1. Is photoperiod a dominant driver of secondary growth resumption?
- Author
-
Ailene K. Ettinger and Sarah C. Elmendorf
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,photoperiodism ,Plant growth ,Multidisciplinary ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Secondary growth ,Ecology ,Northern Hemisphere ,Xylem ,Regression analysis ,Forcing (mathematics) ,Biology ,Seasonality ,medicine.disease ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,medicine ,Letters ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
In their recent paper, Huang et al. (1) have amassed a fascinating time-series of xylem tissue formation across 826 individual trees, spanning 21 species and 79 Northern Hemisphere locations. Like many other aspects of plant growth, wood formation shows strong seasonality, but very little is known about the environmental triggers for seasonal growth resumption. With wood absorbing ∼15% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions annually, this extensive dataset provides an exciting opportunity to refine earth system models, but it does not provide compelling evidence that photoperiod is the dominant season cue. The crux of Huang et al.’s conclusions are derived from their observed positive relationship between the day of year of wood formation (DOYwf) and the photoperiod on the day of year of wood formation (Photoperiodwf), using an analysis that relies heavily on R 2 values (ref. 1, figures 3, S5, and S7). The authors used the response variable (DOYwf) to calculate several of their predictor variables: Photoperiodwf, cumulative forcing (FUwf), and chilling (CUwf) at DOYwf. There are two major problems with this approach. First, it can lead to regression models that appear to fit exceptionally well for the wrong reasons. Where photoperiod covaries positively with day of … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: sarah.elmendorf{at}colorado.edu. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1
- Published
- 2020