1. Energy and greenhouse gas footprint analysis of conventional and reduced tillage practices in rainfed and irrigated rice–wheat systems.
- Author
-
Magar, Shikha Thapa, Timsina, Jagadish, Devkota, Krishna Prasad, and Weili, Liang
- Abstract
Conventional tillage practices in rice–wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains are not only energy-intensive but also release large quantities of greenhouse gases (GHGs) resulting in calls for more sustainable tillage practices. To assess total energy use, energy-use efficiency, GHG emissions and total global warming potential, three reduced tillage rice–wheat systems were compared to standard conventional practice. Dry direct-seeded rice, unpuddled transplanted rice and puddled transplanted rice were paired with zero tillage wheat systems for two years in 84 on-farm trials in two Terai districts of Nepal, and compared to the puddled transplanted rice-conventional tillage wheat. In both districts, the total energy use was lower (p < 0.05) by 17–18% in dry direct-seeded rice and 15–17% in unpuddled transpanted rice than in puddled transplanted rice, and lower by 12.5–19% in zero tillage wheat than in conventional tillage. In both crops, the total global warming potential was lower for reduced tillage practices compared with the conventional counterparts. Higher energy-use efficiency with lower global warming potential could be a resilient and risk minimization strategy for crops in the rice–wheat systems established with reduced tillage under both irrigated and rainfed environments. To offer the most promising incentive for a transition from conventional to reduced tillage practices, availability and optimum use of herbicides, easy access to planting machines, and availability of skilled service providers are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF