Search

Background The impact of right ventricular (RV) lead location on clinical end points in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is unclear. We evaluated the impact of different RV lead locations on clinical outcome in CRT patients enrolled in the Septal Positioning of ventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) Electrodes (SPICE) trial, which randomized recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillators to apical versus midseptal RV lead positioning. Methods Ninety-eight CRT recipients were included in the multicenter SPICE trial and followed for 12 months: Fifty-three patients were randomized to receive an apical (A) and 45 to receive a midseptal (S) lead position. We compared echocardiographical and electrocardiographical parameters and outcome. Results Echocardiographic response with respect to improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (A: +15.8 ± 14.6%, S: +9.7 ± 12.6%, P = 0.156) and reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (A: −4.2 ± 10.7 mm, S: −7.5 ± 10.7 mm, P = 0.141) was comparable in apical and midseptal groups. Paced QRS width neither differed at prehospital discharge (A: 129 ± 21 ms, S: 135 ± 21 ms, P = 0.133) nor at 12-month follow-up (A: 131 ± 23 ms, S: 134 ± 28 ms, P = 0.620). No differences were found with respect to the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia or ICD therapy. Septal RV lead position, however, was associated with a significant longer time to a first heart failure event (P = 0.040) and a longer survival time (P = 0.019). Conclusions In CRT recipients, midseptal RV lead position was not superior with respect to improvement of echocardiographic parameters or paced QRS width. It did not predispose to ventricular arrhythmias or ICD therapy. The finding that midseptal lead position was associated with a longer time to first heart failure event and a longer survival time deserves further investigation.

Concerning rates of pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis were reported following PV isolation (PVI) with a circular pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC). As this may depend on intraprocedural imaging, we evaluated the incidence of PV stenosis in patients undergoing PVAC-PVI with continuous surveillance by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Multi-slice computed tomography was performed before and 3 months after PVAC-PVI with continuous ICE surveillance in 30 patients (37 % male, 65 ± 9 years). PV areas at two levels (ostial and 1 cm distally) and left atrial (LA) volumes were measured. PV area/LA volume ratio was calculated to correct for reverse LA remodelling. PV stenosis was classified as mild (25–50 %), moderate (50–75 %) and severe (>75 %). One hundred sixteen veins were isolated with PVAC with additional touch-up ablation in one patient. One patient was excluded from analysis for untriggered CT acquisition. Left atrial volume decreased from 109.1 ± 30.9 cm3 before to 98.4 ± 34.4 cm3 after ablation (p

Aims Right ventricular (RV) septum is a non-apical site targeted during lead implantation. Electrocardiographic (ECG) recognition of mid-septal lead location is challenging. The aim of the study is to determine ECG correlates of RV mid-septal pacing. Methods and results The present study is a pre-specified analysis of a prospective, multicenter study, which randomized recipients of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator to an apical vs. mid-septal RV lead positioning. Following implantation, a 12-lead ECG was recorded during intrinsic rhythm and RV pacing. In total, 227 patients, 121 in the apical group (76.9% males, 67.1 ± 11.3 years) and 106 in the mid-septal group (82.1% males, age 64.7 ± 12.7 years) were included. Apically as compared with septally paced patients had significantly longer paced QRS duration (177.0 ± 25.0 vs. 170.4 ± 21.7, respectively, P = 0.03) and significantly more leftward paced QRS axis (−71.6 ± 33.3° vs. 9.4 ± 86.5°, respectively, P < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the mid-septal as compared with the apical group displayed predominantly positive QRS in lead V6 (62.3 vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001), predominantly positive QRS in any of the inferior leads (53.8 vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001), and a QR pattern in lead aVL (53.3 vs. 3.3%, P < 0.001). These ECG correlates were incorporated in a stepwise algorithm with total sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 90% for the identification of a mid-septal lead location. Conclusion A mid-septal lead location may be identified using a simple stepwise algorithm, based on the presence of positive QRS in lead V6, positive QRS in any of the inferior leads, and a QR pattern in lead aVL.

Electrocardiographic (ECG) identification of prior myocardial infarction (MI) during right ventricular (RV) pacing is of clinical importance. Proposed ECG criteria have been evaluated only during apical pacing. We evaluated the effect of pacing site on the predictive performance of ECG signs of prior MI.The present study is a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter study which randomized recipients of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator to an apical versus septal RV lead positioning. ECGs of patients with or without prior MI were analyzed for the presence of the following criteria: Cabrera sign, Chapman sign, QR pattern in leads I, aVL, V5 or V6, QR in inferior leads and notching in the descending slope of the QRS complex in inferior leads.The MI group included 89 patients (55.1% apically paced), while 99 patients had no prior MI (50.5% apically paced). In the total population, the Cabrera sign presented the highest specificity (97%) and diagnostic accuracy (62.2%), with a sensitivity of 23.6%. The Cabrera sign was the only significant predictor of a prior MI [OR=9.9, (95%CI:2.8-34.5), p0.001], among all ECG markers. Pacing site did not significantly influence the sensitivity and specificity of the Cabrera sign for detection of prior MI.In our study, the Cabrera sign was the only ECG marker that predicted the presence of prior MI during ventricular paced rhythm. Septal RV lead positioning did not affect the predictive performance of the Cabrera sign.

Background Detrimental effects of right ventricular (RV) apical pacing have directed the interest toward alternative pacing sites such as the RV mid-septum. As safety data are scarce for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients the study aims to evaluate ICD lead performance in the mid-septal position. Methods and results A total of 299 ICD recipients (79% male, aged 65.2±12.1years, 83% primary prevention of sudden cardiac death) were randomized to receive the RV ICD electrode either in a mid-septal (n=145) or apical (n=154) location. Event-free survival was evaluated at 3 (primary endpoint) and 12months (secondary endpoint). Events included a composite of lead revision, suboptimal right ventricular electrode performance (including defibrillation thresholds (DFT)>25J) or lead position not in accordance with randomized location. Event-free survival at 3 (12) months was observed in 80.6% (72.3%) of patients randomized to a mid-septal and in 82.2% (72.1%) of patients randomized to an apical lead position, p=0.726 (p=0.969). Pre-defined margins for non-inferiority were not reached at 3 or 12months. High DFT was found in 7 patients (5.0%) of the mid-septal and in 3 (2.2%) patients of the apical group (p=0.209). Conclusion In ICD recipients electrode positioning to the RV mid-septum or the RV apex results in slightly different rates concerning the survival free of lead revision, suboptimal right ventricular electrode performance or non-randomized lead position. Non-inferiority of the mid-septal lead location cannot be concluded. This should be taken into consideration when a mid-septal lead position is pursued. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00745745.

Aims The choice of left ventricular pacing configurations (LVPCs) of quadripolar leads used for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) affects haemodynamic response and thus may be a tool for device optimization. The value of surface electrocardiograms and interventricular time delays (IVDs) for optimization is unknown. Methods and results Sixteen patients implanted with a CRT device with a quadripolar LV lead underwent invasive testing of LV d P /d t . QRS durations at baseline (bl) and during biventricular pacing (biv) were measured using different LVPCs (total of 141 LVPCs; 8.8 per patient). Variations in QRS duration during biv were calculated for each patient (ΔQRS) and, when compared with intrinsic QRS duration, for all LVPCs (ΔQRSLVPC). Interventricular time delays between the poles of the LV lead were obtained from intracardiac electrograms. ΔIVD was calculated as IVDmax − IVDmin. Parameters were correlated with LV d P /d t . ΔQRS and ΔQRSLVPC both significantly correlated with LV d P /d t ( P 168 ms ( P < 0.001), but not

Aims Image integration of three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of left atrial (LA) and pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy into electroanatomical mapping (EAM) plays a major role in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Point-by-point EAM is commonly used for registration of imported LA and PV anatomy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of intraprocedural rotational angiography-based LA imaging registered by spatial reconstruction of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in patients undergoing AF ablation. Methods and results Twenty-two patients (11 males, 66 ± 12 years) were studied. Reconstructions of LA and PVs based on rotational angiography were registered by a second 3D reconstruction based on ICE. In a second step, EAM points were added to ICE 3D reconstructions. A 3D image of the LA and PVs was reconstructed in all patients by both imaging modalities. Rotational angiography and ICE-based LA 3D reconstructions took 11.5 ± 5.2 and 20.4 ± 11.2 min, respectively. A total of 17 ± 6 two-dimensional ICE fans were used for spatial reconstruction of ICE. The deviation between the two 3D shells was 2.6 ± 0.5 mm. Integration of 78 ± 58 EAM points into ICE 3D reconstruction did not significantly reduce the deviation to rotational angiography-based reconstructions (2.7 ± 0.6 mm). All PVs were isolated successfully. Conclusions Intraprocedural 3D reconstruction of LA and PVs for ablation of AF is feasible based on both rotational angiography and ICE. LA reconstructions based on rotational angiography can accurately be registered using 3D ICE shells. Additional EAM does not enhance accuracy. Therefore, registration of rotational angiography-based 3D reconstructions by 3D reconstructions from ICE seems to be an alternative technique to support AF ablation.

DynaCT Cardiac Integration into Electroanatomical Mapping. Introduction: Exact visualization of complex left atrial (LA) anatomy is crucial for safety and success rates when performing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of our study was to validate the accuracy of integrating rotational angiography-based 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of LA and pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy into an electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system. Methods and Results: In 38 patients (62 ± 8 years, 25 females) undergoing catheter ablation of paroxysmal (n = 19) or persistent (n = 19) AF, intraprocedural rotational angiography of LA and PVs was performed. The subsequent 3D reconstruction and segmentation of LA and PVs was transferred to the EAM system and registered to the EAM. The distances of all EAM points to corresponding points on the LA syngo® DynaCT Cardiac surface were calculated. Segmentation of LA with clear visualization of adjacent structures was possible in all patients. Also, the integrated segmentation of the LA was used to guide the encirclement of ipsilateral veins, which resulted in PV isolation in all patients. Integration into the 3D mapping system was achieved with a distance error of 2.2 ± 0.4 mm when compared with the EAM surface. Subgroups with paroxysmal and persistent AF showed distance errors of 2.3 ± 0.3 mm and 2.1 ± 0.4 mm, respectively (P = n.s.). Conclusion: Intraprocedural registration of LA and PV anatomy by contrast enhanced rotational angiography was feasible and accurate. There were no differences between patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. Therefore, integration of rotational angiography-based reconstructions into 3D EAM systems might be helpful to guide catheter ablation for AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 278–283, March 2010)

In carriers of dual chamber pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is crucial for adequate mode switch function and to avoid inappropriate shock delivery. Detection algorithms rely on the atrial rate and on the relationship of atrial to ventricular intracardiac electrograms, but the relative portion of misclassified AF episodes remains high. Although myocardial impedance is a reliable indicator of contraction, little is known about atrial impedance as a marker of atrial arrhythmias. Methods During an electrophysiological study, we investigated the effect of induced AF on impedance at the right atrial free wall (RAFW) and right atrial appendage (RAA) in 20 patients. Using biphasic square-wave pulses (128 Hz, 200 microA/15 micros), impedance changes were recorded during sinus rhythm (SR-1), atrial pacing at 120 beats/min, AF induced by rapid atrial burst pacing, and after spontaneous AF termination (SR-2). Results At the RAA, peak-to-peak impedance amplitude during cardiac cycle (DeltaZ) dropped from 51.7 +/- 35.3 Omega (SR-1) or 49.6 +/- 30.6 Omega (pacing) to 24.6 +/- 22.0 Omega (AF, Por =0.0005), and subsequently increased to 37.7 +/- 24.7 Omega (SR-2, Por = 0.0004 v. AF). At the RAFW, DeltaZ changed from 16.2 +/- 15.5 Omega (SR-1) or 13.5 +/- 9.9 Omega (pacing) to 5.9 +/- 4.1 Omega (AF, Por = 0.003), and to 11.4 +/- 10.7 Omega (SR-2, Por = 0.015). Given a discrimination threshold of 65%, the sensitivity and the specificity of DeltaZ to detect AF were 79 +/- 18 and 89 +/- 14%, respectively (95% confidence interval).AF causes DeltaZ drop in pacemaker and ICD recipients. This impedance based algorithm can be used as an alternative method of AF detection.