Search

Numerous combinatorial optimization problems (knapsack, maximum-weight matching, etc.) can be expressed as subset maximization problems: One is given a ground set $$N=\{1,\dots ,n\}$$ , a collection $$\mathcal {F}\subseteq 2^N$$ of subsets thereof such that $$\emptyset \in \mathcal {F}$$ , and an objective (profit) function $$p:\mathcal {F}\rightarrow \mathbb {R}_+$$ . The task is to choose a set $$S\in \mathcal {F}$$ that maximizes p(S). We consider the multistage version (Eisenstat et al., Gupta et al., both ICALP 2014) of such problems: The profit function $$p_t$$ (and possibly the set of feasible solutions $$\mathcal {F}_t$$ ) may change over time. Since in many applications changing the solution is costly, the task becomes to find a sequence of solutions that optimizes the trade-off between good per-time solutions and stable solutions taking into account an additional similarity bonus. As similarity measure for two consecutive solutions, we consider either the size of the intersection of the two solutions or the difference of n and the Hamming distance between the two characteristic vectors. We study multistage subset maximization problems in the online setting, that is, $$p_t$$ (along with possibly $$\mathcal {F}_t$$ ) only arrive one by one and, upon such an arrival, the online algorithm has to output the corresponding solution without knowledge of the future. We develop general techniques for online multistage subset maximization and thereby characterize those models (given by the type of data evolution and the type of similarity measure) that admit a constant-competitive online algorithm. When no constant competitive ratio is possible, we employ lookahead to circumvent this issue. When a constant competitive ratio is possible, we provide almost matching lower and upper bounds on the best achievable one.

International audience; We devise a constant-factor approximation algorithm for the maximization version of the edge-disjoint paths problem if the supply graph together with the demand edges form a planar graph. By planar duality this is equivalent to packing cuts in a planar graph such that each cut contains exactly one demand edge. We also show that the natural linear programming relaxations have constant integrality gap, yielding an approximate max-multiflow min-multicut theorem.

We study a fundamental online job admission problem where jobs with deadlines arrive online over time at their release dates, and the task is to determine a preemptive single-server schedule which maximizes the number of jobs that complete on time. To circumvent known impossibility results, we make a standard slackness assumption by which the feasible time window for scheduling a job is at least $$1+\varepsilon $$ 1 + ε times its processing time, for some $$\varepsilon >0$$ ε > 0 . We quantify the impact that different provider commitment requirements have on the performance of online algorithms. Our main contribution is one universal algorithmic framework for online job admission both with and without commitments. Without commitment, our algorithm with a competitive ratio of $$\mathcal {O}(1/\varepsilon )$$ O ( 1 / ε ) is the best possible (deterministic) for this problem. For commitment models, we give the first non-trivial performance bounds. If the commitment decisions must be made before a job’s slack becomes less than a $$\delta $$ δ -fraction of its size, we prove a competitive ratio of $$\mathcal {O}(\varepsilon /((\varepsilon -\delta )\delta ^2))$$ O ( ε / ( ( ε - δ ) δ 2 ) ) , for $$0 0 < δ < ε . When a provider must commit upon starting a job, our bound is $$\mathcal {O}(1/\varepsilon ^2)$$ O ( 1 / ε 2 ) . Finally, we observe that for scheduling with commitment the restriction to the “unweighted” throughput model is essential; if jobs have individual weights, we rule out competitive deterministic algorithms.

A central object in optimal stopping theory is the single-choice prophet inequality for independent, identically distributed random variables: Given a sequence of random variables $X_1,\dots,X_n$ drawn independently from a distribution $F$, the goal is to choose a stopping time $\tau$ so as to maximize $\alpha$ such that for all distributions $F$ we have $\mathbb{E}[X_\tau] \geq \alpha \cdot \mathbb{E}[\max_tX_t]$. What makes this problem challenging is that the decision whether $\tau=t$ may only depend on the values of the random variables $X_1,\dots,X_t$ and on the distribution $F$. For quite some time the best known bound for the problem was $\alpha\geq1-1/e\approx0.632$ [Hill and Kertz, 1982]. Only recently this bound was improved by Abolhassani et al. [2017], and a tight bound of $\alpha\approx0.745$ was obtained by Correa et al. [2017]. The case where $F$ is unknown, such that the decision whether $\tau=t$ may depend only on the values of the first $t$ random variables but not on $F$, is equally well motivated (e.g., [Azar et al., 2014]) but has received much less attention. A straightforward guarantee for this case of $\alpha\geq1/e\approx0.368$ can be derived from the solution to the secretary problem. Our main result is that this bound is tight. Motivated by this impossibility result we investigate the case where the stopping time may additionally depend on a limited number of samples from~$F$. An extension of our main result shows that even with $o(n)$ samples $\alpha\leq 1/e$, so that the interesting case is the one with $\Omega(n)$ samples. Here we show that $n$ samples allow for a significant improvement over the secretary problem, while $O(n^2)$ samples are equivalent to knowledge of the distribution: specifically, with $n$ samples $\alpha\geq1-1/e\approx0.632$ and $\alpha\leq\ln(2)\approx0.693$, and with $O(n^2)$ samples $\alpha\geq0.745-\epsilon$ for any $\epsilon>0$.

We consider the online machine minimization problem in which jobs with hard deadlines arrive online over time at their release dates. The task is to determine a feasible preemptive schedule on a mi...

We investigate online convex optimization with switching costs (OCO; Lin et al., INFOCOM 2011), a natural online problem arising when rightsizing data centers: A server initially located at \(p_0\) on the real line is presented with an online sequence of non-negative convex functions \(f_1,f_2,\dots ,f_n: \mathbb {R}\rightarrow \mathbb {R}_+\). In response to each function \(f_i\), the server moves to a new position \(p_i\) on the real line, resulting in cost \(|p_i-p_{i-1}|+f_i(p_i)\). The total cost is the sum of costs of all steps. One is interested in designing competitive algorithms.

We consider the online traveling salesperson problem (TSP), where requests appear online over time on the real line and need to be visited by a server initially located at the origin. We distinguish between closed and open online TSP, depending on whether the server eventually needs to return to the origin or not. While online TSP on the line is a very natural online problem that was introduced more than two decades ago, no tight competitive analysis was known to date. We settle this problem by providing tight bounds on the competitive ratios for both the closed and the open variant of the problem. In particular, for closed online TSP, we provide a 1.64-competitive algorithm, thus matching a known lower bound. For open online TSP, we give a new upper bound as well as a matching lower bound that establish the remarkable competitive ratio of 2.04. Additionally, we consider the online D IAL -A-R IDE problem on the line, where each request needs to be transported to a specified destination. We provide an improved non-preemptive lower bound of 1.75 for this setting, as well as an improved preemptive algorithm with competitive ratio 2.41. Finally, we generalize known and give new complexity results for the underlying offline problems. In particular, we give an algorithm with running time O ( n 2 ) for closed offline TSP on the line with release dates and show that both variants of offline D IAL -A-R IDE on the line are NP-hard for any capacity c ≥ 2 of the server.

In this paper we investigate the power of migration in online scheduling on multiple parallel machines. The problem is to schedule preemptable jobs with release dates and deadlines on a minimum number of machines. We show that migration, that is, allowing that a preempted job is continued on a different machine, has a huge impact on the performance of a schedule. More precisely, let m be the number of machines required by a migratory solution; then the increase in the number of machines when disallowing migration is unbounded in m. This complements and strongly contrasts previous results on variants of this problem. In both the offline variant and a model allowing extra speed, the power of migration is limited as the increase of number of machines and speed, respectively, can be bounded by a small constant.In this paper, we also derive the first non-trivial bounds on the competitive ratio for non-migratory online scheduling to minimize the number of machines without extra speed. We show that in general no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of f(m), for any function f, and give a lower bound of Omega(log n). For agreeable instances and instances with "loose" jobs, we give O(1)-competitive algorithms and, for laminar instances, we derive an O(log m)-competitive algorithm.

Max-min fairness (MMF) is a widely known approach to a fair allocation of bandwidth to each of the users in a network. This allocation can be computed by uniformly raising the bandwidths of all users without violating capacity constraints. We consider an extension of these allocations by raising the bandwidth with arbitrary and not necessarily uniform time-depending velocities (allocation rates). These allocations are used in a game-theoretic context for routing choices, which we formalize in progressive filling games (PFGs). We present a variety of results for equilibria in PFGs. We show that these games possess pure Nash and strong equilibria. While computation in general is NP-hard, there are polynomial-time algorithms for prominent classes of Max-Min-Fair Games (MMFG), including the case when all users have the same source-destination pair. We characterize prices of anarchy and stability for pure Nash and strong equilibria in PFGs and MMFGs when players have different or the same source-destination pairs. In addition, we show that when a designer can adjust allocation rates, it is possible to design games with optimal strong equilibria. Some initial results on polynomial-time algorithms in this direction are also derived.

We consider three related online problems: Online Convex Optimization, Convex Body Chasing, and Lazy Convex Body Chasing. In Online Convex Optimization the input is an online sequence of convex functions over some Euclidean space. In response to a function, the online algorithm can move to any destination point in the Euclidean space. The cost is the total distance moved plus the sum of the function costs at the destination points. Lazy Convex Body Chasing is a special case of Online Convex Optimization where the function is zero in some convex region, and grows linearly with the distance from this region. And Convex Body Chasing is a special case of Lazy Convex Body Chasing where the destination point has to be in the convex region. We show that these problems are equivalent in the sense that if any of these problems have an O(1)-competitive algorithm then all of the problems have an O(1)-competitive algorithm. By leveraging these results we then obtain the first O(1)-competitive algorithm for Online Convex Optimization in two dimensions, and give the first O(1)-competitive algorithm for chasing linear subspaces. We also give a simple algorithm and O(1)-competitiveness analysis for chasing lines.