Search

Objective: To evaluate the proportion of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who met criteria for comorbid juvenile fibromyalgia (FM) using the Pain and Symptom Assessment Tool (PSAT), and to identify clinical and demographic differences among JIA patients with and without juvenile FM. Methods: Patients ages 11–17 years with JIA were recruited from 4 North American pediatric rheumatology centers. Each patient completed the PSAT. Additional clinical and disease activity measures included pain visual analog scale, patient global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician global assessment of disease activity (PhGA), the Functional Disability Inventory (FDI), and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in children. Results: Of 129 patients, 11 met criteria for juvenile FM. FDI scores were markedly higher in patients who tested positive for juvenile FM, with a mean of 24.8 compared to 6.9 in patients without juvenile FM (P < 0.001). Pain catastrophizing scores were also significantly higher, by ~14 points, in patients with juvenile FM. There was a significant tendency for patients to give higher disease activity scores than physicians, which was more marked among patients with juvenile FM. In patients with juvenile FM, PtGA scores exceeded PhGA scores by a mean of 3.7, compared to a mean of 0.7 among patients without juvenile FM (P < 0.001). Conclusion: A minority of JIA patients (8.5%) met criteria for juvenile FM. This group demonstrated markedly more functional impairment. PtGA scores were strikingly higher than PhGA scores among patients with JIA who met juvenile FM criteria, suggesting that providers might consider a more expansive approach to chronic pain and non‐musculoskeletal symptom assessment and treatment in JIA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The interleukin (IL) -1 family of cytokines are involved in different aspects of inflammation with IL-1 beta being the best known and most powerful proinflammatory cytokine. Dysregulation of IL-1 beta and other family members results in autoinflammatory conditions such as systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and familial Mediterranean fever. The growing understanding and knowledge of the pathophysiology of many autoinflammatory diseases have led to the development and use of IL-1 blocking medications for many chronic and disabling diseases. In this article, we present the anti-IL-1 agents and their major indications in pediatric rheumatology. [Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(2):e72-e76.]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Sexually active adolescents, including young women with lupus, are at high risk for unplanned pregnancy. Unplanned pregnancy among teens with lupus is associated with an elevated risk of poor maternal and fetal outcomes. The provision of effective contraception is a crucial element of care for a sexually-active young woman with lupus. Unfortunately, providers may be hesitant to prescribe contraception to this group due to concerns about increasing the risk of lupus complications. This article reviews the risks and benefits of currently-available contraceptives for young women with lupus. Providers are encouraged to consider long-term, highly-effective contraception, such as implantables and intrauterine devices, for appropriately selected adolescents with lupus.

Autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED) is a rare, but treatable cause of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in children. Most cases present acutely and involve both ears. The precise mechanism of hearing loss in AIED is not known. Many suspected etiologies have been proposed including infections, vascular abnormalities, and trauma. However, 70% of cases are defined as idiopathic. There are no standardized diagnostic criteria for AIED, and the diagnostic process may be challenging. Positive auto antibodies and response to immunosuppressive therapy support the diagnosis. Treatment may include corticosteroids and steroid-sparing immunosuppressive medications. A high index of suspicion is recommended as the hearing loss may be stabilized or even reversed with early treatment. Long-term medical treatment failures generally have good outcomes with cochlear implantation. [Pediatr Ann. 2019;48(10):e391-e394.]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the relationship between serum levels of S100A8/A9 and S100A12 and the maintenance of clinically inactive disease during anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy and the occurrence of disease flare following withdrawal of anti‐TNF therapy in patients with polyarticular forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Methods: In this prospective, multicenter study, 137 patients with polyarticular‐course JIA whose disease was clinically inactive while receiving anti‐TNF therapy were enrolled. Patients were observed for an initial 6‐month phase during which anti‐TNF treatment was continued. For those patients who maintained clinically inactive disease over the 6 months, anti‐TNF was withdrawn and they were followed up for 8 months to assess for the occurrence of flare. Serum S100 levels were measured at baseline and at the time of anti‐TNF withdrawal. Spearman's rank correlation test, Mann‐Whitney U test, Kruskal‐Wallis test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Kaplan‐Meier survival analyses were used to assess the relationship between serum S100 levels and maintenance of clinically inactive disease and occurrence of disease flare after anti‐TNF withdrawal. Results: Over the 6‐month initial phase with anti‐TNF therapy, the disease state reverted from clinically inactive to clinically active in 24 (18%) of the 130 evaluable patients with polyarticular‐course JIA; following anti‐TNF withdrawal, 39 (37%) of the 106 evaluable patients experienced a flare. Serum levels of S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were elevated in up to 45% of patients. Results of the ROC analysis revealed that serum S100 levels did not predict maintenance of clinically inactive disease during anti‐TNF therapy nor did they predict disease flare after treatment withdrawal. Elevated levels of S100A8/A9 were not predictive of the occurrence of a disease flare within 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, or 8 months following anti‐TNF withdrawal, and elevated S100A12 levels had a modest predictive ability for determining the risk of flare within 30, 60, and 90 days after treatment withdrawal. Serum S100A12 levels at the time of anti‐TNF withdrawal were inversely correlated with the time to disease flare (r = −0.36). Conclusion: Serum S100 levels did not predict maintenance of clinically inactive disease or occurrence of disease flare in patients with polyarticular‐course JIA, and S100A12 levels were only moderately, and inversely, correlated with the time to disease flare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the frequency, time to flare, and predictors of disease flare upon withdrawal of anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy in children with polyarticular forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who demonstrated ≥6 months of continuous clinically inactive disease. Methods: In 16 centers 137 patients with clinically inactive JIA who were receiving anti‐TNF therapy (42% of whom were also receiving methotrexate [MTX]) were prospectively followed up. If the disease remained clinically inactive for the initial 6 months of the study, anti‐TNF was stopped and patients were assessed for flare at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 months. Life‐table analysis, t‐tests, chi‐square test, and Cox regression analysis were used to identify independent variables that could significantly predict flare by 8 months or time to flare. Results: Of 137 patients, 106 (77%) maintained clinically inactive disease while receiving anti‐TNF therapy for the initial 6 months and were included in the phase of the study in which anti‐TNF therapy was stopped. Stopping anti‐TNF resulted in disease flare in 39 (37%) of 106 patients by 8 months. The mean/median ± SEM time to flare was 212/250 ± 9.77 days. Patients with shorter disease duration at enrollment, older age at onset and diagnosis, shorter disease duration prior to experiencing clinically inactive disease, and shorter time from onset of clinically inactive disease to enrollment were found to have significantly lower hazard ratios for likelihood of flare by 8 months (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Over one‐third of patients with polyarticular JIA with sustained clinically inactive disease will experience a flare by 8 months after discontinuation of anti‐TNF therapy. Several predictors of lower likelihood of flare were identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening syndrome characterized by a dysregulated hyperinflammatory response associated with aberrant activation of lymphocytes and macrophages that results in hypercytokinemia. It is classically divided into two types: (1) primary or familial HLH and (2) secondary HLH. Familial HLH is generally an autosomal recessive condition, whereas secondary HLH is usually associated with infectious diseases, autoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases (where it is more commonly known as macrophage activation syndrome), malignancy, immunosuppression, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, organ transplantation, HIV infection, and metabolic diseases. Although its clinical presentation is often similar to bacterial sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome, HLH can be life-threatening. As such, it is imperative to recognize and diagnose HLH in a timely manner to optimize care. [Pediatr Ann. 2017;46(8):e309-e313.]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 15-year-old girl presented with knee pain, associated with a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA). She denied joint swelling or morning stiffness and remained physically active despite the pain. A physical examination was unremarkable except for articular hypermobility. Laboratory results were also unremarkable. Therefore, the positive ANA was determined to be nonspecific, and not concerning. In the evaluation of children with musculoskeletal complaints, unusual rash, or fatigue, an ANA assessment is frequently considered. When is this test most likely to be useful? What is the appropriate follow up for a positive result? Which results are concerning for an autoimmune process? This article reviews the literature to address these practical concerns. Understanding the indications for ordering an ANA, and the correct interpretation of a positive ANA, may reduce unnecessary referrals and costly tests. Moreover, the misperception that a positive ANA indicates a rheumatologic disease can cause significant patient and parental anxiety. A 15-year-old girl presented with knee pain, associated with a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA). She denied joint swelling or morning stiffness and remained physically active despite the pain. A physical examination was unremarkable except for articular hypermobility. Laboratory results were also unremarkable. Therefore, the positive ANA was determined to be nonspecific, and not concerning. In the evaluation of children with musculoskeletal complaints, unusual rash, or fatigue, an ANA assessment is frequently considered. When is this test most likely to be useful? What is the appropriate follow up for a positive result? Which results are concerning for an autoimmune process? This article reviews the literature to address these practical concerns. Understanding the indications for ordering an ANA, and the correct interpretation of a positive ANA, may reduce unnecessary referrals and costly tests. Moreover, the misperception that a positive ANA indicates a rheumatologic disease can cause significant patient and parental anxiety. [[Pediatr Ann. 2015;44(6):e131- e135.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 14-year-old boy presented with months of severe widespread musculoskeletal pain. He was profoundly fatigued and unable to attend school. Laboratory evaluation, including complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, inflammatory markers, and thyroid function, was unrevealing. Physical examination was also normal except for multiple tender points. The patient was diagnosed with juvenile primary fibromyalgia syndrome and referred for multidisciplinary treatment including physical therapy, exercise, and counseling, and his daily functioning gradually improves. Juvenile fibromyalgia is a complex syndrome that often severely limits patients' activities and can impede normal adolescent development. Effective treatment requires an understanding of the biologic, psychologic, and social factors contributing to the perpetuation of chronic pain. The author reviews the diagnostic criteria, pathophysiology, and treatment of juvenile fibromyalgia. Medications, particularly antidepressants and anticonvulsants, can be useful adjuncts to therapy. However, multimodal pain management including intensive physical therapy, exercise, counseling, and sleep hygiene is most effective in treating fibromyalgiaA 14-year-old boy presented with months of severe widespread musculoskeletal pain. He was profoundly fatigued and unable to attend school. Laboratory evaluation, including complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, inflammatory markers, and thyroid function, was unrevealing. Physical examination was also normal except for multiple tender points. The patient was diagnosed with juvenile primary fibromyalgia syndrome and referred for multidisciplinary treatment including physical therapy, exercise, and counseling, and his daily functioning gradually improves. Juvenile fibromyalgia is a complex syndrome that often severely limits patients' activities and can impede normal adolescent development. Effective treatment requires an understanding of the biologic, psychologic, and social factors contributing to the perpetuation of chronic pain. The author reviews the diagnostic criteria, pathophysiology, and treatment of juvenile fibromyalgia. Medications, particularly antidepressants and anticonvulsants, can be useful adjuncts to therapy. However, multimodal pain management including intensive physical therapy, exercise, counseling, and sleep hygiene is most effective in treating fibromyalgia. [Pediatr Ann. 2015;44(6):e136-e141.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sexually active adolescents, including young women with lupus, are at high risk for unplanned pregnancy. Unplanned pregnancy among teens with lupus is associated with an elevated risk of poor maternal and fetal outcomes. The provision of effective contraception is a crucial element of care for a sexually-active young woman with lupus. Unfortunately, providers may be hesitant to prescribe contraception to this group due to concerns about increasing the risk of lupus complications. This article reviews the risks and benefits of currently-available contraceptives for young women with lupus. Providers are encouraged to consider long-term, highly-effective contraception, such as implantables and intrauterine devices, for appropriately selected adolescents with lupus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]