Search

The emergence of C8 radiculopathy is a known complication following cervicothoracic osteotomies. However, the clinical profile of C8 radiculopathy is not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of C8 radiculopathy after cervicothoracic osteotomies and to form a clinical profile describing the characteristics through a systematic review of the literature.An electronic database search for full-text English articles was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The search yielded results on indications for cervicothoracic osteotomies, surgical approaches, mean follow-up time, and significant complications, including C8 radiculopathy.Our literature search yielded 2135 articles, of which 12 qualified to be included in the analysis. The 12 articles comprised 451 patients undergoing various osteotomy approaches. The mean age of subjects was 51.0 years (range, 11.4-63.2 years), and the majority of patients were male (66%, n = 298). Ankylosing spondylitis was the most frequent indication for surgery (44.8%, n = 202). The number of patients with postoperative C8 radiculopathy was found to decrease over time (1997-2020) by showing statistical significance (r = -0.65, P = 0.021).Of the 451 patients included in this study, 53 had C8 radiculopathy (11.8% of the total patient population). Moreover, the rate of C8 radiculopathy decreased over time in a statistically significant manner. An understanding of the factors associated with the incidence of C8 radiculopathy is essential for future improvement of patient outcomes.

Study Design Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Objective The purpose of this study is to synthesize recommendations for perioperative medical management of RA patients and quantify outcomes after spine surgery when compared to patients without RA. Methods A search of available literature on patients with RA and spine surgery was performed. Studies were included if they provided a direct comparison of outcomes between patients undergoing spine surgery with or without RA diagnosis. Meta-analysis was performed on operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, overall complications, implant-related complications, reoperation, infection, pseudarthrosis, and adjacent segment disease. Results Included in the analysis were 9 studies with 703 patients with RA undergoing spine surgery and 2569 patients without RA. In RA patients compared to non-RA patients undergoing spine surgery, the relative risk of infection was 2.29 times higher (P = .036), overall complications 1.61 times higher (P < .0001), implant-related complications 3.93 times higher (P = .009), and risk of reoperation 2.45 times higher (P < .0001). Hospital length of stay was 4.6 days longer in RA patients (P < .0001). Conclusions Treatment of spinal pathology in patients with RA carries an increased risk of infection and implant-related complications. Spine-specific guidelines for perioperative management of antirheumatic medication deserve further exploration. All RA patients should be perioperatively co-managed by a rheumatologist. This review helps identify risk profiles in RA specific to spine surgery and may guide future studies seeking to medically optimize RA patients perioperatively.

OBJECTIVE Neurosurgeons generate an enormous amount of data daily. Within these data lie rigorous, valid, and reproducible evidence. Such evidence can facilitate healthcare reform and improve quality of care. To measure the quality of care provided objectively, evaluating the safety and efficacy of clinical activities should occur in real time. Registries must be constructed and collected data analyzed with the precision akin to that of randomized clinical trials to accomplish this goal. METHODS The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) Tumor Registry was launched in February 2019 with 8 sites in its initial 1-year pilot phase. The Tumor Registry was proposed by the AANS/CNS Tumor Section and approved by the QOD Scientific Committee in the fall of 2018. The initial pilot phase aimed to assess the feasibility of collecting outcomes data from 8 academic practices across the United States; these outcomes included length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient complications. RESULTS As of November 2019, 923 eligible patients have been entered, with the following subsets: intracranial metastasis (17.3%, n = 160), high-grade glioma (18.5%, n = 171), low-grade glioma (6%, n = 55), meningioma (20%, n = 184), pituitary tumor (14.3%, n = 132), and other intracranial tumor (24%, n = 221). CONCLUSIONS The authors have demonstrated here, as a pilot study, the feasibility of documenting demographic, clinical, operative, and patient-reported outcome characteristics longitudinally for 6 common intracranial tumor types.

Interbody cages are currently being used to address diseases of the vertebra requiring surgical stabilization. Titanium cages were first introduced in 1988. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages are used frequently as one of the alternatives to titanium cages in current practice. This study aimed to compare available cage materials by reviewing the surgical and radiographic outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.A comprehensive search of several electronic databases was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, arthrodesis rates, subsidence rates, and complications were collected from included studies. Collected outcomes were further stratified according to the procedure type, the number of levels operated, and graft used to compare cage materials.Following the screening for inclusion criteria, a total of 37 studies with 2363 patients were included. The median age was 49.5 years and the median follow-up was 26 months. Overall, no significant differences were found between PEEK and titanium cages regarding fusion, neurologic deficit, subsidence rates, or "good and excellent" outcome according to Odom criteria. However, the standalone comparison between PEEK, titanium, and poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) cages showed a significantly lower fusion rate for PMMA (PEEK: 94%, PMMA: 56%, titanium: 95%, P0.01).In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, a comparison of the long-term patient-reported and the radiographic outcomes associated with the use of titanium and PEEK, intervertebral body cages showed similar findings. However, there were significantly lower fusion rates for PMMA cages when using a standalone cage without graft material.

Currently, large numbers of clinical trials are performed to investigate different forms of experimental therapy for patients suffering from chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). However, for the enrollment process, there are different views on how the time period between injury and interventions should be determined. Herein, we sought to evaluate the impact of time-to-enrollment in chronic SCI clinical trials. A data set comprising 957 clinical studies from clinicalTrials.gov was downloaded and analyzed focusing on the eligibility criteria for post-injury time-to-enrollment. We also aggregated individual patient data from nine clinical trials of regenerative interventions for chronic SCI selected by a systematic literature search from 1990 to 2018. Characteristics of the studies were assessed and compared by dividing into three groups based on time-to-enrollment (group 1 ≤ 12 months, group 2 = 12-23 months and group 3 ≥ 24 months). In ClinicalTrials.gov registry, 445 trials were identified for chronic SCI where 87% (385) were unrestricted in the maximum post-injury time for trial eligibility. From systematic literature search, nine studies and 156 patients (group 1 = 30, group 2 = 55 and group 3 = 71) were included. The range of time-to-enrollment was 0.5 to 321 months in those studies. We also observed various degrees of motor and sensory improvement in between three time-to-enrollment groups. Our results indicate that enrolling wide ranges of time-to-enrollment in a group may present imprecise outcomes. Clinical trial designs should consider appropriate post-injury time frames to evaluate therapeutic benefit.

Numerous clinical trials are being conducted in the field of spinal cord injury (SCI). These trials are typically registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of the completed SCI trials and characterize the potential factors associated with publication. ClinicalTrials.gov database was queried for all the completed trials on patients with SCI. Baseline characteristics of the completed trials were assessed. The publication status of these trials was identified using PubMed or Google Scholar. The secondary and primary outcomes reported in the publication were then compared to the outcomes registered in ClinicalTrial.gov. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the characteristics associated with publication status and time to publication. A total of 457 of 1,061 trials on SCI were completed. Of those, 60% were ultimately published. Trials that had received funding from sources besides the NIH, private industries, or the federal government were more likely to remain unpublished. The median time to publish was three years, with larger trials taking a longer time. The median sample size for completed trials was 30. Assessment of mismatch rates in primary outcomes of published data to registered outcomes was 8.9%. In SCI trials, outcomes registered on ClinicalTrial.gov often matched published results. Additionally, sample size and funding source play a significant role in the publication rate of these trials. Published data represents a reliable source for clinicians, researchers, and patients; efforts to curb publication bias and reporting bias are paramount for implementing evidence-based practices and ensure proper scientific conduct.

Background Gonadotroph pituitary adenoma (Gn-PA) may rarely cause ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, leading to infertility in women, although this remains poorly described. Methods We present a quantitative systematic review including 2 patients from our institutional and 48 from the literature with Gn-PA causing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome to thoroughly describe the clinical features and therapeutic outcomes from multidisciplinary aspects. Results The patients had a mean age of 31.5 years and a mean follicle-stimulating hormone level of 14.4 IU/L. Estradiol level was high in 82% of patients, at >350 pg/mL. The mean maximal adenoma diameter was 22 mm, with a Knosp grade ≥3 in 10 patients. Abdominal surgery preceded adenoma resection in 24 patients (48%). Among 25 patients for whom extent of resection was recorded, total adenoma resection was achieved in 12. Through a mean follow-up of 25 months, adenoma recurrence was observed in 5 patients, who were treated with re-resection (n = 2), radiation (n = 2), and medical therapy followed by bilateral oophorectomy (n = 1). Medical therapies were partially effective or ineffective, and adenoma shrinkage did not follow; gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists/antagonists were partially effective in 20% of patients (2/10), dopamine agonists in 44% (8/18), and somatostatin analogues in 50% (1/2). Four experienced swelling of tumor/ovaries after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists/antagonists administration. Overall, chemical remission was obtained in 26 of 28 patients, normalization of ovaries in 25 of 27, and successful pregnancy in 12 of 14. Conclusions Adenoma resection is the main treatment, leading to reduction in ovarian size and biochemical remission, with a high likelihood of subsequent spontaneous pregnancy. Increased awareness of this rare condition may help avoid unnecessary abdominal procedures.

BackgroundCT-guided biopsy is a commonly used diagnostic procedure for spinal lesions. This meta-analysis aims to investigate its diagnostic performance and complications, as well as factors influencing outcomes.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies reporting outcomes of CT-guided biopsies for spinal lesions. Diagnostic yield (ie, the rate of procedures resulting in a specific pathological diagnosis) and diagnostic accuracy (ie, the rate of procedures resulting in the correct diagnosis) were the primary outcomes of interest. Complications following biopsy procedures were also included.ResultsThirty-nine studies with 3917 patients undergoing 4181 procedures were included. Diagnostic yield per procedure was 91% (95% CI 88% to 94%) among 3598 procedures. The most common reason for non-diagnostic biopsies was inadequacy of sample. No difference in diagnostic yield between different locations and between lytic, sclerotic, and mixed lesions was found. Diagnostic yield did not differ between procedures using ≤13G and ≥14G needles. Diagnostic accuracy per procedure was 86% (95% CI 82% to 89%) among 3054 procedures. Diagnostic accuracy among 2426 procedures that yielded a diagnosis was 94% (95% CI 92% to 96%). Complication rate was 1% (95% CI 0.4% to 1.9%) among 3357 procedures. Transient pain and minor hematoma were the most common complications encountered.ConclusionIn our meta-analysis of 39 studies reporting diagnostic performance and complications of CT-guided biopsy, we found a diagnostic yield of 91% and diagnostic accuracy of 86% with a complication rate of 1%. Diagnostic yield did not differ between different locations, between lytic, sclerotic and mixed lesions, and between wide- and thin-bore needles.

Purpose: While previous studies have suggested that preoperative embolization of hypervascular spinal metastases may alleviate intraoperative blood loss and improve resectability, trends and driving factors for choosing this approach have not been extensively explored. Therefore, we evaluated the trends and assessed the factors associated with preoperative embolization utilization for spinal metastatic tumors using a national inpatient database.Materials and Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was queried for patients undergoing surgical resection for spinal metastasis between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2017. Patients undergoing preoperative embolization were identified; trends in the utilization of preoperative embolization were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage test. Multivariable regression was conducted to assess factors associated with higher preoperative embolization utilization.Results: A total of 11,508 patients with spinal metastasis were identified; 105 (0.91%) underwent preoperative embolization. Of those 105 patients, 79 (75.24%) patients had a primary renal cancer, as compared to 1,732 (15.19%) of those who did not undergo preoperative embolization (P0.05). Trends in preoperative embolization indicated an increase of 0.16% (standard error: 0.024%, P

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the spine has been associated with lower complication rates and improved patient-reported outcomes in recent studies. In this study, we aimed to investigate operative and postoperative outcomes associated with both surgical techniques in elderly patients.Patients who are 65 years old or older underwent either minimally invasive or open surgery for lumbar degenerative conditions. Patients with a nondegenerative cause such as infection or trauma were excluded from the analysis. Patient characteristics such as demographics and associated comorbidities as well as perioperative and postoperative complications were collected. Outcomes of interest were operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), readmissions, reoperations, and any complications.A total of 107 elderly patients were identified for this study, with a median age of 73.0 years. Demographics and comorbidities in both groups were similar in both groups. Univariate analysis yielded an MIS group with significantly lower EBL (P0.001), operative time (P 0.001), and LOS (P0.001). In multivariable analysis, EBL and LOS were found to be significantly lower in the MIS group (P = 0.02 and 0.001, respectively). Rates of complications, readmissions (no readmissions in MIS group), reoperations, and pain improvement also favored the MIS group and although they were not found to be significantly different between the 2 groups on univariate and multivariable analysis, the results trended toward significance.These findings suggest that minimally invasive spine surgery in the elderly is safe and may pose a lower risk of associated perioperative and postoperative complications with faster recovery time.

Teaching hospitals are responsible for the training and education of residents and have been centers of research and advancement in an era of evidence-based medicine. Several studies have reported conflicting findings regarding the effects of teaching status on the outcomes of patients. In the present study, we aimed to identify the differences in surgical outcomes among patients who had undergone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.We queried the National Inpatient Sample for 2012-2015. We identified patients with cervical degenerative disease who had undergone single-level ACDF using the International Classification of Disease, 9th revision, diagnosis and procedure codes. One-to-one propensity score matching was conducted, using appropriate and clinically relevant variables. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the effect of teaching status on the outcomes of interest. Finally, a marginal effect analysis was conducted to compare the differences in admission costs stratified by teaching status within each insurance type.A total of 52,212 patients who had undergone elective ACDF from 2012 to 2015 were identified and matched, with 26,106 patients in each group. On multivariable regression, after adjusting for demographics and hospital characteristics, teaching hospitals were associated with greater odds of nonroutine discharge (odds ratio, 1.25; P0.001) and higher admission cost (coefficient, 414.31; P = 0.002). However, teaching status was not associated with inpatient mortality or morbidity. The marginal effect analysis results indicated that privately insured patients incurred greater costs in nonteaching hospitals.Our results have shown that patients undergoing ACDF at nonteaching hospitals had a greater odds of routine discharge and higher admission costs compared with those at teaching hospitals but similar outcomes in terms of inpatient mortality and morbidity.

Background Outpatient spine surgery has been increasingly used recently owing to its perceived cost benefits and its ability to offset the volume from the inpatient setting. However, the 30-day outcomes of outpatient posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) for low-risk patients have not been extensively studied. In the present study, we assessed the 30-day outcomes of outpatient PLF surgery for low-risk patients using a national surgical quality registry. Methods For the present study, we queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for patients who had undergone PLF from 2009 to 2016. Only patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of 1–2 were included. The 30-day outcomes, including any complications, readmissions, and reoperations, were studied using multivariable logistic regression after adjustment for an array of patient-specific factors. Results A total of 29,830 cases were identified. Of these 29,830 cases, 1016 (3.4%) had been performed as outpatient cases and 28,814 (96.6%) as inpatient. After adjusting for an array of patient-specific factors, we did not find any significant association between the procedure setting and complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6–1.1; P = 0.15) or 30-day readmission rate (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6–1.4; P = 0.76). Patients undergoing outpatient PLF were more likely to have required a 30-day reoperation (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1–2.4; P = 0.02). Conclusion Our results have demonstrated that the 30-day outcomes of patients who have undergone outpatient PLF might be comparable to those of patients who have undergone PLF in an inpatient setting. However, outpatient surgery might be associated with a greater overall reoperation rate.

The adoption of the transradial approach (TRA) has been increasing in popularity as a primary method to conduct both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. As this technique gains broader acceptance and use within the neuroendovascular community, comparing its complication profile with a better-established alternative technique, the transfemoral approach (TFA), becomes more important. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of TRA compared with TFA in patients undergoing diagnostic, therapeutic, and combined neuroendovascular procedures.A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search of PubMed and other databases was conducted for studies from all available dates. To compare TRA and TFA, we performed an indirect meta-analysis between studies that mentioned the complications of the procedures.Our search yielded 532 studies, of which 108 met full inclusion criteria. A total of 54,083 patients (9137 undergoing TRA and 44,946 undergoing TFA) were included. Access site complication rate was lower in TRA (1.62%) compared with TFA (3.31%) (P0.01). Neurological complication rate was lower in TRA (1.64%) compared with TFA (3.82%) (P = 0.02 and P0.01, respectively). Vascular spasm rate was higher in TRA (3.65%) compared with TFA (0.88%) (P0.01). Wound infection complication rate was higher in TRA (0.32%) compared with TFA (0.2%) (P0.01).Patients undergoing TFA are significantly more likely to experience access site complications and neurological complications compared with patients undergoing TRA. Patients undergoing TRA are more likely to experience complications such as wound infections and vascular spasm.

Objective The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the SEER (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) program are the 2 largest cancer registries in the United States. However, considerable differences exist between them regarding the sampling frame as well as the participating facility characteristics. In this study, NCDB and SEER are compared for primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors with the aims of discussing the implications for researchers and evaluating the generalizability of both databases. Methods Patients with primary CNS (brain and spinal cord) tumors from 2004 to 2013 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition topographic codes. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment-related variables were compared between the 2 databases using standardized differences, with values >0.1 denoting statistical significance. Results A total of 588,534 primary brain tumor (NCDB, 416,162; SEER, 172,372) and 34,827 primary spinal cord tumor (NCDB, 26,602; SEER, 8225) cases were identified. We found significant differences regarding age (sd. diff., 0.16 for brain; 0.13 for spinal cord), and Hispanic origin (sd. diff., 0.34 for brain; 0.61 for spinal cord). For NCDB and SEER patients, estimated 5-year overall survival was 59% and 64%, respectively. Conclusions Analysis of 623,361 patients with primary CNS tumors, which are identified using both the NCDB and SEER databases, showed significant differences in age, histopathologic classification of tumors, tumor behavior, and treatment of tumors between 2 databases. Overall, the differences observed between 2 databases provide helpful points for the researchers who would like to use NCDB or SEER. These observations should be taken into account when researchers design studies using these databases and discuss the generalizability of their findings.

Background Chordomas are slow-growing but locally invasive tumors. The standard of care consists of surgical resection and radiotherapy (RT) when complete resection is not possible. The reported data has reached equivocal results regarding the effect of adding RT to increase patient survival. We investigated the effect of adjuvant RT on patient survival. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with a diagnosis of sacral and vertebral column chordoma from 2004 to 2010. The primary outcome was overall survival, which was assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots. Cox proportional hazards were performed to evaluate the effect of each treatment modality on survival after adjusting for an array of patient demographics, facility type, and tumor characteristics. Results The data from 282 patients with chordoma were analyzed; 209 patients (74.1%) had undergone gross total resection (GTR) alone. The median follow-up period for the GTR alone and GTR plus RT groups was 63.4 and 67.6 months, respectively. The mean survival was comparable between patients receiving GTR alone and those receiving adjuvant RT, for both sacral (7.7 and 6.9 years, respectively; P = 0.56) and vertebral chordoma (8.8 and 6.2 years, respectively; P = 0.59). Using Cox proportional hazards, we found that compared with GTR alone, GTR plus adjuvant RT did not add any significant survival benefit, for patients with either sacral chordoma (hazard ratio, 0.55; P = 0.43) or vertebral chordoma (hazard ratio, 7.29; P = 0.23). Conclusion Using data from a large national cancer registry, we found that the available evidence is not enough to suggest that the addition of RT offers a survival benefit for patients with sacral and spinal chordoma after GTR. Given the non-negligible complications associated with RT, the balance of benefits and risks must be considered during preoperative tailoring of the treatment decisions.

Surgery for craniosynostosis remains a crucial element in successful management. Intervention by both endoscopic and open approaches has been proven effective. Given the differences in timing and indications for these procedures, differences in perioperative outcomes have yet to be thoroughly compared between the two approaches. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the available evidence of perioperative outcomes between the two approaches in order to better influence the management paradigm of craniosynostosis. We followed recommended PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Seven electronic databases were searched to identify all potentially relevant studies published from inception to February 2018 which were then screened against a set of selection criteria. Data were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions. Twelve studies satisfied all the selection criteria to be included, which described a pooled cohort involving 2064 craniosynostosis patients, with 965 (47%) and 1099 (53%) patients undergoing surgery by endoscopic and open approaches respectively. When compared to the open approach, it was found that the endoscopic approach conferred statistically significant reductions in blood loss (MD = 162.4 mL), operative time (MD = 112.38 min), length of stay (MD = 2.56 days), and rates of perioperative complications (OR = 0.58), reoperation (OR = 0.37) and transfusion (OR = 0.09), where all p

Key Points Question How do the outcomes of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) compare with the outcomes obtained with en bloc surgical resection for sacral chordoma? Findings In this cohort study including 911 patients with sacral chordomas, CIRT provided similar tumor control and survival outcomes compared with en bloc surgery but with a lower rate of peripheral motor neuropathy. Meaning These findings suggest that CIRT is useful treatment for older patients with high performance status and sacral chordoma in whom surgery is not preferred., Importance Maximal resection is the preferred management for sacral chordomas but can be associated with unacceptable morbidity. Outcomes with radiotherapy are poor. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is being explored as an alternative when surgery is not preferred. Objective To compare oncologic outcomes and treatment-related toxicity of CIRT and en bloc resection for sacral chordoma. Design, Setting, and Participants Univariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between treatment type and oncologic and toxicity outcomes in this retrospective cohort study. Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching was used to match the CIRT cohort with the en bloc resection cohort and 10 National Cancer Database (NCDB) cohorts separately, with the objective of obtaining more homogeneous cohorts when comparing treatments. Patient- and tumor-related characteristics from 2 institutional cohorts were collected for patients diagnosed with sacral chordomas between April 1, 1994, and July 31, 2017. The NCDB was queried for data on patients with sacral chordoma from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2016, as a comparator in overall survival (OS) analyses. Data analysis was conducted from February 24, 2020, to January 16, 2021. Exposures En bloc resection, incomplete resection, photon radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, and CIRT. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Peripheral motor nerve toxic effects were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Results A total of 911 patients were included in the study (NCDB: n = 669; median age, 64 [IQR, 52-74] years; 410 [61.3%] men; CIRT: n = 188; median age, 66 [IQR, 58-71] years; 128 [68.1%] men; en bloc surgical resection: n = 54; median age, 53.5 [IQR 49-64] years, 36 [66.7%] men). Comparison of the propensity score–matched institutional en bloc resection and CIRT cohorts revealed no statistically significant difference in OS (CIRT: median OS, 68.1 [95% CI, 44.0-102.6] months; en bloc resection: median OS, 58.6 [95% CI, 25.6-123.5] months; P = .57; hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.25-2.06]; P = .53). The CIRT cohort experienced lower rates of peripheral motor neuropathy (odds ratio, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.04-0.40]; P, This cohort study examines the use of carbon ion radiotherapy as treatment vs en bloc surgical resection in patients with sacral chordoma.

There have been several clinical trials as well as observational studies that have compared the outcomes of different cervical disc replacement (CDR) devices with anterior cervical disc replacement and fusion (ACDF). Although the results of these studies have provided sufficient evidence for the safety of CDR, there is still a lack of consensus in terms of longer-term outcomes, with studies providing equivocal results for the 2 procedures. In the current study, we used a novel methodology, a meta-epidemiologic study, to investigate the impact of study characteristics on the observed effects in the literature on CDR and ACDF.Data were abstracted from available meta-analyses regarding author, study author, year, intervention events, control events, and sample size, as well as year and geographic location of each study within the meta-analyses. We grouped the studies based on median year of publication as well as the region of the submitting author(s). Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and standard errors of individual studies were calculated based on the number of events and sample size for each arm (ACDF or CDR). Further, results of outcomes from individual studies were pooled and a meta-analysis was conducted. Ratio of odds ratio (ROR) was used to assess the impact of each of these factors on estimates of the study for CDR versus ACDF.A total of 13 meta-analyses were analyzed after exclusions. Using the results from 10 meta-analyses, we found that studies published before 2012 reported significantly lower odds of a reoperation after CDR (vs. ACDF), compared with studies published after 2012 (ROR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.67; P0.001). We did not observe a significant impact of study year on difference in estimates between CDR and ACDF for adjacent segment disease (ROR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.64-1.55; P = 0.465). The region of submitting author was also found to have no impact on results of published studies.These results indicate that there may be a publication bias regarding the year of publication, with earlier studies reporting lower reoperation rates for CDR compared with ACDF.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Meningiomas are one of the most frequently encountered tumor types in the spinal cord, accounting for 20-25% of all spine tumors. Treatment strategies may include observation (active surveillance), surgical excision, radiotherapy/radiosurgery or combination of modalities. Surgery continues to be the most frequently utilized treatment modality, but radiotherapy is also an available treatment option most commonly reserved for high grade or recurrent lesions. Moreover, recent studies have reported on the useful role of radiosurgery for local control and symptom relief for spinal meningioma. PURPOSE To evaluate national utilization trends of radiotherapy/radiosurgery, investigate possible factors associated with its use in patients with spinal meningioma and its impact on survival for atypical tumors. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective study from the national cancer database (NCDB). PATIENT SAMPLE Patients with spinal meningiomas in the 2004-2015 National Cancer Database. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures were utilization rates of radiotherapy and radiosurgery and overall survival. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with spinal meningioma between 2004 and 2015 using ICD-O-3 topographical codes of 70.1, 72.0 and 72.1 and histological codes of 9350-9535 and 9537-9539. Patients receiving radiation in addition to surgery and patients receiving radiation as the only treatment modality were analyzed for factors associated with each treatment. RESULTS We found a total of 269 patients who received any type of radiation. Patients were divided into two main groups for the analysis as radiation alone 137 (51.1%) and radiation plus surgery 131 (48.9%). Age >69 (p=0.03), male sex (p=0.04), tumor size >6 cm (p=0.008) were found to be associated with significantly higher odds while Charlson score >=2 (p=0.04) to be associated with significantly lower odds of receiving radiation alone. In addition, a higher tumor size (2-3 cm, p=0.001; 3-4 cm, p 6 cm, p CONCLUSIONS The current analysis from a national cancer database revealed a small increase in utilization of radiation for management, without benefit to overall survival. Higher tumor size and borderline/malignant behavior were found to be associated with increased utilization. The present analysis failed to demonstrate an overall survival benefit to utilizing adjuvant radiation for atypical tumors. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.