Search

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of death by cancer in the western world. Despite major progress, even new chemotherapeutic regimens have had relatively little impact on long term survival in the approximately 50% of patients with advanced disease at presentation meaning that prevention is the only realistic way to reduce the burden of this disease. Many countries have implemented population-based screening methods to prevent colorectal cancer by the physical removal of its precursor lesion the adenoma, or to detect cancer at an earlier stage when it is amenable to surgical cure. However these programs have only been shown to reduce colorectal cancer deaths by 30% in those screened and therefore new or complimentary approaches are needed. One such approach is chemoprevention. A number of compounds have shown potential in reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer. Most widely known are NSAIDs but recently inhibitors of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, also known as statins, commonly prescribed medications that lower serum cholesterol, have been shown to reduce colorectal cancer incidence. A critical issue in chemoprevention is the weighing of benefits against risks. In chemoprevention this balance is likely to be unfavourable when used in a wide unselected population even for the safest of compounds. Therapy should therefore be tailored to the individual patient. The balance will be more favourable in high risk groups such as individuals especially susceptible to neoplasia because of environmental risk factors, patients with inflammatory bowel disease, those with a hereditary predisposition and patients with a previous history of colorectal cancer or polyps. Furthermore colorectal cancer is not one disease but a heterogeneous group of diseases with different underlying molecular mechanisms. It is likely that both prevention and therapy will need to be tailored to the molecular subtype of the cancer in question. This may explain why studies of colorectal cancer in statin users do not show consistent protective effects. Evidence in vitro has shown a dichotomous effect of statins with either a cancer inhibiting or cancer promoting effect depending on their molecular subtype. Further studies are needed to determine in which patient groups statins can be used to prevent colorectal cancer and whether in other patients groups they should be avoided.

Background Promoter hypermethylation is an important and potentially reversible mechanism of tumour suppressor gene silencing in cancer. Compounds that demethylate tumour suppressor genes and induce differentiation of cancer cells, but do not have toxic side effects, would represent an exciting option in cancer therapy. Statins are cholesterol-lowering drugs with an excellent safety profile and associated with a reduced incidence of various cancers including colorectal cancer (CRC). The authors have previously shown that statins act by activating tumour suppressive bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling in CRC, increasing expression of BMP2. BMP2 is silenced by hypermethylation in gastric cancer. Aim To investigate whether BMP2 is methylated in CRC, whether statins can reverse this, and what implications this has for the use of statins in CRC. Methods Methylation-specific PCR, bisulphite sequencing, immunoblotting, reverse transcription PCR, quantitative PCR, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, an in vitro DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) assay, and cell viability studies were performed on CRC cells. The effect of statins was confirmed in a xenograft mouse model. Results BMP2 is silenced by promoter hypermethylation in cell lines with the hypermethylator phenotype and in primary tumours. Treatment with lovastatin downregulates DNMT activity, leading to BMP2 promoter demethylation and to upregulation of expression of BMP2 as well as other genes methylated in CRC. Statins alter gene expression, indicating a shift from a stem-like state to a more differentiated state, thereby sensitising cells to the effects of 5-fluorouracil. In a xenograft mouse model, simvastatin treatment induces BMP2 expression, leading to differentiation and reduced proliferation of CRC cells. Conclusions Statins act as DNMT inhibitors, demethylating the BMP2 promoter, activating BMP signalling, inducing differentiation of CRC cells, and reducing ‘stemness’. This study indicates that statins may be able to be used as differentiating agents in combined or adjuvant therapy in CRC with the CpG island methylator phenotype.

In gastric cancer, a new epigenetic mechanism of tumour suppressor loss has been suggested where the histone methyltransferase enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is responsible for loss of expression of RUNX3. This is consistent with EZH2 upregulation in multiple cancer types being associated with poor prognosis. We investigated whether EZH2 influences the expression of RUNX3 in colorectal cancer (CRC) and whether this is independent of methylation. We determined protein and messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of EZH2 and RUNX3 and assessed RUNX3 methylation with methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction using 72 human CRCs and 8 CRC cell lines. We assessed the effect of efficient RNA interference-mediated knockdown of EZH2 on RUNX3 levels, cell viability and H3K27 trimethylation of the RUNX3 promoter using chromatin immunoprecipitation. Despite higher levels of EZH2 and lower levels of RUNX3 in CRC specimens in general, no inverse correlation between EZH2 and RUNX3 in paired samples was found arguing against a major role for histone methylation in silencing RUNX3 in CRC. Conversely, downregulation of RUNX3 mRNA in the same tumours was associated with RUNX3 DNA methylation (P < 0.05). In cell lines, knockdown of EZH2 removed the repressive chromatin marks from RUNX3 but did not result in RUNX3 re-expression. However, it prevented the re-silencing of RUNX3 after the removal of demethylating agents. In conclusion, DNA methylation is primarily responsible for the transcriptional silencing of RUNX3 in CRC, but EZH2 and histone methylation are necessary for its methylation-dependent re-silencing after the removal of demethylating agents. These results would predict that inhibitors of EZH2 and histone methylation would enhance the effects of demethylating agents in cancer therapy.

High-grade conventional osteosarcoma is a malignant tumour predominantly affecting adolescents and, despite multimodal intensive therapy, lethal for one third of the patients. Although there is currently detailed knowledge of normal skeletal development, this has not been integrated into research on the genesis of osteosarcoma. Recently we showed that the canonical Wnt pathway is not active in osteosarcoma and that its reactivation is disadvantageous to osteosarcoma cells. Since Wnt is regulating normal skeletogenesis together with other pathways, here we report on the activities of the bone morphogenic protein (BMP), the transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) and the hedgehog (Hh) pathways in osteosarcoma. Human osteosarcoma samples (n=210), benign bone tumours of osteoblastic lineage called osteoblastoma (n=25) and osteosarcoma cell lines (n=19) were examined. For pathway activity luciferase transcriptional reporter assays and gene and protein expression analyses were performed. Immunohistochemical analysis of phosphorylated Smad1 and Smad2, the intracellular effectors of BMP and TGFβ, respectively, showed nuclear expression of both proteins in 70% of the osteosarcoma samples at levels comparable to osteoblastoma. Interestingly cases with lower expression showed significantly worse disease free survival. This may imply that drugs restoring impaired signalling pathways in osteosarcoma might change the tumour’s aggressive clinical course, however targeted pathway modulation in vitro did not affect cell proliferation.