Search

In many natural systems, diverse host communities can reduce disease risk, though less is known about the mechanisms driving this “dilution effect.” We relate feedback theory, which focuses on pathogen‐mediated coexistence, to mechanisms of dilution derived from epidemiological models, with the central goal of gaining insights into host–pathogen interactions in a community context. We first compare the origin, structure, and application of epidemiological and feedback models. We then explore the mechanisms of dilution, which are grounded in single‐pathogen, single‐host epidemiological models, from the perspective of feedback theory. We also draw on feedback theory to examine how coinfecting pathogens, and pathogens that vary along a host specialist–generalist continuum, apply to dilution theory. By identifying synergies among the feedback and epidemiological approaches, we reveal ways in which organisms occupying different trophic levels contribute to diversity–disease relationships. Additionally, using feedbacks to distinguish dilution in disease incidence from dilution in the net effect of disease on host fitness allows us to articulate conditions under which definitions of dilution may not align. After ascribing dilution mechanisms to macro‐ or microorganisms, we propose ways in which each contributes to diversity–disease and productivity–diversity relationships. Our analyses lead to predictions that can guide future research efforts., In many natural systems, diverse host communities can reduce disease risk, though less is known about the mechanisms driving this “dilution effect.” We relate feedback theory, which focuses on pathogen‐mediated coexistence, to mechanisms of dilution derived from epidemiological models, with the central goal of gaining insights into host–pathogen interactions in a community context.

Evolution of eukaryotic species and their genomes has been traditionally understood as a vertical process in which genetic material is transmitted from parents to offspring along a lineage, and in which genetic exchange is restricted within species boundaries. However, mounting evidence from comparative genomics indicates that this paradigm is often violated. Horizontal gene transfer and mating between diverged lineages blur species boundaries and challenge the reconstruction of evolutionary histories of species and their genomes. Nonvertical evolution might be more restricted in eukaryotes than in prokaryotes, yet it is not negligible and can be common in certain groups. Recognition of such processes brings about the need to incorporate this complexity into our models, as well as to conceptually reframe eukaryotic diversity and evolution. Here, I review the recent work from genomics studies that supports the effects of nonvertical modes of evolution including introgression, hybridization, and horizontal gene transfer in different eukaryotic groups. I then discuss emerging patterns and effects, illustrated by specific examples, that support the conclusion that nonvertical processes are often at the root of important evolutionary transitions and adaptations. I will argue that a paradigm shift is needed to naturally accommodate nonvertical processes in eukaryotic evolution., Here, I review recent work from genomics studies that supports the significant effect of nonvertical modes of evolution, including introgression, hybridization, and horizontal gene transfer in different eukaryotic groups. I then discuss emerging patterns and impacts, illustrated by specific examples, that support the conclusion that nonvertical processes are often at the root of important evolutionary transitions and adaptations. I will argue that a paradigm shift is needed to naturally accommodate nonvertical processes in eukaryotic evolution.