Search

Kei Hosoya,1 Taro Komachi,2,* Katsunori Masaki,3,* Isao Suzaki,4 Hidehisa Saeki,5 Naoko Kanda,6 Makoto Nozaki,7 Yosuke Kamide,8 Yoshinori Matsuwaki,9 Yoshiki Kobayashi,10 Eriko Ogino,11 Shin-Ichi Osada,12 Norihiro Usukura,13 Toshikazu Kurumagawa,14 Junya Ninomia,15 Mikiya Asako,16 Keitaro Nakamoto,17 Hidenori Yokoi,18 Manabu Ohyama,19 Keiji Tanese,3 Sho Kanzaki,3 Koichi Fukunaga,3 Motohiro Ebisawa,8 Kimihiro Okubo13 1Nippon Medical School, Musashi Kosugi Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan; 2Department of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Inzai, Chiba, Japan; 3Keio Allergy Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; 4Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Showa University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 5Department of Dermatology, Nihon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan; 6Department of Dermatology, Nippon Medical School, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Inzai, Chiba, Japan; 7Wakaba-Hifuka Clinic, Tokyo, Japan; 8National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Kanagawa, Japan; 9Matsuwaki Clinic Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan; 10Allergy Center, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan; 11Kyoto Nose and Allergy Clinic, Kyoto, Japan; 12Department of Dermatology, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; 13Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; 14Minamiosawa Medical Plaza, Tokyo, Japan; 15Nagase Clinic of Dermatology, Tokyo, Japan; 16Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan; 17Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 18Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 19Department of Dermatology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Kei Hosoya, Nippon Medical School, Musashi Kosugi Hospital, 1-383 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan, Tel +81-44-733-5181, Fax +81-44-711-8713, Email s00-073@nms.ac.jpPurpose: The status of dupilumab self-injection at home is not well understood. We therefore aimed to identify the barriers to adherence to dupilumab self-injection.Patients and Methods: This non-interventional open-label study was conducted between March 2021 and July 2021. Patients with atopic dermatitis, bronchial asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps receiving dupilumab, from 15 sites, were requested to complete a self-administered questionnaire regarding the frequency and effectiveness of dosing as well as their use and satisfaction with dupilumab. Barriers to adherence were assessed using the Adherence Starts with Knowledge-12.Results: We included 331 patients who used dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (n = 164), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (n = 102), and bronchial asthma (n = 65). The median efficacy of dupilumab scored 9.3 on the visual analog scale. Overall, 85.5% of the patients self-injected dupilumab, and 70.7% perfectly complied with the established injection dates. The pre-filled pen was significantly superior to the conventional syringe in terms of usability, operability, ease of pushing the plunger, and patient satisfaction. However, the pre-filled pen caused more pain during self-injection than did the syringe. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that adherence decreased with longer dupilumab treatment duration (p = 0.017) and was not associated with age, sex, underlying disease, or device type. There was a difference in responses related to “inconvenience/forgetfulness” between the good and poor adherence groups.Conclusion: The pre-filled dupilumab pen was superior to the syringe in terms of usability, operability, ease of pushing the plunger, and satisfaction. Repetitive instructions are recommended for preventing poor adherence to dupilumab self-injection.Keywords: atopic dermatitis, biologics, bronchial asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis

Isao Suzaki1, Kazuhito Asano2, Yusuke Shikama3, Taisuke Hamasaki1, Ayako Kanei1, Harumi Suzaki11Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan; 2Division of Physiology, School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Showa University, Yokohama, Japan; 3Department of Respiratory Diseases, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, JapanBackground: COPD is characterized by persistent and progressive airway inflammation. Although neutrophilic airway inflammation is generally accepted to be a major factor in the pathogenesis of COPD, the influence of the agents used for the treatment of COPD on neutrophil functions such as chemotaxis is not fully understood.Purpose: The present study aimed to examine the influence of tiotropium bromide on the production of interleukin (IL)-8 from human airway epithelial cells and lung fibroblasts (LFs) after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation in vitro.Methods: BEAS-2B cells, human bronchial epithelial cell line, and LFs, at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/mL, were stimulated with LPS in the presence of various concentrations of tiotropium bromide. IL-8 in culture supernatants was examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). IL-8 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression was examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The influence of tiotropium bromide on LPS-induced signaling pathways was also analyzed by examining nuclear factor-kappa (NF-κ)B activation and signaling protein phosphorylation by ELISA.Results: Tiotropium bromide at >15 pg/mL inhibited IL-8 production from both BEAS-2B cells and LFs after LPS stimulation. Tiotropium bromide also suppressed IL-8 mRNA expression through the inhibition of NF-κB activation and signaling protein, extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1/2, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase, phosphorylation.Conclusion: The present results strongly suggest that tiotropium bromide exerts the inhibitory effect on neutrophilic inflammation through the suppression of IL-8 production from epithelial cells and LFs by interfering with LPS-mediated signaling pathways and thus may contribute to lower cellular inflammation in COPD, which is responsible for favorable modification of the disease.Keywords: IL-8, suppression, tiotropium bromide, airway cells, in vitro