1. Comparison of Raindrop Size Distribution between NASA’s S-Band Polarimetric Radar and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometers
- Author
-
Leo Pio D'Adderio, Jason L. Pippitt, Ali Tokay, Walter A. Petersen, David B. Wolff, and David A. Marks
- Subjects
Atmospheric Science ,Cloud microphysics ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Drop (liquid) ,0207 environmental engineering ,Polarimetry ,02 engineering and technology ,01 natural sciences ,law.invention ,law ,Environmental science ,S band ,Radar ,020701 environmental engineering ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Remote sensing - Abstract
The ground-based-radar-derived raindrop size distribution (DSD) parameters—mass-weighted drop diameter Dmass and normalized intercept parameter NW—are the sole resource for direct validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Core Observatory satellite-based retrieved DSD. Both Dmass and NW are obtained from radar-measured reflectivity ZH and differential reflectivity ZDR through empirical relationships. This study uses existing relationships that were determined for the GPM ground validation (GV) program and directly compares the NASA S-band polarimetric radar (NPOL) observables of ZH and ZDR and derived Dmass and NW with those calculated by two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD). The joint NPOL and 2DVD datasets were acquired during three GPM GV field campaigns conducted in eastern Iowa, southern Appalachia, and western Washington State. The comparative study quantifies the level of agreement for ZH, ZDR, Dmass, and log(NW) at an optimum distance (15–40 km) from the radar as well as at distances greater than 60 km from radar and over mountainous terrain. Interestingly, roughly 10%–15% of the NPOL ZH–ZDR pairs were well outside the envelope of 2DVD-estimated ZH–ZDR pairs. The exclusion of these pairs improved the comparisons noticeably.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF