Search

Background The important role of surgery in early-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been recognized, and curative surgical resection is recommended. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I SCLC has not yet been evaluated, and novel approaches focusing on the specific genomic characteristics of SCLC may be invaluable for customized therapy. In this study, we focused on the Klotho gene, which is an anti-aging gene known to be a potential tumor suppressor. We investigated whether the expression of Klotho, assessed by immunohistochemistry, can predict survival in patients with resected SCLC. Methods The medical records of patients diagnosed as having limited-disease (LD) SCLC and treated by surgical resection (n = 30) at Tokyo Medical University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The expression status of Klotho, and of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters MRP1, MDR and breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP), which can cause resistance to anticancer drugs, including irinotecan, was assessed by immunohistochemical analysis in resected surgical specimens of patients with early-stage SCLC. Results Of the 30 patients, Klotho expression was seen in the specimens from 18 patients (60.0%), but not in those of the remaining 12 patients (40.0%). The immunostaining for Klotho was mostly localized in the cytoplasm. The expression of Klotho was significantly associated with the overall survival (OS) (ratio 0.088; 95% confidence interval 0.019–0.409; P = 0.002). The administration of perioperative chemotherapy had no significant effect in improving the survival, as assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method. However, the patients showing Klotho expression in the resected specimens in p-stage I and II, may have benefited from perioperative chemotherapy. A multivariate analysis revealed no significant association between the expression status of MRP1, MDR or BCRP and the OS. Conclusion Expression of Klotho was predictive of a favorable outcome following resection in limited-disease SCLC patients, and the Klotho expression status may serve as a new biomarker for the need of additional therapies to be developed in the future.

Background and Objectives PDT induces apoptosis, inflammatory reactions, immune reactions, and damage to the microvasculature around the tumors. The mechanisms responsible for the anticancer effects of Photofrin-PDT and NPe6-PDT differ somewhat. To select a photosensitizer for lung cancer treatment and to improve the efficacy of PDT, the mechanisms of action for PDT using Photofrin or NPe6 must be elucidated and the phenomena validated by analyzing molecular determinants from clinical samples. Study Design/Materials and Methods We examined the role of immunological reactions in the anti-tumor effects of PDT using cytokine-overexpressing cells and investigated whether the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 may be a molecular target. Moreover, we investigated the association between ATP-binding cassette transporter proteins such as breast cancer-resistant protein (BCRP), which can pump out some types of photosensitizer, and the efficacy of PDT using clinical samples from 81 early lung cancer lesions treated with PDT between 1998 and 2006 at the Tokyo Medical University Hospital. Results Photofrin-PDT damaged Bcl-2 and rapidly induced apoptosis, but NPe6-PDT did not damage Bc-2 nor did it induce morphologically typical apoptosis. However, NPe6-PDT exerted a strong anti-tumor effect, regardless of the overexpression of Bcl-2. By analyzing the BCRP-overexpressing cells, Photofrin, but not NPe6, was found to be a substrate of BCRP. All 81 lung cancer lesions were BCRP-positive; as Photofrin was found to be a substrate of BCRP, the expression of BCRP significantly affected the efficacy of Photofrin-PDT. However, NPe6-PDT exerted a strong antitumor effect regardless of BCRP expression, and the complete response rate after NPe6-PDT was much higher than that after Photofrin-PDT. Conclusions Our translational research suggests that NPe6-PDT may be superior to Photofrin-PDT for the treatment of lung caner, and individualized approaches to PDT based on the expression status of Bcl-2 and/or BCRP may improve the efficacy of PDT in patients with lung cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 43:591–599, 2011. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Summary Background We had previously developed the possibility of use of a photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) system using a tumor-selective photosensitizer and laser irradiation for the early detection and photodynamic therapy (PDT) for centrally located early lung cancers. Recently, we established the autofluorescence diagnosis system integrated into a videoendoscope (SAFE-3000) as a very useful technique for the early diagnosis of lung cancer. Patients and methods Twenty-nine patients (38 lesions) with centrally located early lung cancer received PDD and PDT using the second-generation photosensitizer, talaporfin sodium (NPe6). Just before the PDT, we defined the tumor margin accurately using the novel PDD system SAFE-3000 with NPe6 and a diode laser (408 nm). Results Red fluorescence emitted from the tumor by excitation of the photosensitizer by the diode laser (408 nm) from SAFE-3000 allowed accurate determination of the tumor margin just before the PDT. The complete remission (CR) rate following NPe6-PDT in the cases with early lung cancer was 92.1% (35/38 lesions). We also confirmed the loss of red fluorescence from the tumors immediately after the PDT using SAFE-3000. We confirmed that all the NPe6 in the tumor had been excited and photobleached by the laser irradiation (664 nm) and that no additional laser irradiation was needed for curative treatment. Conclusions This novel PDD system using SAFE-3000 and NPe6 improved the quality and efficacy of PDT and avoided misjudgement of the dose of the photosensitizer or laser irradiation in PDT. PDT using NPe6 will become a standard option of treatments for centrally located early lung cancer.

PDT induces apoptosis, inflammatory reactions, immune reactions, and damage to the microvasculature around the tumors. The mechanisms responsible for the anticancer effects of Photofrin-PDT and NPe6-PDT differ somewhat. To select a photosensitizer for lung cancer treatment and to improve the efficacy of PDT, the mechanisms of action for PDT using Photofrin or NPe6 must be elucidated and the phenomena validated by analyzing molecular determinants from clinical samples.We examined the role of immunological reactions in the anti-tumor effects of PDT using cytokine-overexpressing cells and investigated whether the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 may be a molecular target. Moreover, we investigated the association between ATP-binding cassette transporter proteins such as breast cancer-resistant protein (BCRP), which can pump out some types of photosensitizer, and the efficacy of PDT using clinical samples from 81 early lung cancer lesions treated with PDT between 1998 and 2006 at the Tokyo Medical University Hospital.Photofrin-PDT damaged Bcl-2 and rapidly induced apoptosis, but NPe6-PDT did not damage Bc-2 nor did it induce morphologically typical apoptosis. However, NPe6-PDT exerted a strong anti-tumor effect, regardless of the overexpression of Bcl-2. By analyzing the BCRP-overexpressing cells, Photofrin, but not NPe6, was found to be a substrate of BCRP. All 81 lung cancer lesions were BCRP-positive; as Photofrin was found to be a substrate of BCRP, the expression of BCRP significantly affected the efficacy of Photofrin-PDT. However, NPe6-PDT exerted a strong antitumor effect regardless of BCRP expression, and the complete response rate after NPe6-PDT was much higher than that after Photofrin-PDT.Our translational research suggests that NPe6-PDT may be superior to Photofrin-PDT for the treatment of lung caner, and individualized approaches to PDT based on the expression status of Bcl-2 and/or BCRP may improve the efficacy of PDT in patients with lung cancers.