 studies, with 9 funded. High interest was evident by receipt of 148 initial applications for potential studies in various neurologic disorders. Across the first 8 studies (the ninth study was funded at end of initial funding period), the central institutional review board approved the initial protocol in a mean (SD) of 59 (21) days, and additional sites were added a mean (SD) of 22 (18) days after submission. The median time from central institutional review board approval to first site activation was 47.5 days (mean, 102.1; range, 1-282) and from first site activation to first participant consent was 27 days (mean, 37.5; range, 0-96). The median time for database readiness was 3.5 months (mean, 4.0; range, 0-8) from funding receipt. In the 4 completed studies, enrollment met or exceeded expectations with 96% overall data accuracy across all sites. Nine peer-reviewed manuscripts were published, and 22 oral presentations or posters and 9 invited presentations were given at regional, national, and international meetings. Conclusions and Relevance NeuroNEXT initiated 8 studies, successfully enrolled participants at or ahead of schedule, collected high-quality data, published primary results in high-impact journals, and provided mentorship, expert statistical, and trial management support to several new investigators. Partnerships were successfully created between government, academia, industry, foundations, and patient advocacy groups. Clinical trial consortia can efficiently and successfully address a range of important neurologic research and therapeutic questions.

To determine the safety and tolerability of mexiletine in a phase II double-blind randomized controlled trial of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (SALS).Sixty participants with SALS from 10 centers were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, mexiletine 300 mg/d, or mexiletine 900 mg/d and followed for 12 weeks. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetic study from plasma and CSF, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score, slow vital capacity (SVC), and muscle cramp frequency and severity.The only serious adverse event among active arm participants was one episode of imbalance. Thirty-two percent of participants receiving 900 mg of mexiletine discontinued study drug vs 5% on placebo (p = 0.026). Pharmacokinetic study demonstrated a peak plasma concentration 2 hours postdose and strong correlation between plasma and CSF (p0.001). Rates of decline of ALSFRS-R and SVC did not differ from placebo. Analysis of all randomized patients demonstrated significant reductions of muscle cramp frequency (300 mg: rate = 31% of placebo, p = 0.047; 900 mg: 16% of placebo, p = 0.002) and cramp intensity (300 mg: mean = 45% of placebo, p = 0.08; 900 mg: 25% of placebo, p = 0.005).Mexiletine was safe at both doses and well-tolerated at 300 mg/d but adverse effects at 900 mg/d led to a high rate of discontinuation. Mexiletine treatment resulted in large dose-dependent reductions in muscle cramp frequency and severity. No effect on rate of progression was detected, but clinically important differences could not be excluded in this small and short-duration study.This study provides Class I evidence that mexiletine is safe when given daily to patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis at 300 and 900 mg and well-tolerated at the lower dose.

The time is right for the use of Bayesian Adaptive Designs (BAD) in comparative effectiveness trials. For example, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute has joined the Food and Drug Administration and National Intitutes of Health in adopting policies/guidelines encouraging their use. There are multiple aspects to BAD that need to be considered when designing a comparative effectiveness design. First, the adaptation rules can determine the expected size of the trial. Second, a utility function can be used to combine extremely important co-endpoints (e.g., efficacy and tolerability) and is a valuable tool for incorporating clinical expertise and potentially patient preference. Third, accrual rate is also very, very important. Specifically, there is a juxtaposition related to accrual and BAD. If accrual rate is too fast we never gain efficient information for adapting. If accrual rate is too slow we never finish the clinical trial. We propose methodology for finding the 'sweet spot' for BAD that addresses these as design parameters. We demonstrate the methodology on a comparative effectiveness BAD of pharmaceutical agents in cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy. The study has five arms with two endpoints that are combined with a utility function. The accrual rate is assumed to stem from multiple sites. We perform simulations from which the composite accrual rates across sites result in various piecewise Poisson distributions as parameter inputs. We balance both average number of patients needed and average length of time to finish the study.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exploratory efficacy of repeat avalglucosidase alfa dosing (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg qow) for 6 months were evaluated in NEO1 (NCT01898364) in late-onset Pompe disease patients either treatment-naive (Naive) or having received alglucosidase alfa for ≥9 months (Switch). In NEO-EXT (NCT02032524), an ongoing NEO1 extension, long-term safety and pharmacokinetics of repeat avalglucosidase alfa dosing will be monitored over 6 years. Interim safety results after 4.5 years of NEO-EXT are reported here. Mean ages at NEO1 enrollment were: Naive: 44.8 (SD:20.3, range:20-78) years and Switch: 46.7 (SD:14.1, range:21-68) years. Of the 24 NEO1 participants, 19 entered NEO-EXT (8/10 Naive 11/14 Switch) 17 are currently participating (7/8 Naive 10/11 Switch) 2 participants discontinued NEO-EXT (personal reasons). During 2016, all NEO-EXT participants switched to avalglucosidase alfa 20 mg/kg qow. By May 2018, total infusions reached 731 (Naive) and 1174 (Switch) mean infusions were Naive: 73 (SD:43, range:9-113) and Switch: 84 (SD:40, range:8-118). Mean avalglucosidase alfa exposure duration reached 1025 (SD:611, range:109-1572) days for Naive and 1179 (SD:570, range:102-1658) days for Switch participants. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were generally mild across doses. Most frequently reported treatment-related AEs were nausea, fatigue, and headache (3 participants each) and dizziness, dyspnea, erythema, myalgia, muscle spasms, and rash (2 participants each) and are unchanged since the last safety update (WORLDSymposium™ 2018). One Switch participant discontinued NEO1 for a study drug-related serious AE (respiratory distress/chest discomfort) no deaths/life-threatening serious AEs have occurred. Anti-avalglucosidase IgG/IgM antibodies developed in 9/10 Switch (median titer:1600, range:200-51,200) and 9/14 Naive (median titer:400, range:50-12,800) participants. No patient developed IgE antibodies or tested positive for enzyme activity inhibition. In NEO-EXT, the avalglucosidase alfa safety profile is consistent with the initial 6 months’ treatment during NEO1, with no additional participants developing anti-avalglucosidase alfa IgG/IgM antibodies or new allergic reactions. Funding: Sanofi Genzyme.

Episodic ataxia type 1 is considered a rare neuronal ion channel disorder characterized by brief attacks of unsteadiness and dizziness with persistent myokymia. To characterize the natural history, develop outcome measures for future clinical trials, and correlate genotype with phenotype, we undertook an international, prospective, cross-sectional study. Thirty-nine individuals (51% male) were enrolled: median age 37 years (range 15–65 years). We identified 10 different pathogenic point mutations in KCNA1 that accounted for the genetic basis of 85% of the cohort. Participants with KCNA1 mutations were more likely to have a positive family history. Analysis of the total cohort showed that the first episode of ataxia occurred before age 20 in all but one patient, with an average age of onset of 7.9 years. Physical exertion, emotional stress and environmental temperature were the most common triggers for attacks. Attack frequency ranged from daily to monthly, even with the same KCNA1 genotype. Average attack duration was in the order of minutes. Ten participants (26%) developed permanent cerebellar signs, which were related to disease duration. The average Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia score (SARA, a standardized measure of cerebellar dysfunction on clinical examination, scores range from 0–40) was an average of 3.15 for all participants (range 0–14), but was only 2 in those with isolated episodic ataxia compared with 7.7 in those with progressive cerebellar ataxia in addition to episodic ataxia. Thirty-seven participants completed the SF-36, a quality of life survey; all eight domain norm-based average scores (mean = 50) were below normal with mental health being the lowest (41.3) in those with mutation positive episodic ataxia type 1. Scores on SF-36 correlated negatively with attack frequency. Of the 39 participants in the study, 33 harboured mutations in KCNA1 whereas the remaining six had no mutation identified. Episodic ataxia type 1 phenocopies have not been described previously and we report their clinical features, which appear to be different to those with a KCNA1 mutation. This large prospective study of both genetically confirmed episodic ataxia type 1 and episodic ataxia type 1 phenocopies provides detailed baseline characteristics of these disorders and their impact on participants. We found that attacks had a significant effect on quality of life. Unlike previous studies, we found that a significant number of individuals with genetically confirmed episodic ataxia type 1 (21%) had accumulated persistent cerebellar symptoms and signs. These data will enable the development of outcome measures for clinical trials of treatment. * Abbreviations : EA1 : episodic ataxia type 1 SARA : Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of acquired, heterogeneous, systemic connective tissue diseases (CTD) that include polymyositis (PM), adult dermatomyositis (DM), childhood myositis (predominantly juvenile DM), myositis associated with cancer or another connective tissue disease, and inclusion body myositis (IBM) (1, 2). Over the last few decades, survival has improved in IIM, with patients experiencing less cumulative damage and better health related quality of life. Despite an improvement in survival, our knowledge about clinical and serological predictors of clinical improvement in IIM is limited by the lack of well-designed, long–term epidemiological studies and clinical trials. IIM patients have heterogeneous features from a mild rash to life threatening muscle weakness or lung involvement. Their course can be self-limited or may require long-term glucocorticoids and multiple immunosuppressive medications. The response to immunosuppressive drugs is quite variable and current data do not allow the accurate prediction of clinical improvement, which poses a significant challenge to treating physicians, as well as investigators. The varying clinical features of myositis are closely linked to myositis autoantibodies, some of which may contribute to the pathogenesis of IIM (3). Although these autoantibodies provide useful prognostic information on patient outcomes (4–6), this relationship has not been established in prospective cohorts with uniform treatment. Previous evidence suggested that patients possessing anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies had a better prognosis, while patients with anti-SRP fared worse and those with anti-synthetase autoantibodies had intermediate outcomes (6, 7). In addition, there is a paucity of literature regarding predictors of clinical improvement by IIM disease subgroups. IBM is associated with poor treatment responses but studies differentiating responses between PM, DM and JDM are lacking (6). Treatment delay, muscle damage and longer disease duration have also been shown to be associated with poor prognosis (7–10). However, published studies are limited by small sample sizes, retrospective design and a limited assessment of prognostic factors. The availability of targeted therapies and validated outcome measures (11–13) spearheaded the recently completed Rituximab in Myositis (RIM) trial that was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of B cell depletion in adult and pediatric myositis patients (14). Rituximab has been studied in a wide variety of autoimmune diseases, as B cells play a critical role in the initiation and propagation of the immune response and are specifically implicated in the pathogenesis of myositis (15). As biologic agents are increasingly utilized in autoimmune diseases, it is important to elucidate the factors that predict a favorable outcome so that clinical trials can be designed with stratification of patients with a good and poor likelihood of improvement. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical and laboratory predictors of clinical improvement in a trial of refractory myositis subjects treated with B cell depletion. This is the first comprehensive study in myositis to evaluate factors associated with clinical improvement in a large prospective cohort.

In a multicenter study of newly diagnosed ALS patients without a reported family history of ALS, we are prospectively investigating whether markers of oxidative stress (OS) are associated with disease progression. Methods utilize an extensive structured telephone interview ascertaining environmental, lifestyle, dietary and psychological risk factors associated with OS. Detailed assessments were performed at baseline and at 3-6 month intervals during the ensuing 30 months. Our biorepository includes DNA, plasma, urine, and skin. Three hundred and fifty-five patients were recruited. Subjects were enrolled over a 36-month period at 16 sites. To meet the target number of subjects, the recruitment period was prolonged and additional sites were included. Results showed that demographic and disease characteristics were similar between 477 eligible/non-enrolled and enrolled patients, the only difference being type of health insurance among enrolled patients. Sites were divided into three groups by the number of enrolled subjects. Comparing these three groups, the Columbia site had fewer 'definite ALS' diagnoses. This is the first prospective, interdisciplinary, in-depth, multicenter epidemiological investigation of OS related to ALS progression and has been accomplished by an aggressive recruitment process. The baseline demographic and disease features of the study sample are now fully characterized.

Myopathies are a heterogeneous group of disorders that can be challenging to diagnose. The purpose of this review is to provide a diagnostic approach based predominantly on the clinical history and neurologic examination. Laboratory testing that can subsequently be used to confirm the suspected diagnosis based on this pattern recognition approach will also be discussed.Over the past decade, numerous discoveries have allowed clinicians to diagnose myopathies with genetic testing. Unfortunately, the testing is extremely expensive and frequently not covered by insurance.Careful consideration of the pattern of muscle weakness in addition to other aspects of the physical examination and diagnostic testing should assist the clinician in making a timely and accurate diagnosis and minimize the expense of confirmatory genetic testing.

The muscle channelopathies are a group of rare inherited diseases caused by mutations in muscle ion channels. Mutations cause an increase or decrease in muscle membrane excitability, leading to a spectrum of related clinical disorders: the nondystrophic myotonias are characterized by delayed relaxation after muscle contraction, causing muscle stiffness and pain; the periodic paralyses are characterized by episodes of flaccid muscle paralysis. This review describes the clinical characteristics, molecular pathogenesis, and treatments of the nondystrophic myotonias and periodic paralyses.Advances have been made in both the treatment and our understanding of the molecular pathophysiology of muscle channelopathies: (1) a recent controlled trial showed that mexiletine was effective for reducing symptoms and signs of myotonia in nondystrophic myotonia; (2) the mechanisms by which hypokalemic periodic paralysis leads to a depolarized but unexcitable sarcolemma membrane have been traced to a novel gating pore current; and (3) an association was demonstrated between mutations in a potassium inward rectifier and patients with thyrotoxic periodic paralysis.The muscle channelopathies are an expanding group of muscle diseases caused by mutations in sodium, chloride, potassium, and calcium ion channels that result in increased or decreased muscle membrane excitability. Recognizing patients with channelopathies and confirming the diagnosis is important, as treatment and management strategies differ based on mutation and clinical phenotype.

Introduction: Complement activation at the neuromuscular junction is a primary cause of acetylcholine receptor loss and failure of neuromuscular transmission in myasthenia gravis (MG). Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, blocks the formation of terminal complement complex by specifically preventing the enzymatic cleavage of complement 5 (C5). Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial involving 14 patients with severe, refractory generalized MG (gMG). Results: Six of 7 patients treated with eculizumab for 16 weeks (86%) achieved the primary endpoint of a 3-point reduction in the quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score. Examining both treatment periods, the overall change in mean QMG total score was significantly different between eculizumab and placebo (P = 0.0144). After assessing data obtained from all visits, the overall change in mean QMG total score from baseline was found to be significantly different between eculizumab and placebo (P

Peripheral neuropathy is a common neurological disorder. There may be important differences and similarities in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy between North America (NA) and South America (SA). Neuromuscular databases were searched for neuropathy diagnosis at two North American sites, University of Kansas Medical Center and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and one South American site, Federal Fluminense University in Brazil. All patients were included into one of the six major categories: immune-mediated, diabetic, hereditary, infectious/inflammatory, systemic/metabolic/toxic (not diabetic) and cryptogenic. A comparison of the number of patients in each category was made between North America and South America databases. Total number of cases in North America was 1090 and in South America was 1034 [immune-mediated: NA 215 (19.7%), SA 191 (18%); diabetic: NA 148 (13.5%), SA 236 (23%); hereditary: NA 292 (26.7%), SA 103 (10%); infectious/inflammatory: NA 53 (4.8%), SA 141 (14%); systemic/metabolic/toxic: NA 71 (6.5%), SA 124 (12%); cryptogenic: NA 311 (28.5%), SA 239 (23%)]. Some specific neuropathy comparisons were hereditary neuropathies [Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) cases] in NA 246/292 (84.2%) and SA 60/103 (58%); familial amyloid neuropathy in SA 31/103 (30%) and none in NA. Among infectious neuropathies, cases of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) neuropathy in SA were 36/141(25%), Chagas disease in SA were 13/141(9%) and none for either in NA; cases of neuropathy due to leprosy in NA were 26/53 (49%) and in SA were 39/141(28%). South American tertiary care centers are more likely to see patients with infectious, diabetic and hereditary disorders such as familial amyloid neuropathies. North American tertiary centers are more likely to see patients with CMT. Immune neuropathies and cryptogenic neuropathies were seen equally in North America and South America.

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of acquired disorders characterized by chronic inflammation of striated muscle leading to predominantly proximal muscle weakness. The most common subsets of IIM include adult polymyositis (PM), adult and juvenile dermatomyositis (DM), myositis in overlap with cancer or another connective tissue disease and inclusion body myositis (IBM). The IIM are frequently associated with constitutional symptoms and commonly involve other organ systems including the skin, joints, lungs, gastrointestinal tract and heart. They are rare with an estimated incidence of 4-10 cases/million population per year and a bimodal incidence pattern reflecting childhood onset of juvenile DM (JDM) and a later peak in adulthood [1]. Although the precise pathogenesis is unknown, the IIM likely result from immune-mediated processes initiated by environmental factors in genetically susceptible individuals [2]. Factors strongly supporting their autoimmune basis include: the association of myositis with other autoimmune diseases such as Hashimoto thyroiditis, Grave’s disease and various connective tissue diseases, the high frequency of circulating serum autoantibodies, and their response to immunosuppressive (IS) or immunomodulatory therapy. The treatment of IIM is challenging, complicated by its rarity and heterogeneity as well as the lack of controlled trials and partially validated outcome measures. Most studies involve single referral centers using cross-sectional and retrospective analyses of small numbers of treatmentrefractory patients observed for relatively short time periods. In addition, widely disparate inclusion criteria have complicated the assessment of treatment response, as disease damage and the inclusion of misdiagnosed patients contribute to suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. Although glucocorticoids have not been formally tested in controlled trials, expert consensus is that they are the primary therapy to be followed by a variety of immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents alone or in combination [2]. Rituximab, a B cell depleting agent long recognized as an effective therapy for B cell lymphomas, has gained increased favor in the treatment of many autoimmune diseases and is FDA-approved for use in rheumatoid arthritis [3] as well as granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis [4]. The effectiveness of rituximab in PM and DM has been suggested by case reports and case series in adult and pediatric patients with refractory disease [5-9]. B cells play a critical role in the initiation and propagation of the immune response and are implicated in the pathogenesis of myositis. They localize to the perivascular region of DM muscle and are found in the inflammatory infiltrates of both PM and DM [10]. In addition to functioning as the precursor of autoantibody-producing plasma cells, B cells present antigen to T cells and secrete proinflammatory cytokines [10]. Therefore, based on the autoimmune characteristics of myositis and the aforementioned immunopathogenic role of the B cell, the Rituximab in Myositis (RIM) trial assessed the effectiveness of rituximab in refractory adult PM and adult and juvenile DM using validated measures of myositis disease activity and damage, a consensus-driven definition of improvement [11-13] and a unique randomized placebo-phase trial design [14, 15].

Prednisone is a frequently used treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG) but it has numerous side effects. Methotrexate is a selective inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase and lymphocyte proliferation and is an effective immuosuppressive medication for autoimmune diseases. Given the negative results of the mycophenolate mofetil study, search for an effective immunosuppressant drug therapy is ongoing. The objective is to determine if oral methotrexate is safe and effective for MG patients who take prednisone. We have initiated a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of methotrexate versus placebo in patients taking at least 10 mg/day of prednisone at enrollment. The methotrexate dose is increased to 20 mg and the prednisone dose is adjusted per protocol during the study. Clinical and laboratory evaluations are performed monthly for 12 months, with the primary efficacy measure being the nine-month prednisone area under the curve (AUC) from months 3 to 12. Secondary outcome measures include MG outcomes, quality of life measures, and a polyglutamation biomarker assay. A total of 18 U.S. sites and 2 Canadian sites are participating, with 48 screened cases, 42 enrolled, with 19 still active in the study.

Fibromyalgia (FM) patients present with widespread chronic pain and other symptoms. Some studies in the literature have reported inconsistent results after a Qigong exercise intervention in patients with FM. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of a home-based Qigong exercise in patients with FM.A total of 14 subjects were randomly assigned into one of two groups. The experimental group went through a six-week Qigong exercise program involving meditation, deep breathing, and synchronized rhythmic body movements. The control group took part in a sham Qigong exercise program using the same body movements also for six weeks. Clinical assessments at baseline and end of intervention used the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire.Group mean scores of four measurements were significantly (p.0125) reduced in the intervention group, but not in the control group. The percentage changes in the four measurements were 44.2%, 24.8%, 37.3%, and 44.3% in the intervention group, and 10.1%, 6.3%, 9.9%, and 11.8% in the control group.Qigong exercise may potentially be an effective self-management approach in controlling FM symptoms. In this pilot study, regular daily Qigong exercise, accumulated number of exercise sessions, and the specific form of Qigong exercise may all be important factors for the significant improvement in the study subjects. Future research is required to determine whether the same benefit can be obtained in a larger sample.

The primary aims of our study were to compare pregabalin and duloxetine in a neuromuscular clinic for diabetic neuropathic pain (DPN) and to study the effect of these medications in cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy. We performed a retrospective chart review of 143 patients who were started on pregabalin or duloxetine during a 10-month period in a tertiary neuromuscular outpatient center for neuropathic pain. Duloxetine and pregabalin were started in 103 and 91 patients, respectively. Ninety-two patients tried only one of the two medications while both medications were used at different time periods in 51 patients. Follow-up was available for 87 patients on pregabalin and 89 patients on duloxetine. More patients with neuropathic pain reported an improvement with pregabalin (33%) than duloxetine (21%). Duloxetine (38%) had a higher frequency of side effects compared to pregabalin (30%). However, these differences between pregabalin and duloxetine were not statistically significant. Despite the study's limitations of retrospective design, these findings suggest that both pregabalin and duloxetine are probably effective for neuropathic pain, secondary to diabetes or cryptogenic sensory peripheral neuropathy in a tertiary care academic neuromuscular center. Prospective randomized controlled comparative effectiveness studies are required for both drugs in the treatment of neuropathic pain.

We performed a retrospective chart review on 53 muscle-specific kinase antibody (MuSK-Ab)-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) patients at nine university-based centers in the U.S. Of these, 66% were Caucasian, 85% were women, and age of onset was 9-79 years. Twenty-seven patients were nonresponsive to anticholinesterase therapy. Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America improvement status was achieved in 53% patients on corticosteroids, 51% with plasma exchange, and in 20% on intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Thymectomy was beneficial in 7/18 patients at 3 years. Long-term (> or =3 years) outcome was very favorable in 58% of patients who achieved remission and/or minimal manifestation status. Overall, 73% improved. There was one MG-related death. This survey reinforces several cardinal features of MuSK-Ab-positive MG, including prominent bulbar involvement and anticholinesterase nonresponsiveness. Facial or tongue atrophy was rare. Most patients respond favorably to immunotherapy. The best clinical response was to corticosteroids and plasma exchange, and the poorest response was to IVIG. Long-term outcome is favorable in about 60% of cases.

Defining long-term outcomes in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) has been complicated by varying definitions of treatment response and differing scales measuring impairment or disability. An expert panel was convened to devise a CIDP Disease Activity Status (CDAS) and to classify long-term outcome by applying it to 106 patients with a consensus diagnosis of CIDP. Sixty of these cases were graded blindly by three independent reviewers to assess inter-rater reliability. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.4 years (range, 3 months-23 years). Eleven percent of patients were classified as cured (stable examination and off treatment for >= 5 years), 20% were in remission (stable and off treatment for < 5 years), 44% had stable active disease but required ongoing therapy for at least 1 year, 7% were improving after recent initiation of therapy, and 18% had unstable active disease (treatment naive or treatment refractory). Excellent inter-rater reliability was observed (kappa scores: 0.93-0.97; p < 0.0001). The CDAS is considered a simple and reproducible tool to classify patients with CIDP according to disease activity and treatment status that can be applied easily in practice and potentially to select patients for clinical trials.

Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is the most common idiopathic inflammatory myopathy occurring in patients over the age of 50 years and probably accounts for about 30% of all inflammatory myopathies. Muscle biopsy characteristically reveals endomysial inflammation, small groups of atrophic fibres, eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusions and muscle fibres with one or more rimmed vacuoles. However, any given biopsy may lack these histopathological abnormalities; the clinical examination is often the key to diagnosis. Early and often asymmetrical weakness and atrophy of the quadriceps and flexor forearm muscles (ie, wrist and finger flexors) are the clinical hallmarks of IBM. The pathogenesis of IBM is unknown. It may be autoimmune inflammatory myopathy or a primary degenerative myopathy with a secondary inflammatory. A prevailing theory is that there is an overproduction of beta-amyloid precursor protein in muscle fibres that is somehow cleaved into abnormal beta-amyloid, and the accumulation of the latter is somehow toxic to muscle fibres. However, there are many problems with this theory and more work needs to be done. Unfortunately, IBM is generally refractory to therapy. Further research into the pathogenesis, along with both preliminary small pilot trials and larger double blind, placebo controlled efficacy trials, are needed to make progress in our understanding and therapeutic approach for this disorder.

To evaluate the effect of SMN2 copy number on disease severity in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), we stratified 45 adult SMA patients based on SMN2 copy number (3 vs. 4 copies). Patients with 3 copies had an earlier age of onset and lower spinal muscular atrophy functional rating scale (SMAFRS) scores and were more likely to be non-ambulatory. There was, however, no difference between the groups in quantitative muscle strength or pulmonary function testing. Functional scale may be a more discriminating outcome measure for SMA clinical trials.

Twenty ALS patients with sialorrhea refractory to medical therapy were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized study to receive either 2,500 U of botulinum toxin type B (BTxb) or placebo into the bilateral parotid and submandibular glands using electromyographic guidance. Patients who received BTxb reported a global impression of improvement of 82% at 2 weeks compared to 38% of those who received placebo (P < 0.05). This significant effect was sustained at 4 weeks. At 12 weeks, 50% of patients who received BTxb continued to report improvement compared to 14% of those who received placebo. There were no significant adverse events, including dysphagia, in the BTxb group, and there was no significant increase in the rate of decline of vital capacity.

To develop diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), a retrospective series of patients' records diagnosed by sexpert consensus as CIDP or other chronic polyneuropathies were analyzed. Classification and regression tree analysis was applied to 150 patients to derive a classification rule. According to the rule, diagnosis of CIDP required that a patient have a chronic non-genetic polyneuropathy, progressive for at least eight weeks, without a serum paraprotein and either 1) recordable compound muscle action potentials in > or =75% of motor nerves and either abnormal distal latency in >50% of nerves or abnormal motor conduction velocity in >50% of nerves or abnormal F wave latency in >50% of nerves; or 2) symmetrical onset of motor symptoms, symmetrical weakness of four limbs, and proximal weakness in > or =1 limb. When validated in 117 patients, the rule had 83% sensitivity (95% confidence interval 69%-93%) and 97% specificity (95% confidence interval 89%-99%) and performed better than published criteria.

The differential diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) includes a number of acquired or inherited disorders causing degeneration of lower and/or upper motor neurons. It is important to consider these diagnoses in the appropriate clinical context because the prognosis is often bett

We determined the strength of correlation among, and responsiveness of, outcome measures used in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with prednisone in myasthenia gravis (MG). The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline in the Quantitative MG (QMG) score at week 12. Secondary outcome measures included the MG—Activities of Daily Living profile (MG-ADL) and MG Manual Muscle Test (MMT). The measures were collected at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 in the blinded study and at weeks 16, 20, 28, and 36 in an optional open-label extension. At baseline, the QMG was moderately correlated with the MG-ADL (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) and the MMT (r = 0.53, P < 0.0001), but the correlation between the MG-ADL and the MMT was lower (r = 0.30, P = 0.007). These findings were similar at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Similar correlations were found among the changes in scores from baseline at weeks 12 and 36. The MMT and MG-ADL appeared to be the most sensitive measures for changes in MG status at weeks 12 and 36. Although a task force has recommended use of the QMG in prospective MG trials, the MMT and MG-ADL appear to be suitable alternatives and offer potential advantages. No special training or equipment is required, and they take less time. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Muscle Nerve 38: 1429–1433, 2008

Although once an often fatal illness, myasthenia gravis can now be well managed with relatively safe and effective therapies. Prior to 1960 mortality for myasthenia gravis was approximately 30%. In the current era, mortality should be less than 5%. Major therapeutic advances by decade were: physostigmine and thymectomy (1930s); mechanical ventilation (1950s); corticosteroids and plasmapheresis (1960s); azathioprine (1960s-1970s); cyclosporine (1980s); intravenous gamma globulins (1980s-1990s); and most recently mycophenolate mofetil (1990s-2000s). Modern management involves a graded approach, beginning with cholinesterase inhibitors for mild symptoms and advancing to immunomodulating medications for more severe weakness. We now have several immunomodulating agents from which to choose: selection is based largely on time to clinical effect and adverse effects. The various available treatment modalities all have their limitations. In addition, some controversies remain regarding the effectiveness of some of the commonly used myasthenia gravis treatments. Recently completed and ongoing clinical trials suggest that there is still equipoise regarding the benefit of mycophenolate mofetil and thymectomy. Hopefully, the future will be promising, with clinical trials involving novel immunotherapeutic strategies.

Objective: Myostatin is an endogenous negative regulator of muscle growth and a novel target for muscle diseases. We conducted a safety trial of a neutralizing antibody to myostatin, MYO-029, in adult muscular dystrophies (Becker muscular dystrophy, facioscapulohumeral dystrophy, and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy). Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational, randomized study included 116 subjects divided into sequential dose-escalation cohorts, each receiving MYO-029 or placebo (Cohort 1 at 1mg/kg; Cohort 2 at 3mg/kg; Cohort 3 at 10mg/kg; Cohort 4 at 30mg/kg). Safety and adverse events were assessed by reported signs and symptoms, as well as by physical examinations, laboratory results, echocardiograms, electrocardiograms, and in subjects with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy, funduscopic and audiometry examinations. Biological activity of MYO-029 was assessed through manual muscle testing, quantitative muscle testing, timed function tests, subject-reported outcomes, magnetic resonance imaging studies, dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry studies, and muscle biopsy. Results: MYO-029 had good safety and tolerability with the exception of cutaneous hypersensitivity at the 10 and 30mg/kg doses. There were no improvements noted in exploratory end points of muscle strength or function, but the study was not powered to look for efficacy. Importantly, bioactivity of MYO-029 was supported by a trend in a limited number of subjects toward increased muscle size using dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry and muscle histology. Interpretation: This trial supports the hypothesis that systemic administration of myostatin inhibitors provides an adequate safety margin for clinical studies. Further evaluation of more potent myostatin inhibitors for stimulating muscle growth in muscular dystrophy should be considered. Ann Neurol 2008;63:561–571

Approximately 90% of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have the sporadic form, which may be caused by the interaction of multiple environmental factors and previously unknown genes.We performed a genomewide association analysis using 766,955 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found in 386 white patients with sporadic ALS and 542 neurologically normal white controls (the discovery series). Associations of SNPs with sporadic ALS were confirmed in two independent replication populations: replication series 1, with 766 case patients with the disease and 750 neurologically normal controls, and replication series 2, with 135 case patients and 275 controls.We identified 10 genetic loci that are significantly associated (P0.05) with sporadic ALS in three independent series of case patients and controls and an additional 41 loci that had significant associations in two of the three series. The most significant association with disease in white case patients as compared with controls was found for a SNP near an uncharacterized gene known as FLJ10986 (P=3.0x10(-4); odds ratio for having the genotype in patients vs. controls, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.62). The FLJ10986 protein was found to be expressed in the spinal cord and cerebrospinal fluid of patients and of controls. Specific SNPs seem to be associated with sex, age at onset, and site of onset of sporadic ALS.Variants of FLJ10986 may confer susceptibility to sporadic ALS. FLJ10986 and 50 other candidate loci warrant further investigation for their potential role in conferring susceptibility to the disease.

Background: TCH346 exerts antiapoptotic effects by binding to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and blocking the apoptotic pathway in which GAPDH is involved. Apoptosis is considered to be a key pathogenic mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases including ALS. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive either placebo or one of four doses of TCH346 (1.0, 2.5, 7.5, or 15 mg/day) administered orally once daily for at least 24 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the rate of change in the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R). The trial design included a 16-week lead-in phase to determine each patient9s rate of disease progression. The between treatment comparison was adjusted for the individual pretreatment rates of progression. The study was powered to detect a 25% reduction in the rate of decline of the ALSFRS-R as compared with placebo. Secondary outcome measures included survival, pulmonary function, and manual muscle testing (MMT). Results: Five hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled at 42 sites in Europe and North America. There were no differences in baseline variables. There were no significant differences between placebo and active treatment groups in the mean rate of decline of the ALSFRS-R or in the secondary outcome measures (survival, pulmonary function, and MMT). Conclusion: The trial revealed no evidence of a beneficial effect of TCH346 on disease progression in patients with ALS.

(2004). Western ALS Study Group. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders: Vol. 5, No. sup1, pp. 121-124.

No Class I studies of the effectiveness of thymectomy for myasthenia gravis (MG) have been performed. Most Class II studies comparing outcomes in MG patients with and without thymectomy demonstrated higher MG remission and improvement rates in patients undergoing thymectomy. However, these Class II studies were also consistently confounded by important differences between MG patients in surgical and nonsurgical groups. Myasthenia gravis patients undergoing thymectomy were younger, more often women and were more likely to have severe myasthenia. The authors of this paper cannot determine from these Class II studies whether the observed association between thymectomy and improved MG outcomes was a result of a thymectomy benefit or was merely a result of the multiple differences in baseline characteristics between the surgical and nonsurgical groups. The authors concluded that the benefit of thymectomy in non-thymomatous autoimmune MG has not been conclusively established. Thus, for patients with non-thymomatous autoimmune myasthenia gravis, thymectomy should only be considered an option to increase the probability of remission or improvement. The quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology recently adopted this position [1].

The pathogenic basis and treatment of diabetic polyradiculoneuropathy is a source of recent controversy as there may be two or more distinct forms of diabetic polyradiculoplexopathy. We believe that the following two categories of diabetic polyradiculoneuropathy can be made on the basis of clinically differences: 1) the more common asymmetric, painful polyradiculoneuropathy; and 2) the rare symmetric, painless, polyradiculoneuropathy. The asymmetric, painful form (also known as diabetic amyotrophy) may have an autoimmune basis, but the etiology is not clear. The natural history for diabetic amyotrophy is spontaneous improvement. Nevertheless, various immunotherapies (eg, corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) have been tried with subsequent improvement in symptoms. Treatment is reserved only for patients with severe ongoing pain, given the significant side effects of these medications in those patients with diabetes. Prednisone and IVIg may help alleviate the pain associated with diabetic amyotrophy. Relief of pain can help patients begin physical therapy earlier, however, there are no prospective, blinded, controlled studies that demonstrate that these treatments lead to an earlier and better recovery of muscle strength compared with the natural history of the disorder. The symmetric, painless form of diabetic polyradiculoneuropathy may in fact represent chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) occurring in a patient with diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with idiopathic CIDP may improve various immunomodulating therapies, including corticosteroid treatment, plasma exchange (PE), and IVIg. In this regard, patients with the symmetric, painless, proximal diabetic polyradiculoneuropathy may also respond to corticosteroids, plasma exchange, IVIg, azathioprine, or cyclophosphamide. However, as with diabetic amyotrophy, some patients improve spontaneously without treatment. In still other patients, the neuropathy appears unresponsive to immunotherapy. In such patients, this polyradiculoneuropathy might be caused by metabolic dysfunction associated with DM. Unfortunately, from a clinical, laboratory, and electrophysiologic standpoint, it is impossible to distinguish the patients with a symmetric, painless diabetic polyradiculoneuropathy who might respond to therapy. A trial of PE can be useful in identifying patients who might have a polyradiculoplexopathy that is responsive to immunotherapy. If patients respond to PE, they may continue to receive intermittent exchanges or be switched over to prednisone or IVIg.

BACKGROUND The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are clinically, histologically, and pathogenically distinct. In addition, the prognoses and response to treatment of the various forms of inflammatory myopathy are different. Most patients with inflammatory myopathy require aggressive immunosuppressive treatment. Clinicians need to be aware of the treatment options, which can be challenging and associated with various complications. REVIEW SUMMARY In this article, we review the clinical, electrophysiological, laboratory, and histological features of the major categories of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis) and some of the less common disorders (eosinophilic polymyositis, granulomatous or giant cell myositis, myositis secondary to sarcoidosis and Behcet's disease, and focal myositis). Recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of these disorders are discussed. In addition, we detail our approach to diagnosing and managing patients with inflammatory myopathy. CONCLUSIONS Diagnosis and management of patients with inflammatory myopathy can be difficult. Better under-standing of the pathogenic basis for these distinct myositises hopefully will result in better treatment options. Prospective, double-blind, controlled trials are necessary to define the best treatment options. CONCLUSIONS (THE NEUROLOGIST 6:267-287, 2000)

Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is usually refractory to immunosuppressive therapy; however, a few reports suggest that a minority of patients with IBM may have a partial, transient response or that therapy may slow progression. Therefore, although we generally discourage the use of immunosuppressive therapy for IBM, if the patient is willing to accept the potential side effects of therapy, a 3- to 6-month trial of oral prednisone can be attempted: 100 mg/d for 2 to 4 weeks, then 100 mg every other day for 2 to 3 months. If prednisone alone produces no improvement after 3 months, oral methotrexate can be added: 10 to 15 mg/wk for 6 to 12 months. If there is no objective clinical improvement in strength after a trial of prednisone alone or prednisone plus methotrexate over the course of 6 to 12 months, we discontinue pharmacologic therapy. Because of the great expense, relative lack of availability, and minimal evidence of benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), we do not recommend this form of immunomodulating therapy for IBM.